
‘Said I treated her like bachchi, bitched about her'—behind Sitharaman's ire at ex-finance secy Subhash Garg
The reason for her angst? She thought that Garg went about 'bitching' about her and treating her like a bachchi (child).
New Delhi: Soon after she assumed the charge of the finance ministry, Nirmala Sitharaman's attitude towards the finance secretary, Subhash Chandra Garg, was frosty, the IAS officer of 1983 batch Rajasthan cadre has written in his new book, 'No, Minister: Navigating Power, Politics and Bureaucracy with a Steely Resolve'.
In the book, he also describes former Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje as an 'official split personality,' who felt 'cheated' when he was called by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) in 2014, soon after Modi became PM.
Also Read: Home Secy Govind Mohan joins IAS/IPS/IRS officers who have benefited from Modi govt's extension culture
A strange accusation—'bitching' about the finance minister
On their official visit to Japan in June 2019, Garg complimented Sitharaman for speaking effectively at the G-20 finance ministers' meeting. Her reaction surprised him. 'I hope I did not disappoint you,' she retorted.
'My suspicion that she was carrying biases against me were confirmed but I chose to ignore it,' Garg writes.
The second instance came soon after. In June, 2019, Garg sought to conclude a pre-budget meeting with stakeholders by thanking them for their participation, and telling them their inputs will be put up in front of the minister for her consideration.
'I will abide by what the finance secretary says, especially a finance secretary who is much older than me in the finance ministry, and not discuss the suggestions,' Garg recalls her as saying. She did not close the meeting thereafter, and the stakeholders continued to make their interventions. Even as they were talking, Sitharaman turned to Garg, and said, 'What do you think, I cannot violate you? I would.'
When Garg went to her room to clear the air after the meeting, she was 'livid' and 'relentless', he writes. 'She said I treated her like a bachchi (child). At one stage, she said that I had gone to various people and 'bitched' about her, which was false. She also threatened to bring the entire matter to the notice of the prime minister.'
'I don't know what had got into her. It was clear, though, that there was a serious problem and that our functional relationship had broken down,' Garg says.
In the run-up to the Budget, things became worse. While the finance minister and secretary are supposed to work in tandem on the budget speech, which is closely vetted by the prime minister, the finance minister refused to share the draft of the speech with Garg before the meeting with the PM, he said.
'This created an unprecedented situation. I was responsible for finalising the speech and seeing it through to print without any glitches. Further, I was also primarily responsible for presenting and defending the speech in the PMO,' he writes. 'Still, I did not have a draft of it which my finance minister had finalised.'
The 'last straw' for Garg was, however, the non-banking financial company (NBFC) package, which the PMO wanted to announce. The secretary of the Department of Financial Services (DFS), Rajiv Kumar, who recently retired as the chief election commissioner, proposed amendments in the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act, including conferring regulatory and resolution jurisdiction to RBI. Garg opposed this.
While Sitharaman sided with Garg on this issue, he ended up irking Nripendra Misra, former principal secretary to the PM. The PMO decided to go ahead with the initial proposal made by Kumar.
Garg signed the file with a fresh note saying that the proposal of the DFS is to be accepted. Sitharaman—who he says, 'found it difficult to clear any file on which differing views were recorded' —wanted Garg's earlier oppositions to be removed.
'She would not sign the file with the earlier notes still in it. Her office conveyed this clearly to Rajiv. Rajiv told me the note sheets recorded earlier would have to be taken out, destroyed and replaced with new note sheets with the same dates and numbers,' he writes. 'Though I had never allowed such a thing in my life, I acquiesced only to ensure that the budget process could go through.'
'But I decided that I would not be party to something like this ever again. It was the moment I made up my mind to quit the IAS,' he writes.
'Official split personality'
This was not the first time Garg had irked a politician.
In 2014, Garg was called by P.K. Mishra, then Additional Principal Secretary to the newly appointed Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and was asked to join as India's Executive Director at the World Bank.
