
Europeans have been ‘free-riding' on security from US, says Merz
On his first trip to London as chancellor, Mr Merz described the Kensington treaty as historic. It is the first major bilateral agreement between the UK and Germany to deepen defence cooperation and boost economic growth in both nations.
Russia's war in Ukraine has defined the first two months of Mr Merz's chancellorship, as has Donald Trump's tariffs on the EU.
Mr Merz said he has met with Mr Trump three times now and they are 'on the same page' on Ukraine – both wanting to bring an end to the war.
But he admitted that Europe had not historically funded its own security in the past.
'We know we have to do more on our own and we have been free-riders in the past,' he told the BBC. 'They're asking us to do more and we are doing more.'
Asked about his relationship with Mr Trump, he said: 'We are on the phone once a week; we are co-ordinating our efforts. One issue is the war in Ukraine, and the second is our trade debates and tariffs.'
'We are seeing a big threat, and the threat is Russia.'
Mr Merz said he would do 'whatever it takes' to boost Germany's defence spending and increase the size of its army.
At a press conference on Thursday, Mr Merz and Mr Starmer discussed ways to boost European support for Ukraine, following Trump's announcement to bolster Kyiv's stockpile by selling American weapons to Nato allies who would in turn send arms to Kyiv.
Mr Merz said they had discussed Ukraine's need for long-range strike systems, which he called 'long range fire'. 'Ukraine will soon receive substantial additional support in this area,' he said.
The treaty includes a clause on mutual assistance which, 'in light of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, is highly significant', a German official said this week.
He said that 'above all, we need clarity on how weapons systems that are given up from the European side will be replaced by the US.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
33 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: US tariffs take shine off summer economic statement
Tariffs. They are the prince to the hamlet of global economic conversation, the dark cloud blotting out the sun of economic prosperity; they are omnipresent. On Tuesday, in Government Buildings, their prospect hung low as the Government announced its summer economic statement and National Development Plan. In a two-and-a-half-hour session of back-to-back press briefings, government leaders stressed the need to "recalibrate" economic plans in the face of the Trump administration's threats of a trade war with the EU. While Tánaiste Simon Harris has said that a 10% scenario is "baked in", the summer economic statement was based on a zero-tariff scenario. This, both finance minister Paschal Donohoe and public expenditure minister Jack Chambers, said would see the plans for the budget change if tariffs aren't avoided after August 1. In the document, the tax package available will amount to €1.5bn. The spending package will be €7.9bn, an increase of 7.3% on the revised 2025 general expenditure ceiling, but there are caveats. The most notable is that the Government isn't sure how much of that €7.9bn is spoken for. In previous summer economic statements, the existing levels of service has been outlined to break the available money down between extra spending and tax cuts. However, Mr Chambers said on Tuesday he was going to "engage with government partners" on just what their spending for this year will actually be. So, as of now, there is no clarity on just how much money Mr Chambers has to play with when ministers come banging on the door looking for their spending envelopes in September. Of course, Mr Chambers later said that this year's spending ceiling of €105.4bn will be overrun by €3.3bn, meaning that some departments will receive supplementary budgets. Uncertainty reigns The document itself is much more limited than previous ones, not featuring projections for future years, a sign that uncertainty reigns. "Our budget day decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in during the summer and beyond," Mr Donohoe said, rejecting the idea that the statement was a wasted exercise given that much of the economic outlook will be decided after the EU and US decide what the future of their relationship will look like. It's very clear that we're at a moment of significant transition That level of transition is weighing heavily on Irish policymakers but, as they preach prudence on one hand, government leaders had taken to the same stage just minutes previously to talk about record amounts of money which would be unleashed to build houses, infrastructure, and safeguard future finances. The revised National Development Plan was touted as "transformational" and would "overcome pinch points that are holding back investment", but its announcement was a lot less prescriptive than in previous years. Whereas plans in the past were effectively a shopping list of projects it would aim to deliver from roads to mega projects in water, electricity, and transport, this version is more a statement of intent. With billions set to be deployed, categories for spending were remarkably vague. Much of the investment will go towards housing, with a total allocation of €36bn in the next five years. Some €7.68bn of this will go to water. This does not include another €4.5bn in 'equity injections', which brings the total for housing and water to €40bn. Some €22.3bn will be spent on transport, with €2bn for the Dublin Metrolink. Sea change in Irish policy For the public who are hearing that belts need to be tightened and day-to-day spending is to be "moderated", they may look at the billions heading towards projects aimed at other parts of the country and wonder where all of the money is going. In truth, we don't know yet. The plan is merely a way for the Government to ringfence funding that can be argued for when individual departments work out what they can deliver