With the Commanders and Terry McLaurin far apart on an extension, a Jayden Daniels clock is ticking
For now, Daniels has Deebo Samuel — along with lurking questions about what kind of practice time he's going to need with McLaurin and Brown to be ready and in rhythm for Week 1 against the New York Giants.
His answer Sunday was as opaque as his wide receiver depth chart: 'I control what I can control.'
Barring Daniels injecting himself directly into someone else's situation — which has never been known to be his persona — the answers to Washington's remaining business with its wideouts must come from somewhere else. Where it concerns Brown, his consistent and healthy return to practice will be the only testimony that really matters.
But McLaurin and his continued hold-in over a stalemated contract extension?
Let's put it like this: Things are not hopeless. But they're definitely not good, either.
[Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season]
That was the undercurrent of the situation Sunday, with the Commanders firmly tucked into their negotiating trench on one side, and McLaurin and his agent firmly on the other. Right now, those trenches are not close. It's to the point that it's fair to consider that this standoff is capable of making it all the way to the first week of the regular season without McLaurin stepping foot onto the practice field.
That reality at some point will raise the question of whether or not Washington will entertain some kind of trade for a player who is both a captain and clearly the team's No. 1 wideout. Right now, that seems like an unlikely scenario for two reasons: First, Washington does not want to take McLaurin away from Daniels as the coaching staff and front office wants him to remain a part of the organization's fabric moving forward; and second, there aren't a wealth of teams in a hurry to pay McLaurin the extension he wants.
How far apart are the two sides? Everyone is keeping the numbers tight, but the details seep out in the contract comparables. On one side, it's the four-year, $132 million extension the Pittsburgh Steelers slotted to DK Metcalf this offseason, which included $60 million guaranteed. The other side is a little more tricky, but consider it a slightly richer version of the the four-year $92 million extension reached between Courtland Sutton and the Denver Broncos, which had $41 million in guarantees.
It's not perfect apples to apples, but it gives you an idea of the divide between McLaurin and the Commanders. The key difference in the Metcalf and Sutton deals, aside from the significant divide in guaranteed money and annual average salary ($33 million AAV vs. $23 million AAV), is the fact that Metcalf signed his at 27 years old and with a Steelers team that was extremely (maybe desperately) motivated to keep him for a long period. Conversely, the Broncos did a risk-averse deal with a soon-to-be 30-year-old Sutton, who is at the horizon of his prime years.
One guy is young and still has production-versus-age metrics on his side. The other doesn't.
With McLaurin turning 30 in less than a month, he falls into the riskier category. The Commanders know it. The rest of the league knows it. And it's evidenced by this: Of all the wide receivers in league history who have signed contracts earning more than $23 million annually, only two were 30 years old (or turning 30) in the same year they got their deals: Tyreek Hill in 2024 with the Miami Dolphins ($30 million AAV) and Davante Adams ($28 million) with the Las Vegas Raiders in 2022. Both had also been multiple time first-team All-Pros prior to that deal, too.
[Get more Commanders news: Washington team feed]
None of that is to say McLaurin isn't one of the best wideouts in the league, nor undercut the reality that he was a cornerstone of Daniels' coming-out party in 2024. But it showcases why there's a divide here. The receivers who have gotten paid Metcalf-type money in recent years have either been in the midst of their prime or 30-something unicorns who were deep into Hall of Fame-caliber careers.
If McLaurin was in either of those categories right now, the Commanders would have been inundated with trade calls about him from teams willing to pay him a Metcalf-level extension. To date, there's no evidence that has occurred. That reality has left the Commanders dug in on their side of the ledger and McLaurin into his. In between them is Daniels, who is going to need some kind of resolution with the top of his wide receiver depth chart if Washington is going to hit the ground running and compete with the Philadelphia Eagles for the NFC East crown next season.
This is where the hope comes in. If the divide is the Commanders sitting around $25 million per season and $45+ million in guaranteed money — which I believe is in the ballpark — versus the Metcalf numbers at $33 million and $60 million in guarantees, the space between them is $8 million in annual salary and $15 million in guarantees. That's really not close, but from what I understand, it's far better than the first volley of negotiations between the two sides, which was so steeply divided that it seemed there was almost no chance of an extension being reached. That means the two sides are already at least incrementally closer than where they first began … and that's some progress that can continue to a point.
But with the NFL season a month out, the next two weeks are also going to be crucial dealmaking territory. With McLaurin having missed so much time on the field, his ramp-up process if/when he returns is likely going to take a few weeks before he gets to the point of having no restrictions. Anything more aggressive risks potential injury, and the last thing the Commanders could afford in 2025 is reaching a deal with McLaurin and then having him crash out with a major injury (See: the San Francisco 49ers and Brandon Aiyuk last season).
