logo
Asian stocks, bonds climb as trade-truce rally holds

Asian stocks, bonds climb as trade-truce rally holds

Time of India16-05-2025
Live Events
Stock Rally
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Asian equities followed Wall Street higher in a sign the stock market rally has further to run. Treasuries advanced on Thursday as traders priced in two Federal Reserve rate cuts this year.Shares in South Korea and Australia climbed early Friday, while Japan's were mixed. US futures inched higher after the S&P 500 rose 0.4% Thursday. Canada's stock benchmark hit a record with an eight-day rally.Caution still lurked in the background after a furious rally spurred worries about an overheated market, with the pendulum swinging in favor of defensive dividend-payers that had underperformed in the past month. Meta Platforms Inc. paced losses in big tech on a news report it was delaying the rollout of a flagship AI model. In late hours, Applied Materials Inc. gave a tepid forecast. And Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s quarterly revenue grew a disappointing 7%, reflecting pressure on Chinese consumers.Treasuries were steady in Asian trading on Friday after a Thursday rally as prices paid to US producers unexpectedly declined by the most in five years suggesting companies are absorbing some of the hit from higher tariffs. Australian and New Zealand yields fell.Separate US economic data showed growth in retail sales decelerated. Factory production declined for the first time in six months while New York state manufacturing contracted again. And confidence among homebuilders slumped.'If you are in the stagflation camp, these data aren't confirming your thesis,' said Jamie Cox at Harris Financial Group. 'While growth is slowing, disinflation remains intact.'The bond rally on Thursday sent yields down 10 basis points or more for debt maturing in two to 10 years. Longer-dated bonds were earlier whipsawed by large trades that briefly pushed the 30-year yield to nearly 5%. A dollar gauge lost 0.2% Thursday and was flat early Friday.'Bad news is good news for the bond market' as Thursday's data — including producer prices and retail sales — pointed to a weaker economy, said Zachary Griffiths, head of investment-grade and macroeconomic strategy at CreditSights Inc.In Asia, US President Donald Trump said India had made an offer to drop tariffs on US goods, as the Asian nation negotiates a deal to avert higher import taxes. India was one of the first countries to begin trade negotiations with the US following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the White House in February.Elsewhere, Japan's economy shrank for the first time in a year, illustrating its vulnerability even before sustaining the impact of Trump's tariff measures. The yen gained 0.2% on Friday to trade around 145 per dollar.Other data set for release in the region includes gross-domestic product for Malaysia and Hong Kong, inflation expectations for New Zealand and international reserves for Thailand. Bank of Japan official Toyoaki Nakamura will speak later in the day.Stocks are now trading like last month's rout never happened. The S&P 500 is about 4% away from an all-time high, while the Nasdaq 100 swung from a bear market back into a bull market. The advance is building as economic tensions between the US and China ease and the White House appears to be softening its approach to trade negotiations.'I don't want to get too excited, but we may actually be able to focus on company fundamentals for a while this summer,' said Lamar Villere, portfolio manager at Villere & Co. 'If you'd told me a month ago that stocks would be up year-to-date when my kids finished their exams, I'd have called you a liar.'Still, there's little clarity over how the existing levies might impact the US economy or the trajectory the global trade war will take in coming months.Fed Governor Michael Barr said the economy is on solid ground, but warned tariff-related supply-chain disruptions could lead to lower growth and higher inflation.Recession remains a possibility as tariff fallout continues to buffet global economies, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon.'Hopefully we'll avoid it, but I wouldn't take it off the table at this point,' Dimon said in a Bloomberg Television interview Thursday at JPMorgan's annual Global Markets Conference in Paris. 'If there is a recession, I don't know how big it would be or how long it would last.'Wells Fargo Investment Institute sees economic growth, clarity around Trump's tariffs and continued earnings growth driving further stock-market gains through the rest of this year and next.In commodities, oil rebounded on Friday after slumping in its previous session as President Donald Trump said the US and Iran are getting closer to a deal regarding Tehran's nuclear program. Gold was little changed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia is significantly falling behind in global AI race, warns billionaire Scott Farquhar
Australia is significantly falling behind in global AI race, warns billionaire Scott Farquhar

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Australia is significantly falling behind in global AI race, warns billionaire Scott Farquhar

