A $250 Bill and ‘WMAGA': GOP Lawmakers Push Legislation Honoring Trump
The legislation also called for Metrorail, the system's flagship rail line, to be renamed the 'Trump Train.'
The bill, Steube said in a statement, would signal a 'cultural shift away from bureaucratic stagnation toward public-facing excellence and patriotism.'
Steube's proposal is just the latest in legislative offerings this year paying tribute to President Donald Trump. House Republicans have proposed at least eight bills since January to honor the president or burnish his image. They would, among other things, put Trump's portrait on U.S. currency, carve his face onto Mount Rushmore, rename Washington Dulles International Airport for him and make his birthday a national holiday. Two bills, both introduced by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), called for the House to expunge Trump's impeachments in 2019 and 2021.
Longtime political observers say the GOP's legislative love fest for the president is well outside of congressional norms. While members have often proposed legislation that honors presidents, it is almost never while they are still in office.
'It is unprecedented and to be honest with you, it's completely wild,' John White, professor emeritus of politics at Catholic University, said in an interview. 'History shows that most things are named after presidents after they have either long left office or been deceased.'
Ronald Reagan was still alive in 1998 when Congress passed legislation renaming Washington National Airport for him. But by then, Reagan had been out of office for almost a decade and had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's. White also pointed to the renaming of Idlewild Airport in New York for John F. Kennedy in December 1963, just a month after his assassination. But that was a decision proposed by New York City's mayor at the time, not Congress.
In 2012, Congress passed bipartisan legislation that renamed federal buildings for former Democratic president Bill Clinton and former Republican presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.
Steube's proposal to rename the Metro was cheered by many from Trump's's base and met with derision by Democrats and other critics who saw it as a craven appeal to the commander in chief.
'WMATA is not a vanity project for Donald Trump to steamroll. It's the backbone of our nation's capital,' Sen Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia) posted on X. 'When will House Republicans stop trying to suck up to Donald Trump and start focusing on lowering the cost of living?'
WMATA did not respond to a request for comment on the proposed change.
None of the current laundry list of Trump-praising bills are likely to become law, as they face a challenging legislative process and constitutional obstacles. But they do serve a purpose for the members who introduce them, said Casey Burgat, director of the Legislative Affairs masters program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management.
'They're trying to stand out amongst their peers of who can be the most supportive of a president who has a complete hold on their party,' Burgat said. 'Attaching their name to something in their institutional capacity not only signals to their constituents that they're doing this, but more importantly, probably, the president who's looking for fealty.'
Three days after Trump's inauguration in January, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-North Carolina) proposed renaming Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia to the 'Donald J. Trump International Airport.'
'President Donald J. Trump, the greatest president of my lifetime, was just sworn into office for a second term after a historic landslide victory,' Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pennsylvania), a co-sponsor of the bill, said in a statement. 'This legislation will cement his status in our nation's capital as our fearless commander in chief, extraordinary leader and relentless champion for the American people.'
Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-New York) chose Valentine's Day to submit a bill that would make Trump's birthday, June 14, a national holiday along with Flag Day.
'Just as George Washington's Birthday is codified as a federal holiday, this bill will add Trump's Birthday to this list, recognizing him as the founder of America's Golden Age,' Tenney said in a statement at the time. (A few days earlier, Tenney had introduced H.R.1216 – a bill that would end federal support for PBS and NPR. It is titled the Defund Government-Sponsored Propaganda Act).
'President Trump is arguably the most consequential president ever, and his place in history will be remembered for generations to come,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a statement. 'These proposals from Republican lawmakers serve as further proof there's never been a political leader in American history with such immense support from their Party as President Trump. The President appreciates the overwhelming support and these kind gestures from Republican lawmakers.'
Several lawmakers in the current session have served up bills that aim to make Trump's face more ubiquitous.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida) introduced legislation directing the secretary of the interior 'to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.' The National Park Service has previously said there is no suitable stable space on the monument for another face to be added.
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) proposed H.R. 1790, the Golden Age Act of 2025, which directs the Treasury Department to print $100 bills with Trump's portrait on them. That was just after Rep. Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) introduced the Donald J. Trump $250 Bill Act, which would require the Treasury to print 'Federal reserve notes in the denomination of $250 and such notes shall feature a portrait of Donald J. Trump.'
