Arunachal introduces trained 'support persons' to aid child victims during legal process
Trained support persons will help children who are victims of crimes, including sexual abuse, and often feel scared, confused and alone during police investigations and court trials.
Sharing the details, Chief Minister Pema Khandu said one trained person would support every 10 child victims.
'They'll guide the child through medical checks, police questions, and court hearings, and make sure the child feels safe, heard, and not alone,' the chief minister said, adding that Arunachal made changes to suit local needs and ensure better help.
Khandu also stated that this step would ensure that children get the emotional and practical support they need to face the legal process with dignity.
'This will ensure a child-friendly justice process, offer emotional and legal support to child victims and enhance protection for vulnerable children in court proceedings,' he further stated.
The cabinet also approved several significant decisions aimed at strengthening technical education, public safety and administrative efficiency.
It approved the raising of an India Reserve Battalion. The state currently has two State Armed Police Battalions and five India Reserve Battalions.
'The addition of a new battalion will significantly augment policing capacity, improve public safety, maintain law and order, and reduce reliance on Central Armed Police Forces. This will also generate employment opportunities for eligible local youth,' a government statement said.
Taking to X, Khandu wrote, 'In today's cabinet, we focused on what matters: generating revenue, maintaining strong fiscal health, and unlocking the potential of our natural resources like hydropower. With a steady focus on revenue and fiscal discipline, we've put ourselves in a strong position to create more jobs and opportunities for our youth.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Urged To Lower Age Of Consent From 18 To 16 Years In India
Senior advocate Indira Jaising has petitioned the Supreme Court of India to reconsider the statutory age of consent, advocating for its reduction from 18 to 16 years. In her role as amicus curiae in the Nipun Saxena v. Union of India case, Jaising has submitted written arguments challenging the comprehensive criminalization of sexual activities involving teenagers between 16 and 18 years under both the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) 2012 and Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. The senior lawyer contends that existing legislation inappropriately categorizes consensual romantic relationships among adolescents as abusive behavior, thereby disregarding their personal autonomy, emotional maturity, and decision-making capabilities. According to Jaising's submissions, there exists no substantial justification or scientific evidence supporting the 2013 decision to raise the consent age from 16 to 18 years, particularly since the lower age had been maintained for more than seven decades prior to this amendment. Jaising emphasizes that the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013 implemented this change without proper parliamentary discussion and contrary to recommendations from the Justice Verma Committee, which had suggested maintaining 16 as the appropriate age of consent. She argues that contemporary adolescents reach physical and emotional maturity earlier than previous generations and possess the capacity to engage in meaningful romantic and sexual relationships based on personal choice. Supporting her argument with empirical data, including statistics from the National Family Health Survey, Jaising notes that sexual activity among teenagers represents a normal aspect of adolescent development. She highlights alarming statistics showing a 180 percent increase in POCSO prosecutions involving minors aged 16 to 18 between 2017 and 2021, with many cases initiated by parents opposing inter-caste or inter-faith relationships, often against the wishes of the young women involved. The advocate warns that criminalizing consensual sexual activity among teenagers creates harmful consequences, forcing young couples into secretive behavior, premature marriages, or legal difficulties rather than promoting healthy communication and comprehensive sex education. To address these concerns, she proposes implementing a "close-in-age" exception that would protect consensual sexual encounters between adolescents aged 16 to 18 from prosecution under current laws. Drawing from international legal precedents and Indian constitutional jurisprudence, Jaising references the United Kingdom's Gillick decision and India's Puttaswamy privacy judgment to argue that legal capacity should not be rigidly determined by age alone. She maintains that decision-making autonomy forms a fundamental component of privacy rights and should extend to adolescents capable of making informed choices about their sexual lives. The submission also acknowledges evolving judicial attitudes in various high courts, including those in Bombay, Madras, and Meghalaya, where judges have expressed concern about the automatic prosecution of adolescent boys under POCSO provisions. These courts have recognized that not all sexual activities involving minors constitute coercive behavior and have called for legal distinctions between genuine abuse and consensual relationships. Jaising concludes her argument by urging the Supreme Court to formally declare that consensual sexual activity between adolescents aged 16 to 18 should not be classified as abuse and must be excluded from POCSO and rape law provisions. She also advocates for reviewing mandatory reporting requirements under Section 19 of POCSO, which discourage adolescents from seeking necessary medical care and support. The senior advocate frames her argument within constitutional principles, asserting that sexual autonomy represents an integral aspect of human dignity and that preventing adolescents from making informed decisions about their bodies violates fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution.
