
Russia unrattled after Trump's threat of 'very severe tariffs'
Calling Trump's statements 'very serious,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Russia needs 'time to analyze' them.
But investors in the Russian capital who had been gearing up for tougher measures instead embraced a 50-day grace period on tariffs set by Trump on Monday and the Moscow Stock Exchange was up by 2.7% after it opened Tuesday morning.
Oil prices also fell by more than $1 after the announcement, hinting that investors don't think Trump will follow through on his threat to impose the tariffs.
Trump 'did not announce any immediate anti-Russian measures or the confiscation of illegally blocked Russian assets,' Leonid Slutsky, a prominent nationalist politician, said on Telegram Tuesday, adding that the president was trying to balance Western support for Kyiv while avoiding a confrontation with the Kremlin.
Trump announced the levies along with the shipment of new weapons to Ukraine during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House on Monday.
His comments came as a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) made its way through Congress. If passed, it would seek to impose 500% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil and gas.
Praising Trump's announcement, Graham and his bill's co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn) said in a statement that 'the ultimate hammer to bring about the end of this war will be tariffs against countries, like China, India and Brazil, that prop up Putin's war machine by purchasing cheap Russian oil and gas.'
However, Konstantin Kosachev, the Deputy Chairman of the Russian Federation Council, the upper house of the country's parliament, said Graham's bill made 'no sense.' In 50 days, 'how much can change both on the battlefield and in the mood of those in power both in the U.S. and in NATO?' he added.
And former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a hardliner who frequently issues over-the-top threats, called Trump's threat a 'theatrical ultimatum' in a post on X.
'We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100%,' Trump said, without providing further details.
After the announcement, a White House official said Trump's threat of 100% tariffs was referring to Russian goods, as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports.
The president's comments signal a marked shift in tone over his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, for whom he has long shown admiration. 'I've known him for a long time. We've always gotten along well,' Trump said back in March.
Many Western countries have have cut most of their own financial ties to Moscow during since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its smaller neighbor, triggering the first major land war in Europe since World War II.
Still, buyers of Russia's crude oil like China and India have continued financing Moscow's war chest with hundreds of billions of dollars through business with the world's third-largest oil producer.
'It's about tariffs on countries like India and China that are buying their oil,' Matt Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO told reporters Monday after Trump's announcement. 'And it really is going to, I think, dramatically impact the Russian economy.'
Trump's threats of secondary tariffs are 'never going to go anywhere' as long as he is unwilling to impose costs on Moscow directly, Keir Giles, a senior fellow at the London-based Chatham House think tank, told NBC News Monday.
The tariffs also risk upending delicate China-U.S. trade talks, according to Liu Baocheng at Beijing's University of International Business and Economics.
The 'unilateral imposition of punitive trade measures...risks creating new and unnecessary complications,' Baocheng said, adding that the 100% secondary tariffs intended to pressure Moscow could instead 'severely backfire by undermining global economic stability and fragmenting international cooperation.'
Most concerning, Baocheng added, was that the threat comes at a delicate juncture in U.S.-China trade relations, where secondary tariffs on Chinese companies or sectors that import Russian goods 'would seriously damage the fragile momentum of dialogue.'
Trump's tariff agenda has also raised the stakes for India, which has been negotiating a trade deal with Washington to see tariffs on goods from India drop below 20%.
India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar told reporters Tuesday that his country had 'been in touch' with Graham over its concerns and interests on energy and security.
Elsewhere, Europe's chief negotiator Maroš Šefčovič told reporters in Brussels on Monday that a 30% tariff on European goods would have a 'huge impact on trade.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump's Treasury Secretary suggests August 1 trade deal deadline doesn't matter one day after Commerce Secretary calls it a ‘hard deadline'
The Trump administration may be taking a flexible approach to what it previously described as a 'hard deadline' of long-promised tariffs taking effect on August 1. 'The important thing here is the quality of the deal, not the timing of the deals,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Monday, arguing the president's tariff threats had created 'maximum leverage as only he can do' for countries to swiftly reach trade deals with the U.S. 'Our trading partners were told that the rates could boomerang back toward the April 2nd levels,' he added. 'We can continue talking then. But again, we're proceeding apace with the negotiations, but we're not going to rush for the sake of doing deals.' Other Trump officials have described the August 1 deadline, when U.S. trading partners could face up to 40 percent tariffs, as a firmer cutoff point. 'That's a hard deadline, so on August 1, the new tariff rates will come in,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CBS News on Sunday. 'Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on August 1.' The president, for his part, has called the deadline " firm but not 100 percent firm.' Throughout July, the Trump administration has written letters to foreign leaders warning of the coming tariffs, expected to include a 35 percent tariff rate against Canada, a major U.S. trading partner, and a 30 percent rate for the European Union and Mexico. Since being unveiled in April, Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff agenda has been repeatedly delayed, and the administration has conceded it won't achieve its original promise of 90 trade deals in 90 days. 'There's 200 countries,'' the president said earlier this month. 'You can't talk to all of them.'' The president's hesitancy to fully implement the tariffs has prompted critics of the president to deem the tariff agenda the 'TACO' plan, for 'Trump always chickens out.' The markets ' shrugged' off Trump's move to push back the tariffs to August, Carolyn Kissane, a professor at NYU's School of Professional Studies Center for Global Affairs, told The Independent earlier this month, compared to the initial market plunge when the tariffs were first revealed. 'The pattern is familiar: dramatic declarations, walk-backs, and renewed threats. It's eroded his credibility and resembles the boy who cried wolf,' Kissane added. 'He believes this tactic gives him a unique leverage to negotiate, but it also weakens the threats.'


