logo
‘PATHETIC' Europe may finally be waking up from its military slumber

‘PATHETIC' Europe may finally be waking up from its military slumber

CNN30-03-2025
It was a televised ambush that many in Europe hope will stop a war.
Donald Trump's dressing-down of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House was a lightning strike to the transatlantic alliance, dispelling lingering illusions in Europe about whether their American cousin will stand with them to counter Russian aggression.
Reeling, perhaps even fearful, Europe may have finally come to its senses over its self-defense needs in the era of Trump.
'It is as if Roosevelt welcomed Churchill (to the White House) and started bullying him,' European lawmaker Raphaël Glucksmann told CNN.
In a month when US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Europe 'PATHETIC' for 'free-loading' on defense in a group chat with administration officials (which inadvertently included a journalist for The Atlantic), the continent has been shattering decades-old taboos on defense. Policies are on the table that would have been unthinkable just weeks ago.
The biggest change came in Germany, Europe's biggest economy. After the federal election, chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz won a vote in parliament to scrap Germany's constitutional 'debt brake' – a mechanism to limit government borrowing.
In principle, the law change allows for unlimited spending on defense and security. Experts expect the move to unlock as much as €600 billion ($652 billion) in Germany over the next decade.
'This is a game-changer in Europe, because Germany was the laggard – especially among the big countries – when it comes to defense,' Piotr Buras, a senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, an international think tank, told CNN.
In getting over its phobia of debt, Buras said that Germany has finally acted as though Europe really had passed a 'Zeitenwende' – or 'turning point' – as described by outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz in February 2022, just three days after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Although the invasion jolted Germany, 'only the Trump shock made them take this really fundamental decision of suspending the debt brake,' said Buras.
'This is the real, proper Zeitenwende.'
In neighboring France, President Emmanuel Macron – who has long called for European 'strategic autonomy' from the US – has said he is considering extending the protection of its nuclear arsenal to its allies, already ostensibly sheltered by American bombs.
Macron's comments earlier this month came after Merz advocated for talks with France and the United Kingdom – Europe's two nuclear powers – over extending their nuclear protection. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk welcomed the idea, and even called for Poland to consider getting nuclear weapons itself.
Meanwhile, Poland and fellow Baltic states Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia – all neighbors to Russia – have pulled out of the 1997 Ottawa treaty on landmines, long considered a key milestone in the end to mass warfare. Lithuania has already announced the purchase of 85,000 landmines;, Poland is eyeing producing 1 million domestically.
Lithuania also withdrew from the international treaty against cluster munitions this month, becoming the first signatory ever to do so.
Military conscription has also made a comeback on the continent. Denmark made women eligible for obligatory conscription from 2026 and lowered health requirements for some roles, as part of a bolstering of the country's armed forces. Poland has also announced plans for every adult male to undergo military training.
Even famously neutral countries are reconsidering their positions. Amid discussions about how to keep the peace in Ukraine in the event of a settlement, the government in Ireland – a military minnow focused on peacekeeping operations – put forward legislation to allow troops to be deployed without UN approval, skirting a possible Russian (or American) veto.
It's long been the uncomfortable – and often unspoken – truth in Europe that its protection from invasion was ultimately dependent on the American cavalry riding over the horizon. That support no longer looks so sure.
The pivot goes beyond who will do the fighting to who will provide the arms. Some have begun to question future purchases of the astronomically expensive US-made F-35 jets that several European air forces had planned to acquire.
Portuguese Defense Minister Nuno Melo said his country was re-evaluating the expected purchases of the jets in preference for European alternatives over concerns of the US-controlled supply of spare parts.
It's the first time such concerns were aired publicly at such a high level, especially in favor of jets that, on paper, don't offer the same capabilities.
But, although Europe seems to have gotten the message, talk of a unified approach is premature.
When European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a plan to spend billions more on defense, called 'ReArm Europe,' Spain and Italy balked. The plan has since been renamed 'Readiness 2030.'
Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has also ruled out sending Italian troops as part of a European contingent to keep the peace in Ukraine if a negotiated settlement – another key issue on which the continent is split.
The rebranding indicates a dividing line in Europe: The further away from Russia a country is, the less likely it is to put guns before butter.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said this month that 'our threat is not Russia bringing its troops across the Pyrenees.' He called on Brussels 'to take into account that the challenges we face in the southern neighborhood are a bit different to the ones that the eastern flank faces.'
Gabrielius Landsbergis, Lithuania's former foreign minister, told CNN he was 'upset' by the Spanish statements, and that a recent trip to Kyiv – where air raid sirens blast most nights – made it all too easy to imagine similar scenes occurring in Vilnius in the future.
'The further west you go, the more difficult it is to imagine that sort of thing. All the problems, all the decisions, they're relative,' Landsbergis said.
Although this geographical split could deepen divisions, Buras, of the ECFR, said total European unity would always be 'an illusion.'
'What really matters is what the key countries do,' he said, pointing to Germany, France, the UK and Poland. 'I want to be cautiously optimistic, but I think we are on the right track now.'
Asked whether March would be remembered as the month Europe woke up, Buras said: 'Yes, we have woken up – but now we need to get dressed.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What a weaker dollar means for inflation
What a weaker dollar means for inflation

