Half disclosure
There are clear reasons for a more bullish sentiment to take hold in private capital investment in 2025.
- The Australian Financial Review, 20 March 2025
Rightio then …
… prudent investors recognise that today's investments form the bedrock for tomorrow's portfolio health.
- The Australian Financial Review, 20 March 2025
And in a stroke of great fortune, the AFR's correspondent happens to be one such prudent professional investor who's just a click away via this helpful link.
In fact, The Australian Financial Review's 'Industry Insight' column is a veritable well of wisdom drawing as it does right from the source.
Last month it warned not to be left behind by the AI revolution:
… for those prepared to adapt, complexity is not a threat; it's a chance to thrive.
… this is the moment to shift gears.
- The Australian Financial Review, 25 June 2025
And as luck would have it, our scribe just so happened to work for an IT consultancy—no doubt happy to muck in and help.
Two weeks earlier, the AFR sounded the alarm on underinsurance:
In a worst-case scenario, investors may have to sell their property …
- The Australian Financial Review, 12 June 2025
And a handy thing it was, that the author happened to work for a company that flogs insurance.
And on it goes.
The booming Asia Pacific market, by fundies who specialise in the Asia Pacific market.
Electric vehicle subsidies by the CEO of an electric vehicle manufacturer.
And the very many advantages of real-time banking rendered into poetry by a real-time banker.
So why on earth is Australia's premier financial rag printing columns which read like advertising dross?
I'll give you one guess.
Because that's what they are.
'Industry Insight' might have done little to help readers make coin, but they have certainly been a nice little earner for the AFR.
And how do we know?
Because open 'Industry Insight' on the AFR's website and the sponsorship is plain as day.
A mere oversight, I hear you say?
The Fin's poor harried subs too busy to scratch themselves let alone lay-out a proper disclosure in print.
Just one problem with that theory, because for all of 2021 and 2022 The Australian Financial Review clearly marked its 'Industry Insight' feature as sponsored content, allowing readers to choose whether to read the balderdash or turn the page and find some real news instead.
But from about August 2023, the disclosure mostly disappeared.
Now, could it be that ads disguised as genuine articles might be better read?
'Not at all', we were assured by Nine.
A spokesperson for the paper said it was a mere:
… unintentional discrepancy in content published in some print editions of the AFR. We have reviewed our operational processes with the commercial team to help ensure it doesn't happen again.
- Email, Nine Spokesperson, 25 July 2025
Just some print editions? Try almost two years' worth.
But with its half-pregnant disclosures, perhaps we shouldn't be too harsh.
After all, the AFR is all about squeezing the lemon consciously or otherwise and what better than passive income!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
A solar farm approved in weeks shows how renewables rollout could be sped up
A solar farm in Nationals heartland has been given federal approval after just 30 business days, which Environment Minister Murray Watt says is evidence of how the renewables rollout could be dramatically sped up if ageing environment laws were rewritten. The government is also using the speedy approval of the 90-megawatt Summerville solar farm in Nationals deputy Kevin Hogan's seat of Page to twist the knife into the opposition, as the Coalition fights over its commitment to net zero emissions. But the green-lighting of the 244-hectare site in the Richmond Valley in northern NSW also highlights how other energy projects have sat in the queue for years waiting for environmental approval, under outdated laws that business, environment groups, the government and opposition all say are no longer working. Analysis by the Clean Energy Investor Group last year found the average solar project in NSW took 705 days to win approval — with wind farms taking on average almost a decade — a pace that would make it very difficult for Australia to meet its climate targets. "If you get the system right and everyone is working cooperatively, it is possible to get much faster approvals while also generating environmental gains," Senator Watt said. "Unfortunately, while there are these sorts of good examples to point to, we aren't seeing these in as many cases as we should, and that is one of the reasons we do need to reform our environmental laws. The minister said the Summerville solar farm and battery, which will generate enough energy to power 36,000 homes, was a case study in how carefully selecting sites could lead to energy projects being delivered faster. Senator Watt said early cooperation had allowed for design changes that preserved energy generation while being more sensitive to the environment — which also avoided delays from an intensive environmental assessment. Those early negotiations led to changes in how the panels would be laid out, limiting their environmental impact, as well as the panels being lifted to allow for land to still be used for grazing. "It does show, despite what some politicians claim, it is possible for agriculture and renewable energy to coexist and deliver more jobs and more investment for our regional communities," Senator Watt said. The minister said reforms he was developing would allow for earlier engagement more often, and avoid projects having to be assessed twice by both state and federal agencies. Senator Watt has been tasked with making another attempt