Trump threatens extra 10% tariffs on BRICS as leaders meet in Brazil
With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of the U.S. president, the BRICS is presenting itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars.
In a joint statement from the opening of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro released on Sunday afternoon, the group warned the rise in tariffs threatened global trade, continuing its veiled criticism of Trump's tariff policies.
Hours later, Trump warned he would punish countries seeking to join with the grouping.
'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
Trump did not clarify or expand on the 'Anti-American policies' reference in his post.
Trump's administration is seeking to finalize dozens of trade deals with a wide range of countries before his July 9 deadline for the imposition of significant 'retaliatory tariffs'.
The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates as members.
Saudi Arabia has held off formally joining, according to sources, while another 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the BRICS, either as full members or partners.
Indonesia's senior economic minister, Airlangga Hartarto, is in Brazil for the BRICS summit and is scheduled to go to the U.S. on Monday to oversee tariff talks, an official told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In opening remarks to the summit earlier, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted joining either side of a polarized global order.
'BRICS is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.'
BRICS nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40% of its economic output, Lula noted in remarks on Saturday to business leaders, warning of rising protectionism.
Growing clout, complexity
Expansion of the bloc has added diplomatic weight to the gathering, which aspires to speak for developing nations across the Global South, strengthening calls for reforming global institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund.
'If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to BRICS to help bring it up to date,' Lula said in his remarks, which highlighted the failure of U.S.-led wars in the Middle East.
Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his premier in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to his war in Ukraine.
Still, several heads of state were gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous BRICS group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies.
In the joint statement, the leaders called attacks against Iran's 'civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities' a 'violation of international law.'
BRICS finance ministers make unified proposal for IMF reforms
The group expressed 'grave concern' for the Palestinian people over Israeli attacks on Gaza, and condemned what the joint statement called a 'terrorist attack' in India-administered Kashmir.
The group voiced its support for Ethiopia and Iran to join the World Trade Organization, while calling to urgently restore its ability to resolve trade disputes.
The leaders' joint statement backed plans to pilot a BRICS Multilateral Guarantees initiative within the group's New Development Bank to lower financing costs and boost investment in member states, as first reported by Reuters last week.
In a separate statement following a discussion of artificial intelligence, the leaders called for protections against unauthorized use of AI to avoid excessive data collection and allow mechanisms for fair payment.
Brazil, which also hosts the United Nations climate summit in November, has seized on both gatherings to highlight how seriously developing nations are tackling climate change, while Trump has slammed the brakes on U.S. climate initiatives.
China and the UAE signaled in meetings with Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad in Rio that they plan to invest in a proposed Tropical Forests Forever Facility, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions about funding conservation of endangered forests around the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Indo-Pak stand-off
India's Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar on the occasion of QUAD meeting held in Washington DC the other day again challenged President Donald Trump's claim of brokering ceasefire between Pakistan and India after the May 7-10 military conflict between them. In an interview with Newsweek, Jaishankar said, "I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice-President JD Vance spoke to Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi on the night of May 9. There was no linking of trade and ceasefire." Two months after the four-day war, India is still in a denial mode, as Jaishankar went on to say that "later that day, Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart to request a ceasefire", and that was how the standoff was managed. Trump has, however, repeatedly taken credit for the ceasefire and offered mediation on the Kashmir conflict. Pakistan, endorsing the American president's stance on ceasefire, has welcomed his offer to mediate on the Kashmir conflict despite the fact that since the singing of Shimla pact of July 1972, New Delhi has been against any external role over its unresolved issues with Islamabad. For how long will the Indo-Pak standoff continue and will New Delhi assert its position in the White House and Capitol Hill? Will the once influential Indian lobby in Washington DC re-establish its clout in the American policymaking circles? Or the Modi regime needs to transform its approach on terrorism and instead of blaming Pakistan without any evidence pursue a policy on pragmatic lines? As long as Modi and Trump differ on their stance on the ceasefire and mediation, there is a marginal likelihood of a patch-up between the two. It also means the US will continue to equate India with Pakistan. New Delhi believes that in view of the power asymmetry between India and Pakistan, America should not consider the two countries equal and should give it more weightage. When the US gives special treatment to Pakistan, hurting India's pride and ego, it means the failure of Indian diplomacy. Indian media was critical of the US when President Trump invited Prime Minister Modi to the White House after the G-7 summit in Canada at a time when he had also invited Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir. Considering it a clever move on the part of Trump to arrange a meeting between the two powerful men in the White House, Modi politely refused the invitation. Calling himself a 'man of peace', Trump seeks to arrange a meeting between the leaders of the two hostile countries as part of a strategy to strengthen his claim to earn the Nobel peace prize. But Trump's hopes were dashed when India openly contradicted his claim of brokering ceasefire, thereby averting a nuclear showdown in South Asia. Trump had initially ruled out any US role in defusing the Indo-Pak tension, but later in a tweet took the credit for arranging ceasefire - something the reflects a U-turn in his approach. Also, in the case of the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last month, Trump initially made it clear that America was not behind the Israeli attack on Iran. But later on, he took credit for the ceasefire between the two warring countries. Iran firmly