logo
HK to host events marking World Anti-Fascist War

HK to host events marking World Anti-Fascist War

RTHK12-06-2025
HK to host events marking World Anti-Fascist War
John Lee says the SAR government has been establishing a value system centred on patriotism. Photo courtesy of Information Services Department
Chief Executive John Lee said on Thursday Hong Kong will host a series of activities to boost patriotism marking the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.
Speaking at an international academic symposium in Hong Kong commemorating the victory, Lee said various policy bureaus and departments will coordinate in preparing for events such as official commemorative ceremonies, large-scale thematic exhibitions, film screenings and the enhancement of tourism facilities with historical significance.
He added the government has been establishing a value system centred on patriotism and love for Hong Kong, to further strengthen the sense of belonging to the nation among the youth.
The CE said everyone as well as future generations must remember the sacrifices and indomitable spirit of the martyrs of the Chinese nation and world peace, and should always keep in mind that today's national harmony, stability and prosperity have not come easily, and must remain highly vigilant against ideologies and views glorifying aggression and secession.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'
Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

HKFP

time4 hours ago

  • HKFP

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

Handpicked judges presiding over jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai's national security trial have questioned whether content in his pro-democracy paper amounted to 'seditious publications,' as stipulated by the prosecution. The court continued hearing closing arguments on Tuesday after proceedings were twice delayed last week, first owing to bad weather and then to health concerns relating to the 77-year-old tycoon's heart. Delivering arguments for the seditious publications charge, lead prosecutor Anthony Chau referenced articles published in Lai's Apple Daily including an editorial calling for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong authorities. He said that those articles did not include 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations or ventured 'to suggest any solutions.' But High Court judge Esther Toh, one of the three judges chosen to preside over the security trial, cast doubt on the prosecution's argument that critical articles must propose solutions to be considered not seditious. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' Toh asked, appearing to reference a recent contract fraud case involving the drinking water supply at government offices. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill which sparked widespread protests and unrest in 2019 to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill… was that not a suggested solution?' The 2019 protests escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing's encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as 'riots.' Lee on Tuesday added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition.' Chau also referenced Lai's text messages directing the paper's English news division, which the court had earlier heard was set up to appeal for international support. Lai had told senior management that the paper was not supposed to have a 'balanced view' and only needed a view of the 'yellow' side — the colour associated with the city's pro-democracy movement, Chau added. Calls for sanctions 'in disguise' Besides the charge of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation, the tycoon also stands accused of two charges of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. He faces life behind bars if convicted. Based on Lai's prior exchanges with US politicians and diplomats, one could infer that the pro-democracy paper's criticism of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere, Chau told the court on Tuesday. That was after judge Toh asked whether the prosecution meant that the paper's articles were calls for sanctions 'in disguise.' The prosecution has alleged that Lai used his ties with foreign officials and politicians to impose sanctions against authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest, criminalising subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. Chau also maintained that the media baron had called for what the prosecution labelled 'Sanctions, Blockades, or Hostile activity' (SBHA) against the central Chinese authorities, despite not having made any open or direct requests for such actions after the enactment of Beijing's national security law in Hong Kong. The prosecution submitted that Lai had adopted a 'calculated and strategic approach' for foreign sanctions to be imposed on China and Hong Kong by deliberately and 'falsely' picturing the Chinese Communist Party in a negative light. Prosecutors named retired US army general Jack Keane, ex-US deputy secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz, ex-US state department advisor Christian Whiton, and Mary Kissel, an advisor to then US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, as Lai's foreign connections, among others. Chau also told the court that Lai had admitted, during his testimony, that he continued international lobbying efforts even after the enactment of the national security law to inform foreign governments of what was happening in Hong Kong and to appeal for condemnation of the Hong Kong and Beijing authorities. However, he denied lobbying overseas governments to influence foreign policy. Chau is expected to conclude oral submissions of the prosecution's closing arguments on Wednesday.

Court continues to hear closing arguments in Lai case
Court continues to hear closing arguments in Lai case

RTHK

time5 hours ago

  • RTHK

Court continues to hear closing arguments in Lai case

Court continues to hear closing arguments in Lai case The prosecution has spent two days laying out its final arguments in the national security trial. Photo: RTHK Prosecutors have alleged that former media tycoon Jimmy Lai "deliberately painted a false picture' of central and SAR authorities to push for foreign sanctions, as they wrapped up their evidence against the Apple Daily founder. The prosecution's closing speech continued for a second day on Tuesday, arguing that the defendant had indirectly requested punitive actions following the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020. Prosecutor Anthony Chau said Lai tried to 'create a false impression' about the mainland and Hong Kong so external elements could punish the central and SAR governments. While the former media boss 'did not overtly call or request' for such actions following the security law's promulgation, Chau said, Lai's remarks were 'naturally and reasonably' persuading foreign countries to impose sanctions, blockades or hostile activity. The court heard the Apple Daily founder had leveraged 'international attention' to advance his own agenda following the law's implementation. 'He's aware of the international attention to his acts and conducts, and he continued to make use of this media to arouse international attention to achieve his own purpose,' Chau said. One of three judges, Alex Lee, queried whether this was a form of hearsay, as Lai was said to have heard about the attention he was receiving from other people. Judge Esther Toh said regardless of whether this 'international attention' was based in fact, this spoke to the defendant's thinking. The prosecution agreed, adding that it also relied on other evidence to prove its case. Chau also said articles published by the now-defunct newspaper failed to offer 'rational criticisms' of the government or provide solutions to remedy the situation, dismissing the defence's contention that such publications were 'critical opinions'. Judge Toh questioned if suggesting solutions is necessary when giving critical opinions. In response, Chau said commentaries that focus on providing remedies would not have seditious intent. Lai had denied conspiracy charges relating to colluding with foreign forces and publishing seditious material. The prosecution is expected to continue its closing arguments on Wednesday.

Australia probes Nauru-China business deal
Australia probes Nauru-China business deal

HKFP

time11 hours ago

  • HKFP

Australia probes Nauru-China business deal

Australia was Tuesday investigating whether Pacific microstate Nauru breached a security treaty by inking a lucrative business deal with a Chinese company. Nauru last week announced it had signed a US$650 million economic development agreement with the China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation. Australian Minister for Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy said officials were looking into whether that deal complied with a recent security pact between Canberra and Nauru. '(Australia) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether it activates parts of our treaty,' Conroy told reporters. 'That is a really important treaty for us — that helps position us as a security partner of choice with Nauru.' Australia and Nauru announced a landmark security treaty in December last year, advancing Canberra's aim of blunting China's growing regional influence. Under the deal, Nauru must seek Australia's agreement before it signs any bilateral accords on maritime security, defence and policing. Nauru also agreed to consult Australia if other parties look to strike agreements granting them access to critical infrastructure such as ports and airfields or its banking sector. In return, Nauru receives tens of millions of dollars to prop up its government budget and bolster its stretched police force. Nauru last year surprised many Pacific watchers when it abruptly severed diplomatic links with Taiwan in favour of Beijing. Nauru's Foreign Affairs Minister Lionel Aingimea travelled to Beijing to sign the business deal last week. The China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation agreed to invest in key sectors such as agriculture and fisheries, according to a Nauru government release. Nauru, population 12,500, is one of the world's smallest countries with a mainland measuring just 20 square kilometres (7.7 square miles). It is considered especially vulnerable to climate change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store