Central banks in Asia are becoming wary of currency intervention
Some of emerging Asia's biggest central banks look to be dialling back their interventions in the currency market.
The central banks of India and Malaysia have reduced the size of some derivatives positions they use to weaken their currencies. Taiwan has allowed its currency to surge against the US dollar in recent weeks and dropped hints that it would be comfortable with more if the moves were 'orderly'. South Korea's giant national pension fund has ended its five-month support of the won.
A major reason for these moves is a simple change in the market landscape: The US dollar has tumbled more than 7 per cent this year, easing pressure on emerging market currencies. But strategists and investors also point to the risk of a backlash from US President Donald Trump, amid rising speculation that currency policies will be on the table during a series of ongoing – and high stakes – trade negotiations.
'The threat of being labelled a currency manipulator by the US, especially during this period of tariff negotiations, will act as a deterrent to further heavy FX intervention in local markets,' said Rajeev De Mello, a Geneva-based portfolio manager at GAMA Asset Management.
The shifting approach of Asia's central banks to defending their currencies underscores the sweeping changes in global markets since the election of Trump, whose on again-off again tariff threats have roiled asset prices and raised once unthinkable questions about the US dollar's place in the global trading system.
South Korea confirmed last month that it had held currency talks with the US, sending the won higher amid talk that Trump wants a weaker US dollar. But White House chief economist Stephen Miran has denied the idea that Washington is working on secret deals to depreciate the greenback, saying the US continues to have a strong US dollar policy.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The greenback has plummeted against major currencies this year, suffering drops of around 10 per cent against the euro and the Swiss franc.
Traders are now trying to game out which currencies have the most to gain from a period of reduced intervention. The South Korean won and the Malaysian ringgit are two obvious candidates, since both countries have large trade surpluses, said Gautam Kalani, portfolio manager for BlueBay fixed income, emerging markets, at RBC Global Asset Management. Reduced intervention will speed up the appreciation of these currencies, he said.
The Taiwan dollar is also being hotly tipped by strategists. Although Taiwan's central bank is still likely to use intervention to keep volatility in check, most market participants think it will allow the local currency to appreciate further even after hitting multi-year highs.
That suggests room to build on what has already been a widespread rally against the US dollar: Taiwan's currency has surged 11 per cent against the greenback this year, making it the region's best performer. The South Korean won is up almost 8 per cent, while the Malaysian ringgit is around 5 per cent higher.
The retreat from intervention isn't unanimous across Asia. Bank Indonesia pushed back against volatility on Thursday (Jun 19) as Middle East tensions hit emerging market currencies. The Philippines' central bank has sent mixed messages, calling intervention futile but also saying it might have to do so 'more seriously' if a current slide in the peso continues. The People's Bank of China continues to keep its currency under a tight leash.
But for some of emerging Asia's most interventionist central banks, the calculus appears to have shifted in favour of a less hands-on approach.
The US Treasury refrained from labelling any country a currency manipulator in its latest foreign-exchange report, released in June. However, it said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam all met two out of three of its criteria. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Central banks in Asia are becoming wary of currency intervention
Some of emerging Asia's biggest central banks look to be dialling back their interventions in the currency market. The central banks of India and Malaysia have reduced the size of some derivatives positions they use to weaken their currencies. Taiwan has allowed its currency to surge against the US dollar in recent weeks and dropped hints that it would be comfortable with more if the moves were 'orderly'. South Korea's giant national pension fund has ended its five-month support of the won. A major reason for these moves is a simple change in the market landscape: The US dollar has tumbled more than 7 per cent this year, easing pressure on emerging market currencies. But strategists and investors also point to the risk of a backlash from US President Donald Trump, amid rising speculation that currency policies will be on the table during a series of ongoing – and high stakes – trade negotiations. 