Nearly 75pc of US teens use AI companions: Study highlights mental health risks and warns against use for those under 18
AI companions — chatbots designed for personal conversations rather than simple task completion — are available on platforms like Character.AI, Replika, and Nomi.
Unlike traditional artificial intelligence assistants, these systems are programmed to form emotional connections with users. The findings come amid mounting concerns about the mental health risks posed by AI companions.
The nationally representative study of 1,060 teens aged 13-17, conducted for Common Sense Media, found that 72 per cent have used AI companions at least once, while 52 per cent interact with such platforms a few times per month.
Common Sense Media is a leading American non-profit organisation that reviews and provides ratings for media and technology with the goal of providing information on their suitability for children.
The survey revealed that 30 per cent of respondents use the platforms because 'it's entertaining' and 28 per cent are driven by curiosity about the technology.
However, concerning patterns emerged: one-third of users have chosen to discuss serious matters with AI companions instead of real people, while 24 per cent have shared personal information including real names and locations.
Perhaps most troubling, 34 per cent of teen users reported feeling uncomfortable with something an AI companion had said or done, though such incidents were infrequent.
'The reality that nearly three-quarters of teens have used these platforms, with half doing so regularly, means that even a small percentage experiencing harm translates to significant numbers of vulnerable young people at risk,' the report said.
The survey revealed an age divide in trust levels.
While half of all teens expressed distrust in AI companion advice, younger teens (ages 13-14) were more likely than older teens (15-17) to trust advice from these systems.
Despite widespread usage, most teens maintained perspective on these relationships: two thirds found AI conversations less satisfying than human interactions, and 80 per cent spent more time with real friends than AI companions.
Based on the findings, Common Sense Media recommended that no one under 18 use AI companions until stronger safeguards are implemented.
'Companies have put profits before kids' well-being before, and we cannot make the same mistake with AI companions,' the report said. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
US government turmoil stalls thousands of export approvals, sources say
NEW YORK, Aug 2 — Thousands of license applications by US companies to export goods and technology around the globe, including to China, are in limbo because turmoil at the agency in charge of approving them has left it nearly paralysed, two sources said. While US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has become a familiar face touting President Donald Trump's tariff and trade deals, sources said the export bureau under Lutnick's command has failed to issue expected new rules, stifled communications with industry representatives, pushed out experts, and lost staff through buyouts and resignations. Shipments of artificial intelligence chips from Nvidia to China are the most high-profile example of licenses not being swiftly approved. The company said July 14 the government assured it licenses would be granted for its H20 chip, and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Lutnick and other officials confirmed sales would be allowed. But sources said this week no licenses have yet been issued, and billions of dollars of AI chip orders are at stake. One US official said the backlog of license applications is the lengthiest in more than three decades. A spokesperson for Nvidia declined to comment. The Commerce Department defended its licensing practices, saying its Bureau of Industry and Security 'will no longer rubber-stamp license applications that raise grave questions of national security,' a spokesperson said. 'BIS is driving forward President Trump's agenda through strong rules and aggressive enforcement,' the person added. The turmoil and resulting inaction at an agency tasked with promoting overseas trade and safeguarding American technology are alarming both those seeking tougher restrictions on exports to China and companies trying to sell their wares abroad. 'Licensing is how the US does business and competes globally,' said Meghan Harris, who served on the National Security Council in the first Trump administration and has worked at Commerce. 'Delays and unpredictability put us at an unnecessary disadvantage.' BIS averaged 38 days per export license application in fiscal year 2023, the most recent data available, denying 2 per cent of 37,943 applications. The license process enforces US export restrictions in an effort to make sure sensitive goods and technology do not reach countries or entities whose use of the items could harm US national security. Some staff have criticised Jeffrey Kessler, who became BIS undersecretary in March, saying he has micromanaged the bureau and failed to communicate adequately. At a staff meeting soon after he took office, Kessler urged BIS staff to limit communications with company representatives and industry officials, according to two additional sources, who said he later asked for all meetings to be entered on a spreadsheet. Getting approval from Kessler's office to attend meetings with other government agencies has also been tricky, those sources said, speaking anonymously because they were not authorised to speak publicly. The BIS spokesperson said Kessler 'is restoring integrity' to the bureau and enjoys Lutnick's 'full confidence.' Frustration among exporters Frustration is growing within US industry. 'We're seeing whole sectors where there is no movement or indication if or when licenses will be issued,' including license applications for semiconductor manufacturing equipment worth billions of dollars, said Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council. While the clock is ticking on license applications, 'Chinese companies are exploring and doing deals with suppliers in China and other countries,' he said. 