For Daniels, it means there's a clock ticking on the Commanders' early-season chemistry. Unfortunately, it's one of the few football-related clocks that he can't control.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why sports dominate the media industry & what's next in 2026
Paramount (PARA) stock is in focus after the company announced a $7.7 billion deal with TKO Group (TKO) to secure UFC streaming rights. PwC Global entertainment and media leader Bart Spiegel sits down with Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal to discuss why live sports have been a huge focus for media companies. He also discusses what's next in entertainment, including video games and potential deals in the making. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. About a year ago after Netflix announced they were be going to be rolling out NFL games on Christmas day, I spoke with the NFL and they told me they don't want to just be on cable or just on streaming, they want to be everywhere. And it feels like that power then is firmly with these leagues. Yeah, the leagues have a lot of power at this time. They're content creators, right? And so anyone that owns content, owns IP, we always say content is king, right? And it's no different with these leagues that are creating this content and putting out there and striking really creative deals as well, um, to ensure that their property, their IP continues to be popular in perpetuity. That's a great way to think about it, right? They, that is their IP. If we look beyond sports, what's the next content category or experience that you think will create that sticky moment for consumers? Yeah, so it's interesting. 2026 should be a really big year for video games. We really believe that, um, you've got the e-sports Olympics in 2026, you have the, you know, a really prominent title expected to be released in 2026. And you know, video games just just helps the whole sector in general, right? They come up with original IP that is then marketed for, you know, TV and movies that you see being played out. You also see video games, um, utilizing a lot of their technology and infrastructure to help in in in film, special effects, TV, etc. So we see a really big year for video games in 2026 and our forecasts show that. We also see, don't sleep on live experiences either. Because I think live experiences are extremely important. Um, you'd have, you know, that's where a lot of money that's going for the 18 to 25 really sought after demographic, that's where they're spending their time and energy because it plays into the whole social media platform as well as well because now they can go do these live experiences and post it to social media for their friends, their followers, etc. And that's really attractive to them and really compelling to them. So I think live experiences are going to continue to be extremely popular. We have it, you know, the spend on live experiences still exceeds the spend on digital experiences and we expect it to continue. And to that point, live nation earnings, they've been crushing and a big part of that is people are going and traveling to see a lot of concerts. So that's a great point. When we look ahead to MNA, it was a bit stagnant in the entertainment space. We saw a bit of activity. We finally got that Paramount Skydance deal going through. What are you watching for when it comes to upcoming deals? Do you expect the end of this year and into 2026 to be a lot more active than what we've seen? I definitely do. There have been a lot of announced spins, separations, things like that. And I think when you look at the OTT streaming environment, it's really kind of happened in a bunch of different chapters. With the first chapter really being focused on, okay, we have, let's just throw money at content, throw money, get to get people and subscribers onto the platform. Then the second chapter was really, let's take a step back, focus on ROI, focus on really making sure that we've got a profitable business. And now I think you're going to look at chapter three, which is what you're seeing happening right now, real time, some of the things that you mentioned, which is, okay, what are some creative partnerships, joint ventures, MNA, where there's going to be some level of consolidation in the in the ecosystem? Because we've done studies ourselves where the average consumer doesn't want to pay for 10 subscription services. They want three to five subscription services. And so, you know, this allows them to consolidate, you know, take advantage of economies of scale, and that's what I think we're going to see in the next year. But then going out from there, I think then it's all about what other things can you bring to your platform? Video games, social media, user generated content, and that again will just apply just continue to apply that stickiness factor where people are willing to pay more and and limit the churn that you have on your on your platform. Related Videos Tech stocks dip, Fed cut bets, ethereum gaining: Market takeaways 2 reasons this strategist has a 'glass half-full' view on stocks Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac possible IPO: What it means for investors Why there's a 'disconnect' between the Fed & markets right now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Patriots sign DT Kyle Peko
The Patriots picked up a defensive lineman on Monday. The team announced the signing of defensive tackle Kyle Peko. Defensive tackle Bryce Ganious was waived in a corresponding move. Peko had two tackles in five games for the Lions last season. He started 10 of his 13 appearances for the Titans in 2023 and has appeared in 47 games over the course of his NFL career. Peko has 58 tackles, two sacks, and a forced fumble in those 47 appearances. Gainous was undrafted out of Wake Forest this year and signed with the Patriots on August 5. He played eight snaps in New England's first preseason game.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tom Aspinall on title defense pressure at UFC 321: 'That's when I've had my most devastating performances'
