logo
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'split' over roles but it's good news for both of them

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'split' over roles but it's good news for both of them

Daily Mirrora day ago
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced a new deal with Netflix - but one royal expert believes the announcement was very telling about their future directions
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's new Netflix deal underlines a major decision by the couple, according to a royal expert.

The Sussexes have revealed they have signed a new "multi-year, first look deal for film and television projects". The pair's new deal means Netflix will have the first option on their new projects.

Five years ago, Harry and Meghan secured a lucrative contract, thought to be worth more than 100 million dollars (£74 million), with Netflix after quitting as senior working royals in 2020 - but this new extension is seen as a downgrade on their previous exclusive rights deal and is believed to be worth a lot less.

As the deal was announced, Meghan was quoted as saying how she and Harry were proud to be extending their partnership with the platform. And just hours later, the trailer for Meghan's upcoming second series of With Love, Meghan lifestyle show dropped.
And former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond says it is telling that there is "scant mention of Harry" int he announcement. She told the Mirror: "It seems clear that this deal is very much Meghan's project.
"It seems he may have played some part in the production of a documentary about a Ugandan orphanage, but it is Meghan who will be on screen presenting her lifestyle shows.
"I think this underlines that the couple has decided that Meghan is really the TV personality, and Harry is more comfortable continuing his charity work. And I think that's the right balance for them."

It comes after the couple's controversial docuseries, Harry & Meghan, in which they were highly critical of the Royal Family, has been among the streaming platform's most-watched documentary of all time with 23.4 million views.
However, other projects, such as Harry's series on Polo, have failed to bring in anywhere near the same viewers.
Meghan's latest project, her cookery and lifestyle show With Love, Meghan, released in March, failed to break into the top 300 most-watched shows on the streaming platform in the first six months of 2025 and was also panned by many critics.

And Jennie added: "As I understand it, first look deals like this are not unusual in Hollywood. Arrangements like this usually come with a certain amount of financial investment in the company. And that's good news for Archewell.
"The fact that Harry and Meghan have got any kind of new deal with Netflix really is one in the eye to everyone who said their contract was done and dusted.
"Netflix has publicly hailed them as 'influential voices' -nd it's hard to argue with that. Whatever they do and say is widely reported on both sides of the Atlantic.
"So I say well done to the two of them. They've shown that they still hold sway in Hollywood, and they've done what so many people said they couldn't: they've kept their link to Netflix alive and well and – to whatever extent – lucrative."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wednesday fans are blown away after seeing how Thing is filmed in each shot
Wednesday fans are blown away after seeing how Thing is filmed in each shot

Daily Mirror

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Wednesday fans are blown away after seeing how Thing is filmed in each shot

People are only just realising that Thing from Netflix's 'Wednesday' has a big secret, and cannot believe what they were seeing when seeing the behind-the-scenes footage Netflix's 'Wednesday' has returned for a second series - and it's promised to be better than ever with a whole host of celebs added to the cast, including Joanna Lumley and Billie Piper. Lady Gaga even made a subtle appearance after the sped-up version of her song 'Bloody Mary' reached new heights of popularity thanks to the first season of the show. ‌ However, many people were left wondering whether 'Thing' from the show is CGI. For those not in the know, Thing from The Addams Family is a disembodied hand that serves as a loyal and helpful companion to the family. ‌ In the Netflix spin-off series, Thing is portrayed by 28-year-old Victor Dorobantu, a Romanian magician, but people were shocked to learn there was a person behind the hand. ‌ Victor shared some behind-the-scenes footage of him portraying the unusual character, and some people said he had the "hardest job on the set". Taking to X, someone wrote: "Rather than relying entirely on CGI, Thing was performed by Romanian magician and actor Victor Dorobantu, who wore a specially designed costume and prosthetics." His costume was blue with a hood so that he could be edited out of the background easily. In the comments of Victor's video, someone wrote: "Imagine telling the grandkids you were in the Wednesday series, every time thing comes on 'that's me'. So cool to know it was a person and not CGI." Another said: "Wow I actually thought Thing was like an AI type of thing. Not going to lie, he has the hardest job on set. That looks like a good workout lol." ‌ Somebody else shared: "The way I checked IMDB so fast this season to make sure it was you again before watching!! I was so stoked it was... love how you play Thing." "This is INCREDIBLY cool! I'm so happy you shared this," a woman praised him. A man penned: "Dang I never thought it was actually someone's hand I thought it was just animated." ‌ An Instagram user shared he must have a lot of strength, writing: "I know it takes immense shoulder strength to be able to pull off something like this. I know your shoulders are well built. I know your shoulders hurt." "Ok, no, but in all seriousness, the way this dude communicates and sends feelings across the screen is beyond me," a fan praised. Some tried to put the actor down, though, saying: "All this technology we have and there was no room for a robot hand? But I guess this makes it look more realistic." Did you know that behind Thing was a real person, or did you have absolutely no idea? Let us know in the comments...

