'Clumsy' Japanese PM Ishiba's future in the balance
Opinion polls suggest that Ishiba's coalition could lose its majority in upper house elections on Sunday (Jul 20), a result that might push him to resign.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has governed Japan almost continuously since 1955, but whether anyone wants to replace Ishiba is another matter.
"I wonder who else wants the job," Masahisa Endo, politics professor at Waseda University, told AFP.
Ishiba, 68, a self-confessed defence "geek", is the son of a regional governor and is from Japan's small Christian minority.
He won the party leadership in September, on his fifth try, to become the LDP's 10th separate prime minister since 2000, all of them men.
Ishiba pledged to "create a new Japan" and revitalise depressed rural regions, and to address the "quiet emergency" of Japan's shrinking population.
He immediately called lower house elections for October but that backfired spectactularly, with the LDP suffering its worst result in 15 years.
That robbed the LDP and its coalition party Komeito of their majority, forcing them to bargain with opposition parties to pass legislation.
Ishiba's policies on bringing down inflation and spurring growth have "flip-flopped" as a result, said Stefan Angrick at Moody's Analytics.
"Ishiba's government has boxed itself in, promising only some belated and half-hearted financial support that will do little to improve the demand outlook," Angrick said.
The government's popularity ratings have plummeted, with voters angry about price rises, especially for rice that is twice as expensive as a year ago.
CLUMSY WAYS
Ishiba, the father of two daughters, also missed a chance to appear more modern by appointing only two women to his cabinet, down from five under predecessor Fumio Kishida.
Ishiba's sometimes clumsy ways - ranging from the less-than-perfectly tidy arrangement of his tuxedo to his table manners - have also been rich fodder for social media memes.
He drew ridicule after being snapped apparently napping in parliament and for failing to stand up to greet other world leaders at a gathering in South America.
Worse was a video that emerged of Ishiba eating an onigiri rice ball - a popular snack - whole and munching on it without closing his mouth.
"He eats like a three-year-old," one user said on social media platform X.
"How could he have risen to the top with these manners?" asked another.
NO DEAL
A major challenge has been dealing with US President Donald Trump, who has imposed tariffs on Japanese cars, steel and aluminium.
Further levies of 25 per cent on other Japanese imports will come into force on Aug 1 if there is no trade agreement.
Ishiba secured an early invitation to the White House in February and has sent his tariffs envoy to Washington seven times, but there has been no deal yet.
Then-premier Shinzo Abe - dubbed a "Trump whisperer" - fared better during Trump's first term, managing to shield Japan from any tariffs.
Abe, who was assassinated in 2022, gifted Trump a gold-coloured golf club and was a frequent visitor to see the US president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'Why do some Singaporeans feel more entitled than others?'
SINGAPORE: In the Lion City, where social policies intend to strike a sense of balance between fairness and practicality, few schemes have triggered as much discussion as the CDC coupons. These government-issued vouchers are aimed at easing the load of escalating living costs, yet an ostensibly modest gesture of assistance has kindled a bigger discussion about equality, privilege, and the public's perception of prosperity. Recently, a Redditor voiced curiosity about the mounting bitterness observed online. 'I am by no means a wealthy person,' the poster wrote, 'but I keep seeing comments about how it's unfair that someone living in a landed property gets the same vouchers as someone in an HDB flat. I genuinely want to understand—why do people feel entitled to more?' It's a question that opened the floodgates to a variety of outlooks and perceptions, demonstrating that the problem isn't just about dollars and cents—it's about ideals, insights, and messaging. The problem with equality in benefits A common response from commenters was the strain between fairness and equity. While the government gives the same amount of CDC vouchers to rich and poor citizens alike, the lived reality of Singaporeans extensively differs. As one commenter clarified, 'Should poor people get more monetary benefit from the government than rich people? That's a far more complex issue than 'poor people are entitled.'' See also Cost of living issues at the top of voters' minds in GE2025 runup Unquestionably, while some contend that equal dispersal mirrors national harmony, others feel the system should account for need. A S$300 voucher might hardly register for a high-income home, but for households earning the minimum wage, it could mean a week's worth of groceries. It's not just the money—it's the message A vital aspect, according to netizens, is how the government sets these vouchers. The official description is that the CDC vouchers are intended to 'alleviate the cost of living.' That kind of messaging, many claim, sets the belief that the more economically disadvantaged one is, the more help one should receive. 