Bangladeshi forces clash with supporters of ousted leader Hasina, leaving at least 4 dead
The violence erupted in the morning and spread as a new political party formed by students who led the uprising against Ms. Hasina in August last year announced a march toward the southwestern Gopalganj district, Ms. Hasina's ancestral home, and her Awami League party's stronghold.
Authorities later imposed an overnight curfew in the district.
Since Ms. Hasina's ouster 11 months ago, Bangladesh has been marked by chaos and unchecked mob violence. Wednesday's attack underscores the deep divisions in the country as its interim government keeps failing to bring the deteriorating security situation under control.
TV footage showed pro-Hasina activists armed, attacking police with sticks and setting vehicles on fire as a convoy of about 20 vehicles carrying the leaders of the students' National Citizen Party arrived as part of commemorations of the uprising.
Party leaders took shelter in the office of the local police chief. Footage showed top leaders were being escorted by soldiers to an armored vehicle for safety. They later left for a neighboring district with security escorts.
Jibitesh Biswas, a senior official of a state-run hospital, told reporters that the bodies of at least three people had been brought in. The country's leading English-language Daily Star reported that four people died.
The interim government said Wednesday the attackers on the students would not go 'unpunished" and in a statement issued on behalf of interim leader Muhammad Yunus, described the violence in Gopalganj as 'utterly indefensible."
Ms. Hasina's Awami League party, which authorities banned in May, issued several statements on X condemning the violence and blaming the interim government for the deaths and injuries.
'We urge the world to take note of this blatant use of security apparatus,' one Awami statement said, adding that it had used mob violence against 'dissenters.'
Student leader Nahid Islam gave the authorities a 24-hour ultimatum to arrest those responsible for the Gopalganj violence and floated the prospect of another march in the neighboring district of Faridpur on Thursday.
The right-wing Jamaat-e-Islami party condemned the attacks on the student-led party and announced a nationwide protest in all districts and main cities for Thursday.
Critics of the interim government warn of a widening polarisation that has reduced hopes for national reconciliation even as Mr. Yunus' administration pledges to bring order in the post-Hasina era. They say if the situation does not improve, a peaceful transition to democracy would be jeopardized.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
At the heart of Maharashtra's Marathi push back is a debate over Indian identity
In recent weeks, Maharashtra has found itself at the centre of a growing controversy over the National Education Policy 2020. At the heart of the debate is a clause that reaffirms the ' three-language formula ' in schools: children must learn three languages from the first year of school. Typically, these would be the regional language, English and one additional Indian language. Although the policy formally allows any Indian language to serve as the third, Hindi, especially given its dominant presence in central administration, popular media, and national examinations, tends to fill that role by default. In Maharashtra, the issue returned to the headlines after an order by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led state government to introduce Hindi as the compulsory third language from classes 1-4 in Marathi and English medium schools. This privileging of Hindi has sparked concerns in non-Hindi-speaking regions and reignited an old debate: is the NEP merely encouraging multilingualism, or is it reinforcing a creeping centralisation under a 'Hindi-Indian' identity? The dominant regional language of Maharashtra, Marathi, is closely tied to the state's cultural and political identity. The move to introduce Hindi as the mandatory third language by the government was immediately cast by the opposition Shiv Sena faction led by former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray as an attempted imposition of a linguistic-cultural hierarchy by the Centre and a needless burden on young students. Language has long been a fault line in Mumbai politics. The Shiv Sena, a party originally formed to champion Marathi interests, rose to prominence by demanding job quotas and cultural primacy for local speakers in the 1960s and 70s. Although it later adopted a broader Hindu nationalist agenda, its linguistic roots continue to shape Maharashtra's political landscape. Looming elections The debate is especially charged in light of the upcoming, long-overdue municipal elections in Mumbai. The term of the elected corporators ended in March 2022, after which the civic body has been run by an unelected administrator. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, which governs India's wealthiest civic body, is a high-stakes prize. Control over the BMC means influence over infrastructure, education, and symbolic aspects of urban life such as language on public signage and in school curricula. Opposition parties, including factions of the Shiv Sena and regional allies, have seized on the NEP as evidence of the nationally dominant BJP's insensitivity to Maharashtra's linguistic and cultural identity. The BJP thus finds itself walking a tightrope. As the national architect of the NEP and the main proponent of Hindi as a unifying national language, the party is under pressure to defend its policy. Yet in Maharashtra, it risks alienating regional allies and voters if it appears to be undermining Marathi. Recent statements from BJP leaders suggest a softening of tone, offering reassurances of consultation and phased implementation. Whether this reflects genuine reconsideration or electoral strategy remains to be seen. Beyond the corridors of government, the three-language policy has stirred tensions at the grassroots. Parties from the fringes of electoral politics like the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, an offshoot of the Shiv Sena, have revived their campaign against Hindi-speaking migrants, particularly from states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Their tactics – ranging from vandalising non-Marathi signage to public calls, under threat of violence, for linguistic loyalty – have drawn criticism but also found resonance among some voters who feel culturally sidelined. Southern concerns The implications extend beyond Maharashtra. Southern states, particularly Tamil Nadu, have long resisted the imposition of Hindi. In the 1960s, anti-Hindi agitations in the state evolved into a powerful movement for Dravidian identity and regional autonomy. Tamil Nadu has since maintained a two-language policy: Tamil and English. This defiance is not merely about language; it is a broader stand against the perceived cultural and political centralisation from New Delhi. States such as Kerala and Andhra Pradesh have adopted more flexible approaches, but they too resist the notion that Hindi should become the de facto national language. Their concern is that a truly multilingual India must operate on the principle of symmetry: no region should be expected to accommodate others without reciprocity. At the core of this resistance is a sense that Hindi's growing dominance – fostered by media, government policy, and migration of Hindi-speakers to other parts of the country – is less the result of organic cultural exchange and more a product of institutional power. Critics argue that the NEP's language policy, while cloaked in the language of inclusion, reinforces existing hierarchies rather than dismantling them. The debate is unfolding against the backdrop of broader demographic and political shifts. After 2026, parliamentary representation in India is expected to be redrawn based on population. Southern states, which have successfully curbed population growth and achieved stronger human development indicators, could lose seats in Parliament while populous and economically weaker northern states gain seats. This risks deepening feelings of marginalisation, turning language and education into flashpoints for larger questions of federalism and fairness. Language vs dialect Interestingly, even within the so-called Hindi heartland, the notion of a unified linguistic identity is tenuous. The Census of India, 2011 (the latest available) recorded more than 50 'mother tongues ' under the heading of Hindi. This includes Bhojpuri, Awadhi, Magahi and Brajbhasha, all of which have ancient and vibrant literary traditions and significant speaker bases. Yet, they are accorded the status of dialects rather than languages and folded into the generic category of 'Hindi' along with Haryanvi, Rajasthani, Garhwali and Kangri, among others. If Maharashtra and the southern states succeed in defending regional languages, it may inspire similar assertions in the North demanding formal recognition for these often-overlooked tongues. Such movements could challenge the notion of Hindi as India's unifying linguistic thread. Its current dominance is partly the result of its administrative status and cultural projection, not necessarily broad consensus. The resurgence of linguistic identities across India could upend the assumption that a single language can bind a country as diverse as India. Ultimately, the Maharashtra language row underscores that India's celebrated linguistic diversity is also under constant negotiation. The three-language formula, once intended to bridge divides, now reveals them. Maharashtra's resistance is part of a wider conversation about how India defines unity: through imposed sameness or sustained plurality. As more states reconsider their place within the federal system, language could become both a tool for political mobilisation and a test of the Indian republic's democratic character.
