Spartans listed low in College Football Future Power Rankings through 2026 from ESPN
When it comes to future power rankings from ESPN, Michigan State ranks near the bottom of the Big Ten.
Adam Rittenberg of ESPN took a different spin on your typical power rankings that look ahead to just the upcoming season and put together a list for the next two years -- which he has labeled as College Football Future Power Rankings through 2026. The key areas Rittenberg is analyzing as part of these future power rankings are:
Returning quarterback
Likelihood of a multiyear QB on roster
Offensive line/defensive line outlook
Roster management
Star power (All-Americans, national award contenders, all-conference contenders)
Coaching staff
So where did Michigan State rank among the 68 power four teams included in the poll? Firmly in the back half at No. 51 nationally -- which came out to No. 14 in the Big Ten. Within the Big Ten, the Spartans were ahead of Purdue, Maryland, Wisconsin and Northwestern, and right behind UCLA (two spots nationally).
Here are a few of the notable items Rittenberg called out about the Spartans:
Likelihood of a multiyear QB: Quite likely. (Aidan) Chiles carries junior eligibility and has great familiarity with Smith, offensive coordinator Brian Lindgren and the staff. His backups are all young players. Chiles could have a breakout season and move on, but few would be surprised if he's leading the MSU offense in 2026.
Quite likely. (Aidan) Chiles carries junior eligibility and has great familiarity with Smith, offensive coordinator Brian Lindgren and the staff. His backups are all young players. Chiles could have a breakout season and move on, but few would be surprised if he's leading the MSU offense in 2026. Roster management: Michigan State's roster has been fairly fluid under Smith, with transfers going in and out, but the team retained wide receiver Nick Marsh, one of its top young playmakers, and several other key holdovers. The team has made some portal gains, especially at spots such as wide receiver, offensive line and defensive back. Smith has been fairly quiet in high school recruiting, although the team has a commitment from ESPN 300 prospect Kayd Coffman for the 2026 class.
Michigan State's roster has been fairly fluid under Smith, with transfers going in and out, but the team retained wide receiver Nick Marsh, one of its top young playmakers, and several other key holdovers. The team has made some portal gains, especially at spots such as wide receiver, offensive line and defensive back. Smith has been fairly quiet in high school recruiting, although the team has a commitment from ESPN 300 prospect Kayd Coffman for the 2026 class. Star power: Michigan State lost All-Big Ten player Newman to the draft and interceptions leader Charles Brantley to the portal (Miami). Marsh and veteran tight end Jack Velling have all-conference potential, and Chiles is a talented quarterback seeking more consistency. MSU will be banking on big production from transfers such as Moore and wide receivers Chrishon McCray and Omari Kelly.
Personally, I would have Michigan State ranked higher than some of the programs Rittenberg slotted ahead of the Spartans. But I also understand the need to see more from Jonathan Smith at Michigan State from a national writer before putting a ton of faith into the Spartans. So it's a fair ranking, but certainly something I would be very disappointed about should Michigan State be a sub top 50 team nationally by the end of year three under Smith.
Click on the post below to see the complete rankings from Rittenberg and his full write-up on the Spartans:
Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Robert Bondy on X @RobertBondy5.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Revenue sharing impact, transfer portal changes & hot seats
Subscribe to the College Football Enquirer Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube We are back! After a bit of a break, your favorite college football podcast has returned! Some new voices have joined the show with the departures of Dan Wetzel and Pat Forde. Andy Staples and Steven Godfrey join Ross Dellenger for College Football Enquirer's newest version! There was quite a bit of news that happened while we were away, so it's time to catch up. Schools can pay athletes directly now. Revenue sharing has arrived! This has already caused an immediate shift in the college football landscape and schools are taking full advantage. One team who is capitalizing on that is Vanderbilt. Huge hype and ticket prices have followed. How has this change affected the college landscape? Has it changed for the better? These questions and more are what Andy, Ross and Steven answer. As athletes continue to get paid, guardrails around how they can be paid continue to be developed. Enter the College Sports Commission. This commission is supposed to make sure there is fairness across the board in how athletes are being paid. How exactly they are doing that is a bit more complicated. Luckily, Ross can break it all down. Another huge change on the horizon has to do with the transfer portal. This topic has been discussed at length. Should there only be one portal window rather than two? When should that be? Change is coming and while there is some disagreement among conferences for when the portal window should open, a shift appears imminent. The guys explain what the change may look like, and they give