'The longer we have the delay, the more market share we're going to lose.' Jim Anzalone, president of Compliance Assurance, a Florida-based trade consultancy, said he has seen delays in license approvals for sensors, radars, and sonar to Latin America and other parts of the world. 'There's nothing official about what the policy is and when the backlog would be cleared,' he said. He has received denials sporadically after submitting some two dozen applications months ago to export semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, including four denials on Wednesday, he added. Sources stressed that some licenses are getting approved, especially exports to allied countries, and they noted that some communication with companies continues, especially around license applications. Commerce is also delaying regulatory changes. The agency said in May it would rescind and replace a Biden administration rule before it went into effect that month restricting where AI chips can be exported, but the agency has not done so yet. Other rules, which sources said have been drafted for months, have not been published, including one to expand export restrictions to subsidiaries of companies already banned from receiving controlled US exports. Meanwhile, important staff vacancies such as China-based export control officers have not been filled, and high-level career employees have resigned. A retirement party was held this week for Dan Clutch, acting director of the BIS Office of Export Enforcement, the latest experienced staff member to leave. — Reuters
Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay US$243m in fatal Autopilot crash
NEW YORK, Aug 2 — A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla liable to pay US$243 million (RM1.04 billion) to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, a verdict that could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric vehicle company. The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software. Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent yesterday, and are down 25 per cent this year. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, US$129 million in compensatory damages plus US$200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or US$42.6 million. Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Tesla said it will appeal. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company said. The plaintiffs had sought US$345 million of damages. Their lawyers said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. Impact on future cases Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly. 'It's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology.' The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly US$1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence. Driver's role The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph (100 kph) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet (23 metres) to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software,' he added. 'That's a big deal.' Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' the company said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver - from day one - admitted and accepted responsibility.' — Reuters
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Amazon's AI boom boosts earnings by 35pc but outlook leaves Wall Street cold
SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 1 — Amazon reported a 35 per cent jump in quarterly profits Thursday as the e-commerce giant said major investments in artificial intelligence began paying off. But the Seattle-based company's profit outlook for the current quarter came in lower than hoped for, with investors worried that the cost of AI was weighing on the bottom line. Amazon's share price was trading about six per cent lower in after hours trading. This was despite a stellar second quarter that exceeded analyst expecations, much like it did for its AI focused rivals Google, Microsoft and Meta, which posted bumper results for the period. 'Our conviction that AI will change every customer experience is starting to play out,' said Chief Executive Andy Jassy, pointing to the company's expanded Alexa+ service and new AI shopping agents. Amazon posted net profit of US$18.2 billion (RM77.8 billion) for the second quarter that ended June 30, compared with US$13.5 billion in the same period last year. Net sales climbed 13 per cent to US$167.7 billion, beating analyst expectations and signaling that the company was surviving the impacts of the high-tariff trade policy under US President Donald Trump. 'There continues to be a lot of noise about the impact that tariffs will have on retail prices and consumption. Much of it thus far has been wrong and misreported,' Jassy told analysts. 'Curveballs' Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's world leading cloud computing division, led the charge with sales jumping 17.5 per cent to US$30.9 billion. The unit's operating profit rose to US$10.2 billion from US$9.3 billion a year earlier. The strong AWS performance reflects surging demand for cloud infrastructure to power AI applications, a trend that has benefited major cloud providers as companies race to adopt generative AI technologies. But investors seemed worried about Amazon's big cash outlays to pursue its AI ambitions, sending its share price more than three per cent lower in after-hours trading. The company's free cash flow declined sharply to US$18.2 billion, down from US$53 billion in the same period last year, as Amazon ramped up capital spending on AI infrastructure and logistics. The company spent US$32.2 billion on property and equipment in the quarter, nearly double the US$17.6 billion spent a year earlier, reflecting massive investments in data centers and backroom capabilities. Amazon has pledged to spend up to US$100 billion this year, largely on AI-related investments for AWS. For the current quarter, Amazon forecast net sales between US$174.0 billion and US$179.5 billion, representing solid growth of 10-13 per cent compared with the third quarter of 2024. But operating profit was forecast in a wide range from US$15.5 billion to US$20.5 billion in the current third quarter, which was more cautious than some had hoped for. The caution indicates that 'there's still potential for curveballs from ongoing trade negotiations and accelerating competition on the AI front,' said Emarketer analyst Sky Canaves. — AFP
