Chinese money is transforming our favourite holiday destinations
Tourism is worth more than $10 trillion (that's 10,000 billion) to the world economy every year. But is the Chinese Communist Party looking to carve off a bigger slice of that particular pie – and what might it mean for your next holiday?
The idea of China shaping your next getaway may sound fanciful to most travellers (unless you're heading to Shanghai or Beijing, of course).
But the Chinese government's increasingly ambitious strategy of international investments – otherwise known as the controversial Belt and Road Initiative – is increasingly expanding Beijing's presence in some of the world's most popular tourism spots.
Perhaps the most dramatic example of this phenomenon so far has been the Maldives. While best known to most British travellers as an archipelago of high-end resort islands, the destination's unique and isolated location has turned into a battleground for influence between China and one of its biggest strategic rivals, India.
'India has traditionally been very concerned about Chinese investment along the coast of the Indian Ocean,' says Jacob Gunther, from the Germany-based think tank MERICS (the Mercator Institute for China Studies). 'However, the investments in the Maldives have been particularly contentious, as they're right in the middle of the ocean itself.'
While India is keen to maintain a strong military presence in the ocean, China has been on a charm offensive, using its vast cash reserves to try to pry the Maldives away from its historic ally. While this investment spree might not be on the minds of tourists lazing in waterfront bungalows, it isn't entirely invisible either.
It was Chinese cash that funded the upgrade and expansion of Velana International Airport – the landing point for almost every single international tourist arriving in the Maldives. The Belt and Road Initiative (or BRI) also funded a massive, modern road bridge connecting the airport with Male – the Maldives' densely-populated capital city – as well as the slightly more tourist-friendly island of Hulhumalé. If you've crossed over out of curiosity to see the 'real' Maldives, you've almost certainly been on it.
Infrastructure investment is all well and good, but analysts fret that the Maldives is becoming indebted to China, which may then seek to take control of land and assets in the country in return. They point to the massive controversy surrounding China's investment into a new port in Sri Lanka – another tourist hotspot – which then fell into Beijing's hands when the South Asian country was unable to make its payments.
The port story goes to the heart of the mysteries surrounding the BRI, which is understood by most analysts as a way of China expanding trade routes while also peeling some countries away from the West.
'The BRI is both a geostrategic and commercial project, so a lot of the projects are a blend of those two aims,' says Mr Gunther, who has researched China's 'political economy' for more than a decade.
While the Maldives may have been one of the most contentious investments, the Chinese government and its state-backed enterprises have been making their presence felt in numerous other holiday destinations, spanning all the way from south-east Asia to the Adriatic Coast.
Sometimes these investments are explicitly focused on tourism projects. In Cambodia, Chinese investment has turned the unremarkable beach-town of Sihanoukville into an enclave of skyscrapers, some of them hosting plush Chinese casino resorts, but hundreds of them unfinished, creating a dystopian feel.
Some 300 miles away in Krong Siem Reap, the nearest city to Angkor Wat, China has ploughed $1.1 billion into a state-of-the-art airport.
Sub-Saharan Africa has been another hotspot, with China taking advantage of a Western retreat from the continent to bolster its influence. In 2023, African countries received more than $20 billion in investment via BRI deals, much of it going into energy and transport infrastructure.
Then there's the Caribbean, where a number of Commonwealth countries have signed BRI partnerships with Beijing, including Barbados, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. While the Caribbean governments have relished the chance to upgrade their infrastructure, the wave of Chinese funding – which has topped $9 billion across Latin America and the Caribbean – has led the US State Department to warn about the region becoming a 'Chinese lake'.
Closer to home, China has unnerved some Western governments by becoming a significant investor in parts of the Western Balkans, most notably the emerging tourism hotspot of Montenegro.
Alongside some hotel developments backed by private Chinese investors, Beijing has also embarked on creating a new motorway connecting the coastal towns of Budva and Tivat. The building splurge comes amid concerns that overdevelopment is spoiling the character of the region.
'China has an interest in some of the Balkan countries like Montenegro as it regards them as future EU states and thus a potential route for influence in future European decision-making,' says Vladimir Shopov, a BRI expert with the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank.
What will it mean for tourists? To date, Chinese-backed tourism investments haven't proved massively successful. The ambitious project of Sihanoukville remains a ghost town, as does a similar project called Forest City in Malaysia. Those Western travellers who have used the new Siem Reap airport have been baffled to find it almost entirely empty.