rejected Trump's claim that the US attack obliterated its nuclear installations. Nevertheless, Trump tried to give the impression that it was he who stopped the war between the two adversaries. In reality, he failed to end the Russo-Ukrainian war and the war in Gaza contrary to the promises he made during his election campaign. The de-escalation in the May 7-10 Indo-Pak conflict needs to be examined from three angles. First, both India and Pakistan knew that further escalation of the conflict would have lethal consequences. As a result, the DGMOs of the two countries agreed to a ceasefire which was done via the hotline established several decades ago between New Delhi and Islamabad as an essential military CBM. It means India preferred having a direct contact with Pakistan instead of relying on President Trump's ceasefire efforts. How far Pakistan will subscribe to the Indian stance of a direct contact to deescalate the conflict remains to be seen. When the Indo-Pak border tension was at its peak following the attack on the Indian parliament on December 13, 2001 and around half a million troops from both sides were in an eyeball to eyeball confrontation, it was the direct communication between Islamabad and New Delhi which helped defuse the tension leading to the withdrawal of the forces from the border. But, one needs to bear in mind that during those days, Atal Behari Vajpayee was the Indian prime minister who acted as a statesman and his pragmatic approach was reciprocated by President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan. Ironically, today India is led by Modi who has acute dislike for Pakistan which provide space to extremist elements in New Delhi. Second, Prime Minister Modi is repeatedly saying that Operation Sindoor is not yet over and Pakistan will be taught a lesson if there is another alleged act of terrorism, but the momentum which existed after the May 7-10 conflict is over and the world is not going to intervene again in case of another Indian adventure against Pakistan. Modi is trying to keep the momentum going and the assertion of Rajnath Singh, the Indian defense minister, to use Indian navy to cut off Pakistan's supply chain from the port of Karachi is tantamount to a stern warning to Islamabad. Pakistan has been constantly offering India dialogue to sort out issues instead of pursuing a jingoistic approach. Indian opposition parties, including Congress, are also highly critical of the Modi regime for its mishandling of the crisis with Pakistan. Poor performance of Indian air force and India's failure to teach Pakistan a lesson following the Pahalgam attack expose New Delhi's capability to launch another adventure against its western neighbour. Third, defusing any future standoff between India and Pakistan would require professional handling of things with better lines of communication. The two neighbours should bear in mind that a slight miscalculation can lead to dangerous consequences.
Business Recorder
36 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Tariff worries, Trump's BRICS swipe spark worst rupee fall in three weeks
MUMBAI: The Indian rupee slumped on Monday as uncertainty about U.S. tariff policies resurfaced with President Donald Trump's threat of a fresh 10% levy on BRICS countries compounding pressure on the local currency alongside peers like South African rand and Chinese yuan. Worries over U.S. trade policies dented risk sentiment across the board, pushing Asian currencies and equities into the red while U.S. equity futures pointed to a weak return from the long weekend. The rupee had declined to a low of 86.0275 per U.S. dollar during the session but pared losses to close at 85.85 per U.S. dollar, down 0.5% on the day, its worst performance since mid-June, when it traded in the shadow of a military conflict between Israel and Iran. In a social media post, President Donald Trump said the U.S. would start delivering tariff letters from 12:00 pm ET (1600 GMT) on Monday. In a separate post, he rolled out a wholly new tariff policy, calling for countries 'aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies' of the BRICS developing nations to be charged an extra 10% tariff, with no exceptions to be granted. Indian rupee ends nearly flat following choppy trading; forward premiums dip It was not immediately clear if Trump's tariff threat would derail trade talks with India and other BRICS nations. The South African rand fell 1% after Trump's threat while the offshore Chinese yuan was down 0.2%. The absence of progress on trade negotiations over the weekend has come as a negative surprise for markets with Trump's BRICS remark especially hurting the rupee, said Dilip Parmar, a foreign exchange research analyst at HDFC Securities. Parmar expects the Reserve Bank of India to step in to support the rupee if volatility remains elevated due to uncertainty on U.S. trade policies. On the day, traders also pointed to strong dollar demand from a large local private bank which pressured the local currency. A fall below the 85.80 level triggered stop-losses and accentuated the day's move, a trader at a state-run bank said. He expects the currency to weaken to 86.50 in the near-term in the absence of positive developments on the trade front.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Indian benchmarks end flat as consumer stocks offset broader losses amid tariff uncertainty
Indian equity benchmarks ended little changed on Monday as gains in consumer stocks, led by Godrej Consumer, helped offset broader losses, while investors remained cautious amid growing uncertainty over U.S. trade policy. The Nifty 50 closed largely flat at 25,461.3 and the BSE Sensex rose 0.01% to 83,442.5. The more domestically focused small-cap and mid-cap indexes declined 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively. Nine of the 13 major sectoral indexes ended lower. Consumer stocks, however, drove sectoral gains, rising 1.7%, led by a 6.4% surge in Godrej Consumer Products after the company projected double-digit revenue growth for the June quarter. Analysts also attributed the rise in the consumer index to growing expectations of rural demand recovery and stable monsoon rains. Indian benchmarks log weekly losses on caution over trade deal, Jane Street ban Hindustan Unilever rose 3%, while ITC and Nestle added 1% and 1.2%, respectively. Reliance, the third-heaviest stock on the Nifty, advanced about 1%, helping prop up the benchmark. In tariff-related news, President Donald Trump said trade deals with several countries are near finalisation and that tariff notifications would be sent by July 9, with new rates effective August 1. Trump also warned that countries 'aligning with the anti-American policies' of the BRICS bloc would face an additional 10% tariff - with no exceptions. India is part of the group. 'Trade policy uncertainty has become a dominant risk for Indian equities,' said Alekh Yadav, head of investment products at Sanctum Wealth. 'With valuations running hot, the market's on a tightrope-any earnings stumble this quarter could shake sentiment,' Yadav said. The Nifty and Sensex are about 3% below record highs hit on September 27, 2024. Among stocks, Indus Towers dropped 3.9% after a Macquarie downgrade, citing slower growth ahead. Eureka Forbes rose 2.4% after partnering with Dixon Technologies to produce robotic vacuum cleaners.
