Democratic lawmakers criticize Israel's defensive strikes against Iran's nuclear sites
Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion," targeting Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure, and Iran responded with strikes in Tel Aviv, injuring at least five people.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) released a statement Friday calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu an "extremist."
"The world is more dangerous and unstable as a result of the extremist Netanyahu's government ongoing defiance of international law," Sanders wrote. "First, he uses the starvation of children in Gaza as a tool of war, a barbaric violation of the Geneva Conventions. Now, his illegal unilateral attack on Iran risks a full-blown regional war."
Sanders added the strikes "directly contravened" U.S. interests in resolving long-standing tensions over Iran's nuclear program.
"Talks were planned for Sunday, but Netanyahu chose instead to launch an attack," Sanders wrote. "The U.S. must make it clear that we will not be dragged into another Netanyahu war. Along with the international community we should do everything possible to prevent an escalation of this conflict and bring the warring parties to the negotiating table."
Senate Foreign Relations member Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn., chimed in on social media Friday morning.
"Netanyahu wasn't trying to help diplomacy; he was trying to destroy diplomacy," Murphy wrote. "How do we know? They reportedly targeted and killed Iran's chief negotiator with Trump."
Tim Kaine, D-Va., who also serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, added he could not understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike when a meeting was scheduled between the U.S. and Iran this weekend.
Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said military aggression is "never the answer."
"Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," Reed wrote. "These strikes threaten not only the lives of innocent civilians but the stability of the entire Middle East and the safety of American citizens and forces. While tensions between Israel and Iran are real and complex, military aggression of this scale is never the answer."
By Friday afternoon, some Democrats seemingly changed their tune in response to the counter-attack.
Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., slammed Iran's response, calling it "cowardice."
"#Israel's strike on #Iran was targeted precisely at senior Iranian military commanders and military sites that posed an existential threat to Israel," Sherman wrote. "The Islamic Republic's response? To target civilian centers in #TelAviv. Unsurprising cowardice from a regime that has spent decades brutalizing its own people."
Others evaded the conversation all together.
"This is a rapidly evolving situation, and it's critical that the United States works with our allies and avoid steps that will cause further escalation across the region," Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., wrote in a statement. "For years, Iran has threatened the safety of Israel and the region, and Israel has an undeniable right to defend itself and its citizens."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Lawmakers Issue Warning Over Change Impacting Millions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and 10 Senate Democrats sent a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Tuesday, demanding explanations after the Trump administration paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan. This is a move the senators said would harm borrowers who had been in repayment for two decades or more. Newsweek reached out to Sanders and the Department of Education for comment via email. Why It Matters The senators said the pause has created confusion for borrowers who have made payments for decades and could result in denials of legally mandated relief or unexpected tax bills. Some 3 million borrowers are part of the IBR program, according to Sanders' press release. More than 40 million Americans carry federal student loan debt, and the outstanding nationwide balance exceeds $1.7 trillion. Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) questions Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention... Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) questions Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), during her confirmation hearing before the Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on June 25, 2025 in Washington, D.C. MoreWhat To Know Sanders led the group of senators in the letter to McMahon, who was nominated by President Donald Trump, that demanded clarity on the pause. The other senators were: Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Jack Reed (D-R.I.). The lawmakers also criticized the lack of notice to borrowers and Congress and warned that affected borrowers could face tax liabilities if forgiveness did not proceed. "At a time when Americans across the country are struggling to meet the costs of health care, food, housing, child care and other basic needs, it is unacceptable for the Trump administration to take any action that delays or denies legally mandated debt relief to borrowers that have been in repayment for two decades or more," says the letter. "The department should not require borrowers who have fulfilled their legal repayment obligations to continue paying with no guarantee or timeline for relief," it adds. The Trump administration has also reduced the number of income-driven plans and introduced rules that included a minimum monthly payment even for borrowers with no income. There will also be higher payment formulas tied to income bands, and a 30-year repayment term before eligibility for forgiveness. These measures could increase costs for many borrowers compared with prior plans, experts say. "Historically, any time there is a change in law or federal programs, it was on a going-forward basis, and those already in the system were 'grandfathered' in," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "An indefinite pause for all borrowers is in stark contrast to how things are usually done." The new transition rules require borrowers who consolidated through the federal direct loan program beginning July 1, 2026, to choose between Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) and the standard plan. Under RAP, your monthly payments for each year are determined based on your income, and after a fixed term, you would qualify for student loan forgiveness. However, it differs from other IDR plans because it has higher monthly payments and uses a different formula where the percentage of income that is counted toward your monthly payment increases for every $10,000 in additional income earned by the borrower with a cap of $100,000. Other IDR plans use a fixed repayment formula and factor in inflation. Prior payment plans would be phased out through 2028, which could force difficult choices for borrowers. "The administration says the pause is about ensuring accurate tracking of qualifying payments. The program hasn't ended. It's