
The Democrats' hypocritical constitutional crisis
That it came from blocking yet another attempt by former President Joe Biden to shift billions in debt from college students to the general taxpayer should make no difference to those with such acute constitutional concerns. Right?
On Feb. 18, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Biden's Education Department had exceeded its authority in attempting to shift college debt on a scale similar to that provided by Biden's initial 2022 massive college debt shift. In 2023, the Supreme Court had ruled against Biden's effort to permanently cancel up to $430 billion in loan debt for as many as 43 million borrowers under the HEROES Act.
Undeterred, Biden sought multiple times to stretch other laws to shift college debt. By the time he left the White House, he was trying to cancel $184 billion in debt owed to taxpayers by approximately 5 million borrowers.
So to recap, there was a definitive Supreme Court ruling followed by repeated attempts by a president to circumvent it. The judicial branch determined and the executive branch ignored it. Were the Biden-Harris administration still in office, there's no reason to believe — based on repeated prior attempts — that the executive branch would not still be ignoring the judicial branch.
If ever there were the makings of constitutional crisis, this would seem to have it.
For weeks, Democrats have been echoing the mantra of 'constitutional crisis' over the Trump administration's DOGE efforts to cut spending, personnel, and regulations. However, there is no Democrat roar of approval here. In fact, the silence is deafening.
Democrats could also be cheering the avoidance of fiscal and economic crises with the appeals court ruling. Biden's debt shift from college borrowers to general taxpayers would have meant adding billions more to a burgeoning budget deficit.
And had that debt been shifted, it would have amounted to a windfall to borrowers who assuredly would have spent some or all it, further adding to price pressures that have been sizzling since Biden took office in 2021.
Strangely, Democrats are not cheering the avoiding of these crises, either.
When Biden first announced his mammoth college debt shift, Democrats cheered.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called it 'one of the biggest acts of consumer debt relief in American history.' In April 2024, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) applauded Biden's attempts to circumvent the judicial decision through executive action, saying 'the president is heeding Congress's call and Democrats will continue to be relentless in doing everything we can to lower costs and make college more affordable.'
That the president was using executive action — not seeking legislation from Congress — then, despite the nation's highest court having blocked the executive branch's earlier attempt did not bother Democrats.
That the president's attempted circumvention of the judicial decision and legislation to shift debt to the general taxpayer from college borrowers also did not bother Democrats — despite only 38 percent of Americans having earned a college degree.
This at a time when the Biden administration was running up $7.5 trillion in deficits over fiscal 2021 through 2024. Yet they decry as fiscal calamity the extension of Republicans' 2017 tax cuts that are simply an extension of current policy.
Democrats were unbothered by the president's unilateral executive action to provide a financial windfall to borrowers, even as the withering inflation of the Biden-Harris era was savaging taxpayers.
For years, the left's overarching talking point on the subject of President Trump has been ' crisis.' Today, they declare that he is producing a constitutional crisis. They said he was 'an existential threat to our democracy ' and a ' fascist ' in 2024.
The truth is that Democrats can see no crisis unless they can attribute it to Trump. They see no crisis in trying to increase government, federal spending, federal deficits, and federal debt — only in Trump's attempts to decrease them.
Amazingly, Democrats missed all the crises — constitutional, fiscal and economic — that Biden created by attempting to circumvent the judiciary with his college debt chicanery.
Democrats' copious tears over the Constitution are strictly crocodilian. They are blatantly partisan, utterly hypocritical and thoroughly exhausted of efficacy from years of overuse.
The real crisis that Democrats understand all too well is their own lack of an agenda outside of opposition to Trump and a defense of the unsustainable status quo of big government, big spending, high taxes, and more deficits and debt.