Australia risks losing its competitive edge in the global artificial intelligence (AI) race unless urgent action is taken, warned Atlassian co-founder and billionaire tech entrepreneur Scott Farquhar. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking at the National Press Club, Farquhar described AI as a "great industrial revolution" and said Australia is failing to invest adequately in research, infrastructure, and policy reform. He urged both government and industry to treat AI as an economic priority, claiming it could add up to $115 billion annually to the national economy by 2030 if leveraged effectively. AI could add $115 billion to Australia's economy Farquhar highlighted the immense economic opportunity AI presents, stating that by building on existing infrastructure, Australia could generate an additional $115 billion per year by the end of the decade. He pointed to AI's potential to transform sectors such as healthcare, logistics, education, and customer service—boosting productivity and global competitiveness. According to Farquhar, Australia's geography and land availability position it well to become a global hub for AI data centres. These facilities, critical to processing the vast amounts of data AI requires, could allow the country to play a central role in the Asia-Pacific AI economy. However, he warned that realizing this potential would require swift action and government support. Call for copyright reform to enable AI training One of Farquhar's key policy recommendations was to reform Australia's copyright laws to allow text and data mining (TDM) exceptions—something the US and Europe already permit. These legal changes would enable AI models to train more efficiently on large datasets, accelerating innovation and product development across industries. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Addressing concerns about AI replacing human jobs, Farquhar acknowledged that job displacement is inevitable, but emphasized that such shifts have historically led to greater national progress. Drawing a comparison to the transition from steam to electric trains, he argued that embracing change now will lead to long-term benefits, provided Australia adapts intelligently. A wake-up call for policymakers and industry With an economic roundtable on productivity scheduled for August, Farquhar's remarks serve as a timely warning. He urged the Albanese government and Australian businesses to prioritize AI development before the opportunity slips away, insisting the country still has 'everything to play for' in the global AI race.

Trump's tariff move on India may backfire, pharma industry leaders say
Trump's tariff move on India may backfire, pharma industry leaders say

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's tariff move on India may backfire, pharma industry leaders say

The Indian pharmaceutical industry has hit back strongly at the recent tariff announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump , calling it a move that could hurt the American healthcare system more than India's economy. Reacting to the U.S. decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, Dilip Kumar, Chairman of Medical Tourism at the Chamber of Commerce, told that the move aimed at damaging the Indian economy. However, he expressed confidence that it would not succeed. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Design Thinking Product Management Project Management others Operations Management Leadership Healthcare Finance Data Analytics CXO Technology MBA Cybersecurity PGDM Data Science MCA Data Science healthcare Public Policy Others Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 25 Weeks IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India Starts on undefined Get Details "He is trying to kill the market of the Indian economy, but it is not going to happen," Kumar said. "We are exporters, especially of medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and disposables, which mostly come from India. The American market is dependent upon Indian and Chinese markets." Live Events You Might Also Like: Indian IT sector not directly hit by US tariffs, yet ripple effects could be substantial: EY India Kumar emphasized that the cost of treatment and medical procedures in the U.S. will increase as a result of this move, directly affecting American citizens. "India won't be impacted, as we will go by the route of exporting to European countries. We can survive in the toughest times and bounce back," he added. Echoing similar concerns, Namit Joshi, Chairman of Pharmexcil, highlighted the critical role India plays in the global pharmaceutical supply chain . He said that India supplies nearly 47 per cent of the U.S.'s pharmaceutical needs, especially in the generic drugs segment. "India has long been a cornerstone of the global supply chain for affordable, high-quality medicines, particularly in the generic drug market, where it supplies nearly 47 per cent of the U.S.'s pharmaceutical needs. Indian pharmaceutical companies play a vital role in ensuring the affordability and availability of essential medications, including life-saving oncology drugs, antibiotics, and chronic disease treatments," Joshi said. He warned that any disruption to this supply chain would lead to shortages and rising prices in the U.S. "The immediate consequences of these tariffs will likely result in increased costs for essential drugs, the long-term impact will be even more severe," he said. Joshi added that the U.S. market , which relies heavily on India for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and low-cost generics, would struggle to find alternatives. "Efforts to shift pharmaceutical manufacturing and API production to other countries or within the U.S. will take at least 3-5 years to establish meaningful capacity." Industry experts believe the tariff move is a miscalculation that may damage the very healthcare system it aims to protect. However, clarity has to come whether the new 25 per cent tariffs will apply to India's pharmaceutical sector, as in an earlier announcement of April, President Trump had exempted the pharma sector from tariffs. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