simply on hold. IBR is still safe for now, even as other plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are phased out. Officials have assured borrowers that forgiveness will resume once the system issues are resolved," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "For borrowers, though, it creates uncertainty. You're expected to keep making payments as scheduled, and while any overpayments should eventually be refunded, the reality is you're left in limbo." What People Are Saying Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The Trump Administration paused some of the income-based repayment options as it reassessed both the legality of some of them and how they align with the priorities of the administration. The problem, obviously, is for the many student borrowers who have previously qualified, it burdens them with potentially higher monthly payments and financial difficulties on a more than likely lower income." Michele Zampini, associate vice president of federal policy and advocacy at The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS), told Newsweek: "Borrowers have upheld their end of their bargain by making decades of payments and are legally entitled to have any remaining balance discharged under the IBR program. With little explanation, the Education Department is failing to uphold its responsibility to process these discharges, and has given borrowers no clarity as to when this will be resolved. This delay is especially concerning given that loans discharged after 2025 are subject to a heavy tax liability, even if they should have been discharged before the tax change goes into effect." Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "These senators are outraged, and their constituents will soon follow, because this is essentially changing the rules halfway through the game. The affected Student loan borrowers chose Income-Based Repayment (IBR) with the obligation to pay a percentage of their income every single month for 20 to 25 years and the right to loan forgiveness of the remaining balance after that time. There are now borrowers who made this deal 24 years ago, and in July had the rug pulled out from under them. How is this okay?" What Happens Next Borrowers who relied on IBR or other legacy income-driven plans face deadlines to consolidate or select new repayment options as the administration phases prior plans out through 2028. Experts warn those transitions could raise defaults and costs for some borrowers. "In the end, this only hurts middle- and lower-income workers who have been paying back the government on a high interest loan for 20-25 years," Powers said. "They did what they were supposed to do, they have paid back what they borrowed and then some, they just don't make a lot of money. I don't see how these are the borrowers anyone is mad at."
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Hamas accepts cease-fire deal to free more than half the hostages for 60-day truce in Gaza
Hamas has agreed to a cease-fire proposal calling for the terror group to free more than half of the remaining hostages in Gaza, including 10 living captives, in exchange for a 60-day truce, Egyptian mediators said. Senior Hamas official Basem Naim confirmed the group's approval of the proposal on Tuesday, which is nearly identical to the one put forward by Washington earlier this year. The deal would see 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 others released in waves through the 60-day cease-fire, similar to the other exchanges that have taken place throughout the war. Advertisement 5 Israeli protesters demand an end to the war as the nationwide strike continued into Tuesday. REUTERS 5 Fears over the fate of the 20 living hostages skyrocketing following footage released by Hamas of starving captive Rom Braslavski. Israeli officials say Hamas continues to hold 50 hostages after 683 days in captivity, only 20 of whom are believed to still be alive. Israeli-Americans Itay Chen, 19, and Omer Neutra, 22, are among the dead. In exchange for the living hostages, Israel would agree to free 150 Palestinian prisoners serving life sentences, as well as 50 others who were sentenced to more than 15 years in jail. Advertisement Israel would also return the bodies of 10 Palestinian militants for each dead hostage, according to the terms of the deal. The cease-fire deal also calls for more aid to flow into the Gaza Strip through the involvement of the United Nations and International Committee of the Red Cross. 5 Hamas reportedly agreed to a cease-fire deal put forth by Cairo and Doha, which seeks a permanent end to the war in Gaza. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 5 Smoke rises over Gaza following an Israeli airstrike. Getty Images The proposal allows Israel to keep its forces in Gaza, but calls for the military to withdraw about half-a-mile into the border zones. One of the big sticking points includes language that calls on both Hamas and Israel to negotiate the terms of a permanent cease-fire during the 60 days of peace. It remains unclear if Israel will accept the terms of the proposal after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggested last week that he would no longer consider any deal that would only release some of the hostages. Advertisement 5 Israel is facing both domestic and international pressure to secure a cease-fire deal to free the remaining hostages in Gaza. Netanyahu has since demanded that Hamas free all the hostages at once, telling Israeli media that any partial deal 'is behind us.' Asked about the newest cease-fire proposal, a spokesperson for Netanyahu's office reiterated to NBC News the Jewish state's determination to assume full control of Gaza and said Hamas appeared to be 'under immense pressure.' President Trump's special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff echoed Netanyahu's stance, previously telling the families of the hostages that 'piecemeal deals' are no longer on the table. 'Now we think that we have to shift this negotiation to 'all or nothing' — everybody comes home,' Witkoff had said. Despite the stated stance, Israeli officials are reportedly studying the deal as mediators await a reply. Tensions remain high in terms of putting an end to the 21-month war, with the biggest issue surrounding the future of Gaza. Advertisement Hamas has repeatedly rejected any deal that would see it disarm until Palestinian statehood is granted, with Netanyahu refusing to end the war until the terror group is completely eradicated. With Post wires
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Approves Budget Increase to Cover Ongoing Cost of War
By Updated on Save Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet approved an increase to this year's state budget to cover additional spending incurred by the 12-day war with Iran in June and ongoing fighting in Gaza. The upward revision — which comes just five months after the previous budget was signed off by parliament — underlines the heavy toll Israel's 22-month, multi-front war has taken on the country's economy, which unexpectedly contracted in the second quarter.