their takes on when the portal should open. We are just a few weeks away from the start of the season, so naturally we have to talk about what coaches are hoping to still have a job by the end of the season. While some coaches' buyouts are too big for them to have any concern this year, others do not have that luxury. Texas Tech's Joey McGuire and Oklahoma's Brent Venables are two coaches that look to be in win now situations. The guys discuss the coaches' futures with their respective programs. They also dive into how the new college landscape of paying players may have led to some coaches' jobs being saved. Finally, Andy, Ross and Steven take a look at some upset ready matchups in the Week 1 slate. Are Boise St., Mississippi St. and Kentucky on upset watch? The guys chat about what they are looking at in those Week 1 games. A jam-packed episode of College Football Enquirer begins now. Welcome back! (5:10) - Paying athletes (16:43) - College Sports Commission (28:01) - Transfer Portal changes (44:46) - Coaching hot seat (1:20:42) - Week 1 Upset Watch List 🖥️
29 minutes ago
A UFC fight at the White House? Dana White says it's happening amid Paramount deal
Hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, Dana White said he had yet to hear from his friend, President Donald Trump, on his thoughts about the fight company's new streaming home. That was fine with White. The UFC CEO was set to travel to Washington on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to catch up and discuss logistics on the proposed Fourth of July fight card next year at the White House. Trump said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'It's absolutely going to happen," White told The Associated Press. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' The idea of cage fights at the White House would have seemed improbable when the Frittata brothers purchased UFC for $2 million in 2001 and put White in charge of the fledging fight promotion. White helped steer the company into a $4 billion sale in 2016 and broadcast rights deals with Fox and ESPN before landing owner TKO Group's richest one yet — a seven-year deal with Paramount starting in 2026 worth an average of $1.1 billion a year, with all cards on its streaming platform Paramount+ and select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS. ESPN, Amazon and Netflix and other traditional sports broadcast players seemed more in play for UFC rights — White had previously hinted fights could air across different platforms — but Paramount was a serious contender from the start of the negotiating window. The Paramount and UFC deal came just days after Skydance and Paramount officially closed their $8 billion merger — kicking off the reign of a new entertainment giant after a contentious endeavor to get the transaction over the finish line. White said he was impressed with the vision Skydance CEO David Ellison had for the the global MMA leader early in contract talks and how those plans should blossom now that Ellison is chairman and CEO of Paramount. 'When you talk about Paramount, you talk about David Ellison, they're brilliant businessmen, very aggressive, risk takers,' White said. 'They're right up my alley. These are the kind of guys that I like to be in business with.' The $1.1 billion deals marks a notable jump from the roughly $550 million that ESPN paid each year for UFC coverage today. But UFC's new home on Paramount will simplify offerings for fans — with all content set to be available on Paramount+ (which currently costs between $7.99 and $12.99 a month), rather than various pay-per-view fees. Paramount also said it intends to explore UFC rights outside the U.S. 'as they become available in the future.' UFC matchmakers were set to meet this week to shape what White said would be a loaded debut Paramount card. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a 1-of-1 event,' White said. There are still some moving parts to UFC broadcasts and other television programming it has its hands in as the company moves into the Paramount era. White said there are still moving parts to the deal and that includes potentially finding new homes for 'The Ultimate Fighter,' 'Road To UFC,' and 'Dana White's Contender Series.' It's not necessarily a given the traditional 10 p.m. start time for what were the pay-per-view events would stand, especially on nights cards will also air on CBS. 'We haven't figured that out yet but we will,' White said. And what about the sometimes-contentious issue of fighter pay? Some established fighters have clauses in their contracts that they earn more money the higher the buyrate on their cards. Again, most of those issues are to-be-determined as UFC and Paramount settle in to the new deal — with $1.1 billion headed the fight company's way. 'It will affect fighter pay, big time,' White said. 'From deal-to-deal, fighter pay has grown, too. Every time we win, everybody wins.' Boxer Jake Paul wrote on social media the dying PPV model — which was overpriced for fights as UFC saw a decline in buys because of missing star power in many main events — should give the fighters an increased idea of their worth. 'Every fighter in the UFC now has a clear picture of what the revenue more PPV excuses,' Paul wrote. 