India should negotiate trade agreement with US on its own term: EAC-PM chief
Dev expressed hope that India will have an advantage over other countries on tariffs once the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are signed, and it would boost exports.
"The overall approach of India is negotiating trade agreements with countries on its own terms and keeping in view the national interests. The negotiations are going on and the ultimate decision depends on the mutual interests of both countries," he told PTI.
US President Donald Trump has said the proposed trade deal with India would be on the lines of what America has finalised with Indonesia on Tuesday.
Under the US-Indonesia trade pact, the Southeast Asian nation will provide complete access to its market to US products, while Indonesian goods would attract a 19 per cent duty in America.
In addition, Indonesia has committed to purchasing USD 15 billion in US energy, USD 4.5 billion in American Agricultural Products, and 50 Boeing jets.
The Indian team is in Washington for the fifth round of negotiations for the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).
India has hardened its position on the US demand for duty concessions on agri and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector.
India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (26 per cent). It is also seeking the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent) and the auto (25 per cent) sectors. Against these, India has reserved its right under the WTO (World Trade Organisation) norms to impose retaliatory duties.
Asked should India has a slightly higher inflation target rate for a growth economy, Dev said, "There is no need to increase inflation target when the present framework is doing well on both inflation and growth objectives."
He noted that there are some suggestions that RBI should use core inflation, excluding food for inflation targeting (IT).
"We will have better inflation data from CPI after the revision of base year to 2024," the EAC-PM Chairman said.
Dev said the experience of (IT) in the last 10 years shows that Inflation stayed within the band of 2 per cent-6 per cent with some exceptions and inflation declined significantly under IT framework.
"It may be noted that higher inflation hurts the poor and middle class mostly. Low inflation is also important for sustainable growth," he said.
Since 2016, India has adopted a flexible inflation targeting (IT) framework where the RBI aims to maintain a specific inflation rate, currently 4 per cent, with a tolerance band of /- 2 per cent (i.e., between 2 per cent and 6 per cent).
Similarly, Dev said the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) targets should be continued for sound fiscal management.
"It may be noted that a higher fiscal deficit will increase inflation and hurt growth," he said, adding that Interest payments will be higher and lower funds will be left for development expenditure.
While noting that the government has done well to reduce fiscal deficit from 9.2 per cent in FY21 to 4.8 per cent in FY25 and budgeted 4.4 per cent in FY26, he said the government has been sticking to its fiscal consolidation roadmap despite competing demands for expenditures.
On Production Linked Incentive (PLI), he said one should not look at only the direct effect of PLI-linked sectors, as there is significant interlinkage between PLI and non-PLI sectors.
"PLI incentives, along with FTAs with other countries, should attract FDI and enhance exports," Dev said.
He pointed out that studies indicate that the share of Direct Value Addition (DVA) declined for electronics while the share of indirect DVA increased, suggesting linkages with upstream industries.
"Government is working on increasing gross value added, reducing import content and increasing employment for PLI sectors by encouraging local manufacturing capability," Dev said.
The government launched the PLI scheme for 14 sectors to incentivise domestic manufacturing, increase production, create new jobs and boost exports.
The thrust of PLI is to make domestic manufacturing globally competitive and reduce imports by increasing domestic value addition.
The PLI scheme adopts a sector-specific approach, avoiding a "one size fits all" methodology.
In the electronics sector, PLI aims to scale up assembly processes to encourage the existing domestic manufacturing ecosystem. India is one of the biggest assemblers and exporters of mobile handsets.
In FY15, mobile phone imports accounted for 78 per cent of the market in value terms, whereas by FY23 this figure had dropped to just 4 per cent.
