logo
Huge turnout for Tiranga Yatra in Shivamogga despite heavy rains

Huge turnout for Tiranga Yatra in Shivamogga despite heavy rains

The Hindu20-05-2025
Shivamogga
Despite heavy rains, hundreds of people took part in the Tiranga Yatra organised by Shivamogga district unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to celebrate Operation Sindoor, in Shivamogga on May 20.
Amidst heavy rains, many women, college students, BJP leaders and supporters took part in the yatra that began at Ramanna Shetty Park. Participants carried a tricolour and raised slogans praising the soldiers for the success of Operation Sindoor, conducted in response to the terror attack at Pahalgam in Kashmir.
Lok Sabha member B.Y. Raghavendra, legislators S.N. Channabasappa, D.S. Arun, Dr. Dhananjay Sarji, and district BJP president Jagadish were among the participants.
Mr. Raghavendra, addressing the gathering at Gopi Circle, said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership had given a fitting reply to the Pahalgam attack. The military operation had taught a tough lesson to Pakistan. He criticised Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah for opposing war.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War
Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War

NDTV

time19 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War

Washington: US President Donald Trump on Monday once again repeated his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan. Talking to the press in the Oval Office while meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump claimed to have ended six wars, including the war between India and Pakistan. While answering a question, Trump said he thought that the Russia-Ukraine war would be the "easiest one" to end, but it is not. Trump said that "it is the tough one", and we have been talking about it for a long time, like "we were talking about others …India-Pakistan." Trump also indirectly mentioned India and Pakistan on his Truth Social post earlier in the day. "I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster," Trump posted. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. On the day of his summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Trump repeated multiple times within hours his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan, as well as spoke about Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.

A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship
A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship

Synopsis The India-US relationship has deteriorated, with disproportionate responses from the White House despite India's efforts to address trade concerns. Political imperatives in the US, rather than trade merits, seem to be driving the decisions, leading to a chill in relations and a hardening public mood in India. Over the past few weeks, as the India-US relationship has near-imploded, several opinions and assessments have emerged. Most analysts have been measured and thoughtful, and attempted to discern the long view. Others have been astonishingly uninformed, ranging from amateurs talking through their hats to (former) professionals opining through their golf caps. ADVERTISEMENT To be sure, any consequential policy episode must see a reckoning and self-appraisal within the government. This is to be expected in an accountable democracy. The external affairs ministry, commerce ministry and even the PMO would naturally undertake such an exercise. Were there diplomatic missteps? Could the trade negotiations have gone differently? Were gaps in Operation Sindoor's strategic comms deterministic? These are all good questions. Since there is always room for improvement, they must be asked and deliberated upon. However, this should not deflect from a fundamental and pivotal point: nothing India did, no act of commission or omission, merited the sort of response that has come from the White House and Trump regime. It's egregiously disproportionate. Inevitably, this warrants the conclusion that the issue is not about some minor sticking point that can be resolved with a 'high-level phone call' here, or more 'trade concessions' there. Advice that India should rethink its position on GM food, or making investment announcements even without resources to back them, is not particularly sensible those who should know better have advocated reckless and adventurist approaches that no Indian minister, civil servant or public official - past, present and future - can carry out. The legitimate restraints of the Indian system will always - and correctly - prevent also needs to be said India's diplomats recognised the importance of the trade and tariffs issue very early, and worked to a win-win plan. On their part, trade negotiators from the commerce ministry - again, often criticised - came up with the most ambitious market-access package in India's history. They were given the political space for it by the PM, and they delivered. ADVERTISEMENT Whatever else it is, the White House's rejection/non- acceptance of the trade offer - which would give the US an unprecedented market and strategic advantage in India - is not on merits. Even USTR insiders have that appreciation. So, what is driving the Trump regime's decision flow? How goalposts have shifted repeatedly in recent weeks would suggest that trade imperatives have long given way to political imperatives, perhaps even strategic and domestic calculations in the US president's inner council. If that is, indeed, the case, the basket of bilateral challenges could both deepen and expand in the near term. ADVERTISEMENT Either way, the relationship will take a long time to recover to the levels of political trust it has been used to over the past 20 years. A chill is setting in. The public mood is hardening, and the pressure on the Narendra Modi government - including on its ability to offer further trade concessions - is there for all to reckoning in New Delhi is that India is facing the most structured and coercive assault on its strategic autonomy - industrial and policy - in a long time. Inevitably, this perception will shape reactions. Consequences will not be limited to just the immediate future. ADVERTISEMENT No doubt there will be an economic cost. 50% tariffs are not going to be easy to manage, particularly for industries significantly dependent on US exports. Yet, this will also make other sectors wary of the geopolitical risks of excessive market exposure to the US. Rather than spur further engagement - as the trajectory of India-US relations has done in recent decades - it will induce caution and a desire to hedge and diversify. India's economic approaches towards China and Russia will become a self-fulfilling prophecy for Washington's tariff a slightly longer, but still not-too-distant, timeframe, India could conclude a trade deal with the EU. Once the EU recovers from its current 'He loves us, he loves us not' trans-Atlantic minuet, and assesses its position in the ballroom, it will note the opportunity of the moment. Next, India needs to find a non-China, non-RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) pathway to an economic and supply chains partnership with the Indo-Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) lends itself as an idea. Admittedly, CPTPP standards are very stringent. Could there be a trade-off between political comfort - the absence of arm-twisting and/or supply chains surrender - and calibrating just how much an external trade agreement could be used to drive internal reform and regulatory change? The process will not be easy, or without pain. Even so, if it is achieved, it could give India a longer-term hedge and option vis-a-vis the US. The lessons of the Summer of 2025 will alter the baseline for a reset, whenever that happens. This is not a stare-down India wanted - or, more accurately, wants. But whatever happens, India cannot allow itself to be outstared. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY

Owaisi seeks govt clarity on China's support to Pak during Op Sindoor
Owaisi seeks govt clarity on China's support to Pak during Op Sindoor

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Owaisi seeks govt clarity on China's support to Pak during Op Sindoor

Hyderabad: AIMIM president and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi on Monday alleged that China supplied weapons, fighter jets, and satellite intelligence to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor , and demanded that the Centre clarify its position before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's scheduled visit to China later this month. With Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi currently in India on a two-day visit, Owaisi questioned why the govt has remained silent on Beijing's actions. In a post on X, he wrote: "Why are we not strongly raising these issues with China? This is unacceptable. Beijing had even criticised the PM for wishing the Dalai Lama, yet our govt stayed quiet. Is this not a matter of national honour and dignity?" Separately, in the Lok Sabha, Owaisi raised a question on language policy. Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in a written reply said the National Education Policy 2020 emphasises multilingualism, and wherever possible, the medium of instruction till at least class V — and preferably up to class VIII — will be in the home or regional language. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store