The $250 bill is meant to help the nation celebrate its 250 birthday next year, Wilson said in a statement, which concluded, 'The most valuable bill for the most valuable President!' Numerous House members co-sponsored the bill including Steube, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tennessee), Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California).
U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach, who was appointed by Trump, wrote to Wilson in late May expressing his support for the bill but acknowledging that the law does not allow living people to appear on U.S. currency. In a letter Wilson's office shared with The Washington Post, Beach wrote, 'I am willing to help in any way that I can to make this a reality.'
A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) did not respond to an email seeking comment. Spokespeople for other Republican representatives contacted for this story pointed to statements made when the bills were introduced.
Former Republican congressman Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, who served in Congress from 2005 to 2018 and was a chair of the House Ethics Committee, said he thinks the bills honoring Trump would probably make some current GOP House members uncomfortable and he doesn't see much appetite for action on any of them.
'It's better to name buildings and institutions and airports for politicians long after they're out of office, after there's been some time to reflect on their records and their place in history,' he said.
The various proposals honoring Trump this session are 'being done to please the president,' Dent said in an interview on Friday. 'I mean, he loves that kind of attention.'
Dent added that he thinks it is 'ill-advised' to pass legislation bestowing honor on people in such a politically charged atmosphere.
'Usually when you do these types of honorifics, they are moments of celebration and joy to remember that individual,' Dent said. 'I don't think that's what would happen today with the current president, certainly not while he's in office. Maybe over time, after he's long gone, maybe people's views will shift on him. Who knows?'
GW's Burgat says there's a risk involved that the legislation introduced extolling Trump diminishes the institution's reputation and its work.
A 2023 Congressional Research Service report on commemorations noted that beginning in the 1960s, Congress attempted to reduce legislative proposals for naming federal buildings, designating federal holidays and establishing monuments.
'These initiatives were in response to concern that the legislative time spent on commemorative measures was excessive,' the report stated.
'It undermines the job itself,' Burgat said. 'Your job is to write laws, to study them. Not just memorialize the current president.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
41 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump to Host Kennedy Center Honors, Which Will Go to Stallone, Gaynor, Kiss and More
President Donald Trump announced the recipients of the 48th Kennedy Center Honors on Wednesday – the first class of honorees since he took over the arts complex this year – and a major change to the ceremony: He'll be the host. Speaking from the center's Hall of Nations, Trump revealed the 2025 honorees by unveiling five portraits draped in velvet. The group: glam metal band Kiss, Broadway and West End star Michael Crawford, country music legend George Strait, actor Sylvester Stallone and singer Gloria Gaynor. Actor Tom Cruise was offered the honors but declined because of scheduling conflicts, according to several current and former Kennedy Center employees who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss event plans. A spokesperson for Cruise declined to comment. Before naming the honorees, Trump said he always wanted the award himself but 'was never able to get one.' 'I waited and waited and waited, and I said, 'The hell with it, I'll become chairman and I'll give myself an honor,'' he said, drawing chuckles from a crowd that included Kennedy Center President Richard Grenell, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and members of the White House staff. '… Next year, we'll honor Trump, okay?' The choices may surprise some Trump critics. When Trump took over the Kennedy Center, an overworked joke circulated on social media. Here is political analyst Larry Sabato's version: 'Can you imagine forthcoming Kennedy Center Honors for Lee Greenwood, The Village People, and Kid Rock? Inevitable with Trump as Chair. Prepare your stomach.' It certainly seemed as if Trump had major plans in store for the honorees. At a board meeting in March, Trump said: 'We'll go slightly more conservative, if you don't mind, with some of the people. There are people out there that would not be considered that are much bigger stars than the ones that were being honored.' He even suggested offering honors to deceased icons and widening the scope of possible recipients to include athletes, business luminaries and politicians. Perhaps the most surprising thing about Trump's class of honorees is how comfortably it fits with those that came before it. A-list actor? Check. Aging rock band? Check. Broadway star? Check. (The Washington Post previously reported that the center was 'seriously' considering Strait, Crawford and Kiss.) Trump said he was 'very involved' in selecting the 2025 honorees and turned down names he didn't approve of. 