Daredevil: Born Again: Krysten Ritter to Return as Jessica Jones in Season 2
Krysten Ritter is putting that well-worn leather jacket back on.
Ritter, who previously played Marvel hero Jessica Jones in two Netflix projects, is confirmed to reprise that role via Daredevil: Born Again's upcoming second season on Disney+.
More from TVLine
How Andor Quietly Built a Very Cool Connection Between a Hotel Bellhop and Rogue One's Jyn Erso
Andor Reveals Why Bix Isn't in Rogue One - and Adria Arjona Says It Was One of Her 'Scariest Days on Set, Ever'
Andor Star Unpacks Syril's Episode 8 Brawl With [Spoiler], Says Ending Was Filmed 'A Couple Different Ways'
The actress' return was announced by Matt Murdock himself, Charlie Cox, at Disney's Upfront presentation to advertisers on Tuesday.
'It is so great to be back, returning to Jessica after three seasons and The Defenders, and now joining the MCU,' Ritter said during the event. 'I am so excited to bring back this iconic character. And without giving too much away, there's much more in store for Jessica Jones. This is going to be an incredible season.'
Ritter first played Jessica Jones in Marvel's Jessica Jones, which ran on Netflix for three seasons from 2015 to 2019. During that time, she also played Jessica in the team-up event series The Defenders, which dropped on the streamer in August 2017 (and co-starred Cox as Matt Murdock, along with Mike Colter as Luke Cage and Finn Jones as Danny Rand/Iron Fist). After Netflix and Marvel TV ended their creative partnership, though, it was unclear whether Ritter would ever return as Jessica in Marvel projects elsewhere.
Daredevil: Born Again Season 1 ended with first-term NYC mayor Wilson Fisk announcing to the city his Safer Streets plan, which involves an 8 pm curfew, zero tolerance for vigilantes, and the declaration of martial law. Just prior, Matt Murdock declared to Karen Page his resolve to get back their city — though to do so, 'We need an army.'
At episode's end, Matt as Daredevil presented himself to the first soldiers in said army, at Josie's — the bar's owner, law firm P.I. Cherry, and some good cops included. None of the Defenders were on hand, though, much as fans expected to see at least Jessica or Luke Cage. (Read our full finale recap.)
Daredevil: Born Again is currently on track for a March 2026 return. Happy to hear that Ritter is returning as Jessica Jones? Tell us below!
Marvel TV Status Report
View List
Best of TVLine
Stars Who Almost Played Other TV Roles — on Grey's Anatomy, NCIS, Lost, Gilmore Girls, Friends and Other Shows
TV Stars Almost Cast in Other Roles
Fall TV Preview: Who's In? Who's Out? Your Guide to Every Casting Move!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Review: ‘FUBAR' Season 2 wastes Arnold Schwarzenegger's star power
When 'FUBAR' premiered on Netflix in 2023, its biggest draw wasn't the plot or action — it was Arnold Schwarzenegger. And for a moment, the novelty of watching the Governator tackle scripted television — like a blockbuster giant squeezing into a Roku-sized streaming box — was enough. Throw in Oscar-nominated Monica Barbaro for some snappy father-daughter banter, and it sounded like the makings of a compelling show. It wasn't. Now we're back for round two, and instead of evolving, creator Nick Santora's series doubles down on action movie cliches and strained punch lines. The result is a new season that plays like a B-movie but thinks it belongs in a big-budget franchise. With about 90 minutes of story sloshing around in an eight-hour bag, the show again proves nostalgia alone isn't enough. Schwarzenegger's Luke Brunner is still a CIA agent with a messy personal life, now under the same roof as his recon team and ex-wife Tally (Fabiana Udenio), with whom he's trying to rekindle a romance. But the relative peace is short-lived. Another global catastrophe looms, courtesy of Carrie-Anne Moss as a shadowy former flame of Luke's with unresolved business. It's a setup layered with intrigue and stakes, but the execution wobbles between sitcom shenanigans and save-the-world spectacle, landing uncomfortably in the middle. This tonal inconsistency is the show's fatal flaw. The eye-rolling quips and mid-tier gunplay could be forgiven if the story leaned into its absurdity or, conversely, its potential as an espionage drama. Instead, major action beats are consistently undercut by jokes, ensuring the threat level remains perilously low regardless of how many countdown timers or high-stakes missions are thrown into the mix. Where the show does flicker to life is in the chemistry between its cast. Schwarzenegger, well past his box office prime but still commanding with his signature steely charm and self-aware muscle, brings surprising pathos to Luke. There's a weathered quality here — not just age, but the burden of legacy. It's one of the few times the project understands the value of its star. Barbaro, meanwhile, remains a standout. The Bay Area native is effective with the action, yes, but even more so in the quieter moments. As Emma Brunner, her scenes with Schwarzenegger give the series rare flashes of emotional clarity, including an especially amusing one late in the season involving an adorable 'Sesame Street'-esque puppet of dad (trust me, it makes sense in context). Some of the side players earn their keep as well. Jay Baruchel and Andy Buckley, cast as Emma's boyfriend and Tally's boyfriend, respectively, are both used to delightful effect as everyday guys hopelessly adrift in the world of cloak-and-dagger chaos. Still, it's hard to escape the sense that 'FUBAR' is all concept, no conviction. 'I'll be back,' says Luke at one point, a meta wink at Schwarzenegger's most iconic catchphrase. It's a fitting reflection of the show as a whole: built on callbacks, but with little to call back to. Arnold Schwarzenegger headlining a TV series should've been an event — a streaming-era reintroduction of a cinematic icon — but it never finds something meaningful to do with him. After two seasons, the question isn't whether 'FUBAR' will come back, but whether anyone would even notice if it didn't.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Disney and Universal sue AI company over use of copyrighted characters: 'Piracy is piracy'
Disney and NBCUniversal have accused AI company Midjourney of copyright infringement. The plaintiffs accuse the company of using its characters, such as Spider-Man, Star Wars' Darth Vader and Yoda, Disney's Princess Elsa from Frozen, the Minions, Homer Simpson, Deadpool and Wolverine, and more via an online service that allows users to create images, according to lawsuit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court in the Central District of California in Los Angeles. "For more than 100 years, Disney and Universal have delighted audiences around the world by investing in and fostering American creative innovation and producing some of the greatest motion pictures and fictional characters of all time," the lawsuit states. "Midjourney, however, seeks to reap the rewards of Plaintiffs' creative investment by selling an artificial intelligence ("AI") image-generating service ("Image Service") that functions as a virtual vending machine, generating endless unauthorized copies of Disney's and Universal's copyrighted works." The suit continues, "By helping itself to Plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images mages (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters—without investing a penny in their creation—Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing." According to the lawsuit, the startup reportedly made $300 million in revenue last year. Its 21 million users, as of September, paid for subscriptions of $10 to $120 monthly in order to, according to the lawsuit, "view and download copies and derivatives of Plaintiffs' valuable copyrighted characters." They called it "textbook copyright infringement." The lawsuit states that the company had almost 21 million users as of September 2024. It launched its image service in 2022 and reportedly made $300 million in revenue last year. Disney and NBCU said they asked the company to stop using their work, but the company has not and has released new versions of its Image Service. In a statement, Horacio Gutierrez, the senior executive vice president, chief legal and compliance officer of the Walt Disney Company, said: "Our world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation—investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works. We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity. But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing."Kim Harris, executive vice president and general counsel of NBCUniversal, also provided a statement. "Creativity is the cornerstone of our business," Harris said. "We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content. Theft is theft regardless of the technology used, and this action involves blatant infringement of our copyrights." The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and "permanent injunctive relief" to halt the use of the characters. EW has reached out to Midjourney for comment. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
"Piracy Is Piracy": Disney Sues Midjourney for Massive Copyright Violation
Disney and NBCUniversal — a pair of media behemoths behind franchises ranging from "Star Wars" and "Toy Story" to "Minions" and "Shrek" — are suing AI company Midjourney, accusing it of enabling copyright infringement on a massive scale through its AI image generator tech. In the lawsuit, which was filed in a California district court today, the two Hollywood juggernauts accused the firm of ignoring its previous requests to stop violating their intellectual property rights. "Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the scathing complaint reads, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal. It's a major escalation in the fight between copyright holders and AI firms, a battle that has been brewing for years. Per Axios, it's the "first legal action that major Hollywood studios have taken against a generative AI company." And it's not just the use of image generators; generative AI writ large has triggered a barrage of lawsuits, with media companies accusing the likes of OpenAI and Google of training their large language models on their materials without fair compensation. Those disputes have turned into a major pain point for the AI industry, despite surging enthusiasm for the tech. Considering the sheer size of both Disney and Universal — Disney is the third largest media company by market cap in the world — Midjourney could soon be in a world of hurt. Disney, in particular, has a long track record of closely guarding its enormous cache of intellectual property. "Our world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation—investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works," said Disney's chief legal compliance officer, Horacio Gutierrez, in a statement. "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity," he added. "But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing." The lawsuit explained in an example how Midjourney users could easily request a picture of the Disney-owned "Star Wars" character Darth Vader in a "particular setting or doing a particular action," and the AI "obliges by generating and displaying a high-quality, downloadable image." That kind of loose approach to copyright has been an open secret for quite some time. In January 2024, noted AI critic Gary Marcus and film industry concept artist Reid Southen warned in a piece for IEEE Spectrum that tools like Midjourney and OpenAI's DALL-E3 could land them in a "copyright minefield." The pair found that it was "easy to generate many plagiaristic outputs, with brief prompts related to commercial films," including well-known Marvel superheroes, Nintendo's Super Mario, and Disney's Darth Vader. Disney and Universal are framing their legal action as a way to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us," said NBCU executive VP and general of counsel Kim Harris in the statement. Given the lack of a clear legal precedent, it'll be fascinating to watch the lawsuit unfold over what's likely to turn into a years-long courtroom battle. More on Midjourney: Self-Styled "AI Artist" Furious That People Are "Blatantly Stealing My Work"