to modernise the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, which governs environmental approvals for major projects, but has been little changed for more than two decades. Successive governments have failed to pass reforms to the EPBC Act since an independent review concluded the laws were no longer working for business or the environment. Ahead of a productivity roundtable, former Treasury boss Ken Henry named it the single most important item for reform, adding the degradation of Australia's environment proved it was failing to protect wildlife. The now-chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation is among a chorus of voices who have expressed their frustration that the laws have still not been updated — a promise made last term that was shelved in the face of fierce resistance from West Australian Premier Roger Cook. Senator Watt acknowledged last month that much of the government's economic agenda, including housing and productivity, depended on fixing the laws. Shadow Environment Minister Angie Bell said last week she had met with Senator Watt on moving EPBC reforms forward. "I think if Labor were to go in partnership with the Greens on EPBC reform, that would be disastrous for, again, livelihoods, for industry. It would decimate thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs around the country. And so, I think on EPBC reform, we need to strike a balance," Ms Bell said. "And that balance needs to be minimising red tape, of course, and approvals, but also protecting our environment." The latest project approval comes as the Coalition debates how it will respond to climate change, after its nuclear proposal was rejected by voters at the federal election. Half a dozen Nationals MPs stood on the lawns of Parliament House yesterday morning in support of their colleague Barnaby Joyce, who introduced a bill to parliament to repeal several laws that relate to renewable energy. Despite the Coalition saying it has not decided a position on its current commitment to pursue net zero emissions by 2050, with two internal reviews underway, a number of Nationals have ignored that process to openly advocate for the net zero commitment to be dumped. While Mr Joyce's bill has no chance of passing, the government intends to allow the parliament to debate it without limits, as it seeks to exploit divisions within the opposition. Senator Watt said the government was continuing with its renewables rollout. "At the very same time the Albanese government is getting on with delivering cleaner, cheaper energy and jobs for the Northern Rivers, the Member for Page Kevin Hogan is engaged in Coalition squabbling over the science of climate change," Senator Watt said. This morning, Mr Hogan told Sky News it was good that Mr Joyce introduced his private member's bill to repeal net zero, saying he was representing millions of Australians who agreed with him. "We're not a croquet club down here. We are a very important legislative body here in Canberra. Views need to be articulated," Mr Hogan said. He said the majority of the Nationals party room supported the Coalition reviews of net zero.
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Accused fraudster Chris Marco raised $250 million from investors, Perth court told
An accused fraudster who raised hundreds of millions of dollars from investors had a "perfect payment record", a Perth court has heard. Chris Marco, 67, is on trial in the WA Supreme Court along with Linda Marissen, accused of defrauding would-be investors out of tens of millions between 2010 and 2018. His lawyer denies Mr Marco engaged in fraud and said everything he promised to investors "was delivered on". But prosecutor Steven Whybrow has labelled Mr Marco "an illusionist" and Ms Marissen his "assistant". On the first day of the trial, the court was told Mr Marco presented himself as a private investor with access to "exclusive" types of investment which would produce higher rates of return. Mr Whybrow told the jury Mr Marco was very convincing, holding himself out as a "leprechaun" who would take them "to the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow". Mr Whybrow said Mr Marco gathered more than $250 million from 151 individuals, seven of whom would testify about the lies he told them. The prosecutor told the jury that money was paid into an account and used to pay promised returns to other investors. From the $253 million, Mr Marco paid out $198.5 million to people who had provided funds. This was to give them the impression they were getting returns on investments, and they were then urged to "reinvest", Mr Whybrow said. But "there were no investments." Ms Marissen helped Mr Marco and "was aware the money was being provided on a certain basis," Mr Whybrow said. Mr Marco's lawyer Luka Margaretic told the court his client "genuinely believed" he was operating a legitimate investment business and he had a "perfect payment record." "Anyone who wanted their money back got it," Mr Margaretic said, and they also got "handsome" interest payments. "Every cent was accounted for," he told the court, but because the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) shut his investment scheme down in 2018, it wouldn't be known if investments were going to "bear fruit". Ms Marissen's lawyer Simon Freitag said his client had worked under Mr Marco's direction. "He's the brains of the operation, she does the typing," he told the court. The total losses allegedly suffered by the complainants has not been specified in court. Justice Natalie Whitby had told the jury "there will, in essence, be multiple trials running at the same time". The trial is expected to run for several weeks.