The other possibility is that the BRI could result in more Chinese tourism. While outbound Chinese tourism was grounded by the pandemic, it has been rising in recent years, with the number of overseas trips taken by Chinese nationals projected to rise to 128 million by the end of 2028.
'A lot of countries are keen to get Chinese tourists, but there haven't necessarily been any explicit links between BRI investments and expanding tourism,' says Mr Shopov. 'If you look at Montenegro, tourism is still down on pre-pandemic levels, and Chinese tourism to Europe is still down significantly compared to 2019.'
'While tourism isn't a major focus for the BRI, there is often a link between countries which have strong trade links with China and those which receive a lot of Chinese tourism,' says Jacob Gunther from MERICS. Indeed, Chinese visitors to Cambodia rose some 55 per cent in 2024, although he cautions against attributing the increase entirely to any one factor.
Perhaps we shouldn't be expecting the CCP or its state-backed allies to displace the likes of Hilton or Marriott in their dominance of the tourism world any time soon.
But with Chinese influence increasing across the globe – including in the West – the chances of Beijing playing a role in your next holiday are probably nowhere near as remote as you think.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
The growing case for rate cuts, federal cuts won't gut health care and other commentary
Fed watch: The Growing Case for Rate Cuts 'President Trump's tariffs present the Federal Reserve with two conflicting challenges,' observes The Wall Street Journal's Greg Ip. Tariffs 'raise prices, which weakens the case for cutting interest rates' but also 'sap confidence and demand, which strengthens the case.' So far, 'the Fed has focused on the first risk, keeping its interest rate target between 4.25% and 4.5% since December. It might soon have to pivot to the second': 'Evidence is accumulating that inflation, despite tariffs, has been milder than feared, while the labor market might be deteriorating.' Unemployment 'has risen every month since January, by a quarter percentage point in all.' A 'restrictive stance' on interest rates 'make sense so long as inflation is all the Fed has to worry about. It no longer is.' Eye on NY: Federal Cuts Won't Gut Health Care 'New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding' under the GOP federal budget bill, notes the Empire Center's Bill Hammond, yet that wouldn't 'be enough to 'decimate' or 'gut' New York's health care system,' as Gov. Hochul has claimed. 'The House budget would reduce federal health-care aid by $10.1 billion while obliging the state to spend an additional $3.3 billion,' a state Health Department analysis finds — yet federal aid 'would still be higher than it was in 2023.' Cut the state's Medicaid enrollment by 1.2 million, and New York 'would still be providing free coverage to about 36 percent of its population' — still '12 points higher than the national average.' Republican: Don't Let Judges Help China Steal Tech The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is 'effectively allowing a Chinese firm to keep stealing an American semiconductor technology,' warns Rep. Nathaniel Moran at The Hill. The judges on the board 'just sided with Innoscience, a Chinese firm' accused of 'stealing patented technology and selling knockoff chips' from Cali company Efficient Power Conversion. 'After a 16-month investigation,' the US International Trade Commission 'found that Innoscience had indeed stolen the technology.' Yet Innoscience separately the patent board to invalidate Efficient Power Conversion's patent. 'The Trump administration has the authority to overrule' the board's 'dangerous decision' and 'should do so immediately,' but also 'implement broader reforms' to stop 'rogue administrative judges from helping Chinese companies pilfer US intellectual property in the future.' Democrats: San Francisco Shows the Way 'In the most famously liberal city in America, voters are no longer satisfied with symbolism or purity tests — they want results,' cheer Nancy Tung & Eric Kingsbury at Real Clear Politics. San Francisco voters 'still support Democratic principles, but they are demanding leaders who deliver.' In elections since 2022 through the rise of 'outsider' Mayor Daniel Lurie, voters are supporting a 'New Pragmatism' that's 'reshaping' how the Democratic Party 'governs and earns trust.' In other parts of the country, when 'voters asked for outcomes,' the party 'gave them process and vibes.' To win back voters, Dems 'need to be practical, not performative.' New Pragmatism is about 'solving problems, using power, and being honest about what is broken and what can be fixed.' If Democrats 'want to win again, they should start paying attention' to what voters want. Media watch: Don't Follow the Money? The media can 'no longer be trusted to tell anything like the truth,' blasts the Issues & Insights editorial board. 'The FBI is investigating the financial ties behind' the LA riots, but 'the mainstream press could care less,' fearing the facts might 'implicate Democrats or upset the left's agenda.' The Post has reported how the 'Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has ties to the Chinese Communist Party, is said to be behind some of the protests,' but other outlets remain mute. 'If you want to uncover corruption, find out where the money is coming from and where it is going. At least it used to be. Today? Not so much.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Israel Says Goal Is Not Iran Regime Change as Trump Vetoes Ayatollah Strike