'I would say I was about 98 percent involved. They all went through me,' he said. '… I had a couple of wokesters. Now, we have great people. This is very different than it used to be, very different.' Not all of the artists have supported Trump, including the face – that is, the tongue – of Kiss. Bassist Gene Simmons, whom Trump fired during the first season of 'The Celebrity Apprentice,' backed Trump during his first term – but soon changed his tune. 'Look what that gentleman did to this country and the polarization – got all the cockroaches to rise to the top,' Simmons told Spin of Trump in 2022. 'Once upon a time, you were embarrassed to be publicly racist and out there with conspiracy theories. Now it's all out in the open because he allowed it.' 'I don't think he's a Republican or a Democrat,' Simmons added of the president. 'He's out for himself, any way you can get there. And in the last election, over 70 million people bought it hook, line and sinker.' Simmons's bandmate Paul Stanley appears to have had a more favorable view of Trump. Days after the 2024 election, Stanley wrote on X: 'IT'S OVER. If your candidate lost, it's time to learn from it, accept it and try to understand why. There will be no building bridges to those you don't agree with by being condescending, insulting, talking AT them or removing yourself.' Gaynor, a Grammy Award-winning singer from New Jersey, rose to fame during the disco era of the 1970s. While she isn't known to be political, her hit song 'I Will Survive' has become an anthem for marginalized groups – particularly within the LGBTQ+ community – and was named to the Library of Congress National Recording Registry in 2015. If Trump's personal tastes align with any of the picks, it would be Crawford. Trump is famously a fan of 1980s Broadway hits, particularly 'The Phantom of the Opera,' the title role of which Crawford originated. Trump would often play songs from the musical at his rallies. Stallone, though, has emerged as a prominent Trump booster. In November, the Rocky actor gave a warmup speech for Trump at Mar-a-Lago, where Stallone described him as the 'second George Washington,' called him a 'mythical character' and compared him to Rocky Balboa. In January, as president-elect, Trump named Stallone – along with Mel Gibson and Jon Voight – as 'Special Ambassadors to a great but very troubled place, Hollywood, California,' and tasked them with 'bringing Hollywood, which has lost much business over the last four years to Foreign Countries, BACK-BIGGER, BETTER, AND STRONGER THAN EVER BEFORE!' Strait, meanwhile, is a country legend – a genre that soundtracks many red states – but he has long kept fairly mum on his political leanings. The ceremony will take place Dec. 7 and will later be broadcast on CBS. During the news conference, Trump spoke about an array of topics, including crime, his upcoming summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and the landscape of D.C. 'We're going to make it so beautiful again,' he said of the city whose police he has placed under federal control. '… When you look at the parks where the grass is old, tired, exhausted. We're going to redo the grass with the finest grasses. I know a lot about grass because I own a lot of golf courses.' He also made unsubstantiated claims that, since becoming chairman of the Kennedy Center, 'we have completely reversed the decline of this cherished national institution.' 'We ended the woke political programming, and we're restoring the Kennedy Center as the premier venue for performing arts anywhere in the country,' Trump said. 'Anywhere in the world.' As of earlier this summer, subscriptions to the center's programming were down from last year, and several artists have boycotted the center. Trump said of the columns supporting the center, 'When you see them the next time, they'll be magnificent,' before praising the 'bones' of the building. Outside the center Wednesday, about a dozen demonstrators gathered with signs and bullhorns to protest Trump's involvement in the arts. Since returning to office in January, the president has targeted prominent arts and cultural institutions, including the Smithsonian, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Library of Congress. There will be potential changes to the honors, according to the current and former employees. The center has contacted the jeweler Tiffany & Company about redesigning the medallions, which have traditionally depicted President John F. Kennedy on one side and the building on the other, with a rainbow-colored ribbon meant to represent different artistic skills and talents. The annual dinner at the State Department may be moved to the White House. The White House and Tiffany did not respond to requests for comment. Meanwhile, Done+Dusted, the production company that produced the past several Kennedy Center Honors (as well as recent Mark Twain Prizes for American Humor, the center's other big televised event), pulled out of producing this year's honors. Matthew Winer, the center's internal executive producer of the honors, has resigned from the center, along with Emeline Carlisle, the producer and honoree manager. Even in less tumultuous years, the Kennedy Center Honors are a complex, logistical undertaking. The show usually consists of 70 or more other artists celebrating the honorees. Last year, the 2½-hour show featured Queen Latifah, David Letterman, Robert De Niro, Dave Chappelle, Sheryl Crow, Al Pacino and Martin Scorsese, many of whom are outspoken Trump critics. With so many performers avoiding the center, who will be there on the actual night? It might be where Lee Greenwood, the Village People and Kid Rock come in.
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
How South Korea's ‘MASGA' Proposal Could Reshape US Shipbuilding
South Korea offered in trade negotiations to 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again.' It could mark a new phase for the alliance. When the United States threatened to impose 25 percent tariffs on South Korean exports in mid-2025, the dispute appeared set to become another flashpoint in the alliance, highlighting the current U.S. administration's transactional approach to both trade and security. The stakes were high: tariffs at that level would have disrupted billions of dollars in goods, strained political trust, and reinforced the perception that even close allies were not exempt from the United States' protectionist turn. The eventual compromise, reached just before the August 1 deadline, cut tariffs to 15 percent in exchange for a sweeping economic and industrial package from Seoul. At the center of that package was an initiative that quickly captured media attention and political imagination – 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again' (MASGA). MASGA proposes $150 billion in investments from South Korea's world-class shipbuilders into the U.S. maritime sector. This would include upgrading U.S. shipyards, training U.S. workers, supporting U.S. Navy maintenance backlogs, and co-producing vessels on U.S. soil. The branding was deliberate: borrowing from U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Make America Great Again' slogan, MASGA appealed directly to the White House's political messaging while offering substantive industrial cooperation. The sight of red MASGA hats at the negotiation table underscored Seoul's deft use of symbolic diplomacy. A Structural Problem Meets a Willing Partner The United States has been grappling with a long-term erosion of its shipbuilding base. Since the end of the Cold War, consolidation in the sector has left only a handful of major shipyards. These yards face aging infrastructure, shortages of skilled labor, and program delays that have pushed naval construction timelines into the realm of decades rather than years. Even as the Pentagon and Congress debate fleet expansion – most recently aiming for a 355-ship navy – U.S. shipyards are already at capacity, struggling to meet existing orders. Maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facilities face their own crisis, with warships idled for months awaiting work. By contrast, South Korea remains a global shipbuilding powerhouse. Hyundai Heavy Industries, Hanwha Ocean, and Samsung Heavy Industries lead in commercial tonnage, advanced modular construction, and digitalized production systems. Korean shipyards routinely deliver complex vessels – both military and civilian – on time and within budget. For Washington, tapping this capacity could help bridge a dangerous gap between naval ambition and industrial reality. MASGA is not about importing foreign-built ships into U.S. service – something prohibited for domestic routes under the Jones Act and restricted for defense programs under Buy American rules. Instead, it proposes onshore investment by Korean firms in partnership with U.S. yards, combining the strengths of both countries through joint ventures, licensed production, technology transfer, and workforce development. Korean shipbuilders would partner with U.S. companies to share design, project management, and production methods, while U.S. yards could build Korean-designed vessels domestically, in full compliance with U.S. content laws. The Korean investments would introduce advanced modular construction techniques, automation systems, and integrated supply chain management to improve efficiency; U.S. workers would receive training in proven Korean shipbuilding methods through exchange programs and on-site instruction. The investment would be distributed across multiple U.S. shipyards – both naval and commercial – targeting bottlenecks in the construction of auxiliary vessels, logistics ships, smaller combatants, and unmanned surface platforms, with the aim of increasing output, reducing delays, and modernizing facilities without compromising U.S. control over sensitive capabilities. Looking at the U.S. shipbuilding sector, the U.S. Navy's MRO backlog is a persistent and costly problem. Delays in scheduled maintenance mean fewer ships are available for deployment, undermining fleet readiness. South Korean shipyards, with their proven ability to service advanced warships and large commercial vessels, could provide relief in several ways. One model would see Korean firms upgrade and operate MRO facilities on U.S. soil, applying their efficiency-focused processes to U.S. platforms. Another would allow Korean yards to handle non-sensitive maintenance overseas, freeing up U.S. facilities for high-priority or classified work. Both approaches would reduce downtime and extend the operational life of the fleet. This component of MASGA is particularly attractive to the Pentagon, as it addresses a short-term readiness issue without requiring entirely new construction – something Congress may find easier to approve. From Trade Concession to Strategic Integration What makes MASGA significant is its potential to turn a contentious trade negotiation into a blueprint for long-term alliance integration. Shipbuilding is