and when. Pumping money into infrastructure is both necessary and overdue, but the watchword here will be delivery. For something which is being touted as a sea change in Irish policy, it doesn't feel like it This is largely down to two factors: A lack of detail on projects, and even less detail on how delivery of infrastructure is going to change pace in Ireland all of a sudden. The ringfencing of €2bn for the Metrolink in Dublin was hailed as a show of commitment, but the project has been on the political agenda for a decade — after a decade and a half of planning before that. I, personally, have been to two launches. At what point was it not committed to? The plan is a war chest the likes of which has never been seen. It has the potential to genuinely transform Ireland. However, its lack of a detailed timeline or plan of how this will be achieved will leave much to be desired from a public that is facing the reality of an economic downturn head-on. Read More Government to invest €102bn in infrastructure by 2030 under revised National Development Plan

The 42
an hour ago
- The 42
Crystal Palace to know European fate by 11 August after submitting appeal to CAS
CRYSTAL PALACE WILL learn no later than 11 August which European competition they will play in next season after submitting an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The London club, who won last season's FA Cup, were demoted from the Europa League to the Conference League after falling foul of UEFA's rules governing multi-club ownership. European football's governing body determined that as of 1 March, American businessman John Textor had control or influence in Palace and French club Lyon. Where one or more club are found to have shared ownership, they cannot play in the same competition, and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position. Palace's place in the second-tier competition was taken by Nottingham Forest. Advertisement Earlier this summer, Drogheda United fell foul of the same rules when Silkeborg took the League of Ireland club's place in the Conference League and they were expelled entirely. The CAS issued a statement on Tuesday confirming it had received an appeal by Palace and would render an operative decision – without written reasons – on or before August 11. A date for the hearing has not yet been scheduled, the court said. The CAS confirmed Palace were seeking to take either Forest's or Lyon's place in the Europa League. Textor has agreed to sell his stake in Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, but the move came too late to satisfy UEFA. Palace's prospects looked brighter when Lyon were relegated to France's second division by the country's football finance regulator. Lyon had reached a settlement with UEFA agreeing to be excluded from European competition if their appeal against that sanction failed, but they managed to overturn the initial decision and hold on to their top-flight place. The CAS said parties were currently exchanging written submissions. Palace fans have staged protests against the ruling, and club chairman Steve Parish told The Rest Is Football podcast last week: 'We are still fighting. There's an appeal process, so we go to CAS which is the court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club. 'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.'


Irish Daily Star
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
12 times Trump's fake tan has looked horrible and exposed shocking reality
Donald Trump's skin tone has been a topic of intrigue for years, and the curiosity surrounding his unique hue doesn't seem to be fading anytime soon Donald Trump's signature "orange hue" has long been a source of fascination, and the intrigue about his distinctive skin tone shows no signs of waning. The former US president is notorious for his glowing complexion, but it wasn't always so. Observers note that Trump's tanning booth-kissed appearance became a staple only after 2012, during his time on The Apprentice, when he began to apply makeup more frequently for TV appearances and public engagements. From then on, his orange tint became a hallmark, and by 2015, as he stepped into the political arena as a presidential hopeful, the world took a keen interest in his tanning practices. There's been plenty of speculation over the years about how Trump achieves his "orange" look. 'Fake Melania' theory sparked as critics spot four signs after odd sunglasses and cap Donald Trump's 7-word quip to Speaker Mike Johnson about his wife Experts agree that at times, Trump's artificial tan appears particularly vivid, with the orange intensity peaking in 2020, only to be toned down as the 2024 election approaches. A notably poor photo from 2020 even sparked a scientific investigation. Researchers have concluded that Trump's fluctuating skin color is likely due to self-tanner rather than heavy makeup application. A PubMed study titled 'Fake tan or fake news?' delved into the distinctive skin tone of Donald Trump, comparing it to natural and artificial tanning ranges. "We then compared the estimated skin colours with two existing data sets of skin colours: the range of skin tans that occur naturally in the Caucasian population and the range skin colors brought about by a sunless tan. We find that Trump's skin color is close to the edge of the natural skin tan gamut and firmly within the gamut of a sunless skin tan," the study reported. The lighter area around his eyes has been attributed by some to wearing protective goggles while tanning. Despite this analysis, Trump's camp has consistently denied using spray tans or sunbeds. In 2019, an anonymous White House insider claimed to The New York Times, under strict anonymity, that Trump's unique hue was simply due to 'good genes.' Despite his denials, here are 12 times when Trump's tan situation took the internet by surprise. Trump before the tan and makeup Tan peaks in 2020 Pressure on means tanning bed is on Two different skin tones in court