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
WH responds to Epstein files controversy
The White House said that Republicans remain behind the President, despite criticism from some Trump supporters over the handling of the DOJ files of notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Plus, former President Biden's son Hunter blamed Ambien for his father's disastrous debate performance. NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell reports.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Fox News tosses softballs at Karoline Leavitt - right after Press Secretary bans sister outlet Wall Street Journal over Epstein bombshell
Moments after the Wall Street Journal was removed from the White House travel press pool as retribution for the newspaper's bombshell about Donald Trump's alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was greeted on the WSJ's sister network with softball questions about Hunter Biden. As has largely been the case since the president filed his $10 billion lawsuit against the WSJ , its parent company News Corp and its owner Rupert Murdoch over the story, Fox News – which is also owned by Murdoch – once again ignored the White House's vendetta against the right-wing network's 94-year-old founder. Following Trump's concerted effort to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax' amid a MAGA uproar over his Justice Department concluding Epstein had no 'client list,' the WSJ published a much-anticipated report on Thursday evening detailing the president's once-close relationship with the dead sex offender. The blockbuster story claimed Trump gave Epstein a 'bawdy' card for his 50th birthday that included a hand-drawn sketch of a naked woman with Trump's signature mimicking pubic hair. The report also claimed Trump wrote Epstein a personalized message that concluded: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Asserting that the sexually suggestive birthday card is a 'fake thing,' Trump – likely emboldened by CBS owner Paramount settling the 'meritless' 60 Minutes complaint – threatened legal action against the WSJ and his on-again/off-again friend Murdoch before filing a libel lawsuit on Friday afternoon. The defendants 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained,' the president's lawsuit alleges. 'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists,' the complaint adds. Fox News – which enjoys a symbiotic relationship with the president and has helped staff his administration – has mostly steered clear of reporting on either the WSJ's scoop or the president's subsequent defamation lawsuit against the network's founder and owner. So far, the WSJ's story has only been mentioned on a handful of Fox News programs – one of which is the Journal Editorial Report, a show co-produced by the WSJ. Fox News media host Howie Kurtz also devoted the opening segment of Sunday morning's MediaBuzz to the lawsuit and the eye-popping report. On Monday afternoon, the White House followed up by removing reporters from the WSJ from the pool of journalists scheduled to cover the president's upcoming four-day trip to Scotland to tour his golf courses. Tarini Parti, a White House reporter for the WSJ, had been initially slated to serve as the print pooler for the final two days of the visit. 'As the appeals court confirmed, the Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the [13] outlets on board. Every news organization in the entire world wishes to cover President Trump, and the White House has taken significant steps to include as many voices as possible.' The latest action by the White House echoes its ban of Associated Press journalists from covering Oval Office events after the wire service said it would not refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America' following Trump's executive order renaming the body of water, citing editorial standards. Shortly after Trump took office, Leavitt took control of pool rotation assignments from the White House Correspondents' Association. Appearing on Fox News' The Story moments after confirming that she had booted the WSJ from the travel pool, Leavitt didn't have to worry about being pressed by anchor Martha MacCallum to explain the latest move against the network's sister publication. Despite the Trump administration going on the 'warpath' against Murdoch, MacCallum instead conducted a friendly and non-adversarial chat with the White House flack over the five-minute segment. After devoting the first part of the conversation to the recent shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer in New York City, which featured Leavitt blaming the incident on the former Biden administration, MacCallum then brought up New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. 'You know, Karoline, we have not heard from Mamdani – who is running for mayor in New York,' the anchor stated, wondering if Trump would endorse another candidate in the race because 'he's a New Yorker and he wants to keep the city safe.' Leavitt, meanwhile, took the opportunity to accuse Mamdani – who has quickly become a leftist boogeyman for the right – of standing for 'allowing illegal criminals and criminals of all kinds to run free.' MacCallum, meanwhile, took the opportunity to get Leavitt's 'quick reaction' to something that is 'getting a lot of attention.' But rather than the continued fallout over the Epstein saga, the president's lawsuit and the White House's continued retribution against the WSJ, MacCallum instead wanted Leavitt to respond to Hunter Biden profanely blasting Democrats in a recent podcast appearance. 'Clearly, they've learned nothing from President Trump's overwhelming victory on November 5th,' Leavitt responded, leaning heavily on her tried-and-true talking points. 'The American people want deportations. They want secure borders. That's why we had the most successful six months of any administration!' Adding that it was clear the younger Biden 'wanted to tear down anybody' who veers to the middle on immigration, MacCallum thanked Leavitt for her time before letting viewers know that she would be covering more about Hunter Biden's recent comments later in the program. It would appear the message is clear to Trump world – Fox News isn't going to defend their colleagues at the WSJ or even stand up for their boss right now. Instead, they will just avoid this entire story while focusing energy on the distractions the president prefers they cover – such as Tulsi Gabbard's reigniting MAGA's long-standing obsession with jailing Barack Obama over the Trump-Russia probe, which the administration served up to Fox as an exclusive. In the end, Trump-boosting Fox News host Mark Levin perhaps said it best this past weekend. 'We can't waste our time on Epstein, and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us to focus on,' Levin exclaimed.