
Why American tech stocks are newly vulnerable
AS THE panic fades, investors' nerves are still jangling. For the time being, stock markets have stopped convulsing and the prices of American Treasury bonds are no longer in free fall. Yet share indices across America, Asia and Europe have hardly recovered their poise; instead, day-to-day drops of a percentage point or more have become unremarkable.
The VIX index – Wall Street's 'fear gauge', which measures expected volatility using the market price of insurance against it – has fallen from its nerve-shredding peak reached a fortnight ago. It is nevertheless at a level last seen in 2022, amid a grinding bear market. The price of gold has been breaking record after record. Investors, in other words, are offloading risk wherever they can and preparing for a drawn-out slump.
For one group of stocks, that is an especially big problem. 'You can only sell what you own,' says Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, 'and by the end of last year, fund managers in aggregate had a record-breaking 'overweight' position in US equities.'
In particular, they had bet on a clutch of tech giants that Hartnett, two years ago, dubbed the Magnificent Seven: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla. Between March 2023 and March 2025 'long Magnificent Seven' continuously topped his bank's monthly survey asking fund managers to name the most crowded trade. 'It was an accident waiting to happen,' says Hartnett.
Now the accident is under way. Since a peak in December, an equal-weighted average of the Magnificent Seven's share prices has fallen by 27 per cent, far more than the broader S&P 500 index or indeed that for any other big stock market.
Tesla has fared worst, with its market value cut in half. Analysts at Goldman Sachs, a bank, have called the group the 'Maleficent Seven'. It is quite a turnaround for companies that, a few months ago, were the standard-bearers for transformative technology, not least artificial intelligence (AI), and the explosive profits it might mint. What is more, their share prices matter greatly even to passive index trackers, since they still account for more than a quarter of the S&P 500's market value. Is the market turbulence killing the hottest theme in investment?
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
With investors having previously bet so heavily on the tech giants, any reversal in sentiment might easily have led to big losses. Recent weeks have been especially tough, however. Erratic policymaking in the White House has prompted investors to question the wisdom of outsize allocations to American assets.
A trade war, meanwhile, has sparked worries of a slowdown that hurts America more than others. Such fears might lead you to sell shares in the Magnificent Seven, since they formerly embodied the widespread belief in American exceptionalism and rely on demand from consumers the world over.
Moreover, a trade war will cause grave harm to the business models of multinationals whose vast supply chains, and customer base, span continents. That is true not just of the Magnificent Seven but, for instance, of chipmakers around the world. Sure enough, the Philadelphia semiconductor index, which tracks companies in the industry, has fallen by more than a third since a peak in July.
The most recent drop in Nvidia's share price, beginning on Apr 15, came after the company said that America's government had barred it from selling its 'H20' chip to China without an export licence. The chip was released last year and explicitly designed to avoid export controls; Nvidia warned the new restrictions will wipe US$5.5 billion from its quarterly earnings.
A bite out of Apple
Even after the recent plunge in their share prices, most of the Magnificent Seven remain unusually vulnerable to additional shocks. Three of them – Amazon, Apple and Microsoft – have market values that are around 30 times their underlying earnings; Nvidia's equivalent ratio is 34; Tesla's is 118. These compare with an average 'valuation multiple' of 22 for the broader S&P 500 index today, and a long-run historical one of around 19.
High valuations are justified for companies, such as America's tech giants, that expect to sustain high rates of profit growth for a long time to come. The lion's share of their value comes not from their present cash flows, but from the much larger earnings they expect to make in the future. Yet all corporate profits many years from now are subject to radical uncertainty, and those for firms reliant on technological innovation are even more so. Who knows what the world will look like in 2030 or 2040? Since the share prices of firms with high valuations depend far more on this future, they are more sensitive to shocks.
Meanwhile, the Magnificent Seven's barnstorming profit growth is unlikely to continue for ever. Over the five years to the end of 2024, the group's aggregate earnings before tax, debt interest and accounting write-downs grew at an annualised rate of 41 per cent. Analysts' average forecast for 2025 is still for an extremely healthy 34 per cent. But over the past seven quarters 'the second derivative of earnings has been negative', notes Torsten Slok of Apollo, a private-asset manager, meaning that the rate of earnings growth has fallen. That might be a sign of a slowing economy or – more ominously for companies with market values predicated on ballooning profits – that their trajectories are levelling out.
The tech giants also have more to fear from a recession than they did in the past. Investors once lauded their 'capital light' business models, under which they needed to plough only a small proportion of their cash into physical assets and spend little to acquire new customers. This, in turn, helped justify high valuations, since it left tech firms with low fixed costs and hence better able to weather falling demand when recessions materialised.
Those days are now history, with the big tech firms splurging on everything from developing new platforms to investing in the physical infrastructure needed for AI. The trend is accelerating. Whereas in 2019 the Magnificent Seven spent 35 per cent of their cash from operations on capital expenditure, in 2025 analysts expect it to be 49 per cent. The hope is that such investment will fuel innovation, better products and even greater profits – and in a boom it may well do. Yet it also leaves the tech giants far more exposed to faltering demand than they were before.
The Magnificent Seven are gobbling up capital in another way, too, points out James White of Elm Wealth, an investment firm. Whereas they themselves are profitable, many of their customers – whether for Nvidia's chips or Amazon's Web services – are smaller, loss-making startups much further down the AI food chain.
Part of the tech giants' explosive profit growth has therefore come from the floods of cash venture-capital firms and other financial institutions have poured into such startups in recent years. For that to continue, capital must remain plentiful and relatively cheap. Neither is likely if investors continue to worry about the future and prefer buying insurance to taking risk. Even if they prove to be ephemeral, market ructions could yet dole out much more damage to America's corporate titans.
©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
34 minutes ago
- CNA
Consumer Reports urges Congress to drop electric vehicle tax proposal
WASHINGTON :An influential consumer organization on Wednesday urged Republican lawmakers to drop a plan to impose a proposed $250 annual fee on electric cars to pay for road repairs. Consumer Reports, which also tests and rates new vehicles, noted that Republican Senator Bernie Moreno has called for boosting the proposed yearly fee to $500 for EVs and $250 for plug-in hybrids versus the tax and budget bill over the fee in the bill approved by the U.S. House in May. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The fees would mean consumers would pay anywhere from three to seven times as much as owners of similar conventional gasoline vehicles in federal gas taxes, Consumer Reports said. The new fees could hit Tesla, GM other EV owners. KEY QUOTES Chris Harto, senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports said the EV fees were "punitive taxes designed to confiscate fuel savings from consumers who just want to save money for their families." CONTEXT Lawmakers in April dropped a $20 federal yearly registration fee on all vehicles starting in 2031 to fund road repairs. The U.S. House bill would end a $7,500 tax credit for new EVs for most automakers by Dec. 31, end a $4,000 used car EV tax credit, repeal vehicle emissions rules and kill an Energy Department loan program that supports the manufacture of green advanced technology vehicles. It would also phase out EV battery production tax credits in 2028. Ford said the bill's provision to eliminate EV battery production using Chinese technology threatens the automaker's projected $3 billion investment in a Marshall, Michigan, plant that is 60 per cent complete and slated to employ 1,700 workers. On Thursday, President Donald Trump will sign three resolutions approved by lawmakers barring California's electric vehicle sales mandates and diesel engine rules, auto industry and House aides told Reuters.


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Tesla robotaxi rollout in Austin tests Musk's vision of self-driving future
Tesla faces an existential test this month as it aims to launch self-driving 'robotaxis' in its home base of Austin, Texas, where public-safety officials are increasingly concerned about the state's anti-regulation stance toward autonomous vehicles. For Tesla, the launch of between 10 and 20 Model Y vehicles follows a decade of unfulfilled promises of self-driving vehicles from CEO Elon Musk, who last year staked the company's future on such technology as it pivoted away from chasing rapid growth in electric-vehicle sales. The Austin robotaxi launch, which Musk says will "tentatively" open to the public on June 22, comes as Tesla tries to arrest a global vehicle-sales slide, stemming from both its aging lineup of human-driven electric vehicles and Musk's right-wing political activities. Some analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has yet to deliver. On an earnings call last year, Musk said investors "should sell their Tesla stock" if they did not believe the company would solve the technological challenges of driverless vehicles. For the city of Austin, Tesla's launch adds anxiety to a regulation-free landscape for autonomous vehicles. The Texas legislature in 2017 prohibited cities from regulating autonomous vehicles as a way to promote the industry's growth statewide. Now, as the vehicles proliferate, some politicians, public-safety officials and advocates are pushing for more rules. Austin police officers continually have run into problems with autonomous vehicles from Alphabet's Waymo and General Motors' now-defunct Cruise freezing up when they encounter complex traffic situations, such as festivals where officers direct traffic with hand signals, said Austin Police Lieutenant William White. Vehicles have disregarded traffic barriers and driven into prohibited areas, he said. 'It's been very frustrating on our end from a safety standpoint,' said White, who oversees autonomous-vehicle safety for the department. 'If these machines are learning, they're not learning at a quick enough pace for sure.' Waymo said it works closely with Austin officials and is always looking to improve the technology. The Texas legislature passed a bill last month that for the first time would require autonomous-vehicle companies to apply for authorization to operate in the state, and give state authorities the power to revoke permits if a driverless vehicle "endangers the public." Firms are also required to provide the state information on how police and first responders can deal with the vehicles in emergency situations. If the bill is signed by the governor, it is unclear when the new system would take effect, but likely not until next year, according to a state Department of Motor Vehicles spokesperson. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Musk and Tesla have given few details about their plans for the Austin robotaxi launch. Among the key questions is whether the cars will include new sensors or other technology that differs from the currently offered "Full Self-Driving" feature, which is not autonomous. In a post on his X social media platform on Tuesday, Musk described the driverless Austin vehicles as "unmodified Tesla cars" using a "new version of software." In January, Musk said Tesla would be offering 'autonomous ride-hailing for money in Austin, in June,' followed by other American cities 'as swiftly as possible.' He has described Tesla's approach as one that 'works anywhere.' In April, he said the Austin rollout would begin with 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles, and that the company would 'scale it up rapidly after that' to be in 'many other cities in the U.S.' by the end of the year. He predicted there would be 'millions of Teslas' operating 'fully autonomously' by the second half of next year. Musk's statements in recent weeks have been more cautious. On CNBC last month, he said that when Tesla deploys robotaxis in Austin, the company will 'geofence' the vehicles and operate in 'only the parts of Austin that we consider to be the safest.' He said company staff would remotely monitor the vehicles. 'We're going to be extremely paranoid about the deployment, as we should be,' he said. Musk and Tesla have not said who the passengers will be, how Tesla will charge for rides, where in Austin they will operate or how extensive the remote operation will be. Rivals have started testing with their own employees and a limited number of passengers before opening the services to anyone. In a post on X on Tuesday night, Musk said public rides would begin "tentatively, June 22," adding "the date could shift." One video that surfaced on social media on Tuesday, which Musk reposted, showed a Model Y with the word 'Robotaxi' driving on a street in Austin with no human driver, followed closely by a second Tesla vehicle. In a May 28 post on X, Musk said the company had recently started testing 'self-driving' vehicles on Austin public streets with 'no one in driver's seat.' Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla advertisements for 'teleoperation' positions say the company needs the ability to 'access and control" autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely, adding that such employees can 'remotely perform complex and intricate tasks.' The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration inquired last month about many of the unanswered questions surrounding the Austin rollout. The agency, which is investigating Tesla's FSD driver-assistance feature after a fatal crash in 2023, sent a detailed request seeking information about safety features, Tesla's timetable for expansion, where exactly it will be operating the vehicles and how it is preparing for accidents and emergency scenarios. The responses are due next week. A person familiar with NHTSA's operations said the agency sent the letter because it already has concerns about Tesla's current FSD technology, which it sells to customers for $99 a month, and it fears that Tesla's Austin rollout may not be safe. The Texas attorney general is considering a Reuters request for communications between Tesla and city officials in Austin over the past two years, which Tesla has opposed over trade secrets concerns. Austin's Department of Transportation and Public Works declined to discuss Tesla's operations. A person familiar with Austin's autonomous-vehicle policies said the city has been meeting regularly with Tesla since December and that the company has shared some deployment plans with the city. Safety experts say there has been a dearth of information about Tesla's technology. Phil Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said Musk's statements 'leave room for ambiguity' about its plans in Austin and the sophistication of its robotaxi technology. 'When you start to pin it down, it's like jello,' he said. He questioned whether Tesla would be ready for a rapid nationwide rollout soon. 'Having 10 cars on the road and not having a crash,' Koopman said, 'is sort of table stakes for this game.'

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Argentine market traders cautiously cheer 'future without Cristina'
FILE PHOTO: Argentina's former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner looks on outside the Partido Justicialista (Justicialista Party) national building, after Argentina's Supreme Court upheld her guilty verdict for defrauding the state, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Tomas Cuesta/ File Photo BUENOS AIRES/NEW YORK - Argentine traders cheered on Wednesday a court's political ban on populist former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, a powerful but divisive politician who often clashed with investors and creditors. The country's Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a ruling against the former president, who was sentenced to six years in prison and banned from holding public office for fraud, rejecting an appeal by the leader of the Peronist opposition. "All investors fear a return to Kirchnerism. A future without Cristina.... clears the outlook," said Mariano Sardans of local financial firm FDI Gerenciadora de Patrimonios, citing high-spending, interventionist policies under the Peronists. "The specter that always looms over investors is Kirchnerism and Argentina's falling back into policies of that nature." Current market-friendly libertarian President Javier Milei has been well received by investors, helping boost equities and bonds since he took office in late 2023, ushering in tough austerity and a "zero deficit" drive. Legislative elections in October are seen as a test of his popularity. A positive result in those ballots will help ensure the success of some of his investor-friendly reforms. Fernández, the government's strongest opposition figure, will now be barred from running for a seat she sought in Buenos Aires Province. Sovereign dollar bonds were trading slightly higher on the day while the benchmark S&P Merval stock index fell over 1% after rising more than 4% on Tuesday. Other analysts were more cautious, warning about tough economic challenges ahead, including rebuilding foreign exchange reserves. "The impact on the market will most likely be limited, since the Supreme Court's ruling doesn't solve Argentina's macroeconomic problems," said Roberto Geretto, an economist at local firm Adcap. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.