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said in an interview with CNN on Sunday said that his country's goal is not regime change even as Israel's forces expand their strikes in Iran. The admission follows the revelation that President Donald Trump had vetoed Israel's plan to target Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to Reuters. Newsweek reached out to the U.S. Department of State for comment outside of normal business hours through submission form. Why It Matters Israel struck Iran with a wave of airstrikes overnight on Thursday U.S. time, which it described as a "preemptive" offensive based on "high-quality intelligence" that Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon. The strikes hit a variety of Iranian targets, including military personnel and nuclear scientists, in what Israeli leadership has called "Operation Rising Lion." Israel's strikes have killed at least 406 people in Iran and wounded another 654, according to a human rights group that has long tracked the country, Washington-based Human Rights Activists. Iran's government has not offered overall casualty figures. Israel has said 14 people have been killed since Friday and 390 have been wounded, the Associated Press reported. Khamenei condemned the attacks and promised to retaliate, saying Israel had "sealed for itself a bitter and painful destiny." Iran's military vowed a "crushing response," according to the state-run IRNA news agency, and fired salvos of missiles and drones at sites and cities across Israel. Iranian officials have always denied seeking a nuclear weapon. The United States and Iran have held five rounds of negotiations regarding the country's nuclear program, with a sixth round scheduled for Sunday that ultimately did not happen as Israel and Iran each continue to carry out attacks on each other. Rocket trails are seen in the sky above the Israeli coastal city of Netanya amid a fresh barrage of Iranian missile attacks on June 15. Inset: Iranian Supreme leader Ali Khamenei during the Friday prayer... Rocket trails are seen in the sky above the Israeli coastal city of Netanya amid a fresh barrage of Iranian missile attacks on June 15. Inset: Iranian Supreme leader Ali Khamenei during the Friday prayer ceremony on October 4, 2024, in Tehran, Iran. More Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images // Iranian Leader's Press Office - Handout/Getty Images What To Know Speaking with CNN anchor Bianna Golodryga, Sa'ar insisted that his country's goal is not to force regime change in Iran, saying, "The security Cabinet had decided on the objectives," and that regime change "was not one of the objectives." "This is for the Iranian people to decide," Sa'ar said. "We, Israel, don't see the Iranian people as our enemies. We had great relations with Iran until 1979 until the Islamic Revolution, when a very fanatic and barbaric regime came to power. And these are the people that chant 'Death to America,' 'Death to Israel.' And they put as an objective to eliminate the State of Israel." "It's not for us to decide: That's for the Iranian people to act or to do what they want to do," Sa'ar added. "We took as an objective the nuclear program, the ballistic missiles program, the elimination program. It's all things we must stop and create the conditions for moves afterwards that also will able to achieve these objectives." When asked about what kind of advanced notice the U.S. had about the attack, Sa'ar said Israel had informed the Trump administration that "we are going to act," which occurred after the U.S. and Iran had an opportunity to reach a diplomatic solution. He accused Iran of wanting to just "waste time and continue" pushing forward their nuclear plans "even during negotiations." "Iran is in a situation of non-compliance. They breach everything they were committed to," Sa'ar said, noting that Iran's foreign minister had cancelled his interview with CNN, which would have immediately followed Sa'ar's own. "After all other options are gone, we must take care of our security and of our existence. Of course, we informed the US as friends and allies that we are going to operate," he said. Meanwhile, Trump wrote in a Saturday social media post that the U.S. "had not nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight." Iran has said it believes the U.S. is involved. Israeli officials have reportedly asked the Trump administration to join in on efforts to attack Iran, with Iran's nuclear program having long been a focal point of U.S. and Israeli concern. Trump talked to ABC News' Rachel Scott on Sunday about the matter, saying, "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved." Trump Rejected Israeli Plan to Kill Khamenei Reports on Sunday from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters revealed that Israel had attempted to execute a plan to take out Khamenei, but that Trump put a stop to it. Both outlets cited unnamed senior U.S. administration officials. One of the sources told Reuters: "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we're not even talking about going after the political leadership," underscoring the U.S. desire to keep distance from the conflict. An unnamed U.S. official on Sunday told CNN that Trump did indeed reject the plan to assassinate Khamenei. Israel had the chance to kill Khamenei, but Trump opposed the plan, which prevented Israel from pursuing the opportunity. A second source told the outlet that Trump's opposition comes from a desire to avoid another protracted and involved war in the Middle East. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an interview on Sunday with Fox News said: "There's so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I'm not going to get into that." He added: "But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States." Photo taken after an explosion in downtown Tehran amid Israel's two-day campaign of strikes against Iran on June 15. Photo taken after an explosion in downtown Tehran amid Israel's two-day campaign of strikes against Iran on June 15. Khoshiran/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal, just like I got India and Pakistan to make, in that case by using TRADE with the United States to bring reason, cohesion, and sanity into the talks with two excellent leaders who were able to quickly make a decision and STOP! Also, during my first term, Serbia and Kosovo were going at it hot and heavy, as they have for many decades, and this long time conflict was ready to break out into WAR. I stopped it (Biden has hurt the longer term prospects with some very stupid decisions, but I will fix it, again!). Another case is Egypt and Ethiopia, and their fight over a massive dam that is having an effect on the magnificent Nile River. There is peace, at least for now, because of my intervention, and it will stay that way! Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran! Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a video address on Friday: "More is on the [Tehran] regime doesn't know what hit them. They don't know [what] will hit them." What Happens Next? Israel and Iran have shown no indication of decreasing their exchange of missiles, with more to follow as the U.S. seeks de-escalation and an end to the current conflict. This article included reporting by The Associated Press.


Business Upturn
2 hours ago
- Business Upturn
CGTN: From father to son: The enduring values guiding Xi Jinping
BEIJING, June 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — During a 2021 visit to the very place where his father had once worked, Chinese President Xi Jinping softly recited a line now displayed prominently in the exhibition hall – 'Sit upright at the side of the people.' These words were spoken, and lived by, his father Xi Zhongxun, who was a revered leader of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Describing his father as someone who had devoted himself wholeheartedly to the Chinese people, Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the CPC Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, has pledged to continue the mission of serving the people. Putting people first Xi Jinping's people-oriented approach to governance was deeply shaped by his father's influence. When the senior Xi worked at the prefectural Party committee of Suide, northwest China's Shaanxi Province, a simple phrase echoed through the mouths of local cadres and villagers alike: 'Go find Zhongxun.' The simple words were a testament to the approachability, trust and support that Xi Zhongxun embodied as a leader, and a problem solver, rooted in the lives of the local people. Like father, like son. Xi Jinping has engraved the word 'people' in his mind throughout his political career across different parts of China, first from Liangjiahe to Zhengding, from Fujian to Zhejiang, and from Shanghai to Beijing. Over the years, he engaged with villagers, whether seated on a kang, the traditional bed-stove made out of clay or bricks in north China, or on humble wooden stools. He shared simple meals with them, listened intently, and showed real care about the everyday needs in people's lives. 'Of all the jobs in front of us, the most important is to ensure a happy life for our people,' Xi reiterated in his 2025 New Year message. Prioritizing investigation and research Xi Jinping has consistently placed great emphasis on investigation and research as cornerstones of both planning and decision-making, convictions influenced by his father. In 1978, Xi Zhongxun was sent to south China's Guangdong Province as a principal official, and later helped build the country's first special economic zones including Shenzhen. Back then, Guangdong's industrial and agricultural growth had lagged behind the national average for 14 consecutive years. Determined to boost productivity and improve people's livelihoods, the senior Xi worked with a strong sense of urgency. To better understand conditions at the grassroots level, Xi Zhongxun visited 23 counties in a single summer. After conducting in-depth field research, he submitted a report to the central leadership, advocating for greater autonomy for Guangdong and proposing that the province take the lead in reform and opening up by building special economic zones. Xi Jinping has inherited his father's work ethic. Since November 2012, Xi has conducted more than 100 grassroots inspections. He has explained policies to people in courtyards and pavilions. He has listened to reports on boats and trains. He has inquired about livelihoods in fields. And he has sketched development plans on factory floors. Following thorough investigation and research, the pressing concerns of the people have topped the agenda of the central leadership's meetings, becoming focal points and drivers of China's continuous reform endeavors. 'No matter what your job title is, serve the people diligently, consider the interests of the people with all your heart, maintain close ties with the people, and always stay approachable to the people,' Xi Zhongxun once told his son. While bearing his father's words in his heart, Xi Jinping has also always lived up to his own pledge: 'I will fully commit to the people and never fail them.' Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash