Poland's Presidential Election Goes Down to the Wire
Rafal Trzaskowski, the liberal mayor of Warsaw, appeared to be narrowly ahead in the runoff election, but by such a small margin that it was unclear whether he would prevail in the official vote tally due on Monday.
Mr. Trzaskowski nonetheless claimed victory.
'Dear ladies and gentlemen — we won!' he declared to supporters Sunday evening in Warsaw. 'I think that the term 'razor-thin victory' will enter the Polish language.'
The results of usually reliable exit polling, broadcast by public and private television stations Sunday evening after polling stations closed, gave Mr. Trzaskowsk a tiny advantage, with 50.3 percent of the vote. His rival, Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist historian backed by Poland's previous right-wing governing party, Law and Justice, had 49.7 percent.
Mr. Nawrocki told his own supporters after the exit poll data came out that the official results would show him to be the victor. 'Dear people, we will win,' he said. 'Tonight we will win and save Poland.'
The turnout was 72.8 percent, the highest in a Polish presidential election since the first free and direct vote for the presidency in 1990, when Lech Walesa, the Solidarity trade union leader, won after the collapse of communism.
The election has been widely viewed as a test of whether populist nationalism is a rising or receding force in Europe and beyond. A hard fought campaign drew in supporters and foes of President Trump on both sides of the Atlantic.
The Trump administration, along with Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary and other right-wing politicians, including the defeated Trump-admiring nationalist candidate in a recent presidential election in Romania, were rooting for Mr. Nawrocki. Europe's mainstream political forces supported Mr. Trzaskowski.
The election hinged on the question of whether Polish voters want a president who can work with the sitting government of Poland's centrist prime minister, Donald Tusk, or one who opposes it. The closeness of the race highlighted Poland's polarization between right-wing nationalist forces opposed to Mr. Tusk and centrists who support him.
The election of Mr. Trzaskowski, who was backed by Mr. Tusk's party, Civic Platform, would likely end a long period of political deadlock that began when Law and Justice lost its majority in Parliament in a 2023 election but retained control of the separately elected presidency.
The presidency is a largely ceremonial role, but the president has veto power over legislation passed by Parliament. The departing, term-limited president, Andrzej Duda, used this power to obstruct efforts by Mr. Tusk's government to reverse the legacy of eight years of populist rule by Law and Justice.
A win for Mr. Nawrocki would continue and even harden this deadlock.
Anatol Magdziarz contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Country stands with families of Southport victims, Prime Minister says
The country will come together to show 'sorrow and solidarity' a year after the Southport attack, the Prime Minister has said. Three-minutes silence will be held in the Merseyside town at 3pm on Tuesday to mark a year since Axel Rudakubana launched his attack on a Taylor Swift-themed dance class and murdered Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven. In the days following the attack, during which he also attempted to kill eight other children and two adults, violent disorder broke out in the seaside town and across the country. Writing on X on Tuesday morning, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'One year on, the whole nation stands with the families of Bebe, Alice and Elsie. 'We stand together in grief, in honour of the memory of those wonderful children, and in admiration of the families who have shown strength beyond words. 'We stand with all the children and adults who still bear the physical and mental scars of that day – and in awe of those who risked their lives to help. 'And we stand with the people of Southport, who have shown Britain the meaning of community. 'The nation wants to put its arms around you all. We will come together today to show our sorrow and solidarity. But also to show our determination to uphold the true legacy of Bebe, Alice and Elsie – one of joy, kindness and love.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the lives of the 'three innocent young girls' were 'extinguished in an act of pure evil'. In a post on X, she said: 'We honour the memories of Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar. 'Their families, and those that survived, carry unimaginable grief and trauma. 'We owe it to them, the people of Southport and communities across the country to demand justice and learn the painful lessons of state failure to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.' People have been asked not to leave flowers at the scene or at the schools the girls attended as the town continues to rebuild after the tragedy. Deputy leader of Sefton Council Paulette Lappin said the community was looking to move forward in a positive way. She told the PA news agency: 'It still remains beyond belief, even though I know it to be true, and so it's just very sad. 'From sadness, we hope to bring goodness and that's all we can do.' The area outside Southport Town Hall, where hundreds laid floral tributes and a vigil was held last year, is due to be transformed into legacy gardens, in memory of those who lost their lives. Ms Lappin said: 'It will be designed for the enjoyment and the fun of children, so that all children can come and they can all play in here. 'That's what we have to remember, that it is an absolutely terrible tragedy, but we cannot allow evil to define us.' A new playground is also being built at Churchtown Primary School, in memory of Alice and Bebe, who were both pupils. Members of the public are being asked to consider making donations to local causes – including funds set up in the names of the victims of the attack and the Southport Strong Together Appeal, which was established last year to support those affected. No large vigil will be held but churches and community centres will be open for those looking for support or space for quiet reflection. Ms Lappin said plans for the day were guided by the families, who had their 'thoughts, compassion and incredible respect'.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia carries out deadly air strike on Ukrainian prison
A Russian air strike on a prison in Ukraine's south-eastern Zaporizhzhia region has killed at least 17 inmates and wounded more than 80 others. The operation on Monday hit the Bilenkivska Correctional Colony with four guided aerial bombs, according to the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine. At least 42 inmates were admitted to hospital with serious injuries while another 40 people, including one staff member, sustained other injuries. The strike destroyed the prison's dining hall and damaged administrative and quarantine buildings, but the perimeter fence held and no escapes were reported. Ukrainian officials condemned the attack, saying that targeting civilian infrastructure, such as prisons, is a war crime under international conventions.