not just another industrial sector – it is a strategic asset. Control over production timelines, maintenance schedules, and technology flows directly affects a nation's ability to project power and respond to crises. By embedding South Korean firms in the U.S. shipbuilding ecosystem, MASGA would create a form of industrial interdependence that strengthens the alliance. It would also lock in long-term cooperation, making the economic and security costs of alliance friction higher for both sides. For Washington, MASGA represents a politically palatable solution: it expands domestic capacity while creating U.S. jobs, deflecting charges of outsourcing. For Seoul, it offers access to a market that has historically been closed to foreign shipbuilders, along with a seat at the table in shaping future maritime strategies. The geopolitical implications are also significant. The Indo-Pacific maritime balance is shifting rapidly. China's shipyards are producing warships at a pace unmatched in peacetime history, while also expanding their commercial dominance. For the United States and its allies, matching this surge is as much about industrial mobilization as it is about naval doctrine. MASGA aligns with the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy by ensuring that allied capacity – not just U.S. capacity – underpins forward presence in the region. In a crisis, an integrated South Korean-U.S. shipbuilding base could surge production, repair battle-damaged vessels more quickly, and sustain logistics flows. This fits into a broader trend of allies contributing niche industrial strengths to collective deterrence. Just as Japan's advanced electronics feed into missile defense and Australia's shipyards support regional patrol fleets, South Korea's shipbuilding prowess could become a core enabler of allied maritime power. Navigating Domestic Politics Despite its strategic logic, MASGA faces significant political headwinds in the United States. Shipyard operators and labor unions have historically resisted foreign participation, fearing competition and job losses. Congressional protectionists could seek to tighten Buy American provisions, limiting the scope of cooperation. To overcome this, MASGA must be framed not as an outsourcing arrangement but as capacity-building within the United States. Korean firms would need to invest visibly in U.S. facilities, hire U.S. workers, and ensure that intellectual property and sensitive technologies remain under U.S. control. The aerospace sector of the defense industry offers a precedent. Co-production programs such as the F-35 have shown that carefully structured international partnerships can be politically acceptable while meeting industrial goals. MASGA's success may hinge on adopting a similar model. The genius of MASGA lies in its dual identity. On one level, it is a tactical concession, designed to ease tariff pressure and satisfy U.S. political optics. On another, it is a strategic vision for integrating two advanced shipbuilding nations in ways that bolster both economic and military strength. If fully realized, MASGA could help reverse decades of U.S. shipbuilding decline, accelerate naval modernization, and reinforce the industrial foundation of the South Korea-U.S. alliance. For the United States, that would mean a stronger maritime posture in the Indo-Pacific and globally. For South Korea, it would mean deeper integration into the supply chains and decision-making processes that shape allied naval power. In an era where industrial capacity is a decisive element of strategic competition, MASGA offers something rare: a solution that addresses domestic political imperatives while delivering genuine alliance capability. Turning the slogan into reality will not be easy, but if Seoul and Washington can navigate the political shoals, MASGA could yet become a defining success story of 21st-century alliance management.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
DC Residents Protest as White House Says Federal Agents Will Be on Patrol 24/7
WASHINGTON (AP) — Residents in one Washington, D.C., neighborhood lined up Wednesday to protest the increased police presence after the White House said the number of National Guard troops in the nation's capital would ramp up and federal officers would be the streets around the clock. After law enforcement set up a vehicle checkpoint along the busy 14th Street Northwest corridor, hecklers shouted, 'Go home, fascists' and other insults. Some protesters stood at the intersection before the checkpoint and urged drivers to turn away from it. The action intensified a few days after President Donald Trump's unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city's police department for at least a month. The city's Democratic mayor walked a political tightrope, referring to the takeover as an 'authoritarian push' at one point and later framing the infusion of officers as boost to public safety, though one with few specific barometers for success. The Republican president has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix — even as District of Columbia leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago. For two days, small groups of federal officers have been visible in scattered areas of the city. But a significant increase was expected Wednesday at the Guard's armory