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
RCB Star Yash Dayal Booked For Rape With A 17-Year-Old Minor During IPL 2025 In Jaipur
Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) pacer Yash Dayal appears to be embroiled in a new controversy, as the IPL 2025 winner has now been booked for rape in Jaipur. Shocking details have emerged concerning Dayal's alleged sexual involvement with a 17-year-old minor during IPL 2025. Prior to this incident, Yash Dayal had already been facing legal proceedings for a sexual assault case, where a woman from Ghaziabad had accused the Royal Challengers Bangalore pacer of similar criminal activity. Allegations by a Minor in Jaipur The Allahabad High Court had previously issued a stay order on Dayal's police custody in the Ghaziabad case, based on recent proceedings. However, this new case in Jaipur presents a significant risk for the RCB player, as it involves a minor girl aged 17 accusing him of rape. According to a report by Dainik Bhaskar, An FIR was lodged against Yash Dayal at the Sanganer Sadar Police Station in Jaipur, based on allegations of rape by a minor victim. According to the report, Yash allegedly promised the young girl a promising future in professional cricket and exploited her for a period of two years. IPL 2025 Connection Anil Jaiman, the Station House Officer (SHO) of the Sanganer Sadar Police Station, stated that the victim came into contact with Yash through cricket. It is alleged that approximately two years ago, when the victim was a minor, Yash repeatedly raped her over a two-year period under the guise of helping her build a cricket career. The report also mentions the IPL 2025 connection. As per the Jaipur Police, Yash Dayal, while in Jaipur for an RR vs RCB match, allegedly summoned the victim to a hotel near the Sitapura area and raped her again. After a prolonged period of silence, emotional blackmail, and physical and mental harassment, the victim finally registered an official complaint on July 23, 2025. The Jaipur Police further informed that since the first reported incident of rape occurred when the victim was a 17-year-old minor, a case has been registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act 2012). If found guilty, Yash could face severe consequences, as cases under the POCSO Act are tried rigorously, and the punishment can include lengthy imprisonment. Yash Dayal was a member of the Royal Challengers Bangalore team that secured their first-ever IPL title. RCB clinched the championship by defeating PBKS on June 3.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
27-year-old sentenced to 20 years in prison for minor's kidnapping, rape
Kendrapada: Additional district judge-cum-special judge (Pocso) in Jajpur has sentenced a 27-year-old man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for the kidnapping and rape of a 16-year-old girl. The verdict was delivered on Wednesday, marking a crucial step in the fight against crimes against minors. The convict, Dusmanta Jena, was fined Rs 30,000. Failure to pay the fine will result in an additional six months of imprisonment. The court has directed the Odisha State Legal Services Authority (OSLSA) to compensate the girl with Rs 2 lakh. The incident dates back to April 9, 2023, when the girl was abducted while returning home from college. Following the filing of an FIR, police swiftly launched an investigation, leading to Jena's arrest and rescuing of the girl from Vijayawada three days later. Judge Abhijit Palei, while pronouncing the verdict, relied on the testimonies of 13 witnesses, including the girl's, and the medical report. Jena was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC (rape) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Special public prosecutor Rajiv Mohanty emphasised the importance of the ruling, stating that it underscores the judiciary's commitment to delivering justice in cases of sexual offenses against minors.