'The threat of being labelled a currency manipulator by the US, especially during this period of tariff negotiations, will act as a deterrent to further heavy FX intervention in local markets,' said Rajeev De Mello, a Geneva-based portfolio manager at GAMA Asset Management. The shifting approach of Asia's central banks to defending their currencies underscores the sweeping changes in global markets since the election of Trump, whose on again-off again tariff threats have roiled asset prices and raised once unthinkable questions about the US dollar's place in the global trading system. South Korea confirmed last month that it had held currency talks with the US, sending the won higher amid talk that Trump wants a weaker US dollar. But White House chief economist Stephen Miran has denied the idea that Washington is working on secret deals to depreciate the greenback, saying the US continues to have a strong US dollar policy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The greenback has plummeted against major currencies this year, suffering drops of around 10 per cent against the euro and the Swiss franc. Traders are now trying to game out which currencies have the most to gain from a period of reduced intervention. The South Korean won and the Malaysian ringgit are two obvious candidates, since both countries have large trade surpluses, said Gautam Kalani, portfolio manager for BlueBay fixed income, emerging markets, at RBC Global Asset Management. Reduced intervention will speed up the appreciation of these currencies, he said. The Taiwan dollar is also being hotly tipped by strategists. Although Taiwan's central bank is still likely to use intervention to keep volatility in check, most market participants think it will allow the local currency to appreciate further even after hitting multi-year highs. That suggests room to build on what has already been a widespread rally against the US dollar: Taiwan's currency has surged 11 per cent against the greenback this year, making it the region's best performer. The South Korean won is up almost 8 per cent, while the Malaysian ringgit is around 5 per cent higher. The retreat from intervention isn't unanimous across Asia. Bank Indonesia pushed back against volatility on Thursday (Jun 19) as Middle East tensions hit emerging market currencies. The Philippines' central bank has sent mixed messages, calling intervention futile but also saying it might have to do so 'more seriously' if a current slide in the peso continues. The People's Bank of China continues to keep its currency under a tight leash. But for some of emerging Asia's most interventionist central banks, the calculus appears to have shifted in favour of a less hands-on approach. The US Treasury refrained from labelling any country a currency manipulator in its latest foreign-exchange report, released in June. However, it said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam all met two out of three of its criteria. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Markets set for rocky opening after Trump's plunge into Middle East war
[SINGAPORE] When the major markets reopen on Monday (Jun 23), investors in Asia and other parts of the world will be bracing themselves for a volatile few days ahead, with oil prices likely to surge and inflation forecasts coming under renewed scrutiny. This after US President Donald Trump's stunning U-turn from his earlier position that he would keep the United States out of Middle Eastern wars. On Saturday, he ordered a strike against three Iranian nuclear facilities, giving a boost to Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. His decision has already prompted analysts to describe it as Trump's biggest foreign-policy gamble of his two presidential terms. In a televised address from the White House, Trump called the strikes a 'spectacular military success' and warned Teheran against any retaliation, adding that Iran would face more attacks if it did not agree to peace. 'This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' said the president. Terence Wong, the chief executive officer of investment fund Azure Capital, expects the markets to be choppy on Monday. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Given Trump's generally anti-war stance and opposition to overseas defence spending, this was a surprising move and definitely marks a significant escalation in the Middle East conflict. The big question is how Iran will react,' he told The Business Times. Vasu Menon, managing director of investment strategy at OCBC, expressed some optimism that things may not turn out as bad as others fear. He said the 'unfazed response' from markets in the Middle East that were open on Sunday offers hope that the fallout for other global markets when they start trading on Monday may not be dramatic. 'Even if there is a sharp pullback among global markets on Monday, they may not be down and out. The response may be temporary and a rebound could materialise eventually,' he noted. 'Much depends on what Iran will do next, but the shock and awe of the US attack and the warning from Trump not to retaliate or suffer significant consequences, may prevent Iran's leaders from responding aggressively.' How Iran reacts over the next few days or even weeks 'may keep investors nervous' and markets volatile in the short term, he added. 'Of greater consequence to markets may be the reciprocal tariffs that Trump will decide on by Jul 9. Trade concerns have taken a back seat due to the developments in the Middle East, but could re-emerge to the forefront in the coming weeks.' Higher risk premium for oil As for oil, prices are likely to go up by between US$3 and US$5 per barrel when trading resumes, said market analysts on Sunday, with the gains expected to accelerate only if Iran – the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' (Opec) third-largest crude producer – retaliates in a major way and causes a major disruption to oil supply. Jorge Leon, the head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy and a former Opec official, said: 'An oil-price jump is expected. Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium.' UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said that such risk premiums typically fade when there are no supply disruptions. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions – which would likely result in higher prices – or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium,' he explained. In an extreme scenario in which the Strait of Hormuz ends up being shut, the price of oil could even go above US$130 a barrel, weighing on global growth and driving consumer prices higher, according to a Bloomberg Economics analysis. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial choke point between Iran and Oman through which about 20 per cent of global oil and gas demand flows. Flight disruptions Singapore Airlines (SIA) said on Sunday that it had cancelled two flights between Singapore and Dubai – SQ494 and SQ495 – following a 'security assessment' of the ongoing situation in the Middle East. The carrier added that it would be reaching out to all affected customers, with those impacted to be put on alternative flights or given the option to seek a full refund of the unused portion of their ticket. Other SIA flights between Singapore and Dubai may also be affected as the situation remains fluid, the airline said. British Airways cancelled several flights to Dubai and diverted two planes bound for Doha on Sunday, according to data from Flightradar24. The flight-tracking website noted that most airlines have maintained their flight diversions around the region due to recent missile exchanges. The website showed that airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. Many carriers have opted for other routes such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these mean higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times. Operation Midnight While the rest of the world continues to make sense of the US attacks and the fallout, senior figures from the Trump administration said the ball was now firmly in Iran's court and that it should make peace. All in, the US strikes involved 14 bunker-buster bombs, over two dozen Tomahawk missiles and more than 125 military aircraft. General Dan Caine, the nation's highest-ranking military officer, said the strike was named 'Operation Midnight Hammer'. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a briefing at the Pentagon that the US 'devastated' the Iranian nuclear programme, adding that the operation 'did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people'. '(Trump) seeks peace, and Iran should take that path. This mission was not, and has not, been about regime change,' he noted.
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
Sustainable investors hold their ground as energy, defence stocks surge
[SINGAPORE] Regional wars, tariff threats and the US' pro-fossil fuel policies have sent defence and energy stocks soaring in 2025, but not all is lost for investors committed to sustainable and responsible investing, experts told The Business Times. Markets were closed on Jun 22, when US President Donald Trump ordered an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, but investors are bracing for a further spike in oil prices and rush to safe havens. The S&P 500 Energy sector index had risen 8.56 per cent month on month as at Jun 20, compared with the S&P 500's 2.11 per cent month-on-month gain. In Asia, several energy stocks rose after Israel launched air strikes on Iran on Jun 13, sending Brent futures up by US$5 to US$74 per barrel. Singapore-listed energy players such as Rex International and RH PetroGas surged more than 6 per cent at market open on Jun 16 after the strikes. The MSCI World Aerospace and Defense Index had an even larger surge, and was up 33.45 per cent year-to-date as at May 31. Comparatively, the MSCI World Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Index has underperformed, rising 3.26 per cent year-to-date as at May 30, 2025, compared with the MSCI World index's 5.18 per cent year-to-date increase. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up More than half (56 per cent) of global investors believe that Trump's pro-fossil fuels and anti-clean energy agenda will slow the net-zero transition, indicated asset management firm Robeco's fifth annual Global Climate Investing Survey 2025 released on Jun 3, 2025. 'Clearly, the world is currently facing a tremendous amount of uncertainty, which affects both companies and investors,' Jane Wadia, London-based head of sustainability for core products and clients at AXA Investment Managers (AXA IM), told BT. US tariffs will disrupt the global trade system, she said, 'which has implications for sustainability due to the strain on supply chains'. She added: 'As a result, it may become more challenging for businesses to source materials and finance long-term projects that contribute to their sustainability efforts.' Even so, sustainability investing experts like Wadia are not too worried about the underperformance of sustainable funds or environmental, social and governance (ESG)-integrated strategies in light of these geopolitical and policy-driven uncertainties. 'We continue to see significant progress in the transition to net zero. A recent report from the International Energy Agency suggests that more than one in four cars sold globally in 2025 will be electric,' she said. 'The cost of renewable energy is falling relative to oil and gas in the long term, while demand for electricity is rising, driven by the ongoing development in China and the growth of artificial intelligence and data centres.' Despite news headlines about the ESG backlash, the undercurrents of companies' continued commitment to the energy transition and emissions reduction are still 'quite positive', said Louise Dudley, Federated Hermes' portfolio manager for global equities, who also leads ESG and responsible investment research strategy. 