and troops were expected to start doing more missions in Washington on Thursday, according to a Guard spokesman who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the planning process. On Wednesday, agents from Homeland Security Investigations patrolled the popular U Street corridor. Drug Enforcement Administration officers were seen on the National Mall, while National Guard members were parked nearby. DEA agents also joined Metropolitan Police Department officers on patrol in the Navy Yard neighborhood, while FBI agents stood along the heavily trafficked Massachusetts Avenue. Hundreds of federal law enforcement and city police officers who patrolled the streets Tuesday night made 43 arrests, compared with about two dozen the night before. D.C. Councilmember Christina Henderson downplayed the arrest reports as 'a bunch of traffic stops' and said the administration was seeking to disguise how unnecessary this federal intervention is. 'I'm looking at this list of arrests and they sound like a normal Saturday night in any big city,' said Henderson. Unlike in other U.S. states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days. Extending his power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance. Trump suggested that he could seek a longer period of control or decide to call on Congress to exercise authority over city laws his administration sees as lax on crime. 'We're gonna do this very quickly. But we're gonna want extensions. I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,' he said. Later, on his Truth Social site, Trump reiterated his claims about the city, writing, 'D.C. has been under siege from thugs and killers, but now, D.C. is back under Federal Control where it belongs.' Henderson, who worked for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York before running for the D.C. Council, said she was already in touch with 'friends on the Hill' to rally opposition for any Trump extension request. She added, 'It's Day Three and he's already saying he's going to need more time?' Targeting a variety of infractions The arrests made by 1,450 federal and local officers across the city included those for suspicion of driving under the influence and unlawful entry, as well as a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, according to the White House. Seven illegal firearms were seized. There have now been more than 100 arrests since Trump began beefing up the federal law enforcement presence in Washington last week, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said. 'President Trump is delivering on his campaign promise to clean up this city and restore American Greatness to our cherished capital,' she said. The president has full command of the National Guard and has activated up to 800 troops to support law enforcement, though exactly what form remains to be determined. Neither Army nor District of Columbia National Guard officials have been able to describe the training backgrounds of the troops who have so far reported for duty. While some members are military police, others likely hold jobs that would have offered them little training in dealing with civilians or law enforcement. The federalization push also includes clearing out encampments for people who are homeless, Trump has said. U.S. Park Police have removed dozens of tents since March, and plan to take out two more this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said. People are offered the chance to go to shelters and get addiction treatment, if needed, but those who refuse could be fined or jailed, she said. City officials said they are making more shelter space available and increasing their outreach. Violent crime has dropped in the district The federal effort comes even after a drop in violent crime in the nation's capital, a trend that experts have seen in cities across the U.S. since an increase during the coronavirus pandemic. On average, the level of violence Washington remains mostly higher than averages in three dozen cities analyzed by the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice, said the group's president and CEO, Adam Gelb. Police Chief Pamela Smith said during an interview with the local Fox affiliate that the city's Metro Police Department has been down nearly 800 officers. She said the increased number of federal agents on the streets would help fill that gap, at least for now. Mayor Muriel Bowser said city officials did not get any specific goals for the surge during a meeting with Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, and other top federal law enforcement officials Tuesday. But, she said, 'I think they regard it as a success to have more presence and take more guns off the street, and we do too.' She had previously called Trump's moves 'unsettling and unprecedented' while pointing out he was within a president's legal rights regarding the district, which is the seat of American government but is not a state. For some residents, the increased presence of law enforcement and National Guard troops is nerve-racking. 'I've seen them right here at the subway … they had my street where I live at blocked off yesterday, actually,' Washington native Sheina Taylor said. 'It's more fearful now because even though you're a law-abiding citizen, here in D.C., you don't know, especially because I'm African American.'