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mizoram begins biometric enrolment drive for Myanmar refugees in Serchhip district
AIZAWL: The Mizoram government began its biometric enrolment drive for Myanmar refugees in Serchhip district on Wednesday, the first attempt by the state government to issue identification documents to the refugees. The District Level Committee on Displaced Persons meeting on July 11 in Serchhip had discussed Biometric Enrolment of Displaced Persons through Foreigner's Identification Portal for refugees from Myanmar and Bangladesh. Sixteen Myanmarese nationals residing in Chanmari locality of Serchhip town were enrolled during the session, said Serchhip district nodal officer for Foreigners Identification Portal & Biometric Enrolment, Vanthangpuia. 'This is the first biometric enrolment drive in the entire state, and Chanmari was chosen for its smaller refugee population to facilitate a practical, on-the-spot session for officials,' Vanthangpuia told HT, adding that a comprehensive drive would start on August 5. Serchhip currently has 647 Myanmarese and 266 Bangladeshi refugees across more than 30 villages. Similar enrolment exercises are scheduled to begin in Champhai, Saitual, and Lunglei districts from Thursday, according to a statement by the state government. Mizoram has refugees in all 11 districts, with the largest number in Champhai district, which houses 13,586 refugees. Officials in Champhai said enrolment teams using the Foreigners Identification Portal & Biometric Enrolment (FIP&BE) system will begin tagging individuals in Vengthlang, Kanan Veng, and Dinthar Veng areas of Champhai town. Mizoram's home department estimates that over 37,000 people from Myanmar are currently residing in the state. Officials, however, underline that the figures fluctuate due to cross-border movements. Additional home secretary H Vanlaldika said the enrolment was being carried out through a system developed by the National Informatics Centre and indicated that a similar process could be conducted in districts where Bangladeshi nationals live if the state receives instructions from the Centre.
United News of India
41 minutes ago
- United News of India
EU transport network completely inadequate for any potential military conflict
Brussels, July 30 (UNI) The European Union's transport network is critically unprepared for a potential military conflict, EU Commissioner for Transport Apostolos Tzitzikostas warned, raising concerns about the bloc's ability to rapidly move troops and heavy equipment across the continent in the event of a war, reports RT News. In an interview with the Financial Times, Tzitzikostas said much of Europe's key infrastructure — including railways, tunnels, and bridges — is either outdated or otherwise woefully inadequate for modern-day military logistics. 'If we want to move military equipment and troops from the western side of Europe to the eastern side, it takes weeks — and in some cases, months,' he said. 'We have old bridges that need to be upgraded, narrow bridges that must be widened, and in some places, no bridges at all.' Most of Europe's infrastructure was designed for civilian uses post-World War II, making it virtually ineffective for military uses. As per Tzitzikotas , commercial trucks typically weigh up to 40 tonnes while military tanks can exceed 70 tonnes, putting excessive strain on roads and structures never designed to carry such weight. Tzitzikostas warned that without urgent upgrades, NATO units could face delays, bottlenecks, or even structural failures if they needed to respond quickly to a security crisis. The security concerns come amid the EU's increasing worry over the possible worry of a military venture by Russia, despite Moscow maintaining that it has no such intention. To address its militarisation, Brussels is now finalising a strategic overhaul to address its various military gaps, with plans to upgrade 500 transport hubs along four major military corridors. The initiative — developed in coordination with NATO — is expected to be unveiled later this year. While project details remain classified, the estimated cost is €17 billion ($19.5 billion). The plan also aims to reduce bureaucratic delays at national borders to allow for seamless military mobility. Recent moves by the EU to counter the alleged 'Russian threat' also include the €800 billion ($920 billion) 'ReArm Europe' initiative and pledges from NATO members to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP. For its part, Moscow has completely dismissed these claims calling them ludicrous. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov further levied accusations against Western governments of deliberately portraying Russia as a 'monster' to justify their military expansion, while Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has warned that the West is pushing Europe towards direct military confrontation.