Wednesday fans 'rumble' real villain in part two and it's not who you think
Wednesday fans 'rumble' real villain in part two and it's not who you think

Daily Mirror

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Wednesday fans 'rumble' real villain in part two and it's not who you think

Wednesday season 2 fans are convinced they have worked out who the real villain is after a major clue *Warning: Contains spoilers for Wednesday season 2* ‌ Wednesday devotees are convinced they've cracked a massive "red herring" and are utterly convinced they've sussed out the 'real villain'. ‌ Following an agonising wait, Wednesday season 2 finally hit our screens this month, though in typical Netflix style, viewers will need to hang on a bit longer for part two following a jaw-dropping cliff-hanger. At the end of the opening instalment, audiences witnessed Tyler Galpin (Hunter Doohan) morphing into the Hyde before brutally slaying his master Laurel Gates AKA Miss Thornhill (Christina Ricci). ‌ He subsequently lunged at Wednesday (Jenna Ortega), with viewers then seeing her hurled savagely through the window onto the pavement beneath, reports the Express. However, with Tyler now free, devotees are adamant they've identified the genuine antagonist - and it's not the Hyde. Flocking to Reddit, fans are buzzing about Isadora Capri (Billie Piper). One devotee remarked: "She's too eager to cultivate a connection with Weds and I don't buy her reason for being at the Asylum." Another theorised she might actually be Morticia's sibling, whilst one person reckoned she'll prove to be a "villain of some sort". A third fan penned: "She's definitely controlling things with her music." A fourth supporter speculated: "I think that Isadora Capri might be Tyler's master all along. Thornhill was just a pawn to a bigger setup. Tyler's mom was unlocked as a Hyde through music at the opera, right? "And Isadora is a musician where she can manipulate her surroundings with music and Shockwaves. She unlocked Tyler's and let thornhill play with him and exact her revenge while she put together a bigger game." ‌ The second part of the trailer has certainly left fans on tenterhooks, with every scene being analysed as viewers try to decipher what will unfold. However, they'll have to hold their breath until 3 September. On Reddit, one fan speculated about Isadora: "Her conversation in the first episode with Wednesday, and how she spoke about Prokofiev, a famous musician who was also a chess master, indirectly hints at her planning and moving the pieces." Yet, some believe that Isadora, along with Tyler, might just be a "red herring", and the real villain is still lurking in the shadows. But fans will have to wait a few more weeks to find out.

Hollywood star Julie Delpy: ‘I made enemies by saying no to very powerful men'
Hollywood star Julie Delpy: ‘I made enemies by saying no to very powerful men'

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Hollywood star Julie Delpy: ‘I made enemies by saying no to very powerful men'