His acceptance irrevocably antagonised his then chief minister, Vasundhara Raje, with whom he had worked for several years. Raje had an 'official split personality'—extraordinarily efficient and transparent on one hand, but 'different' on matters concerning revenue-earning departments like excise, land allotment, etc., he says. Yet, he enjoyed a close working relationship with her for years.
When Raje learnt of his appointment, 'all hell broke loose' in Rajasthan, he writes. 'She was infuriated and felt cheated,' he writes. 'She summoned Rajiv Mehrishi (then the chief secretary of Rajasthan) and declared, 'Subhash is not going anywhere.''
She asked Mehrishi to write to the PMO that Garg will not be relieved, but the chief secretary advised her against it, given that 'the relationship between the two was also not very cordial'.
Later, Garg was unceremoniously excluded from a cabinet meeting for which he went, and his relieving orders were suddenly handed to him. He was asked to immediately proceed on central deputation without even a courtesy visit to Raje, which he requested twice.
'I made one more request to see her before I departed Jaipur lock, stock and barrel on 24 September,' he writes. 'Her secretary did not revert. I decided that was the end of the matter. I never reached out to her thereafter. We have neither met nor spoken to each other since September 2014.'
The recalcitrant minister
Unlike Sitharaman and Raje, Garg did not work directly with the 'recalcitrant minister' Jayanthi Natrajan, who was the environment minister in the 'policy paralysis' era of the UPA II.
In 2013, when Garg was appointed in the cabinet secretariat, first as a joint secretary and then an additional secretary, there was an 'evident rot' in the environment ministry, he writes. Not only was it procedurally difficult to get clearances, Natarajan 'sat on files for months', he writes.
'The environment secretary's helplessness was apparent—there were over 400 files reportedly pending, waiting for the minister's approval and signature,' he says. Even the constitution of the cabinet committee on investments did not succeed in getting the 'recalcitrant minister' to act.
He relates one particular incident, 'a bizarre spectacle', where Natrajan kept former prime minister Manmohan Singh waiting for 40 minutes at a meeting of the cabinet committee on investments.
When she finally showed up, she just said she would take more time to examine the projects without any explanation for the delay, Garg writes. 'The meeting ended with the prime minister advising the minister to try to clear the projects at the earliest,' he says. 'No one needed better evidence to conclude how weak and ineffectual Manmohan Singh had become in his own cabinet.'
In the over-400-page book, Garg also writes of the difficult relationship he shared with Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu and former principal secretary to the PM, Misra.
Naidu, who like present times was a key coalition partner of the NDA government in the early 2000s, sought to direct disproportionate amount of central funds to Andhra Pradesh, Garg writes. When as director in the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA), Garg sought to check this, Babu started 'baying for his blood', he says.
As for Misra, on one occasion, Garg says he told him, 'Don't ever go to the PM over my head.' On another, he explicitly said, 'The prime minister is unhappy with you. The finance minister is unhappy with you. Subhash, you are not in tune with the thinking of the government.'
