logo
How Low Can You Go: Even at Cannes, Longevity Means Living Lean

How Low Can You Go: Even at Cannes, Longevity Means Living Lean

Yahoo19-05-2025

📩 Industry insight, unfiltered. Subscribe and check the 'In Development' box.
✉️ Tell us what you think: dana@indiewire.com or call/text: 323-435-7690
More from IndieWire
'Eagles of the Republic' Review: Egyptian Drama Explores the Line Between Art and Propaganda
'Sesame Street' Is Coming to Netflix, Where It Will Have a Reimagined Season 56
👋 Hello! The Cannes Film Festival was a blur, the American Pavilion was packed, and IndieWire's Future of Filmmaking summit was a huge success. Today I'm flying to Paris for two well-earned days visiting my sister, but here's my take on what Cannes had to tell us about sustainable film careers. Turns out Beverly Hills' sister city had a quite a bit to say. (As always, if you've got anything to say to me reach out at the contacts above.)
Richard Linklater on the down low
Zero is a minimum guarantee
Minimalism is a superpower
Here's Richard Linklater's best advice to aspiring filmmakers: 'Keep your overhead low.'
Given our location, that might sound ridiculous. We're at the American Pavilion in Cannes and I've asked him how he might advise today's filmmakers, who operate in a world very different than the one that shaped his career.Later, at IndieWire's Future of Filmmaking summit, the director of Cannes Competition title 'Nouvelle Vague' got real about how much the industry has changed since his 'Slacker' days. 'I don't know if guilty's the word, but when I talk to young filmmakers… it was such a different time that just doesn't exist anymore.'
This was my 10th Cannes Film Festival, but my first since 2013. To the naked eye, little changed: massive Carlton Hotel billboards for the latest 'Mission: Impossible'; a stunning Emma Stone on the red carpet, even while being attacked by a bee; and guest appearances by shameless strivers. (The faux Bezos-Sanchez couple was mightily convincing until they were seated in the nosebleed section of the Palais.)
However, after talking with independent producers, filmmakers, and sales agents, it's clearly a different world. A $1 million film may make money; $3 million and up is cause for anxiety. We live in the era of the zero m.g., where theatrical distribution doesn't necessarily mean the filmmakers were paid.
Negotiations for the advance (or, the minimum guarantee) can start at zero and sometimes that's where they stay. As two producers noted, in separate conversations: 'The worst part is they expect you to be grateful.'
So how do you make it work? One unlikely role model is a filmmaker I met in Cannes, Elizabeth Blake-Thomas.
Her career doesn't look anything like Linklater's. Originally a U.K. theater director, she's made more than two dozen low-budget genre films you might find on TVODs like Amazon or Tubi, with actors like Mena Suvari or Casper Van Dien. Sometimes the cast includes her daughter and producing partner, Isabella.
Blake-Thomas' first film cost $26,000; she's had budgets up to $3 million. Whatever the number, she's never gone over. That applies to her own life as well.
She keeps overhead low — very low. Elizabeth and Isabella live in a one-bedroom apartment in the Valley and share a Fiat 500. No debt; no vacations; yes savings. 'If a job wasn't to come straight away, you can still live,' she said. 'That would be awful if I was in that situation.'Most of all, she said, this isn't temporary. Her lean and focused life leaves her the energy to focus on making movies that make money for her investors, which means she can keep making more. 'I don't put time and effort into things that don't matter,' she said. 'I have my dog and my daughter. We love our life. That lets me put my full energy into filmmaking but I have to be really intentional about it, because it takes everything.'
This won't be the first time Hollywood's compared to gambling, but: The less you spend at the casino, the longer you last. Aspiring filmmakers need a runway — the time required to meet people, make things, make mistakes. And time is money.
'Everything you do, you're taking a leap,' Linklater said at the summit. 'I tell filmmakers: If no one wants to support you, that just means you are not ready yet. People [need] to believe in you, and that's usually you believing in yourself. You can't fake that. You have to earn that through your own experience, your own confidence, your own hard work and dedication. But I think the timing works out when it's ready.'
Not every sustainable career requires sleeping on a sofa bed, but creative lives constantly face factors beyond their control. For people like Blake-Thomas, minimalism means controlling her destiny. Keep it simple, keep costs down, and keep making movies.
'It means I get to be here,' she said from our table overlooking the Mediterranean, 'and do this.'
Future of Filmmaking has partnered with Universal Studio Group for a series of virtual panels about the making of TV shows like 'Hacks,' 'Man on the Inside,' and 'The Four Seasons.' Quinta Brunson of 'Abbott Elementary' will also be joining IndieWire at Vidiots on May 20 for another installment of 'Pass the Remote.'
Check out USG University: Consider This, starting May 19.Register to attend 'Pass the Remote' at Vidiots on May 20.
5. by Charles Bastille
Pretty self-explanatory from the title and we wish it was more helpful, but this list published on Medium draws a troubling portrait of Trump's effect on American arts programming even before he started bringing up tariffs. From theaters to city parks funding, a huge bite has been taken out of cultural curation in this country and it's time we started recognizing it as an injustice in the same way this piece does.
4. by Dhar Mann
Ignoring the eye-catching lead-in, Mann's post on Linkedin this week acknowledges a very important conversation happening in many spaces around Hollywood: Is the creator economy taking over? People tend to balk at the idea of new money and that's what Mann represents with his newly formed YouTube content creation studio in Burbank, but every pipeline we now consider traditional had to start somewhere.
3. by Jon Reiss*
With his substack 8 Above, Reiss digs into the fluctuating nuances of global film distribution. For his most recent write-up, he breaks down modern strategies for getting your project seen, with emphasis on eventizing the work for theatrical, as well as building a digital following.
2. by That Final Scene
As much as we're intrigued by the creator economy and the opportunities it may bring, we still have an overall appreciation for what some may call 'traditional cinema' and trying to get others to as well is kind of our bag. This seems to be the case with Sophie from That Final Scene as well, who's framework of 'cinema as cultural gyms' might be the most genius marketing tool we've heard in a while. No surprise, considering Sophie was at one point in film marketing herself.
1. by Ted Hope*
There's a lot of meat to this breakdown from American film producer Ted Hope via his substack Hope for Film. Some of it is positive, but it mostly serves as a necessary wake-up call. The system that allowed independent filmmaking to thrive has been broken and we deserve better. In an industry that has become all about factoring risk against reward, Hope suggests it's time to be bold in new ways just for the hell of it.
*paid subscription
Best of IndieWire
Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See
'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie
The 55 Best LGBTQ Movies and TV Shows Streaming on Netflix Right Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal Face Off in Trailer for Ari Aster's 'Eddington'
Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal Face Off in Trailer for Ari Aster's 'Eddington'