"A similar story can be heard for exports. The electronics and renewable energy sectors have attracted higher FDI inflows," Dev said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Japan's US dilemma
Written by Vanshika Saraf In the space of a few weeks, Japan has found itself at the centre of a geopolitical storm. On the one hand is a jarring economic fallout with its most important ally, the United States, and on the other, a major recalibration of its defence orientation. Japan plans to deploy long-range missiles on its southwestern islands by 2026, a historic departure from its post-war pacifist posture. Simultaneously, the reimposition of tariffs on Japanese automobile and steel exports by the Trump administration has raised profound concerns in Tokyo about the stability and reciprocity of its alliance with Washington. This unfolding tension illustrates a paradox. Japan is rearming to secure American support while facing an economic squeeze from that very ally. For India, this emerging contradiction presents a critical moment of opportunity and responsibility. The opportunity lies in Tokyo's growing willingness to diversify its strategic and economic relationships. The responsibility stems from the fact that the health of the US-Japan relationship is integral for the Quad to succeed. In 2024, Japan unveiled its largest defence budget, as part of a broader plan to double spending by 2027. It now plans to deploy long-range cruise missiles, capable of striking military bases in China or North Korea, to strengthen deterrence capabilities amid rising tensions in the East China Sea. Late last month, it also carried out its first-ever missile test on domestic soil at the Shizunai Anti-Air Firing Range. But such assertiveness comes with challenges. Domestically, Japan's pacifist constitution and fiscal constraints limit the extent of militarisation. Public opinion remains cautious, and defence spending, even under current commitments, barely crosses 2 per cent of GDP. More importantly, Japan's defence upgrades are premised on continued US military backing, including interoperability, intelligence sharing, and nuclear deterrence cover. However, the reliability of that cover is now in question. The second Trump administration's protectionist outlook has resurfaced longstanding doubts in Tokyo about the durability of the alliance. As the US demands more from its allies while offering diminishing assurances, Japan's dependency on a single power is beginning to look untenable. The imposition of tariffs on Japanese automobiles and steel products by Washington has reopened old wounds. These sectors are core to Japan's export economy and national innovation ecosystem. It signals that security alliances no longer guarantee economic goodwill. Moreover, Japan's vulnerability to trade coercion is not limited to the US. China's increasing use of informal embargoes, on semiconductors, rare earths, and tourism, means that Tokyo now finds itself squeezed between its top two trading partners, neither of whom are fully reliable. This economic dilemma has spurred internal calls, particularly from opposition parties, for Japan to diversify its trade architecture and reduce reliance on the US market. In this recalibration, India features as a natural partner. First, defence and technology cooperation between India and Japan should move beyond joint exercises like JIMEX and Malabar to co-production and co-development. Joint R&D in unmanned systems, electronic warfare, and hypersonic are areas where both countries lag compared to China and the US. A co-production deal on missile components and air defence systems will also reduce reliance on Western original equipment manufacturers. Second, economic collaboration must be re-energised. The India-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), which came into effect in 2011, has not undergone a formal revision despite several rounds of discussion and joint reviews. India should accelerate the upgradation of the CEPA to include new elements like digital trade, e-commerce, fintech and mutual recognition of standards. Finally, New Delhi and Tokyo must ensure that their newly institutionalised economic security dialogue continues to be a regular annual affair. Focusing on the weaponisation of trade, supply chain resilience, and financial sanctions, the first round of the India-Japan Dialogue on Economic Security, Strategic Trade and Technology took place in November 2024. As both countries face the ripple effects of the US-China rivalry, they need coordinated strategies to defend their economic sovereignty. Prime Minister Ishiba is under pressure to deliver a precarious US–Japan trade deal by August 1 or face 25 per cent U.S. tariffs. Before that, on July 20, Japan will head to the polls for a crucial Upper House election. The ruling LDP–Komeito coalition currently commands the upper house, but polls suggest they could lose their majority. 124 of 248 seats are at stake, with the coalition needing to secure 50 seats to maintain its majority. Recent NHK surveys show the LDP's support is at 24 per cent, its lowest since 2012, while populist parties like Sanseito are gaining ground. Although losing the upper house would not mean an immediate change in government, it could mean crippled governance, creating the prospect of legislative deadlocks. Tokyo is clearly entering a new phase of geopolitical agency. It is no longer shielded from the turbulence shaping global politics. The country is being pushed slowly from the comfort zone of technocratic governance and soft balancing into a harsher landscape. For decades, Japan has served as a quiet anchor of regional order, but that paradigm is increasingly under strain. A deeper, more symmetrical India-Japan partnership could serve as a stabilising force in the Indo-Pacific. The writer is a Research Analyst for the Indo-Pacific Studies Program at the Takshashila Institution
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India needs to be careful, clever while negotiating trade pact with US: Raghuram Rajan