At UFC 321 on Oct. 25, the heavyweight division will start the Tom Aspinall era properly. Aspinall's historically long reign as a UFC interim champion came to an end in June, thanks to the retirement of the now-former heavyweight champion, Jon Jones. Therefore, Aspinall was promoted to undisputed status, which allows him to return to action after the saga stalled his career for the past 13 months. Despite Jones' departure from MMA, it wasn't long before the all-time great was enticed by the new prospect of potentially competing at next year's proposed UFC event at the White House in Washington, D.C. Jones appeared publicly at the ESPYs weeks after his announcement to share that he would be interested in fighting again, with the hope of doing so in the nation's capital. UFC CEO Dana White, however, wasn't too keen on the idea, shutting it down because of his former champion's lack of reliability. As the man tied to Jones since he claimed the interim strap in late 2023, Aspinall is done entertaining the thought of the once highly anticipated matchup. Instead, all his focus is on his next challenger, Ciryl Gane. "Oh mate, it's just boring. It's just so boring. I don't even have a comment on it," Aspinall said of Jones' recent comments during his appearance on Monday's edition of "The Ariel Helwani Show." "It's boring as hell. Don't want to talk about it. I've already got a fight, so I'm focusing on that. That's the way I micromanage things so well mentally. "For the next 10 weeks of my life, all I'm thinking about is Ciryl Gane and how to beat him. Even with his coach, what he said, I said, or didn't say, it doesn't matter. Because I'm fighting Ciryl and that's all that matters, really. No matter what anybody's said or done in the past is pretty irrelevant at this point, because we're going to fight each other, and that's all that really matters." Theoretically, a Jones return would (and arguably should) re-open the door to the Aspinall fight, assuming he remains champion by that targeted July 2026 date. The thought of the matchup aside, the current heavyweight champion — a proud Englishman — isn't even concerned about the fantasy event on White House grounds. "It has spent zero seconds in my mind. I'm not interested, mate. Not interested. The world shouldn't be interested either, because what's the point? That's false hope," Aspinall said of a Jones fight. "[The White House] doesn't not interest me, but it doesn't really interest me, to be honest. I'll fight anywhere, it doesn't really bother me. It'd be a cool experience, but I feel like the Americans should get the shot at the White House. I'm not American. [President Donald] Trump and the political stance in America doesn't really bother me at all, to be honest. So yeah, I'm not really a big Trump supporter, or I'm not against him. I don't know anything about American politics. I'm not American. I don't live there. I don't do anything apart from pay taxes and fight there. Really, all that stuff is irrelevant to me." Aspinall, 32, started to lose faith in a fight against Jones coming together before the latter officially called it a career. From there, it was onto what, or who, was next. In this case, that was a big question that was ultimately answered in the form of an old pseudo-rival in Gane. The pair had been aligned to collide in recent years, and while it never came to fruition, Aspinall remained interested in how the fight would go. At this juncture, Aspinall said, he was open to all comers once his latest negotiations unfolded. "I said, 'Who do you want me to fight?' They said Ciryl Gane, and I said, 'Sweet. I'm in,'" Aspinall said. "I'm ready to fight absolutely anybody. We asked about, basically, a few options, really. At the moment, there's Gane, [Alexander] Volkov, or [Jailton] Almeida, really. That's who was available at the time that the match was made. So I said I'll fight any one of them. "I'm not in the realm of dodging fights at all. I'm here to fight everybody and anybody, and trying my best. That's it. To do work, fight people, while I'm involved in the sport. That's what I want to do. I want to fight everybody and anybody that I possibly can." Two weeks ago, Gane's longtime coach Fernand Lopez spoke on Uncrowned's "The Ariel Helwani Show," expressing his displeasure with Aspinall's handling of the Jones saga. The coach said he believes that, given how everything has resolved and the hype surrounding Aspinall, there's now more pressure than ever on him to deliver against Gane. Aspinall doesn't necessarily agree or disagree with the notion. But one thing the champion knows for a certainty is that he thrives under said circumstances. "That's great because I fight really, really, really well under pressure," Aspinall said. "I've been around martial arts nearly my whole life at this point. There's the guys who I've trained with from my experience, who in the gym, are absolute killers, absolute world-beaters, and they'll get in a fight and they'll just freeze up and it doesn't work like it does in the gym. There's other guys, like myself, who are not that good in the gym, but get under the lights, get under the pressure, with all the chips on the table, and they get in there and do things that they would never be able to do in the gym. That is exactly what I do, and I feel like that's one of my biggest strengths. "Any time there's pressure on me, that's when I've done my most devastating performances. And if he believes that, that's a fantastic thing for me."