
In Seremban, company director claims trial to allegedly using fake Sirim stickers on 80 retreaded tyres
Cerico Retread Sdn Bhd, represented by its director, Khoo Chai Kee, 65, (he), as the Person Under Summons (OKS), pleaded not guilty to the charge read before Judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam.
According to the charge, Khoo, as the director, and Cerico Retread Sdn Bhd, were accused of making false representations by using Sirim MS 224:2005 logo stickers on 80 units of retreaded tyres of various brands and sizes for supply without Sirim's approval.
The offence was allegedly committed at the company's premises in Taman Perindustrian Bukit Palong Lukut, Pekan Lukut, Port Dickson, at 4pm on February 13.
The charge against Khoo was filed under Section 21 (b) of the Trade Descriptions Act 2011, which provides for a maximum fine of RM200,000 or imprisonment not exceeding three years or both, while for a second or subsequent offence, a maximum fine of RM500,000 or five years imprisonment or both, can be imposed, if convicted.
The company was charged under Section 21 (a) of the same act, which provides for a fine not exceeding RM500,000 and for a second and subsequent offence, a maximum fine of RM1 million.
The prosecution was handled by Deputy Public Prosecutor from the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living, Muhammad Hakiim Izani, while the accused was represented by lawyers Raswanti Nagaindren and Suwaathee Nakkeeran.
Earlier, Muhammad Hakiim requested that Khoo be granted bail of RM20,000, with an additional condition that his passport be surrendered to the court until the trial concludes, while Raswanti requested that the bail amount be reduced due to the accused's age.
The court then set bail at RM8,000 with one surety and ordered the passport of the accused be surrendered to the court. The court also set August 28 as the date for mention and submission of documents. — Bernama
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
11 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Reward whistleblowers to combat ‘counter setting' and border corruption, says Deputy Speaker
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 4 — Dewan Rakyat Deputy Speaker Datuk Ramli Mohd Nor has proposed that the government offer covert incentives to civil servants who expose internal misconduct at immigration entry points, including practices such as 'counter setting,' to curb corruption at the country's borders. Ramli suggested that whistleblowers with inside information on manipulation or abuse of power should be rewarded under administrative rules or legal provisions. 'Why not consider giving rewards, like giving them a thousand ringgit or two thousand covertly? This is done in criminal investigations. It could work in this case too,' he said in the Dewan Rakyat today. He said only those directly involved or close to such misconduct would have access to such information. 'Nothing is ever exposed unless the information comes from those directly involved or their close associates,' he said. 'This isn't about betraying friends, it's about protecting the country and the people,' he added. During the same session, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said the government is ramping up efforts to stamp out border manipulation tactics such as counter setting, flying passports, phantom travellers and U-turns, describing them as acts that severely damage the credibility of Malaysia's immigration and border control agencies. He said measures being implemented include digitalisation, the use of body-worn cameras, advanced passenger screening systems, and integrity awareness programmes. Saifuddin said 635 autogates will be installed at 123 national entry points under the Entry/Exit Gateway Processing System (EGPS), including at KLIA Terminals 1 and 2, the Sultan Abu Bakar Complex, the Sultan Iskandar Building, and airports in Kuching, Kota Kinabalu and Penang. The rollout is expected to be completed by March 2028. 'These autogates will reduce direct officer interaction, as screenings will rely on biometric data, facial recognition and iris scans,' he said. Saifuddin also said immigration officers at major entry points, particularly KLIA, are currently undergoing a proof-of-concept phase for body-worn cameras. The ministry plans to deploy 614 units by September to enhance transparency and prevent misconduct. He added that Malaysia will soon implement an Advanced Passenger Screening System and an Advanced Passenger Information (API) system in partnership with the Royal Malaysia Police, Malaysia Airports Berhad and the Aviation Security Force. The API pilot will begin with 10 of the 56 airlines operating in Malaysia by the end of this year, allowing authorities to access detailed passenger data before arrival and strengthen pre-emptive screening efforts. According to Saifuddin, 26 officers were dismissed in 2024 and eight in 2023 under Section 37 of the public service regulations, all involving serious misconduct. Separately, 50 other cases involving phantom manipulation were referred to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), with two individuals already charged in court. He reiterated the government's zero-tolerance policy in addressing such abuses.