'We are still continuing to see opportunities around the world.' Federated Hermes managed US$839.8 billion in assets as at Mar 31, 2025. The 'green-hushing' phenomenon – where companies are removing climate goals and Web pages from the public eye but are still committed to sustainable agendas – is still alive and well, she said in an interview with BT. In addition, some of the underperforming funds could have been those that 'went quite high-risk, quite concentrated', she said, adding: 'Those types of thematic funds will have periods of underperformance as well as periods of outperformance.' A fund that is less thematic and more diversified is likely to be more resilient in the long term, she added. 'Maybe you don't get the excitement of 'Oh, we're 6 per cent ahead', but when some of these thematic trends, such as inflation, interest rates and all those things (come into play), we'll be well positioned on that,' she noted. At the core of it, measuring ESG factors is a form of risk management, she added. 'Governance, we always feel, is the backbone (of a firm), where, if a company is doing well from a governance perspective, it's going to do well… because it's going to be thinking about the right kind of risk; and it has the right people in place to manage whatever environment they go into,' she said. Responsible energy and defence investments The rise in energy and defence stocks is not necessarily incompatible with sustainable investing either, said Lucian Peppelenbos, climate and biodiversity strategist at Robeco, which had US$222 billion in assets under management and advice, of which US$216 billion is managed in ESG-integrated assets, as at December 2024. 'Within energy stocks, there are companies seriously transitioning; and also in many cases, for example, where gas replaces coal, we can see it as a sustainable transition investment,' said Peppelenbos, who is based in Amsterdam, said in an interview with BT. For instance, Norwegian oil and gas company Aker BP, which is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with a market capitalisation of 176.59 billion kroner (S$22.49 billion) has been viewed as an energy business with strong transition commitments, a relatively clean eco-footprint and strong fundamentals. Several other, more well-known global names such as Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell have diversified into alternative energy sources to varying degrees, although some – such as British Petroleum (BP) – have rolled back their commitments to transition away from fossil fuels. When it comes to defence stocks, Robeco makes sure there is no exposure to controversial weapons – which is against the law, as Peppelenbos reminded – and the firm calls defence investments 'responsible investing' over 'sustainable investing'. Robeco considers controversial weapons to include cluster munitions, anti-personnel mines, white phosphorus and depleted uranium ammunition, along with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Most of these are banned under international treaties. '(Within) exposure to defence stocks more generally, for example, there are more cybersecurity-related defence stocks that are very well compatible within ESG-integrated strategies,' he said. For instance, a high-profile incident last year where Northern Korean hackers were accused of allegedly stealing over US$1 billion worth of cryptocurrency highlights how modern warfare has evolved beyond conventional wars to cyberwars. Peppelenbos also believes that ESG is a performance driver; and because sustainability risks 'can be and often are financially material', integrating those risks makes for better informed investment decisions to help risk-adjusted returns, he said. 'Our research shows, for example, that among companies across high emission sectors and low emission sectors, companies that have good transition plans in terms of climate change – meaning targets that are in line with how their sector should decarbonise over time and are reflected in a credible transition plan – those companies are outperforming the climate laggers in their sector. So that's clearly a piece of evidence where sustainability and performance can actually go hand in hand,' he added. One underappreciated aspect of clean energy is that it plays a crucial role in future geopolitical stability as conflicts historically often arise over food, resources and energy, Ulrik Fugmann, co-head of environmental strategies group at the BNP Paribas Asset Management, told BT. Clean energy solutions and environment infrastructure is growing across Asia, Europe and the US at unprecedented speed and scale, he said. This is because of its cost-competitiveness and ability to readily tackle an urgent need to address global power deficits that are accelerated by the progress in artificial intelligence and data centres, said Fugmann, who is based in London. The asset manager has 602 billion euros (S$892.9 billion) in assets under management, of which 418 billion euros is in ESG assets. 'Given recent years' rise in inflation, interest rates and uncertain policy environment that is now getting re-enforced in the US and Europe, the clean energy sector today trades at valuation levels not seen since the great financial crisis in 2008 and depths of the Covid-19 crisis – in sharp contrast to global markets and elevated valuations in the technology sector trading at all-time highs,' he said. 'The case for sustainable solutions in clean energy has rarely been this attractive – both from a top-down macro-economic perspective and bottom-up valuation point of view,' he added.
