EXCLUSIVE Truth behind Tube station brawl revealed: Man dumped toddler on floor to pile into massive fight
Horrific footage of the melee, which happened at the entrance to Highbury and Islington Station in north London on Thursday afternoon, showed three white men in formal suits appearing to hurl a black man wearing headphones down the stairs, before throwing punches and kicking him.
However amid the chaos, a young child - aged around two or three according to a witness - was left crying on the ground after being dropped down the steps as the incident became heated, a source told MailOnline.
The mother of the child - who was with two other children - was then seen rushing to the boy's aid, without noticing the pram she had been holding onto had began to roll down the incline close to the stairs.
Thankfully, a bystander was able to intervene and prevent the second child from coming to harm.
The suited man who had been holding the child is understood to have been punched to the head and was seen with a large lump on his forehead, as well as a bloodied left eye following the vicious incident.
British Transport Police are probing mobile phone footage being shared online.
A woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, told MailOnline she and her mother had begun walking up the steps towards the station exit when the argument broke out, at around 5.24pm.
She said: 'At first we heard yelling. That's when we noticed there were two men on the stairs, a black man and a white man in a formal outfit, who were arguing with each other.
'They started pushing each other, still arguing.
'The man in the formal attire was holding a young child aged around two or three.
'But when things started to get a little more heated, the child was dropped and landed on the ground.
'The black man punched the white man first.
'When the first punch was thrown, two other white men joined in and started fighting against the black man, and that's when they pushed him down and were stomping on him.'
The witness said bystanders attempted to break up the fight but the white men appeared 'very aggravated and drunk'.
She added that there were also two women - one of whom told the witness they were sisters - trying to calm the men down.
'One of the women in a yellow dress kept saying, "Calm down. You don't want to cause a scene or anything."
'But the white man involved in the fight was not able to be consoled in any way, even by somebody he knew.'
The witness also described how in the first moments of the fight, the formally attired man had dropped a young toddler boy to the ground.
'His mother rushed to pick him up. The child was crying and she was also crying.
'But because the mum was so focused on the child that had been dropped, she did not notice the pram she had been holding onto began to roll, because there's an incline right by the stairs.
'It was actually my mother who went to catch the pram and kept the child safe.'
The fight eventually ended, with the black man fleeing from the station, while the group in formal attire continued onto the platform and boarded a train.
Shaken by the incident, the witness gave a description of the men to a TfL worker, who informed her that that the black man had returned to the station to retrieve his headphones, but left before police arrived on the scene.
'This was actually the first fight I've ever witnessed. My heart was racing.
'Because I was there right in front of it, I was scared that maybe one of them would fall on me or would have fallen down these stairs.
'Everyone was trying to calm down the man that got punched.
'He was shouting: "You're not the one with a black eye. I want to go after him." But everyone was trying to hold him back, saying, "No, leave it, let it be. You don't want to cause any other problems. He's gone."
'I could see there was a really massive bump on his forehead from where he got punched and blood around his eye.'
A spokesperson for the British Transport Police said: 'Officers received a report of a fight at Highbury and Islington Underground station at around 5.30pm yesterday.
'Officers are aware of footage circulating on social media, and the incident is currently being investigated.
'Anyone with information is asked to text 61016 with reference 558 of 17 July.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Mexican Federation fines Chicharito following sexist remarks
MEXICO CITY, July 23 (Reuters) - The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) has fined Javier "Chicharito" Hernandez and launched an investigation after the former Manchester United striker posted social media videos that football authorities said "promote sexist stereotypes". In a joint statement released on Wednesday by FMF along with Mexico's top men's and women's leagues - Liga MX and Liga MX Femenil - officials said Hernandez's remarks were in violation of their gender and diversity policies and constituted a form of media violence. A representative for the Chivas Guadalajara player did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. FMF has imposed a financial fine and issued a warning, and more severe sanctions could follow if Hernandez repeats such behaviour. "A few days ago on the social media platform 'TikTok', Hernandez made statements that promote sexist stereotypes that are considered media violence and go against gender equality in sport," the football bodies said in the statement. "The Gender and Diversity Commission announces that it has initiated an investigation that seeks to prevent and punish this behaviour, determining to impose a financial penalty and a warning on Javier 'El Chicharito' Hernandez, stating that this Commission will take more severe measures in the event of a repeat offence." Hernandez, 37, posted videos over the weekend in which he called on women to "let themselves be guided by a man" and accused women of "eradicating masculinity". The high-profile athlete also said society had become "hypersensitive" and questioned feminist views on domestic roles. The remarks were widely criticised as sexist and out of touch with contemporary society, prompting condemnation from fans and public figures including President Claudia Sheinbaum. "He's a very good footballer, but in terms of his opinion about women, I think he still has a lot to learn, because women can be whatever we want to be," Sheinbaum said in her daily news conference on Wednesday. Hernandez, Mexico's all-time leading scorer, rejoined boyhood club Chivas in January 2024 after playing for LA Galaxy and several top European teams, including Manchester United, West Ham United, Real Madrid and Sevilla. Chivas also condemned his remarks. "The club has taken the appropriate measures in accordance with its internal regulations," the Liga MX side said. "As an institution with a deep sense of social responsibility, we firmly reject any behaviour, stance or expression that reinforces stereotypes that limit the freedom, respect and full development of all people."
