Taliban change tune towards heritage sites in Afghanistan
Even months before their takeover in 2021 the Taliban called for the protection of ancient artefacts in the country, sparking scepticism among observers. They are 'part of our country's history, identity and rich culture', the authorities declared.
Since their return to power and decades of war ended, archaeological finds — particularly related to Buddhism — have proliferated, with discoveries publicised by the authorities.
In eastern Laghman province, niches carved into rocks in Gowarjan village and carved Brahmi inscriptions have been found. 'It is said that Afghan history goes back 5,000 years — these ancient sites prove it; people lived here,' said Mohammed Yaqoub Ayoubi, head of the provincial culture and tourism department.
'I think the Taliban have understood how much the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas damaged their reputation,' said Valery Freland, director of the ALIPH foundation, the International Alliance for the Protection of Heritage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Watch film first: Kerala Story director on Pinarayi Vijayan's National Award criticism
Kerala Chief Minister, Pinarayi Vijayan, condemned the National Award win for 'The Kerala Story'. In an exclusive interview with now, the film's director, Sudipto Sen, reacted to the criticism from the senior politician, referring to the Chief Minister's support for former Kerala CM, VS Achuthanandan, in the said he read the entire post made by Vijayan on X, in which he called 'The Kerala Story' a film that "spreads blatant misinformation with the clear intent of tarnishing Kerala's image and sowing seeds of communal hatred." advertisementWhen asked to comment on the post, Sen said he doubts that Vijayan had even watched his film before criticising its National Award win. "I have, I have a mixed bag reaction. Number one, I'm sure he did not see the film. I would request, he's a very, very senior politician and a very, very revered politician, so I would request him to watch the film," he recalled Vijayan's support for Achutanandan's statement a few years back. He elaborated, "And if he had watched the film, then he would know that 15 years back, his senior, Comrade VS Achuthanandan, came to Delhi to have a press conference to say that the way PFI (Popular Front of India) kind of communal outfits are converting women there, Kerala will turn into Islamic state in the next 20 years. It is on record. The video is available on YouTube. You need not check with me."He went on, "When he did that press conference in Delhi, there was a protest in Kerala. And you know who actually came in support of VS Achuthanandan sir? Mr Pinarayi Vijayan, who was his deputy in the Communist Party - I think he was the joint secretary or something. He supported VS Achuthanandan's concern wholeheartedly."Sen highlighted the irony of Pinarayi's current statement and his actions 15 years back."What he said at that time and what he's saying now are the complete opposite. Which Pinarayi Vijayan sir should I trust?"The filmmaker continued to call himself someone who believes in art, and is unaware of the dynamics of politics. He said, "I am not a politician. I don't understand their style of talking, the style of the strategies of their political life - how it evolves. I'm not the right person to make any comment on any politician's point."He then referred to the film's certification by the censor board, highlighting that due diligence was done while it was originally released in 2023."I will only say the censor board gave a certificate to the film after two months of rigorous checking. They checked the authenticity of each and every dialogue. I stand by every word spoken in the film. I stand by every scene shown in the film. And anybody can challenge my film shot by shot. I am there to answer."advertisement Sen said he would rather focus on the adulation that he's getting for the film, and for the prestigious honour. He said for every Pinarayi Vijayan-like criticism, there are hundreds of congratulatory messages that he would rather read first."The critics are outnumbered in the film. I love my critics. I love my people who praise the film, praise the award, congratulate me. As a human being, I am also a greedy person. I am counting the congratulations. I am right now only reading the congratulatory messages. I will be reading the criticism later," he concluded.'The Kerala Story' won two awards at the 71st National Film Awards - Best Direction, and Best Cinematography. The film follows a group of Kerala women who are coerced into embracing Islam, sexually abused and are eventually made to join ISIS. The initial promos claimed that thousands of Hindu women have been converted to Islam - which was challenged by various a court case, the makers accepted to add two disclaimers, stating that the figures mentioned in the film were "inauthentic and that the movie was a fictionalised depiction of events."- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Pinarayi Vijayan
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Is alcohol sold in Sharia-ruled Saudi Arabia, and can you obtain a liquor license? Liquor consumption is only permitted for...
Liquor is prohibited in Saudi Arabia (File) Saudi Arabia Liquor: Saudi Arabia, one of the most hardline Islamic nations in the world, which is ruled under the stringent Sharia law, has recently softened its extreme stance in certain matters, such as women rights, entertainment, music, among other. However, the consumption of alcohol is still a criminal act in the desert kingdom and can invite severe punishment from authorities. Is alcohol sold in Saudi Arabia? Saudi Arabia had imposed a blanket ban on the sale and consumption of alcohol within its borders in 1952 after King Abdul Aziz's son got drunk at a party and shot and killed a British diplomat. However, the ban was lifted in 2024, following which the sale of alcohol was resumed in capital Riyadh after nearly 70 years. Who can sell and consume liquor in Saudi Arabia? After the ban was removed, a state-owned liquor store was opened, which only serves a select group of non-Muslim immigrants and diplomats. The customers are prohibited from carrying mobile phones or any other recording devices inside the store, and the purchases are made through a dedicated mobile app. Additionally, there is also a cap on how much liquor a single customer can purchase at the store. There are no public liquor stores in Saudi Arabia. Can you get a liquor license in Saudi Arabia? Currently, Saudi Arabia does not offer licenses to operate liquor stores in the country, however, a report by Metro News claims that the kingdom will implement licensing laws in 2026, allowing alcohol consumption. The report also claimed that the Saudi Arabian government has started the sale of alcohol at about 600 tourist places across the country. Thus, there are no public liquor shops in Saudi Arabia as the country does not offer licenses for the same. Why liquor is banned in Saudi Arabia? The sale and consumption of alcohol is strictly prohibited in Saudi Arabia under Islamic Sharia law, which prohibits the consumption of liquor and other intoxicants and deems it is as a great sin. Additionally, Saudi Arabia is home to Mecca and Medina, arguably two of the holiest cities in Islam, thus mandating strict prohibition on liquor consumption. What is the punishment for liquor consumption in Saudi? As mentioned above, Saudi Arabia has strict laws prohibiting the sale and consumption of liquor, and alcohol-related crimes could invite punitive measures like flogging, imprisonment, heavy fines or deportation for foreigners. The privilege is granted only to a few non-Muslim diplomats, while foreign tourists, who are not Muslims, are allowed to carry and drink liquor at certain places.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Arunachal Pradesh activists urge Centre for a talk with China before proceeding with hydel project on Siang
NEW DELHI: Environmental activists and civil society representatives from Uttarakhand and Northeast states accused the Centre of creating fear over China's world's largest dam on the Brahmaputra River to develop an 11,500 MW hydroelectric project in Arunachal Pradesh on the Siang River. They urged the government to engage in dialogue with China to gain a clear understanding of the hydrology before proceeding with the dam's construction. However, it's noteworthy that China shares its borders with 13 countries and currently has no water treaties in place with any of them. In July, P.K. Mishra, the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, held a meeting with all stakeholders to expedite the survey work, citing the project is of national importance. During a press conference in Delhi, activists claimed that both the Union and state governments are suppressing public protests against the Pre-Feasibility Report (PFR) for the Siang Upper Multi-Purpose Project (SUMP). The project involves the construction of a dam that would be 300 meters high and would lead to the submergence of 27 villages, affecting around 150,000 members of the Adi tribe. "The Union and State governments are militarising the entire region to prevent people from organising protests," said Bhanu Tarak, a lawyer and activist from Arunachal Pradesh.
