
Emirates Just Made First Class More Exclusive – It's a Smart Brand Strategy
Bloggers may be up in arms, but Emirates understands that scarcity creates desire and exclusivity protects brand equity.
On Experience Colin Nagy is a marketing strategist and writes on customer-centric experiences and innovation across the luxury sector, hotels, aviation, and beyond. You can read all of his writing
Colin Nagy is a marketing strategist and writes on customer-centric experiences and innovation across the luxury sector, hotels, aviation, and beyond. You can read all of his writing here
Few companies excel at brand management like Emirates. I'm talking about the clarity of their brand promise, the consistency of execution across touch points (advertising, digital, app, and in lounges and onboard), and continuous innovation. Plus, Emirates understands the importance of exclusivity.
This strategic discipline has paid off. The brand consistently ranks among the world's most valuable airline brands, currently number 4 globally with a brand value of $7.4 billion, according to Brand Finance, and generated $33 billion in revenue in 2023-24, with premium cabins driving significant yield premiums.
And good brand strategy is knowing when to say no. So I wasn't entirely surprised when I saw Emirates announce that its first-class product can now only be booked by Emirates Skywards members at the Silver, Gold, or Platinum tier. The collective gasp you heard on the internet this weekend was points bloggers, mileage runners, and YouTubers, disappointed by the change. I understand the negative reaction, but for the Emirates brand, it was strategically brilliant.
Protecting the First-Class Experience
For a long time, Emirates has benefitted from the halo of its first-class product: the Game Changer suites, the A380 showers ( highlighted by a memorable Jennifer Aniston spot), and the accoutrements like the if-you-know-you-know grey tote, Bvlgari products, and black notebook.
Emirates' first class has become a grail item for bloggers and other people who like to hack systems and broadcast their experiences. In fact, Emirates reviews are a surefire way to goose YouTube engagement.
The problem is for the core audience. These are people spending actual money to sit up front, or elite, regular customers of the airline, and this cabin is the last place you want to be annoyed by people broadcasting every molecular detail of their experience and asking for a third serving of caviar.
It diminished the cabin experience for other paying customers. And that's why Emirates' decision to restrict access is brand protection at its finest and why I'm all for it. Emirates calculated that it has already built up enough brand value from the social proliferation of the first-class product, and that it was time to assert its exclusivity.
The economics here are counterintuitive. Emirates has among the largest first-class cabins in the world, up to 14 suites on some A380s, and award redemptions aren't cheap giveaways. With prices often exceeding 200,000 miles plus substantial taxes, Emirates likely makes money on these redemptions. This move isn't about filling seats or protecting yield; it's about deciding who fills them.
Emirates is borrowing from the luxury playbook here: Think Hermès limiting Birkin bag purchases or Rolex's notorious waitlists. The psychology is identical: scarcity creates desire, and exclusivity protects brand equity. When everyone can access your premium product (and annoy other passengers as they document it), it ceases to be premium.
They are taking a cue from Air France, which has been arguably the best executor of luxury service with its La Première product. Air France makes it notoriously hard to book, and often limits it to the higher levels of its own loyalty program or other Skyteam members. It is hard to hack, and thus the allure, and privacy, is heightened for the people paying for the product.
These moves come as more airlines are deciding to double down on first-class products: British Airways is investing £400 million in its new first-class suite, Lufthansa is retrofitting its A350s with Allegris First, and Singapore Airlines continues to expand its suite-equipped fleet. But product innovation alone isn't enough. As Emirates demonstrates, protecting the exclusivity of that product is equally crucial.
In an era where every experience is Instagrammed and TikToked, Emirates' move is a reminder that there are still moves to ensure that luxury still values discretion over hyper disclosure.
Sometimes the best brand management decision is knowing when to say no.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iran says no sanctions relief in US nuclear proposal
Iran's parliament speaker said on Sunday that the latest US proposal for a nuclear deal does not include the lifting of sanctions, state media reported as negotiations appeared to have hit a roadblock. The two foes have held five rounds of Omani-mediated talks since April, seeking to replace a landmark agreement between Tehran and world powers that set restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief, before US President Donald Trump abandoned the accord in 2018 during his first term. In a video aired on Iranian state TV, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that "the US plan does not even mention the lifting of sanctions". He called it a sign of dishonesty, accusing the Americans of seeking to impose a "unilateral" agreement that Tehran would not accept. "The delusional US president should know better and change his approach if he is really looking for a deal," Ghalibaf said. On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal, with officials later taking issue with "ambiguities" in the draft text. The US and its Western allies have long accused the Islamic republic of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, a charge Iran has consistently denied, insisting that its atomic programme was solely for peaceful purposes. Key issues in the negotiations have been the removal of biting economic sanctions and uranium enrichment. Tehran says it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the Trump administration has called any Iranian enrichment a "red line". Trump, who has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions on Iran since taking office in January, has repeatedly said it will not be allowed any uranium enrichment under a potential deal. On Tuesday, Iran's top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, said the country "will not ask anyone for permission to continue enriching uranium". - IAEA meeting - According to the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that enriches uranium up to 60 percent -- close to the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected the latest US proposal and said enrichment was "key" to Iran's nuclear programme. The IAEA Board of Governors is scheduled to meet in Vienna starting Monday and discuss Iran's nuclear activities. On Sunday the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran warned it could reduce its level of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog if it adopts a resolution against it. "Certainly, the IAEA should not expect the Islamic Republic of Iran to continue its broad and friendly cooperation," the Iranian agency's spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi told state TV. Araghchi on Friday accused European powers of "opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors", warning on X that "Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights". A quarterly report from the IAEA issued last week cited a "general lack of cooperation" from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. Tehran has rejected the report as politically motivated and based on "forged documents" it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel. pdm/ami/dcp


Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday , applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban , his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado , saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas . The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa . The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Napoli's Victor Osimhen rejects Al Hilal move
Serie A giants Napoli were close to selling Victor Osimhen to Al Hilal but the move will now not go through. Earlier today, it became clear that the Saudi Arabian club will trigger the player's release clause and they were only waiting for the Nigerian's go-ahead for a transfer. Advertisement It seems as if the move will not go through after all. Gianluca di Marzio has reported that the striker has made it clear that he will not join Al Hilal. This has happened after the Napoli player made some final assessments about the potential transfer. Initially, the Saudi club had offered a fee that was slightly lower that the player's release clause. But that wasn't enough for Napoli, who wanted a higher fee and the release clause was triggered. Alfredo Pedulla has revealed that Al Hilal had offered Osimhen a wage of over €30 million per season but the player's 'no' is quite decisive. Kaustubh Pandey I GIFN