'If it was, say, a tax rebate,' one Redditor pointed out, 'the rich get more and no one complains, because it's seen as a discount on taxes—something they already pay more of. But when vouchers are positioned as support, people feel it should be given based on need, not equality.' Another added, 'If the message was simply, 'we're returning a budget surplus to all citizens,' I don't think people would be as upset.' What do people really want? Underneath the discussion, there's a sense that the real issue isn't just about coupons—it's about acknowledgment and reprieve. Lower-income people often feel the pinch of mounting expenditures more intensely and want that hardship addressed in concrete ways. 'The vouchers can cover a month's worth of basic expenses for some families,' one netizen wrote. 'So, when others use it to buy luxuries, it feels like a slap in the face.' However, it's not only the 'have-nots' who are disgruntled. As one noted, even high-income earners sometimes complain they're being deceitfully overtaxed or that the system doesn't reward them sufficiently, even though many of them have benefited from scholarships or overseas funding in the past. 'There will always be people unhappy,' one Redditor wisecracked. 'They lack contentment—so it's not just the lower income.' Gratitude vs entitlement The most surprising insight came from a commenter who thought that gratitude has become increasingly rare across all income brackets. 'People will never be grateful for what's being given,' he said. 'It doesn't matter if they're high-income or low-income.' It's a sceptic's mindset, but it can lead to a deeper challenge for legislators — even benevolent initiatives can provoke hatred if the public sees them as skewed from actual realities and societal values. A question of perspective Eventually, the poster wasn't aiming to attack or protect any side but was trying to understand why ' people feel entitled to more.' Yes, all Singaporeans work hard, but hardship is not always gauged in hours—it's gauged in values and outcomes. When someone living paycheck to paycheck gets the same aid as someone with financial resources, the result can feel more like nominal equality than real equity. And that's the actual core of the debate — not who deserves what, but how we describe fair-mindedness in a society that strives for both meritocracy and sympathy.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Foxconn to suspend share trading on July 30 pending major announcement
TAIPEI :Foxconn, also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry, said it will suspend share trading on July 30 pending a major announcement. In Taiwan, companies typically halt trading ahead of announcements, including investments, asset sales and mergers or strategic partnerships, that could affect share prices.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Microsoft's AI edge under scrutiny as OpenAI turns to rivals for cloud services
Microsoft investors head into Wednesday's earnings with one big question: is the company's artificial intelligence edge at risk as partner OpenAI turns to rivals Google, Oracle and CoreWeave for cloud services? Exclusive licensing deals and access to OpenAI's cutting-edge models have made Microsoft one of the biggest winners of the generative AI boom, fueling growth in its Azure cloud business and pushing its market value toward $4 trillion. In the April-June quarter, the tie-up is expected to have driven a 34.8 per cent increase in Azure revenue, in line with the company's forecast and higher than the 33 per cent rise in the previous three months, according to data from Visible Alpha. But that deal is being renegotiated as OpenAI eyes a public listing, with media reports suggesting a deadlock over how much access Microsoft will retain to ChatGPT maker's technology and its stake if OpenAI converts into a public-benefit corporation. The conversion cannot proceed without Microsoft's sign-off and is crucial for a $40 billion funding round led by Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Group, $20 billion of which is contingent on the restructuring being completed by the end of the year. OpenAI, which recently deepened its Oracle tie-up with a planned 4.5 gigawatts data center capacity, has also added Google Cloud among its suppliers for computing capacity. UBS analysts said investor views on the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership are divided, though the software giant holds an upper hand. "Microsoft's leadership earned enough credibility … such that the company will end up negotiating terms that will be in the interest of its shareholders," the analysts said. Some of that confidence is reflected in the company's stock price, which has risen by more than a fifth so far this year. In the April-June period, Microsoft's fiscal fourth quarter, the company likely benefited from a weaker dollar, stronger non-AI Azure demand and PC makers pulling forward orders for its Windows products ahead of possible U.S. tariffs. Revenue is expected to have risen 14 per cent to $73.81 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG, its best growth in three quarters. Profit is estimated to have increased 14.2 per cent to $25.16 billion, slightly slower than the previous quarter as operating costs rose. Capital spending will also be in focus after rival Alphabet raised its annual outlay by $10 billion last week. Microsoft has repeatedly said it remains capacity constrained on AI, and in April signaled continued growth in capex after planned spending of over $80 billion last fiscal year, though at a slower pace and on shorter-lived assets such as AI chips. Dan Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust who owns Microsoft shares, said the spending has been paying off.