(Edited by Zinnia Ray Chaudhuri)
Also read: IAS seeing progress on gender parity—1 of 5 secretaries at Centre are women
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Telangana HC hears Vacate Petitions filed by senior IAS and IPS officers on land at Nagaram
The High Court of Telangana on Monday heard the Vacate Petitions filed by senior IAS and IPS officers and questioned the writ petitioner Birla Mallesh about his locus standi to file the writ petition concerned with Survey No. 194 of Nagaram village. Senior counsels appearing for the officers, have pointed out that Birla Jangamma, mother of the writ petitioner, had already filed a writ petition in the year 2024 and it was disposed. The writ petitioner with a malafide intention to tarnish the image of IAS and IPS officers has not disclosed the WP filed by his mother and disposed of in 2024 to the High Court, they argued. Senior counsels P. Raghuram and Chandrasen Reddy have further argued that the petitioner, after obtaining interim orders stating Survey No. 194 of Nagaram village as Bhoodan land, has changed his stand that the land is not Bhoodan land but government land. The petitioner also suppressed various material facts misrepresenting that Survey No. 194 of Nagaram village is a Bhoodan land. The counsel for petitioner sought two weeks of time from the Court, but the Court declined the request and posted the matter to tomorrow (July 29) for hearing.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC questions locus standi of petitioner in Bhoodan case
Hyderabad: In a significant development concerning alleged Bhoodan lands allegedly purchased by IAS and IPS officers in survey no. 194 of Nagaram village, the Telangana high court on Monday heard the vacate petitions filed by senior IAS and IPS officers and questioned the writ petitioner Birla Mallesh about his locus standi in the case. The counsel for the IAS and IPS officers pointed out that Birla Jangamma, the petitioner's mother, had already filed a writ petition in 2024 which was disposed. The petitioner, with the malafide intention of tarnishing the image of senior IAS and IPS officers, has not disclosed the same to the high court, the counsel alleged. Hearing the case, Justice K Lakshman of the Telangana high court questioned the petitioner about the need to make representations on the issue to the Prime Minister, chief minister and various other political authorities. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The counsel for the IAS and IPS officers further argued that the petitioner, after obtaining interim orders stating survey no. 194 of Nagaram village as Bhoodan land, had changed his stand that the land was in fact govt land. "The petitioner has suppressed various material facts and abused the process of law in order to obtain an interim order by misrepresenting that survey no. 194 of Nagaram village is Bhoodan land," the counsel said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Are Ditching Finger Pricks with This Breakthrough Monitor Thelifeh Undo Standing counsel for the Bhoodan board then informed the high court that survey no. 194, in which land was purchased by the officers, was never recorded as Bhoodan land. The counsel for the officers stated that the Rangareddy collector had also filed a detailed counter affidavit stating that the survey nos. 194 and 195 of Nagaram village is patta land. Justice Lakshman posted the matter for further hearing on Tuesday. Additional advocate general T Rajanikant Reddy meanwhile said that state has no intention of appointing a commission of inquiry into the case. Justice Lakshman directed the state to furnish to the court the details of Bhoodan land in the area.


India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
'We don't need your money': India to China on investment; 'There is no plan from the Modi government to...,' says source
New Delhi: India and China's relations are going through ups and downs. Recently there has been some improvement in the relations between the two countries. It is another matter that the government is not in the mood to lift the ban on investment coming from China. Sources have given this information. According to them, there is no plan from the Modi government to review Press Note 3. Press Note 3 says that investment coming from countries sharing land border with India will have to get approval from the government in every case. What is India's response to China? This is a clear message for the Dragon. It shows that for India its security is of paramount importance. Until it is assured, it cannot take the risk of opening the doors for China. According to a source, this is still a very early stage. There has been no talk so far about relaxing Press Note 3. At present, the possibility of doing so is also low. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had indicated the need for more access and dialogue between the two countries for economic cooperation. But, at the same time, she also stressed on exercising 'caution'. In a program, she said that both the countries want to have more dialogue with each other for economic cooperation. But this has to be done carefully. When was India's FDI policy changed? In April 2020, the government changed the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy. This change was made through Press Note 3 of 2020. According to this, if a company is from a country sharing land border with India or the owner of that company lives in such a country or is a citizen of that country, then it will have to invest through the government only. Even if the ownership of such a company is transferred to a company in India, government approval is necessary. What is India's message to China? There has been tension in the relations between India and China since the conflict in the Galwan Valley in 2020. Press Note 3 was initially implemented to protect companies during the pandemic. But now it is working as an important weapon of national security. The government wants to ensure that there is no threat to national interests and security even while restoring economic relations. India wants to explore opportunities for economic cooperation with China. It is very keen to increase investment especially in areas like electronics manufacturing. But it is also cautious about China's geostrategic intentions. The continuation of Press Note 3 is an attempt to maintain this balance.