'My next holiday will be in Kashmir', Sunil Shetty urges people to be fearless after Pahalgam terror attack
In the aftermath of the recent terror incident in Pahalgam, actor
Suniel Shetty
urged citizens to remain courageous and unshaken. He declared that his next vacation destination would be Kashmir, a gesture aimed at reviving tourism in the region and sending a powerful message to terrorists that their attempts to instill fear have failed.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India pulled the plug on IWT when Pakistanis are fighting over water
What makes this India-Pakistan standoff more dangerous than past ones
The problem of Pakistan couldn't have come at a worse time for D-St
Speaking to the press during the Lata Deenanath Mangeshkar Award ceremony held in 2025, Shetty passionately stated that 'Kashmir has always been, is, and will forever remain an inseparable part of our nation.'
His comments drew a wave of reactions online. Many lauded his words as thoughtful and heartfelt, praising him for speaking with clarity and conviction. Several individuals expressed joy and pride after hearing his remarks. Others, however, raised important concerns about public safety, questioning how ordinary citizens, unlike celebrities with access to government protection, could confidently travel to high-risk areas.
Highlighting the significance of collective strength, Shetty emphasized that serving humanity equates to worshipping the divine. He added that every action is observed by a higher power and that justice will eventually prevail. In a call for national solidarity, he stressed that this was a time for unity across communities and regions, warning against falling victim to those who attempt to divide society through terror and hatred.
'We must stand together as one people,' Shetty affirmed. 'Let's not succumb to those trying to instill division and panic. Instead, we need to demonstrate that Kashmir belonged to us, continues to be ours, and will always be part of India's soul. That's the reason why the military, political leaders, and civilians are actively participating in ensuring peace and stability in the region.'
The actor's message sparked a mix of appreciation and criticism across social media. One commenter noted, 'Finally, someone speaking wisely.' Another wrote, 'Suniel Shetty, your words brought happiness to our hearts—love from Kashmir.' A third user exclaimed, 'Beautifully said! You won us over.'
However, not all responses were positive. Skeptics pointed out the privileges that public figures enjoy. One user challenged Shetty's bravery, saying, 'Then you should go without any protection and prove you're not scared.' Another remarked, 'You people are already under heavy security. Unlike us commoners, we can't afford to take such risks.' A critical voice asked, 'You'll get state-provided security—but what about everyday citizens?'
This blend of admiration and critique reflects the complex emotions that often follow celebrity involvement in political or national issues. While many praised Shetty for speaking boldly and promoting patriotism, others voiced legitimate concerns regarding equality, safety, and the realities faced by the general public. His call to action has undeniably stirred a national conversation around courage, unity, and the symbolic importance of Kashmir in the Indian consciousness.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Mediation Between Two Unequals Not Possible": Shashi Tharoor On Trump's Claims
Washington: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. Mr Tharoor, currently in the US leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations here Thursday. "…Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Mr Tharoor said. He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible,' Mr Tharoor added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate' ceasefire after a 'long night' of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he 'helped settle' the tensions between India and Pakistan. He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. On being asked how he would characterize the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree' that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and 'certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest.' He said that at the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and 'our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis.' Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the US President said that he is 'very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan. 'I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides' and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either 'if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Trump said. 'You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that,' Trump added. About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Patrons punished, perpetrators still at large
Even as six weeks have passed after 25 tourists and a local resident were brutally killed at a scenic meadow near Pahalgam in south Kashmir, the terrorists, who carried out the attack, remain at large. India responded to the carnage by launching 'Operation Sindoor' on May 7, targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and areas under illegal occupation of Pakistan, and sending out a strong message to the 'deep state' of the neighbouring country. A four-day-long cross-border military flare-up followed, which came to its end on May 10. New Delhi also put in abeyance its Indus Water Treaty with Islamabad, apart from other measures. But, despite a massive manhunt by the J&K police and Indian Army, the five terrorists, who went on a killing spree on the meadow that day, appear to have vanished like ghosts into the forests and mountains of south Kashmir. The April 22 massacre, claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), a shadowy proxy of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, marked one of the deadliest attacks on civilians in Kashmir in recent years. It also triggered one of the most intense security operations in the Valley since the abrogation of Article 370 in time for political consolidation in J& April 27, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) formally took over the probe. Its teams have been stationed in Srinagar and south Kashmir, working closely with J&K police and military intelligence units, combing through call records, travel data, and seized digital devices. Yet, there has been no arrest or clue leading to the terrorists, who turned the scenic tourist destination into a killing field. This is in sharp contrast to the terrorist attack at Pulwama on February 14, 2019, when, within 10 days after 40 CRPF personnel were killed in a suicide bombing, the security forces tracked down and eliminated the main perpetrators in a village just 12 km from the scene. 'The Pulwama operation showed the strength of the intelligence and response apparatus,' a retired senior police officer told DH. 'This time, the same ecosystem seems slower, fragmented – or perhaps outsmarted.' 'They (terrorists who carried out the April 22 attacks) have either exfiltrated through deep forest or are hiding in plain sight with local support,' he said. 'When we eliminated the terrorists responsible for the Pulwama attack, it restored some public faith. Today, that faith is shaken.' Intelligence agencies suggest that Pahalgam attackers – three Pakistanis and two local residents - were well-trained to operate without digital trails, making them hard to track. 'The terrain is their ally,' another former security official said. 'They can live off the grid for weeks. They're using our mountains and forests the way guerrilla fighters do. That's the real challenge.' In mid-May, six local militants were killed in two operations in Tral and Shopian. But as officials later clarified, none of them were directly linked to the April 22 massacre. The prolonged failure to trace the attackers is raising difficult questions. The public is anxious, especially in tourism-dependent areas. 'It's not just the killings — it's the silence since. That's what's most terrifying,' said a hotelier in Pahalgam. More worryingly, experts believe this could signal a new phase in Kashmir's militancy — one where handlers across the border are deploying mercenaries physically and mentally well-trained and capable of evading security dragnets for a long period. And, as long as the 'Butchers of Baisaran' remain free, the horror they unleashed will loom large over the fragile calm of Kashmir.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Pakistan writes fourth letter to India, requests revival of Indus pact amid water crisis
Pakistan has written to India for the fourth time, requesting it to reconsider its decision to put the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) on hold, according to multiple reports. The IWT was suspended following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that resulted in the death of 26 civilians. Pakistan is on the verge of a water crisis and appears to be desperate, according to reports. Reports stated that Pakistan wrote to India on the IWT even after Operation Sindoor. Prime Minister Modi had earlier underlined the government's uncompromising position that "water and blood cannot flow together" and "terror and talks cannot happen at the same time". According to government sources, India is currently not interested in holding talks with Pakistan on this issue, and the treaty will remain suspended. The four letters sent by Syed Ali Murtaza, Secretary of Pakistan's Ministry of Water Resources, were addressed to the Ministry of Jal Shakti, which has since then forwarded them to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), sources indicated. In the letters, Murtaza has urged India to reinstate the agreement. Invoking its national security powers, India has stated that the treaty will stay suspended until Islamabad "credibly and permanently" stops supporting cross-border terrorism. This decision was approved by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), the highest body for strategic matters. This marks the first time New Delhi has paused the World Bank-backed agreement.