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Reintroducing a carbon price the 'most economically efficient tax reform' to repair budget
The father of emissions trading in Australia has warned the nation is "on a path to comprehensive failure" without the urgent reintroduction of a carbon price. Speaking at the Australian Clean Energy Summit in Sydney, Professor Ross Garnaut said the Albanese government had the right objectives on renewable generation, emissions reduction and supporting new export industries based on clean energy. However, he added that, despite the Albanese government's "Herculean efforts", Australia looked set to fall short of its objectives. "Failure to reach them will have tragic consequences for Australian productivity, budgetary strength and contribution to the global climate mitigation effort," he argued. Professor Garnaut's speech comes as Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen is preparing to announce an extension of the Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS), which promotes investment in renewable energy generation. "In three short years, we have seen Capacity Investment Scheme unlock record levels of investment in Australia's energy grid and get us on track to reach 82 per cent renewable energy by 2030," he will tell the Investor Group on Climate Change in a speech on Tuesday evening. "We will be further expanding the CIS with a further 3 gigawatts of generation, enough to power more than 1 million households. "We will also incentivise even more storage to come online. Through the CIS, we will underwrite an additional 5 GW of dispatchable capacity or storage. "This is equivalent to supplying 4.6 million households in the National Electricity Market with energy at peak times, and will support an additional $21 billion in investment in dispatchable capacity." However, speaking ahead of Mr Bowen's announcement, Professor Garnaut was critical that almost all new private grid-scale investment in solar and wind power was now underwritten by government. He said the combination of falling prices for solar and wind power, along with the sliding value of large generation certificates (LGCs) for renewable projects, meant that even effective government subsidies like the CIS might no longer be effective in attracting enough renewables investment. In fact, Professor Garnaut argued that they might be discouraging voluntary private sector investment. "Announcement of the extended CIS was one of several Commonwealth policy and other changes that led to a slowing of voluntary commitments to use renewable energy. The election of President Trump in November 2024 has been the latest of these developments," he observed. Professor Garnaut instead urged the government to completely overhaul its carbon reduction strategy. "There are limits to the progress that we can make towards Anthony Albanese objectives using Tony Abbott policies. These policies include the safeguard mechanism and heavy reliance on voluntary commitments to using renewable energy," he said. "Australia now needs Anthony Albanese policies to achieve Anthony Albanese objectives." The eminent economist urged a return to the past to help Australia achieve a net zero emissions future at the lowest possible cost. "The best cure in the national interest is a carbon price. Not by a little bit, but by a big margin," he argued. "The carbon price greatly reduces contingent budget liabilities from the CIS and other underwriting schemes. "In addition, it can add about 1 per cent of GDP or about $25 billion to government revenues, with only a small proportion being required to compensate households for increases in power prices." Ahead of the federal government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month, Professor Garnaut said that reintroducing some form of carbon price was a far better idea than increasing the Goods and Services Tax (GST). "Introduction of carbon pricing is the most economically efficient tax reform available to Australia at a time when we need budget repair," he told the audience. "It delivers all of the economic advantages claimed for increases in GST by its advocates, with the additional advantage of increasing the efficiency of markets. "The carbon price unleashes the innovation, dynamism and capital resources of competitive markets to build the transition. It efficiently reduces emissions through most of the economy and not only in electricity generation." If the politics of a carbon price are still too difficult, an alternative temporary fix suggested by Professor Garnaut would be to extend the federal government's Renewable Energy Target (RET). However, he argued it would not contribute to budget repair, nor to reducing emissions outside the electricity sector, and would ultimately need to be supplanted by carbon pricing "well before 2050". "Apply neither of the remedies, and we are headed for energy and climate policy crisis within a few years, with demands from the energy sector contributing to severe budgetary problems," Professor Garnaut warned. In the absence of either, the economist warned that Australian consumers remained vulnerable to the "oligopolistic" behaviour of gas suppliers and big energy generators. "Average gas power prices are now much higher than during the height of Ukraine disruption, despite gas commodity prices having fallen back," he observed. "They have been driven to a considerable extent by the loosening of inhibitions in the use of oligopolistic power to lift prices. "At times, gas generators reduced output when low renewable output was lifting market prices above the average." Professor Garnaut said a carbon price was the most technology-agnostic, efficient and equitable way to reduce emissions. "All forms of energy and all ways of reducing emissions can compete on a level playing field," he argued. "There is no need then for a climate trigger in environmental legislation. "Nuclear power, which is genuinely zero emissions like solar and wind, gets the same advantage on climate grounds as wind or solar. Gas gets an advantage over coal because it does less climate damage. "Geological carbon capture and storage is rewarded for its reductions in emissions at the same rate as renewable energy. So is sequestration of carbon in plants and soils." Professor Garnaut ended with this message to politicians of all political persuasions: "Let's stop kidding ourselves in the 48th Parliament," he concluded. "Let's start telling the truth. The truth is that early adoption of carbon pricing is in Australia's national interest, and needs to be considered as a matter of urgency."