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What a weaker dollar means for inflation

The US dollar ( has fallen this year, and that can have big implications for inflation. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas talks about that connection and when the impact of tariffs may start to show in the US economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. turning out to the dollar index, it's seen many swings we know amid economic uncertainty. Joe, you highlight what the moves in the currency mean for inflation? Walk us through that. All right. When you get a sustained 10% decline in the value of the dollar, typically, you should expect to see a 1/2 of 1% increase in inflation over the next 6 to 12 months. We clearly are at that point, even though we had a nice rebound. I think it was 3.3% for the month of July, strongest month for the greenback this year, but nevertheless, the policy mix out of the administration, all points towards a weaker dollar, and I think that's what we're going to get. Moreover, when you take a look at import prices, especially import prices ex petroleum, it tells the tale. We're going to see more inflation and a weaker dollar going forward. Does Trump want a strong dollar? I would think he does, and I think, well, I think like all politicians, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't want de-dollarization, clearly, but he wants a weaker dollar because A, it really tends to juice the tech sector, and B, it will provide relief to the beleaguered manufacturing sector that's been in an effective recession for the past couple of years. Is it too soon to say the kind of impact the softer dollars had during this earnings season, particularly what it's meant for the multinationals? It's way too early to jump on that bandwagon. I think we're really going to be talking in the fourth quarter earnings, and then next year. Moreover, a lot of those firms that he wants to help are actually having real problems with the tariff issue because, you know, 45% of everything we import goes into domestic manufacturing. So policies at a cross purposes, a good portion of the time this year, which is why that economy slowed to 1.2% growth in the first half of the year, and we think it's not going to do much better. Our forecast for this year is 1.1%. Can I ask you when we talk about these tariff policies? We've been talking about them all show. There's the near to intermediate impact, but how long do we have to wait to see what the long-term impact is? Meaning, do I have to wait till does it have to be August 2026, and Joe and Josh are back on set for me to really know, okay, it's really boosted manufacturing job. It's really opened up all these new markets for American business. It's really raised this much revenue. It's a little worse, actually. So as of midnight last night, on once we get to October 5th, we're going to have an effective 18.3% tariff. The real problem is we won't really understand what any of this means, not till October 5th, 2026, but more like October 5th, 2027. Why? Why do you say that, Joe? Because it takes so long to pass through the tariff costs. You know, there are four points along the chain. You've got your retail, you've got your consumers, you've got your importers, and you've got your exporters. At each point of the supply chain, you're going to see a bit of it absorbed, a bit of it eaten. When we went through this in 2018, for example, we didn't see the full price of the increase in the price of washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers caused by tariffs show up on consumers' balance sheets until about two years later. Turned out 90% of that cost was eaten entirely by consumers. So when we talk about whether where the cost falls falls on the value chain, and there was this big debate, maybe it's really the key debate inside the Fed. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this debate about whether the the the tariff induced inflation is one time or transitory persistent. Even if it's one time, it could go on for some time. Is that part of the point? Well, that's right, and that's why they've been counseling patients because you just don't know. Right now, for all of the noise, right? The tariff rate that's showing up, which is causing revenues to rise, right? And from the Trump administration's point of view, that's an absolutely good thing. It's about 8.85%. It's not 30, it's not 50, it's not 15. But as we get into mid-October, it'll be closer to 20 is my sense because we're still not done with Mexico, and we're still not done with China, and then USMCA has to be renegotiated next year. So this is going to be a variable target. It's going to be a moving target, but nevertheless, if you cause the average price of goods imported in the United States to rise by 18.3%, that's going to be eaten. And here's why we say that. There's a lot of talk that, well, foreign exporters are just eating the price. You know, they're going to engage in invoice pricing. If that was the case, import prices would be falling significantly. They're not. They're actually rising. So that's just not happening. So that means it's not the exporter, it's going to be the importer, the retail, or the consumer. Those points on the chain where those are going to be eaten. Joe, I can honestly say that given the news flow today, you were the perfect guy to be sitting in that chair. That's very kind of you to say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much, Joe.

SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs
SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SuperMotocross, Monster Energy extend sponsorship through 2030, includes playoffs