'Get your worth boys and girls.' White also scoffed at the idea that the traditional PPV model is dead. There are still UFC cards on pay-per-view the rest of the year through the end of the ESPN contract and White and Saudi Arabia have teamed to launch a new boxing venture that starts next year and could use a PPV home. White, though, is part of the promotional team for the Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford fight in September in Las Vegas that airs on Netflix. 'It's definitely not run it's course,' White said. 'There were guys out there who were interested in pay-per-view and there were guys out there that weren't. Wherever we ended up, that's what we're going to roll with.' White said UFC archival footage 'kills it' in repeat views and those classic bouts also needed a new home once the ESPN deal expires. Just when it seems there's little left for UFC to conquer, White says, there's always more. Why stop at becoming the biggest fight game in the world? Why not rewrite the pecking order in popularity and riches and go for No. 1 in all sports? 'You have the NFL, the NBA, the UFC, and soccer globally,' White said. 'We're coming. We're coming for all of them.'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 Big Ten betting preview, odds: Favorite over/unders, conference bets and team ratings
For a while there, the Big Ten felt like a side tournament between Michigan and Ohio State to see which would face (and subsequently crush) a team from the west side of Lake Michigan in the conference title game. Then last year, a quartet of ex-Pac 12 teams were added, and Oregon came in and won it. Meanwhile, Penn State benefited from the Buckeyes' loss to the Wolverines, getting to Indianapolis, and now the buzz around the Nittany Lions is at an all-time high. Over at THE WINDOW, we keep things simple, translating the market's opinion of a team into a rating out of 100. The Big Ten brass might be bummed out to find that it sits behind the SEC, but the rest of us are impressed by the average estimated market rating in the conference (65.6). Just playing in the Big Ten warrants a strength-of-schedule boost of 17% above that of an average team, nationally. Even if some (we're looking at you, Indiana) are taking advantage of what conference they are in by avoiding a non-conference matchup against anyone with a pulse. While the Big Ten fights for automatic bids for future College Football Playoffs, it'll figure out its place nationally in December and January. Before then, we're here to figure out who's priced with the best value to win the conference relative to their odds, which members of the conference are overrated or underrated, and if there are any Game of the Year lookahead lines worth locking in now. Conference odds The Big Ten landscape suffers from the same conundrum the SEC does. The more it argues about guaranteed CFP bids, the more we can at least wonder about the importance teams put on getting to their conference title game. That shouldn't lead to some shocking matchup in the Big Ten Championship, but missing out on that 13th game didn't exactly hurt Ohio State last year. As far as a cutoff point for teams that could at least possibly make it to Indianapolis, that probably includes Illinois, Nebraska and Iowa, but with four certified contenders — Ohio State (+190), Penn State (+240), Oregon (+350) and Michigan (+700) — breaking that bubble would be almost miraculous. Team rating nationally Here's a look at how the betting market rates each team in the conference on a national level. To project a point spread between any two teams, find the difference between their points, before applying 3-4 points for home-field advantage. As part of the research for the Big Ten this season, there were two surprising reminders about Illinois: The Illini won 10 games last season Illinois is somehow alphabetically first when listing Big Ten teams While the market might not be instantly aware of the latter, it seems wildly excited about the former, giving the Illini the team rating of a legitimate playoff contender because of last season's success. USC is also among that group, but Lincoln Riley's tenure has been repeatedly underwhelming. The Trojans join Nebraska as teams whose high ceiling rests on the hope that a highly touted quarterback becomes the star he was promised to be. At the bottom of the league, only Northwestern and Purdue are being rated as below-average teams nationally, but at least the Wildcats brought in what should be one of the biggest improvements for any team at quarterback, procuring the services of Preston Stone from SMU. Best bets Michigan to win the Big Ten (+700 at BetMGM) In high-reward betting, we're looking for one key element that can take a team through its previously assumed ceiling. When it comes to conference championship betting, having a positive path that gets a team to the title game acts as permission to take the chance on that key piece ending up being a super-catalyst. Michigan's follow-up to the 2023 national championship was rocky. The Wolverines had to adjust to having to replace head coach Jim Harbaugh — with new coaches in new roles and more than a handful of stars leaving for the NFL. Oh, and they also didn't have a functional quarterback. They took care of that latter by dropping a forklift of cash on the doorstep of No. 1 recruit Bryce Underwood, while also scooping up Mikey Keene (1,170 career pass attempts at UCF and Fresno State), just in case. Reports are that Underwood, who came in at 6-foot-4, 208 lbs, is now tipping the scales at around 230. If Underwood — clearly more physically ready — can be the dual-threat star his rumored $12.5 million NIL deal expects him to be, the Wolverines can beat anyone. 