BCI Chairman comes in support of Sharmishtha Panoli, seeks her release immediately
New Delhi [India], June 1 (ANI): Manan Kumar Mishra, Chairman of the Bar Council of India and Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India, has strongly condemned the arrest of law student Sharmishtha Panoli.
He through a statement issued stated that, her detention over a now-deleted social media video--despite her immediate apology--has sparked outrage, with Mishra denouncing it as a grave miscarriage of justice and a direct attack on freedom of expression.
Mishra asserted that the Bengal government and Kolkata Police have repeatedly demonstrated selective enforcement of the law, targeting individuals from specific communities while overlooking more serious offences committed by others.
He pointed to historical injustices in West Bengal, such as the Marichjhanpi massacre, Nandigram violence, and politically motivated killings, as evidence of systemic failures in the state's justice system. Recent incidents, including the Murshidabad riots, further exemplify what he termed 'appeasement politics,' where the state shields perpetrators of violence against certain groups while swiftly punishing those who express dissent.
He also criticised the government's opposition to Operation Sindoor, a counter-terror initiative, questioning its priorities in safeguarding innocent lives.
Mishra stressed that Sharmishtha's case highlights the continued persecution of individuals based on selective outrage and political bias, stating that a mere misstep in the choice of words does not warrant such severe legal action.
Calling for immediate intervention, Mishra urged the West Bengal government and police to uphold the principles of democracy by ensuring equal protection under the law. He demanded Sharmishtha Panoli's swift release, a fair trial, and an end to the double standards that have long plagued the state's judicial system.
Law student and social media influencer Sharmishta Panoli was taken into custody by Kolkata Police in Gurugram on Friday night after facing intense backlash over a video she shared earlier this month. The now-deleted footage allegedly featured communally sensitive language and remarks that sparked outrage online and led to legal proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Everyone should support whatever is in the national interest: Salman Khurshid
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, who was part of an all-party parliamentary delegation on an 'Operation Sindoor' diplomatic outreach mission, has said that anything done in the national interest should be supported by all, regardless of political affiliations. In an interview with IANS, Khurshid addressed criticism from within his party regarding the ongoing diplomatic initiative and emphasised the importance of unity when representing the country abroad. He said that if you have to go outside the country and speak for your nation, is it easy or difficult? And if someone is doing so, why should there be any objection? His remarks come shortly after his post on social media platform X on Monday, where he expressed dismay over domestic political divisions while he was abroad on a mission against terrorism. "When on a mission to carry India's message to the world in the fight against terrorism, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?' he had posted during the delegation's visit to Kuala Lumpur. Excerpts from the interview: IANS: You were part of the all-party delegation. How successful do you consider the outreach? Salman Khurshid: I consider it very successful. The goal was to engage with multiple countries and urge them to go beyond expressing sympathy - to take concrete steps against terrorism. Terrorism affects not only India but also many other nations. We emphasised the need for global cooperation in fighting this menace, and the response was encouraging. IANS: What would you like to say about your post on X where you asked, "Is it so difficult to be patriotic?" What were you referring to? Salman Khurshid: That's exactly what I'm asking. And I'm not getting an answer. If someone has to go abroad and speak for the country, is that difficult or easy? If someone is doing it, why should there be a problem? I don't think it's a bad thing—I think it's a good thing. So, whatever is in the interest of the country, I believe everyone should support it. IANS: Despite calling the outreach a success, your own party has raised questions. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said, "While terrorists are roaming freely, so are our MPs." How do you respond? Salman Khurshid: Jairam Ramesh is right - we were indeed travelling. But if we hadn't been travelling, we would have been sitting idle. I've already communicated our efforts and achievements to both my party and the government. Let me be clear: I was sent by the Congress; I didn't go on my own. I'm grateful for the opportunity and hopeful that the party will recognise the value of our work. IANS: You praised the abrogation of Article 370 during your speech in Indonesia. What do you want to say about this? Salman Khurshid: Why are you asking me about that? I don't live in Jammu and Kashmir, though I do visit occasionally. Whether it was right or wrong is a matter of ongoing public debate. However, there is a real issue of statehood, and elected representatives are demanding its restoration. If we can be united in supporting that demand, it would be better for everyone. IANS: What is your view on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's 'Narendra Surrender' remark? Salman Khurshid: Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right, and I support him. I am a member of the Congress party and take leadership directions from him. If others want to interpret my loyalty or position differently, they may do so. But I'm clear on where I stand. IANS: The BJP claims that Rahul Gandhi's "Narendra Surrender" comment is being used by Pakistani media to further anti-India propaganda. They argue that even Pakistan hasn't used such harsh terms. What's your take? Salman Khurshid: Frankly, I don't care what Pakistan says. I oppose everything they've done to promote terrorism. My only interest is in ensuring India gives a strong and clear message to Pakistan so that such behaviour is never repeated. I don't watch Pakistani TV—there are enough Indian news channels to keep me informed.