J.T. Young is the author of 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left.' He has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management, and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maine oysterman launches bid to unseat Republican US Senator Susan Collins
By Nolan D. McCaskill WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. military veteran and oyster farmer on Tuesday launched a bid to unseat Republican U.S. Senator Susan Collins in Maine, as his party fights an uphill battle to try to recapture control of the chamber in next year's midterm elections. Democrat Graham Platner, a Marine and Army veteran, said he's angered by how unlivable the northeasternmost U.S. state has become for working-class people, blaming billionaires and corrupt politicians for hurting middle-class families and pushing others into poverty. 'I'm not afraid to name an enemy,' Platner said in a two-minute, 20-second launch video posted to X. 'And yeah, that means politicians like Susan Collins. I'm not fooled by this fake charade of Collins' deliberation and moderation.' Platner's campaign pits him against Jordan Wood, former chief of staff to former U.S. Representative Katie Porter of California, and comes as Democrats hope to recruit Maine Governor Janet Mills to challenge Collins. Two other high-profile Democrats, former Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper recently launched Senate bids in their states. Republicans currently hold a 53-47 Senate majority, and are defending only two seats widely viewed as competitive by nonpartisan election analysts - Maine and North Carolina. That means that Democrats would have to defend all their seats and also secure wins in more deeply Republican states, such as Ohio or Iowa, to secure a majority. Collins has a reputation as a centrist who occasionally bucks her party on key votes, including voting no on President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending package nicknamed the One Big Beautiful Bill. She raised more than $2.4 million for her reelection in the most recent fundraising quarter and entered July with $3.2 million in her campaign account, according to federal campaign finance records. First elected to the Senate in 1996, Collins has won reelection four times, including her 8-point victory over former Maine House Speaker Sara Gideon in 2020. Collins chairs the Appropriations Committee, which has jurisdiction over federal discretionary spending. Former Vice President Kamala Harris won Maine in last November's presidential election by nearly 7 percentage points.


Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Why Trump continues to lie about the 2020 presidential election
The right results were given in 2020. Trump lost. But nearly five years later, whenever Trump speaks, the question isn't whether he'll find a way to switch the conversation to the 2020 election but when. Given his tendency to babble about inconsequential subjects, it's tempting to dismiss Trump's off-script ramblings. But don't overlook the method behind the madness here. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up From Trump's Advertisement That's what he's doing every time he repeats the Big Lie about 2020. He upholds it as an example of a dishonest election stolen from the people despite no evidence of widespread fraud in that presidential contest. Trump lost because American voters had enough of him. Advertisement The president's motives are clear. He needs Republicans to hold on to the House in 2026 because he knows that if Democrats regain control they'll start impeachment hearings against him as soon as possible. For all his big talk about big wins in his second term, Trump knows that voters, For years, Trump undermined election integrity. As the 2016 presidential contest entered its final weeks, he falsely claimed that the election was This was Trump's hedge against a possible defeat: He could only lose an election if it was rigged against him. Of course, all of his machinations after he lost in 2020 supercharged his baseless allegations, culminating in the deadly insurrection at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, when he attempted to overthrow the outcome of the presidential election. But despite Trump's impeachment for incitement, he hasn't stopped promoting the antidemocratic lie that he was robbed and that election integrity must be restored, while he's doing everything to destroy it. That includes Trump's latest attempt to end mail-in voting by Advertisement Mail-in balloting garnered widespread use during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. According to a Trump remains unswayed. He Seven months into his Trump uses 2020 as a phony example of a crooked election. That's why he brings it up as often as possible and usually in places where he receives no pushback. But the voters he's targeting should also remember 2020 as the year when a historic number of people, despite a pandemic, cast their ballots and tossed this tyrant out of power. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump floats air support for Ukraine as part of security guarantees
President Trump is floating providing U.S. pilots and war planes as part of security guarantees for post-war Ukraine as he pushes for an end to Russia's war against the country. Trump has said the U.S. will help Europe craft security guarantees for Ukraine to backstop any peace deal reached with Russia, in lieu of Ukraine joining NATO, a red line for Russia. 'When it comes to security, they are willing to put people on the ground,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News aired Monday evening, referring to Europe. 'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air because nobody has stuff we have.' White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that Trump has tasked his national security team to 'come up with a framework for these security guarantees that can be acceptable to help ensure a lasting peace and end this war.' 'I won't, certainly, rule out anything as far as military options that the president has at his disposal, I'll let him do that,' she said, but added that the president has 'definitively' ruled out boots on the ground. NATO chief Mark Rutte on Monday said Trump's willingness to involve the U.S. in security gaurantees for Ukraine was a 'breakthrough' in the peace process, though details on America's potential role remain scarce. Trump's floating the possibility for air support could mean American pilots engaged in defensive operations, guarding against Russian missiles, or simply providing support for other aircraft – such as air-to-air refueling or for transportation of military equipment. Defensive operations could risk a confrontation between the U.S. and Russia, a scenario that both Trump and former President Biden before him have been anxious to avoid. Biden turned down Ukraine's requests for no-fly zone following Russia's invasion, over concerns it could escalate the conflict and lead to a direct confrontation between nuclear powers.