We can't be sure 25% will be Trump's final tariff; India should have taken tougher stand like China: Swaminathan Aiyar
We can't be sure 25% will be Trump's final tariff; India should have taken tougher stand like China: Swaminathan Aiyar

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

We can't be sure 25% will be Trump's final tariff; India should have taken tougher stand like China: Swaminathan Aiyar

Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor, ET Now, argues that India's initial accommodative approach towards Trump's trade policies has backfired, contrasting it with China's more assertive stance. Giving in to demands like the Google tax without reciprocation signaled weakness, leading to harsher tariffs. A tougher stance from the beginning might have yielded a better outcome for India in trade negotiations with the US. We just spoke last evening. We were thinking about what is going to happen, but finally Donald Trump has decided on a 25% tariff plus additional penalties. Your first thoughts. Swaminathan Aiyar: I would straight away say please do not say finally. Mr Trump is still going to be dancing around. He says 25% plus. It may then become minus. It may become a plus again. Anybody who thinks that this is a final tariff for his four years of power is very much mistaken. I am quite sure that in subsequent years too he is going to try. First this shows that all the stuff about India being a special position or some chemistry between Modi and Trump was optimistic faff. And if the interim tariff was supposed to be 26% and people thought oh, how high and now it is 25 plus, it is going to be even worse than the interim tariff. There were a lot of optimistic things about some interim agreement and that is not the way it is working out. I would also add that there were many people who earlier said let us be very accommodative, let us give in to Trump as far as possible and let us not get into a retaliation game with him. For instance, one thing that we gave up without anything in return was the Google tax to try and modify the man in advance. Now, if we see between our approach and China's approach, China said I am absolutely going to stand up to you. The Chinese approach ultimately turns out to be better. If you stand up to Trump, you are going to get a better deal. If you just give in to begin with, he sees a weakness. He sees that India just does not have that many cards in this particular game and he is going to slap you with whatever he wants. You just say that I am going to buy some more US energy. Well, everybody is saying that. The EU is saying that. Even China is saying that and that does not appear to be any kind of strong point that we have. So, all I can say is that we should have been tougher to begin with, but let us see what happens. This is a significant tariff. With this tariff you are going to be harder hit. Earlier, we thought that we will be better off than say Bangladesh or various other people and have an advantage over them. Now, it is no longer so certain. We just do not know. So, let us see going forward. I will merely say things have turned out to be worse than we had expected. It shows that there is no special chemistry and it shows that we should have stood up to China in the first instance instead of being so soft. We will have to see how the situation pans out. But what is your understanding on how long are these tariffs going to continue because we were given to understand that a trade team from the United States is going to visit India on August 25th. Do you think there is going to be some respite and how soon can a respite from these tariffs come about? Swaminathan Aiyar: Anybody who thinks that because Trump comes here it means that we get some favours on the Trump side on the tariff side, is wrong. I think we have already been shown very clearly what the situation is. He has treated us like any other country and the fact that we were soft to begin with, has not wooed him over. There is no special chemistry. It was just a mistake to start on that basis. So, again, the idea that just because he drops into India he will give us a favour or two, has no basis. He may give us a slap or two. Given the kind of reputation he has, the way he is carrying on, we have to get rid of the idea that by being friends, by being goody-goody we are somehow going to get something out of him on the trade side. The plain and simple fact is that they have a large trade deficit. It is not going to go away. But I have to disagree with you just a little bit. You can disagree with me as well. When it comes to India's strategy to deal with the United States, we have stood our ground, we have not let the United States cross the very red lines that India is trying to protect whether it is with respect to agri, dairy, GM crops, or even on e-commerce. So, India has stood its ground and perhaps it is one of very few countries in Southeast Asia which has not really agreed to Donald Trump's tariffs and conditions and of course, the pressure that he is trying to build since April. Swaminathan Aiyar: I would say that you are going to be hit by him anyway. He is not interested in India doing well. He is interested in the USA doing well. There is this large trade deficit between the two and truth be told, it is difficult to see what India could buy. Earlier, there was this talk about buying fancy fighter planes at $100 million each. After what we have seen in Operation Sindoor and in Ukraine, the success of drones and loitering munitions, we should just forget about massive arms purchases since it is a waste of money. We should be developing much cheaper things, a lot of it on our own. So, as I said, just by saying that we will buy more arms, we should not buy more arms. We are offering to buy more energy but everybody is offering to buy more energy from them and there is a limit to what they can produce. How do you anticipate the markets to react today? We have spoken