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sharmistha Panoli gets bail from Calcutta HC on three conditions. What are they?
The Calcutta high court on Thursday granted bail to social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli, who had been arrested due to her purportedly controversial remarks about Operation Sindoor. A bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury held that the complaint against her does not disclose any cognisable offence, according to PTI. The court, while granting bail to her, also imposed certain conditions. Justice Chowdhury ordered that she be enlarged on bail bond and security of ₹10,000, and directed her to cooperate with the investigation into the case. The court also directed her not to leave the country without its permission. 'She has got bail on 3 conditions, that she will surrender her passport, she will join the investigation and sign a bail is happening right now in the country is wrong. You just arrest speak what they see, their exposure is she said, she said it based on the videos she saw," advocate DP Singh, lawyer of Sharmistha Panoli, told ANI. Also Read | Instagram influencer Sharmishta Panoli's lawyer claims poor hygiene in Kolkata jail: 'She has kidney stones' "These children don't know is a fight between India and Pakistan, and they are just defending their country, so in such a they post a video like that of 5-10 seconds, is it even wrong? She is a victim of circumstances...a whole community has stood up against is not like a riot took place because of what she said, so why is she being punished?' he added. The 22-year-old was arrested by the Kolkata Police last week from Gurugram in Haryana. She is accused of hurting religious sentiments through her 'communal' comments in a video on her social media. In the video, she had made remarks criticising Bollywood actors on Operation Sindoor. After facing backlash, Panoli deleted the post and issued an apology. Also Read | 'Hate speech unacceptable': TMC leader Kunal Ghosh after Sharmistha Panoli denied interim bail Her arrest led to a political row in West Bengal, with the Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) describing Sharmishta Panoli's arrest as 'selective enforcement' and accusing the Kolkata Police of acting in 'uncharacteristic haste'. Earlier this week, the court denied interim bail to Panoli, citing that freedom of speech does not mean one can hurt the sentiments of another person or community. "Look, we have freedom of speech, but that doesn't mean you will go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with people from different castes, creeds, and religions. We must be cautious by saying this. So, the day after tomorrow. Heavens will not fall," Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee had said.
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
PM Modi chairs first union ministers' meet after Operation Sindoor
Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a high-level meeting of the Union Council of Ministers in the capital on Wednesday, marking the first such gathering following the recent Pahalgam terror attack and Indias retaliatory actions under Operation Sindoor. The session was attended by key members of the Cabinet, including Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Road Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari, Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers J P Nadda, Minister for Food Processing Industries Chirag Paswan, and Minister of State for Jal Shakti C R Patil. While official details of the discussion remain under wraps, the media reported that a detailed presentation on Operation Sindoor was made, alongside a review of each ministrys key achievements. Operation Sindoor was launched in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, where 26 people lost their lives in an assault by Pakistan-backed terrorists. In a decisive response, Indian forces destroyed terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK, eliminating over 100 terrorists. India also hit back at Pakistani airbases following further aggression, with military action ceasing after a request from Pakistans DGMO on May 10.