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'Everyone's on edge': Epping braces for another hotel protest
Tracey's cheese toastie is getting cold. She's explaining to me how hacked off she is about the asylum hotel in Epping, there is a lot to get off her chest. This Essex commuter town has seen a series of protests around the Bell Hotel where asylum seekers have been housed for the past few years. The catalyst last week was an Ethiopian man, who had only recently arrived on a small boat, appearing in court charged with three counts of sexual assault on a local girl. Tracey was in the crowd demonstrating last Thursday when things turned violent, with some protesters clashing with police. Eight officers suffered injuries along with two hotel employees. Tracey told Sky News: "I've been here since I was four years old, I'm sixty now and we've never had any trouble like this before. "I'm sick to the skin of it all, I can't wait for it all to be over. "Everyone's on edge now. There's a lot of hostility so I think they (the migrants) should go. "I'm not a racist and I'm not prejudiced but this has just gone too far for this town. "You shouldn't relocate them, you should send them back to where they came from, simple as that. "Then it will be restored, the peace." She's angry at the government's response and the way she feels communities have not been listened to. She told Sky News: "They are going to have a lot of protests on their hands if they don't do anything about it. "So watch this space!" She went back to her cheese toastie and chips. Essex Police officers are preparing for another demonstration in Epping later with a march planned from the hotel to the council offices, where local politicians are due to discuss the problems. The chief constable has promised that his officers will facilitate peaceful protest while warning troublemakers they will be robustly dealt with. As we walked along the main shopping street with our camera, a man wound down the window of his partner's Mini and shouted about the violence last week. We asked him to stop and explain what he meant. It turned out Keith was at the protest too, his son was arrested and charged with criminal damage. "My son is actually going to court because he shook the Bell hotel sign and they are trying to do him with criminal damage," he said. "If they arrest somebody there will be five people to take their place," he warned - suggesting that people will show up regardless. "It will go on until it stops, it'll stop when they (the migrants) get moved out." Not everyone feels the same way - another woman who did not want to give her name said she strongly disagreed with the protests at the hotel. She told us: "I don't think an angry mob outside somewhere where people are staying within our community is the right way to go about it. "They could be demonstrating outside the Home Office." It is a divisive issue that the government clearly can't solve quickly. They are aiming to stop using hotels to house asylum seekers by 2029. Very few people in Epping feel they can wait that long. They want solutions now.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Gaps in Len McCluskey's memory must be filled one way or another
Len McCluskey has questions to answer RAY MCMANUS/SPORTSFILE In his last major investigation for The Times before his untimely death, Andrew Norfolk, the reporter whose work exposed the grooming gangs scandal, turned his forensic eye to the Unite trade union. In a series of reports for this newspaper, Mr Norfolk revealed that a company owned by a friend of the union's then general secretary, Len McCluskey, was paid at least £95 million for the construction of a hotel and conference centre in Birmingham initially meant to cost £7 million. This week an independent report commissioned by Sharon Graham, Mr McCluskey's successor at Unite, showed the situation to be even worse. Ms Graham had asked Martin Bowdery KC, a barrister specialising in construction, to investigate the hotel project, for which Mr McCluskey was a vocal advocate. The inquiry concluded that the cost of the hotel had in fact ballooned to £112 million. That was £74.5 million more than its market value. As a result, Unite has had to wipe £66 million from its accounts. An audit accompanying the KC's report concluded that under Mr McCluskey's leadership there was a 'pervasive fraud environment' at Unite. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is pursuing its own investigation. Mr McCluskey, an avowed socialist and admirer of Jeremy Corbyn, never shy of voicing his opinions on Labour politics, clearly has serious questions to answer. Mr Bowdery's report claims that the union leader was flown to watch his beloved Liverpool FC in two Champions League finals, in Kyiv and Madrid, by the Flanagan Group, the construction firm alleged to have overcharged Unite by at least £30 million when building the hotel. The report also lists five other occasions on which the union leader was taken to watch Liverpool, enjoying matchday hospitality courtesy of the Flanagans, whom he described as 'good friends'. Mr McCluskey said that as far as he could recall he paid his own way. Unite officials and lawyers were uneasy about Flanagan, which the report said had a history of 'poor performance, delays [and] cost overruns'. Mr McCluskey is said to have overruled them. He denies doing so, and through his lawyers has denounced Ms Graham's inquiry as 'inaccurate, selective and highly misleading'. The ultimate judgment will be made by the SFO but Ms Graham believes there is enough evidence to support criminal action against two 'very senior' former Unite officials. South Wales police are undertaking an investigation involving alleged bribery, fraud, money laundering and tax evasion. It is not often that The Times agrees with Ms Graham but she is to be commended for her courage in taking on vested interests within a vast and powerful union of some 1.2 million members straddling the private and public sectors. She told this newspaper of the 'horrendous' attacks she endured from supporters of Mr McCluskey after promising to investigate the hotel project. She has described being 'followed home' and subjected to 'despicable online abuse'. There is much to criticise about Unite's positioning under Ms Graham's leadership, not least its intransigence over refuse collection strikes in Birmingham, but whatever her politics, she is at least committed to uncovering the truth. As Ms Graham says, multiple investigations suggest 'rank incompetence … or something else' during Mr McCluskey's reign. It now falls to the SFO to establish what that 'something else' might have been. It should expedite its inquiry as swiftly as possible. Unite pays £1.5 million a year to affiliate to the Labour Party and contributes significant sums to individual Labour MPs. It is too significant a political player to remain under a cloud of suspicion about its past integrity. The facts as they pertain to Mr McCluskey must be established, even if recalling some of them appears to be beyond our Len.