India needs to be 'very careful and clever' while negotiating trade agreements with the U.S., especially with regard to the agriculture sector, which is heavily subsidised by developed countries, former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan said on Friday (July 18, 2025). In an interview with PTI Videos, Mr. Rajan said India's economic growth has sort of settled in the range of 6-7%, and a fraction of percentage point may be affected by the global trade uncertainties. "I think where it is much more sort of difficult (trade negotiations) is in areas such as agriculture, where every country subsidises its producers, and our producers may be relatively smaller, may have somewhat lower flow of agricultural products into the country may create problems for them," he said. Earlier this week, the Indian team was in Washington for the fifth round of negotiations for the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). "For example, can we encourage more foreign direct investments from those countries (developed countries) to enhance the value added in some of those sectors, the milk for example, sort of improving the value added in our milk products, milk powder, cheese, etc, could be beneficial to our milk producers," the eminent economist noted. U.S. President Donald Trump has said that the proposed trade deal with India would be on the lines of what America has finalised with Indonesia. Giving access in the agriculture sector is proving to be a political issue for the government. "Are there things we can do, rather than necessarily saying we welcome sort of more milk into the country from other countries. "So all this requires very careful, clever negotiation, and I hope that is what our government officials are engaged in," Mr. Rajan, currently a professor of finance at Chicago Booth, said. India has hardened its position on the U.S. demand for duty concessions on agricultural and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector. Noting that the trade tensions are negative for both in terms of exports as well as investment, Rajan said, "But you must remember that there are opportunities also in what is happening to the extent that India is perceived as an alternative route to some of the other regions like the United States." According to him, if the tariffs imposed by the US on China and some other parts of Asia are much higher than tariffs on India, there may be an opportunity for some manufacturing to flow to India. While pointing out that Indian exports in manufacturing to the United States are not that big, he said any kind of tariffs (on India) will have some modest dampening effect, but not a lot. Mr. Rajan said that India's economic growth has sort of settled at a 6-7 per cent range, a fraction of percentage point maybe affected by the global sort of tariff environment. "But in the longer term, this would spell opportunity for India," he added. Trump announced heavy tariffs on a number of countries, including India, on April 2. However, it was soon postponed for 90 days until July 9 and later to August 1. India is seeking the removal of an additional tariff (26%). It is also seeking the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50%) and auto (25%) sectors. As far as tariffs go, Mr. Rajan said he thinks there are certain areas where India has become more protectionist, and added, "certainly we can reverse that protectionism". He said that there are areas where India has been historically protectionist, and bringing down the level of tariffs, increasing competition in those sectors can be quite beneficial. "For example, in car manufacturing, we have some advantages. We produce certain kinds of cars very well, and bringing competition in the automobile sector can actually be quite beneficial," Mr. Rajan observed.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India needs to be careful, clever in trade talks with US: Raghuram Rajan
India needs to be 'very careful and clever' while negotiating trade agreements with the US, especially with regard to the agriculture sector, which is heavily subsidised by developed countries, former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan said on Friday. In an interview with PTI Videos, Rajan said India's economic growth has sort of settled in the range of 6-7 per cent, and a fraction of percentage point may be affected by the global trade uncertainties. "I think where it is much more sort of difficult (trade negotiations) is in areas such as agriculture, where every country subsidises its producers, and our producers may be relatively smaller, may have somewhat lower subsidies... the kind of harm that unconstrained flow of agricultural products into the country may create problems for them," he said. Earlier this week, the Indian team was in Washington for the fifth round of negotiations for the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). "For example, can we encourage more foreign direct investments from those countries (developed countries) to enhance the value added in some of those sectors, the milk for example, sort of improving the value added in our milk products, milk powder, cheese, etc, could be beneficial to our milk producers," the eminent economist noted. US President Donald Trump has said that the proposed trade deal with India would be on the lines of what America has finalised with Indonesia. Giving access in the agriculture sector is proving to be a political issue for the government. "Are there things we can do, rather than necessarily saying we welcome sort of more milk into the country from other countries. "So all this requires very careful, clever negotiation, and I hope that is what our government officials are engaged in," Rajan, currently a professor of finance at Chicago Booth, said. India has hardened its position on the US demand for duty concessions on agri and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector. Noting that the trade tensions are negative for both in terms of exports as well as investment, Rajan said, "But you must remember that there are opportunities also in what is happening to the extent that India is perceived as an alternative route to some of the other regions like the United States." According to him, if the tariffs imposed by the US on China and some other parts of Asia are much higher than tariffs on India, there may be an opportunity for some manufacturing to flow to India. While pointing out that Indian exports in manufacturing to the United States are not that big, he said any kind of tariffs (on India) will have some modest dampening effect, but not a lot. Rajan said that India's economic growth has sort of settled at a 6-7 per cent range, a fraction of percentage point maybe affected by the global sort of tariff environment. "But in the longer term, this would spell opportunity for India," he added. Trump announced heavy tariffs on a number of countries, including India, on April 2. However, it was soon postponed for 90 days until July 9 and later to August 1. India is seeking the removal of an additional tariff (26 per cent). It is also seeking the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent) and auto (25 per cent) sectors. As far as tariffs go, Rajan said he thinks there are certain areas where India has become more protectionist, and added, "certainly we can reverse that protectionism". He said that there are areas where India has been historically protectionist, and bringing down the level of tariffs, increasing competition in those sectors can be quite beneficial. "For example, in car manufacturing, we have some advantages. We produce certain kinds of cars very well, and bringing competition in the automobile sector can actually be quite beneficial," Rajan observed.