to some other investors as well. They are saying that the markets have already priced in the impact of these tariffs. What is your expectation on how the markets are going to react tomorrow? Swaminathan Aiyar: In the short run, there can be a setback. I believe the rupee has weakened which again will be a weak point as far as foreign investors are concerned. The outcome right now is much worse than had been anticipated because the outcome is much worse, there will be some downward movement. By and large, the markets were very disturbed in April when Mr Trump first came out with these huge so-called reciprocal tariffs. After that they say this guy put something high and he negotiates something else, up and down, this that and the other. So, they are saying that this will have some impact in the short run but seeing through it to the longer run, they are saying India has good prospects and the world has good prospects. Yes, the growth prospect has been brought down earlier in April, but you have just seen that the IMF in its World Economic Outlook has said things do not look as bad as they looked like in April and because of that, there have been some upward revisions. As I said, in the short-term, there are some negatives but in the medium term, the market will go up again. So, when you say that in April things did not look as bad perhaps and it is going to perhaps get impacted that much more because these tariffs will come into effect starting August 1. There was a relief period given by Trump and of course, 10% baseline tariff applied on countries across the globe and of course, the impact is going to be that much more. You mentioned the IMF data and the RBI also projected that the Indian economy will grow between 6% and 6.5%. Can that number be sustained and what impact will these tariffs have on the Indian economy in the near term? Swaminathan Aiyar: Apart from what I have said, we are going to find it more difficult to export. The idea that India would have a window to compete better vis-à-vis China is now an illusion. Earlier, there was the idea that the smartphones being manufactured by Apple in India, are going to be competitive with China. I am no longer quite certain that would be the case. The value addition in India is so small that if there is a 25% tariff, how much advantage will we have over anybody else? The same question might apply to Samsung. We were very gung-ho on this particular sector and a very large part of these exports were going to the USA. There is now a big question mark. Look at the entire PLI policy. There were 14 sectors, and out of those 14 sectors, only one sector seems to be succeeding, even that is in jeopardy. But still the cost of making an iPhone in the United States is far more than it is of making it here and, of course, data suggests that iPhone exports from India to the United States have exceeded those from China. But rightly said, it remains to be seen whether that momentum can be sustained. On the 25th, a team from the United States is going to arrive in India. How soon can a bilateral trade agreement, the first branch of it, can be completed? Do you think India and the United States will be able to finalise a deal by fall this year? Swaminathan Aiyar: In my personal opinion, Trump regards this as an occasion to bully India and force it into various contracts especially on the arms. Anybody who thinks he is coming here to give you some golgapas and lollipops is wrong. I do not think that is the way he behaves. He will come here and say we are great friends. So, you must buy all these extremely expensive aircraft from me and the electronics that you require for this. He will offer you some very expensive drones also and maybe some of those we can buy. But Mr Trump will regard this as an occasion to squeeze more out of India. Do not think that the relationship is such that we can squeeze much out of him. There is this constant notion that if anything comes here it is a gain. Let us wait and watch. I am willing to bet that Mr Trump will push his agenda. If we see the trend that Donald Trump has been following with several countries in negotiations, be it with countries in Southeast Asia or with EU or Japan, a significant component is related to investments into the United States or perhaps as a part of manufacturing. Specifically in talks with the EU, they have committed to investments in energy infrastructure in the United States. If India asks for relief on these tariffs and of course on steel and aluminium, is there going to be a component about perhaps increasing investments into the United States? Swaminathan Aiyar: The Government of India has no ability to force Indians to invest in energy there. So, it is not going to happen. China may be able to give an assurance like that. We cannot say we give you an assurance that Reliance is going to invest out there. If you say ONGC is going to invest, I mean people will find it hard to find anything even here, let alone in various other places. It will not be treated as serious. As I said, India is not a big important country. We are still a lower middle-income country. So, in terms of competing with the European Union, Britain, Japan – all of whom have been asked to invest, we will remain a tiny pygmy compared with the others. So yes, he will demand that. And yet his main expectation is that India will buy stuff from America. As for foreign investment in another country, it takes many years to work that out. The investment itself will be distributed over a large number of years, especially in the energy sector. I do not think this is where India has any kind of comparative advantage. We do have a comparative advantage in buying arms, but as I said, I am against buying arms. At this point of time, we need to totally change the kind of armaments pattern that we have had so far and that will not be something that Mr Trump will be happy about.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store