'Anyone' is an obvious reference to the Buckeyes, whom the Wolverines get at home this season, while also avoiding Penn State and Oregon. At least until a potential Big Ten title game, where at 10-1 odds, you'd be holding a ticket on a team that would: Likely be no more than a field-goal underdog against its opponent, due to a team rating already not that far behind the top three contenders. Have already shown that Underwood and Co. are playing at a higher level than their preseason expectations. With a win over either Nebraska or USC on the road, even a dreaded loss to Ohio State should leave Michigan with a league record of 7-2, and at least a tiebreaker away from making it to Indianapolis. As always, shop around with conference odds, as there are some better prices at different books. Regular-season win totals Indiana over 8.5 wins (+110) A bet on the Hoosiers is an exercise in being able to hold an idea that's contrary to a feeling. We may feel like Indiana's non-conference scheduling practices are antithetical to what we'd like college football to be, and how decisions are made within the College Football Playoff committee. However, if Curt Cignetti and the Hoosiers' athletic department are going to bet on a strategy of 'win as many games as possible and hope no one notices the opponents,' then why can't we profit off it? It helps Cignetti that, as a Google search suggests, he's a darn good football coach who likes to — and does — win football games. So, after cruising through their first three games, the Hoosiers will only be underdogs in two of nine Big Ten games, as they somehow manage to miss Ohio State, Michigan and even USC. A second offseason in Bloomington has allowed Cignetti to keep building, potentially even improving the Hoosiers' situation at quarterback by adding one of the top NFL prospects at the position in California transfer Fernando Mendoza. Even if the narrative that Indiana snuck into the CFP last season might ring true, it may also be the reason over 8.5 wins is still priced as an underdog, making it worth a bet with our head, not our principles, on Indiana to flirt with playoff contention again. Michigan State under 5.5 wins (+125) The Spartans have something of their own cozy non-conference schedule with Western Michigan, Boston College and Youngstown State coming to East Lansing, but, unlike Indiana, their Big Ten slate doesn't have landmines, so much as it is one big grenade. Michigan State's best chance for a road win looks to be at Minnesota, where it will be around a touchdown underdog in a notoriously tricky place to play. At home, head coach Jonathan Smith could have the Spartans in a good enough place to top UCLA, but the season-ender against Maryland is at Ford Field — which won't exactly be rocking in support of a team looking for just its sixth or (hopefully) fifth win. Smith brought QB Aidan Chiles with him from Oregon State, but getting to six wins will require a leap in production that doesn't seem likely based on what we saw last season (13:11 TD:INT ratio, 30 sacks taken). Washington over 7.5 wins (-110) Like Michigan, the year after the big season (new head coach, quarterback and in the Huskies' case — conference) was always going to be rough. However, all we need to know about Washington's chances for outperforming the betting market's expectations is this is the second season for Jedd Fisch. Arizona went from 1-11 to 5-7 in his second season under Fisch (and then 10-3 in his third and final one), but the cupboard was considerably more bare in Tucson than it is in Seattle. Will Rogers wasn't the perfect fit at QB last season, but more of a serviceable stopgap while highly talented freshman Demond Williams got a chance to watch. What Williams saw was a six-win season that wasn't nearly as bad as it seems, given the Huskies had to zigzag cross-country as part of their new conference schedule, with road games at Rutgers, Iowa, Indiana, Penn State and Oregon. This season, Williams (with a full offseason as the No. 1 QB) only has four Big Ten road games, and one of those is even in Pacific Standard Time (at UCLA). Plus, not having to deal with John Mateer in the Apple Cup makes that game considerably more winnable (Huskies are 12.5-point favorites). Bonus: Game of the Year value bet Beyond the few Big Ten conference games that qualified in our earlier article listing one bet per week in the Game of the Year lookahead lines, here's another bet worth making with an eye on getting the best number possible before kickoff. Week 5: Washington (+13.5) vs. Ohio State Bettors have already gobbled up the +14 that was available on the Huskies' Week 5 game with the Buckeyes this summer, but that doesn't mean there still isn't some value left on Washington. An estimated team rating of 62/100 comes without any boost above an average strength of schedule, which still projects Washington to be around 10-point underdogs to Ohio State. Any regard for a Husky slate that also includes Michigan, Illinois and Oregon, and the 7.5 wins Washington is lined at should equate to a rating that puts it just outside any top-25 ranking. If the Buckeyes don't survive Week 1's showdown with Texas, and Washington dominates the Apple Cup, there may be a groundswell for UW's chances at an upset, and an even shorter point spread than our projection.