Hypebeast

timean hour ago

  • Hypebeast

Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal Face Off in Trailer for Ari Aster's 'Eddington'

Summary A24debuted the official trailer forAri Aster's upcoming contemporary Western,Eddington. Set during May 2020, the film stars Joaquin Phoenix as the sheriff and Pedro Pascal as the mayor of Eddington, New Mexico. A fiery standoff between the two divides the residents of its town, causing what seems like violent encounters. Joining Phoenix and Pascal in the cast are Luke Grimes, Deirdre O'Connell, Micheal Ward, with Austin Butler and Emma Stone. The film premiered at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival and will have its second premiere in Sydney this June. Watch the trailer theaters July 18.

I'm completely hooked on this new Netflix thriller that's so intense I can't turn it off
I'm completely hooked on this new Netflix thriller that's so intense I can't turn it off

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

I'm completely hooked on this new Netflix thriller that's so intense I can't turn it off

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Gripping new thriller series The Survivors only landed on Netflix last week, but it has already secured itself a place in the streaming site's top 5 - and I can see why! The six-part series is based on the bestseller by Jane Harper, and as a fan of Jane's books, I knew this was going to be a show to look out for. However, little did I know just how hooked I would be right from the word go. Set in the fictional seaside town of Evelyn Bay in Tasmania, The Survivors follows Kieran Elliot, whose life was changed forever 15 years ago when his brother and best friend drowned while trying to rescue him from a terrible storm. While the small town was rocked by the terrible tragedy, a young woman called Gabby also went missing on the same night. However, this is a mystery that no one in the local area seems to talk about. But why? In the present day, Bronte, a woman from out of town comes to investigate what happened to Gabby on the fateful day she vanished. But, it seems someone in the town isn't happy about her digging up old secrets, and soon tragedy hits Evelyn Bay once again when Bronte also turns up dead. But who has killed her and what did she unearth that got her murdered? Amazingly, all this happens in the very first episode of the series, meaning the season kicks off with a bang, and it doesn't let up from there. Each episode is packed with twists and turns that even the most dedicated crime thriller fan won't see coming, and I can promise you this show will quickly become your next box set to binge-watch - but unlike so many others, you'll be watching this one through your fingers! All six episodes of The Survivors are available to stream worldwide on Netflix now.

What parents should consider before sharing photos of their children online
What parents should consider before sharing photos of their children online

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What parents should consider before sharing photos of their children online

While Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have previously shared official portraits of their two children, Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor, they have chosen to keep both out of the spotlight since their departure from royal duties and move to California in 2020. But, coinciding with the release of her Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, earlier this year, the Duchess of Sussex returned to social media – offering fans a snapshot of her family's new life in the Golden State. The first tidbit Meghan shared was part of a tribute to her late dog Guy, where both Archie and Lili could be seen playing with the pup, and audio of them talking could be heard alongside the backing track. Then, we later saw snippets of the children in a Reel of Meghan making biscuits with friends. She also previously shared a video on Instagram Stories, showing her and Lili wearing matching beekeeping outfits as they approached a beehive. Today, celebrating her daughter's fourth birthday, Meghan posted two black-and-white images of them both – one taken recently, the other of when she had just given birth. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (@meghan) In all of these pictures, though, she has chosen to keep her children's faces out of shot or obscured to protect their identities. Of course, Meghan and Harry have both expressed their desire for privacy over the years, instead choosing what, when and how they share information with the public (for the most part). But, they're not the only parents who choose to shield their kids' faces when sharing photos and videos online. This is becoming a particularly pertinent trend among parents since various updates to data-sharing policies and Meta's announcement that it would be using certain user images and content to help train artificial intelligence (AI) models. Even so, "sharenting" – the movement of parents sharing content of their kids online – has long been a hot topic of debate. Some argue that social media allows them to connect with other parents and similar communities, as well as give updates to family and friends. But others brandish the exercise as irresponsible and exploitative – and that's before we even get to kids having access to their own social media accounts and how to navigate that. So, here's what you need to know. First things first, it's important to understand what tech companies can do with images and information. Dr Jason Nurse, a reader of cyber security at the University of Kent, tells Yahoo UK that, depending on the social media platform, there is a risk that images can be shared and used in different ways. He explains: "Companies don't usually 'own' the pictures uploaded to them. Rather, by uploading photos, we are typically agreeing to grant the platform a licence to use our content. This could include obvious actions, such as displaying content on one's profile page, but it may also allow them to use a person's content for other purposes. "This doesn't necessarily mean that photos will appear in other places online (e.g. in advertisements), but it is wise to always read the terms of service before using social media sites," he adds. Developer OpenAI, for example, has previously confirmed that it uses copyrighted material and data from the internet in order to train its chatbot, ChatGPT. Snapchat has also said that by using its AI-generated selfie feature, users' images may be used in ads and sponsored content. Dr Nurse says that while some platforms may have different rules, generally speaking, private settings are more of a safeguard when it comes to protecting your content, particularly if you're worried about sharing pictures of your children. "For some, private accounts primarily control which other individuals on (or off) the platform can view posts or photos. This therefore may not naturally translate to greater restrictions on social media platforms," he explains. "For others, setting photos or posts to private may afford users a higher level of privacy even in terms of their use by the platform itself; this has been discussed especially around private posts, with some platforms like X confirming that such posts are not used to train AI." Additional online safety threats, according to Dr Nurse, include photo misuse and exploitation and privacy violation. "Sharing photos of children exposes them to this long before they are even able to curate their own digital presence," he adds. "Shielding their faces, as Meghan has done, can be a good way to protect their identities, as our faces are our most distinguishing features." Jenny Warwick, a BACP-accredited counsellor who specialises in providing support for parents and carers of adolescents and teenagers, stresses: "Once images are online and 'out there' – they are 'out there'. They become widely accessible and can be downloaded, altered, shared and circulated without your consent. Even the most innocent photos can be exploited and misused by people whose intention is not innocent. It's a horrible thought, but unfortunately, it's a reality that highlights the potential for harm." She adds: "Additionally, due to the long-lasting and often permanent imprint of digital footprints, your children are inheriting an online presence that they have not or could not have chosen, which can impact their futures. It also opens up the risk of identity theft as personal information, such as full names, locations, or school uniforms, for example, can be used fraudulently." While Warwick understands the motivation behind posting can range from pride and love to a desire to feel less lonely, she says it's important to assess what can happen beyond the immediate post. She says: "Sharing our children's milestones helps boost a sense of connection and community, so we feel supported and less alone. We want to keep memories of our kids' childhood, and social media platforms make it easy to create a digital scrapbook or diary. Plus, likes, comments and engagement can give a sense of validation and social approval, which feels rewarding. "But when sharing about your child online, consider their future feelings by asking yourself if you would want this information or content shared about you. Avoid posting personal details like full names, school names, locations or dates of birth." "Ask yourself if the content could be misinterpreted or misused, particularly in the case of photos taken at bath time, the beach or during emotionally vulnerable moments," Warwick continues. "While sharing humorous or cute content might feel fun, ask yourself if this is respecting your child's dignity. Is this something they might feel embarrassed or ashamed of if they were aware of it? Ask your child how they feel about a photo being shared. Even very young children can express their consent or dissent." Warwick warns that, while sharing pictures can build a sense of family connection and pride if done mindfully, children may also feel pressure to "perform" for the camera rather than just being themselves. "They may feel embarrassed or ashamed – particularly if their private or vulnerable moments are made public," she says. "If they're feeling overly scrutinised or 'known' online, this can impact their mental health, and they may develop anxiety or challenges with their identity." She adds: "If your children discover that things were shared without their knowledge, they might feel betrayed, undermining their trust in caregivers to prioritise their well-being. Plus, when their boundaries and consent aren't considered, they will struggle with boundaries and distinguishing between public and private in their own lives." Finally, Dr Nurse advises: "I would always suggest parents consider the implications of sharing such photos, and weigh them up against the risks. If sharing is deemed appropriate, it's really important for parents to limit what's included in the photos of children and who can access them. "Ideally, I suggest always limiting viewing to a small circle of family members or friends, and asking them never to re-share photos without your consent." Read more about parenting: How a social media curfew could impact your children (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read) 5 ways to support your child's talent as Beyoncé's daughter Blue Ivy returns to the stage (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read) Why sleepovers have become a new nightmare for parents (Yahoo Life UK, 12-min read)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store