Entrepreneur
35 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Founders, Step Up
This Government has shown it is taking UK tech seriously, now founders need to step up too Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. For those that remember the heady days of David Cameron, George Osborne and the then Mayor of London Boris Johnson finding every opportunity to come to Old Street roundabout to celebrate the area's emerging startups, the first nine months of the new Labour administration gave the impression of a Government that was largely indifferent to tech. However, the last six weeks have changed that. Starting with some major AI commitments announced alongside Jenson Huang from NVIDIA at London Tech Week (a much more high profile tech leader than former PMs were able to bring to the UK's flagship tech event), followed by the Spending Review and the Modern Industrial Strategy, the Government has set out a clear roadmap for founders about where its priorities for policy and investment will lie. As a VC very active in the UK early-stage ecosystem, of course we don't look to Government for guidance on investment opportunities, or expect Government to have the power to dictate innovation. But the Government does play an important role in the ecosystem. Firstly, it has a loud voice. And anything the Government can do to showcase success, signal the scale of the opportunity for UK companies and demonstrate a real commitment to back British tech innovation sends a strong message to international investors and customers looking to work with new start-ups. But more importantly, the Government can create material commercial opportunities by unlocking the UK's massive public sectors for digital innovation. And this matters for start-ups. And that is what was most exciting about these policy announcements in recent weeks. They give a very clear sense of where Government will be focusing its funding, procurement and regulation. And these are big industries with huge potential for digital disruption that we're talking about. From the NHS to national defence, from education to green industries - there are billion-dollar opportunities for start-ups who know how to look for them. What caught my attention wasn't just the scale of investment, but how these announcements add up to something bigger - a government that finally understands tech isn't just about apps and algorithms, but about rebuilding Britain's industrial base: With a new £27.8bn National Wealth Fund prioritising clean energy, digital, manufacturing, the UK is now a major co-investor in climate infrastructure The UK now sees defencetech and dual-use innovation as core to its industrial future, not just its national safety, with a new £2bn+ annual defence R&D budget Dedicating £1bn+ for cross-government digital and AI transformation will unlock a new era of govtech innovation. The most important is the Government's push for Digital ID. This will have major repercussions for fintechs and the way individuals interact with public services The UK wants to lead in making the things that matter, from biomanufacturing to smart robotics to deeptech scale-up. With £2.5bn for quantum, £1bn for semiconductors and £1bn+ for compute, AI, and synthetic biology this is about scaling up national capabilities The NHS will undergo one of the biggest programmes of digital transformation the world has ever seen. £10bn committed to NHS tech and digital transformation will put tech at the heart of our NHS. The regions matter. The Government will be investing in clusters up and down the country, which is good news for founders based outside of the capital. Significant expansion of the British Business Bank (to £25.6bn) makes it one of the most important state-backed investors in Europe. Now, I know what you're thinking. Government promises are cheap, and Whitehall's track record on tech delivery is mixed at best. Fair enough. But here's what's different this time: these aren't moonshot commitments decades away. This is funding that's being deployed now, with departments that have clear mandates and Ministers who understand the urgency. So what does this actually mean for founders building companies right now in the UK? These policy announcements signal the Government's attention. These are the sectors which Ministers, policymakers and Treasury officials will be prioritising in the coming years. If you're a pre-seed founder, building for alignment with UK capability priorities is a very sensible idea. These are the sectors where decisions will be made faster, and budget will be more available. Here's the practical bit: start with your local Catapult centre - they're your fastest route into government procurement conversations. Then work backwards through Innovate UK and UKRI. Don't pitch your product; pitch the problem you solve. If you're building AI for fraud detection, lead with "we can save the public sector £2.6bn annually" not "we've built a great ML model." Founders become adept very quickly at speaking the language of their core customers. Founders learn to speak 'corporate' early on if they are selling to enterprises and global organisations. The same should be true for founders speaking to Government. Learn their language and frame things in terms of outcomes, resilience and productivity. The UK is hungry for globally ambitious founders building 'infrastructure layers' in every sector. If founders can demonstrate they are building national capabilities to increase UK digital sovereignty they will be welcomed with open arms by Government. Rightly so, international events have overshadowed many of the policy announcements. But to my mind they are the most significant combination of Government policies for UK founders in many years. This won't last forever. Political priorities shift, budgets get cut, Ministers move on. But right now, for the first time in years, government and private markets are aligned on what Britain needs to build. The founders who move fast on this will have a structural advantage that lasts decades. The question isn't whether you can build a billion-dollar company in this environment. It's whether you can afford not to try.