A soberly dressed British prime minister welcomes the French president on the steps of Downing Street. The leader from across the Channel puts her counterpart in the shade: she's blonde, glamorous, with intense red lipstick and elegant gold earrings. Soon, she is offering ­subtly cutting advice to her opposite number about the tense way the PM holds her face in the presence of photographers. Their relationship is already strained: in a hot-mic incident, the prime minister has described president Toussaint as a 'handmaiden to the far-Right'. These are the opening moments of Netflix's Hostage, a political thriller in which the two women become entwined in a ransom drama involving the husband of PM Abigail Dalton (Suranne Jones). The actress who plays the French president – the film star Julie Delpy – has just popped up on my Zoom call. I have to ask her, is her Toussaint – who talks of 'listening to my people' and appealing, on immigration, to a 'silent majority who value national identity' – based on Marine Le Pen? Did Delpy observe the National Rally leader while studying for the role? 'No, because I didn't want her to be that; it's a fictional piece and I think it would be weird to…' She halts. 'First of all, Marine Le Pen speaks very bad English; it would have been a very different vibe.' Put-down neatly delivered, she notes: 'She's actually probably less of a Marine Le Pen and more of a Macron that's kind of flirting with the extreme far-Right.' Indeed, the weaponised wardrobe and one-upmanship chime well with the sitting president. Yet there's little of that in the 55-year-old Delpy, whose dress code is more cool professor than power dresser. But she certainly understands Toussaint's ­hunger to hold on to her role. 'I think for some women, and I'm not even talking in politics, for some women, power is very important. Even in my business, I've seen women fight so hard to get somewhere that they can become more fierce than ­certain men, because they had to battle twice as hard.' Showbusiness is relentless, to be sure, and Delpy has been part of it since she was a teenager. Her parents were both actors, her father a theatre director, when the great French film director Jean-Luc ­Godard put her on screen at just 14, capturing her intelligent mien as 'Wise Young Girl' in his 1985 film Détective. Within two years, she was turning heads in Bertrand Tavernier's Beatrice; by her mid-20s, Delpy had starred in Krzysztof Kieslowski's revered Three Colours trilogy, and become internationally adored in the quintessential indie romance Before Sunrise (1995). She played Céline, who steps off a train to explore Vienna with a passenger she's just met, Ethan Hawke's Jesse. 'It wasn't rape, it was manipulation' Her view of the film industry at the time she joined it still shocks. 'Everyone knows, in France, there are people walking around making movies who were openly dating 13-year-olds in the 1980s,' she once stated. Today, she remembers saying it to a French newspaper, how it described a generation of creepy men twisting 1960s ideals of 'sexual liberation'. 'Oh, you know, it's 'sexual freedom', blah, blah, but I was very against it… it wasn't rape, it was manipulation.' For her, as a teenager, the manipulation came in the form of 'flirting letters, love letters. I've received a lot of those, you know. I was constantly getting [them], trying to get me to cave in, when I was 13, 14, 15'. They came from 'mostly directors, by the way, it wasn't producers so much,' she adds. But the predatory tactic was generally the same. 'It was the artist and the 'muse',' she notes, with irony. Being part of that milieu, her parents were wise to it. 'My mom was very, very determined to stop me being a victim of that system. So she taught me, really young, to protect myself. And when I got to the US, I had to navigate the same thing. And I got a few enemies by saying no to very, very, very pow­erful men. I still had a career, but I did miss a lot of opportunities because I refused to comply.' The pressures she describes are well under­stood now, in the post-­ Weinstein era. Delpy has straightforward views about those who abuse their position. On her celebrated countryman Gérard Depardieu, 76, who was convicted in May of sexually assaulting two women on a film in 2021: 'If he's [an abuser], he has to be punished for it,' she says. 'I don't excuse – he's an incredibly t­alented actor, but, you know, nothing excuses sexual abuse.' 'One of the worst feelings of my life' Delpy, meanwhile, has forged a fascinating career as a writer, director and actress, which includes a role in the so-bad-it's-good An American Werewolf in Paris. Does she regret that one? 'Well, ­listen, [some] people love that film. So it's really funny every time someone comes up to me and says, 'I love Werewolf'. Even young ­people. I'm like, 'Why did you even watch this?'' She also starred in two sequels to Richard Linklater's paean to impulsive connection – Before Sunset (2004) and Before Midnight (2013), for both of which she received Academy Award nominations as a co-writer with Linklater and Hawke. She believes she and her co-star deserved script credits for the first film, too. 'We were naive young actors,' she says. 'It was not a tweaking exercise, because I know the difference, so I'm not going to pick that film as my favourite because I don't think it's right.' Not being credited for her work, she says, was 'one of the worst feelings I've had in my life'. Fans still hanker for a fourth film, but Delpy confesses to reservations about how the story was resolved in Before Midnight, with the couple, now married parents, having a volcanic row that ends in rather implausible reconciliation. 'To this day, I don't love that ending,' she says. 'Maybe because I had nothing to do with it. That's an ego thing. But, um, I think the guys kind of did their little­ ­ending, and it didn't ­resonate for me that much.' They have talked about a fourth film, she admits. 'Richard sent us an email, possibly about my character dying of cancer. And I thought about it, and I was like, 'Really?'' She feels the characters represent the study of a relationship over decades, 'and to have her die at 50… It confused me a lot. Because I'd say women have so much to say in their 50s – I was a bit concerned that maybe Richard was not really understanding that.' Is Hollywood dying? The film industry continues to struggle post-Covid lockdowns, with audiences dropping alarmingly for everything but block­busters and low-budget horror. Is Hollywood dying? 'If films don't survive, it's a huge part of culture that's collapsing,' Delpy warns. She foresees difficult times ahead, though, with new threats emerging. 'When power becomes more overbearing and more controlling, more totalitarian, which is the era we are entering, I think art can be [seen as] a danger, can be a voice that people want to control.' Political events in the US, she explains, are 'really worrisome… We are at that place, I think, where people are concerned that democracy might be in danger, which is never a good thing, no matter what your political views are. 'Those structures are at stake right now in the US. I don't think we're there in France yet. In England, I imagine that there's still a strong democratic system, but it's being eroded.' It's clear she is not aligned with Toussaint's views. 'I believe it's easier to blame immigration than to blame a system ­falling apart by itself,' she says. It's an effective tactic, she adds. 'It worked 100 years ago. It worked 200 years ago. It's working now.' Did playing Toussaint give her a sense that she would like to influence politics more directly? 'I'm not a very greedy person,' she says, 'and I'm not ready to make compromises, so I'll never be in politics.' Hostage is on Netflix from Thursday August 21

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store