Free Malaysia Today
15 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ramasamy awarded RM150,000 in damages over bribery allegation
Former Penang deputy chief minister P Ramasamy had sued two men who claimed that he had taken no action over bribery in state housing applications. GEORGE TOWN : Former Penang deputy chief minister P Ramasamy has been awarded RM150,000 in defamation damages over a video clip in which two men accused him of ignoring a housing scandal. Judge Norsalha Hamzah ruled that Ramasamy had successfully proven his case against K Elemperu Valuthi and activist Sophian Zain on a balance of probabilities. Norsalha allowed Ramasamy's claims for RM150,000 in damages, and ordered both defendants to make a written apology. They were also barred from repeating their allegations. The case stemmed from a video clip in which the two men linked Ramasamy to an alleged bribery scandal involving state housing applications. They claimed Ramasamy took no action despite being informed of wrongdoing. In the video, Elemperu said 'I already showed Ramasamy and brought the victim to meet him, but still no action was taken' while Sophian added 'an investigation must be carried out on P Ramasamy.' Ramasamy argued that these remarks implied he had wilfully ignored complaints or was complicit in corrupt acts, thereby defaming his integrity and conduct in public office. Defence lawyer N Ahilan said his clients' intentions were to raise public awareness about bribery in housing programmes, and not to accuse anyone directly of corruption. Elemperu had earlier told the court that he was merely raising awareness so that no potential house buyers would pay bribes. However, the judge ruled that the defendants' words clearly referred to Ramasamy, and their open speech in public meant the statements were bound to spread. After the hearing, Ramasamy said he felt vindicated.


Free Malaysia Today
15 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Supermax co-founder to oppose husband Stanley Thai's media blackout bid
Tan Bee Geok is suing Stanley Thai over statements he made three years ago which she claims were calculated to shame her as a mother, relative and business leader. PETALING JAYA : The estranged wife of Supermax founder Stanley Thai is opposing his application to bar the media and public from their high-stakes defamation suit. Tan Bee Geok, co-founder of the glovemaking giant, will contend at the hearing that Thai has no grounds to oppose a public hearing since he claims his impugned statements are true. Tan also claims that Thai's statements were circulated beyond their household. For that reason, she says, it would be fundamentally unjust to shut the courtroom doors in a lawsuit brought to seek redress for harm allegedly suffered in the public domain. Tan will argue that an open trial is a fundamental principle of Malaysia's legal system and that any discomfort felt is normal to all litigants. She is also expected to take issue with the late filing of Thai's application, saying it disrupted the trial which had been scheduled to start last month. On Wednesday, Tan filed an affidavit setting out her reasons for opposing the application. Thai has until Aug 6 to file his reply. Judicial Commissioner Eddie Yeo will hear the application on Sept 19. Tan is suing Thai over a series of text messages and verbal remarks allegedly made to family and friends three years ago—statements, she claims, were calculated to shame her as a mother, relative and business leader. With the trial set to begin on July 23, Thai made an eleventh-hour application for a sweeping gag order to limit any potential harm to his personal and professional reputation. He said he was also looking to shield several high-profile witnesses he intended to call to testify on his behalf. In his application, Thai asked for the court to hold the trial behind closed doors, seal all court documents, and impose a media blackout of the proceedings. He said the trial touches on matters that are confidential and private, and that they only involve familial matters that do not warrant public interest. Thai, 65, is also understood to be calling several well-known individuals to testify, including a former national badminton player, a distinguished businessman and the manager of a renowned international artiste. The tycoon did not name them but said one witness was about to get married and would not want past romantic relationships brought out into the open. Thai also seeks other protective measures, including an order that all court transcripts remain confidential and be made available only to the parties and their lawyers. He also wants all transcribers to sign non-disclosure agreements. Tan, 64, is represented in the suit by S Ravenesan, while Shearn Delamore & Co acts for Thai. Thai and Tan jointly own Supermax Holdings Sdn Bhd, a substantial shareholder in Supermax Corporation Berhad, one of the world's leading producers of rubber gloves. They were married in 1987, but saw their relationship deteriorate amid allegations from both sides. In 2022, Tan sought a judicial separation. Thai filed for divorce in April last year. Those proceedings are ongoing in the family court.