Monster Energy has renewed its agreement with Feld Motor Sports' American Motorcycle Association (AMA) Supercross Championship for an additional five years, running through 2030. In addition, they will become the title sponsor of the entire SuperMotocross World Championship (SMX) series. According to Adam Stern, the deal is in the mid-eight-figure range in total revenue for the league during the contracted period. Beginning in 2007, Monster Energy and Supercross will have a 24-year history, making it one of the longest-running relationships in the energy drink brand's history, according to Mitch Covington, Senior Vice President of Sports Marketing at Monster Energy. The SMX League combines points from Supercross and the AMA Pro Motocross series, encompassing 28 regular-season rounds of competition. The three-round playoffs bring the total to 31 rounds. Negotiations for the extension were held between the two companies, with Feld Motor Sports VP/Global Partnerships Dave Muye leading the effort for the series. During the 2025 Supercross season, 828,796 spectators attended events, including more than 329,000 who participated in the popular pre-race FanFest activities, where companies like Monster Energy had the opportunity to engage directly with fans. Also in 2025, the Supercross series accounted for eight of the 10 most-streamed races ever on NBC Sports' streaming service, Peacock TV. More SuperMotocross News Roger De Coster retires as US MXoN managerKTM AG returns to full productionMotocross of Nations to return to U.S. in 2028, 2031Washougal 450 Results | 250 ResultsJo Shimoda earns second Motocross win of 2025 at WashougalChase Sexton beats Jett Lawrence at WashougalHaiden Deegan wins Washougal Moto 1 over Jo ShimodaChase Sexton wins Washougal Moto 1, Jett Lawrence thirdJason Anderson out for remainder of 2025 SMX season Loretta Lynn's News Lachlan Turner sweeps first two races in Women's division with Moto 2 winGordon ends Temmerman's streak with Open Pro Sport Moto 2 winThree for Temmerman, Enzo scores third win in 250 Pro Sport Moto 2Enzo Temmerman wins Open Pro Sport Moto 1 at Loretta'sWMX leader, Lachlan Turner, wins first Women's motoEnzo Temmerman Lorretta's 250 Pro Sports Moto 1Loretta's Lap-a-Thon Benefitting St. Jude returns for 2025

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary
Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

From the right: Dems' Grim Outlook for '26 'November 2026 may not go the way conventional wisdom suggests,' and Dems may lose, warns the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone. During midterm elections, 'the president's party almost always loses the House and, slightly less often, Senate seats.' But this time around, 'it looks like the Democrats' baggage, especially from the Biden years, is heavier than the loads Trump Republicans must juggle.' Black marks like 'the Russia collusion hoax, COVID-19 school closings, 'transitory' inflation, the Hunter Biden laptop, and open borders immigration' have too deeply damaged' Dems' credibility. Trump and Republicans are also becoming widely popular, with 'Republican gains' being 'widespread while Democratic gains are scarcely visible.' 'Nothing's inevitable in politics, but so far, the Democrats have not gotten up off the floor.' Mideast beat: 'Palestine' Is a Made-Up Cause Advertisement Westerners should 'understand that the George Soros-funded agents of Jew Hate and chaos' in the streets 'have zero to do with the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world,' argues Christopher Messina at Messy Times. As Dalia Ziada, an Egyptian political analyst notes, protesters claim ' 'Palestine' is the cause of all Muslims,' but there's 'no trace of anything called 'Palestine' or anything similar to it in the Quran or the Prophetic Hadiths!' Indeed, the 'Palestinian Cause' was 'invented by the Pan-Arabist communists,' who 'attached it to Islam' to 'fool ordinary Muslims' and gain 'legitimacy' to commit crimes against nations 'in the East and the West.' 'I am a Muslim,' but Palestine 'will never be my cause,' because it hinders 'peace' — 'a divine obligation of all Muslims.' Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025. REUTERS Capitol watch: Rep's War on DC Dementia Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) wants a 'way for Congress to evaluate whether some politicians are no longer fit to serve,' reports The Free Press' Gabe Kaminsky. Most Dems 'would rather talk about anything other than the Biden cover-up — and the wider problem of the gerontocracy that runs the party and Washington.' But, Gluesenkamp Perez is pushing'an amendment that would direct the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to determine House members' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' ' Some Democratic colleagues took her move 'personally,' and it 'failed in her first attempt to tuck it into a federal spending bill, with Democrats and Republicans all voting against its inclusion.' But her office is 'still exploring avenues to build a coalition.' Advertisement Liberal: Democrats' Best Way Back 'The Democratic Party faces a conundrum,' observes the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. Despite President Trump's struggles with voters on 'his overall job approval rating' and among specific issues, 'Democrats are doing even worse with Americans.' They've tumbled 'from roughly a 3-point net unfavorable rating just before [Joe] Biden was elected in 2020 to a 30-point net unfavorable rating today.' With polls showing more than half of voters believe 'Congress isn't doing enough to keep Trump in line,' a 2026 message 'arguing for divided government to stop Republican overreach' may help 'Democrats to retake the House.' Ahead of 2028, Democrats should offer 'new voices without cultural baggage' and a message of 'economic uplift for America's working- and middle-class families.' Advertisement Foreign desk: Chinese Dam's Regional Threat China has 'officially acknowledged' that it's building 'the biggest dam ever conceived,' gasps Brahma Chellaney at The Hill. The structure will 'generate nearly three times as much hydropower' as the massive Three Gorges Dam but 'portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis.' The new dam 'is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe.' Moreover, 'capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve' farmers of crucial riparian nutrients. While China's dam-building 'has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal,' this project 'raises profound questions about regional stability.' By seizing control over regional water, 'China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store