1 killed after firing at Texas Tech University campus police officers, hospitalizing 2
According to the TTU Police Department, officers were checking on a suspicious vehicle in a TTU parking lot located on the north side of the Jones AT&T Stadium around 12:45 a.m. on June 24.
Others are reading: Lubbock police chief pleased with department, city response during active shooter training
During the interaction, the suspect produced a gun and began firing shots at officers. The suspect was shot and was pronounced dead at the scene.
According to TTUPD, two Texas Tech police officers were shot and suffered "non-life-threatening injuries" and were taken to UMC via EMS.
No further information was yet available, including the identity of the suspect.
A current investigation is underway, led by Lubbock Metropolitan Special Crimes.
This is a developing story; more information will be added as it is released.
Mateo Rosiles is the Government & Public Policy reporter for the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. Got a news tip for him? Email him: mrosiles@lubbockonline.com.
This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: 1 person killed after shooting at Texas Tech police officers

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I sold $3K in gold via wire transfer, but then the buyer got their bank to reverse the payment. What can I do?
Buyer-beware scams are in the headlines every day, but a growing number of buyers are ripping off businesses by reversing charges on their purchases. This is a seller-beware scenario. Imagine you run a precious metals store and a customer wants to buy $3,000 worth of gold via wire transfer. You verify their identity, complete the sale and hand over the gold. All by the book, right? Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Not quite. A month later, the customer calls their bank to dispute the charge, claiming they were tricked into buying the gold by a third party. The bank is convinced by the customer's story, cancels the wire transfer and withdraws money from your merchant account, leaving you without payment — and your store down $3,000 worth of gold, which is hard to trace. The same thing can happen with customers who request the reversal of electronic fund transfers (EFTs) or credit card charges. Such transactions are called 'friendly fraud" or "chargeback fraud." The customer may indeed have been the victim of a scam, or be pulling off a scam themselves. Either way, your business is left with a loss. Unfortunately, it's not an uncommon occurrence, particularly for businesses dealing in precious gems and metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. Here's what happens and how to protect your business. Banks often side with customers in cases of alleged fraud Banks typically allow chargebacks or payment reversals only under certain conditions: Unauthorized transactions. The customer claims they didn't authorize the purchase. Billing errors. The charge was duplicated, incorrect, or charged in the wrong amount. Fraudulent activity. The purchase was made under false pretenses or through deception. Failure to receive goods or services. The item was never delivered, was defective, or didn't match the description. In many cases, banks default to protecting the consumer, especially when fraud is alleged. However, with wire transfers, often considered final and irreversible, the rules are more complicated and the reversal takes more time. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Some banks will allow customers to file a complaint and launch an investigation, especially if they claim they were defrauded or coerced into making a purchase. If the bank believes the customer acted in good faith, it may choose to reverse the charge, even if the merchant did nothing wrong. That's what makes this type of situation so frustrating for business owners. What to do if your business falls victim to this scam Once a bank reverses a wire transfer, it's tough to undo. So be proactive. If a bank contacts your business about potential fraud, respond promptly. Providing proof, such as receipts, can help your case before the funds are reversed. After funds are reversed, you still have a few options: Dispute the reversal. Provide documentation showing the customer authorized the purchase and received the goods. This could include signed receipts, invoices, tracking data, or even video footage. File a police report. If the customer's story involves criminal fraud, getting law enforcement involved may help clarify who's actually at fault. Seek legal action. If the bank won't reverse its decision, the business may consider small claims court or civil litigation to recover the funds. Consult with the bank. Each bank has its own internal process. Sometimes, escalating the issue to a higher level of review can change the outcome. To avoid issues in the future, consider implementing more advanced due diligence processes for high-dollar sales — especially for gems and precious metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. You can leverage technology in your business's fight against friendly fraud. A number of companies offer AI-based fraud prevention software, including Signifyd — designed to protect online retailers — and Arctic Intelligence. Arctic Intelligence advises training staff to identify questionable purchases. They should ask for proof of the source of funds for any big transaction, particularly with a new client, and report suspected money laundering to law enforcement. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas parents who lost children in Camp Mystic flooding to speak at hearing
The parents of children who were among the 27 killed at Camp Mystic on Texas' Guadalupe River during the historic Fourth of July flash flooding that devastated the Hill Country region are scheduled to testify on Wednesday before a state legislative committee probing the disaster. A coalition of Camp Mystic parents are slated to testify before the Texas Senate Disaster Preparedness and Flooding Select Committee which is considering reforms to increase safety at youth camps across the state. "Our children's lives were cut short because the safeguards in place were not enough," the Campaign for Camp Safety, a group that includes the Camp Mystic parents, said in a statement released this week ahead of Wednesday's hearing. "We are asking lawmakers to make sure no other family ever has to endure the pain we have lived with every day since July 4th." The parents testifying on Wednesday are expected to make suggestions on how to improve camp safety along the Guadalupe River. In its statement, the group said they want lawmakers to require campgrounds in a 100-year floodplain like Camp Mystic to equip cabins with emergency rooftop ladders and develop flash flood evacuation plans. "The families emphasized that while they continue to grieve, they are committed to turning their pain into meaningful and urgent change for all kids, on behalf of their angels they now refer to as 'Heaven's 27,'" the Campaign for Camp Safety said in its statement. MORE: Texas flooding victims: From young campers to a dad saving his family, what we know about the lives lost Camp Mystic, one of 19 youth summer camps on the Guadalupe River near Hunt, Texas, was devastated on July 4 when torrential rains fell over a short amount of time, causing the river to overflow in the early morning hours of July 4, trapping many campers in their cabins. Officials in hard-hit Kerr County, where Camp Mystic is located, said that more than 12 inches of rain fell in under 6 hours, and that the Guadalupe River rose more than 20 feet per hour during the storm. At least 130 people were killed in flash flooding across the Hill Country region, including 117 in Kerr County, officials said. During an Aug. 1 hearing of the Texas House and Senate Select Committees on Disaster Preparedness and Flooding, the Kerr County emergency management director conceded that he was sick and asleep as the water rose to historic levels on the Guadalupe River. MORE: Kerr County, Texas, lead emergency management official says he was asleep during deadly flooding Other Kerr County officials testified that an inadequate flash-flood warning system upstream contributed to the disaster. Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly testified that in the aftermath of the flooding, the county commissioned an independent hydrology study that confirmed the July weather event was a 1,000-year flood. MORE: Texas flooding timeline: How rapidly rising waters killed dozens "By the time flooding became visible downstream, upstream communities, including multiple youth camps, were already under water," Kelly said. When committee members asked Kelly why an evacuation order was not issued, he said, "It was too late."
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police make fourth arrest after taxi smashed into home
POLICE have made a fourth arrest after a taxi was smashed into the side of a house. As already reported, a car was smashed into the side of a parked white Peugeot taxi in Woodgreen Avenue. It then caused the taxi to collide with the house it was parked outside of, leading to significant damage to the bricks. Nobody was injured in the crash, but the road was taped off for most of Monday, August 18 while officers investigated. Shortly after the crash happened at around 3.30am, police officers made two arrests. READ MORE: This included a 19-year-old man and a 28-year-old man, both from Banbury, arrested on suspicion of criminal damage. Later on Monday afternoon, officers also arrested a third man, 59 from Banbury, also on suspicion of criminal damage. Providing an update on Wednesday afternoon, Thames Valley police said that in addition to the three men arrested, officers have also now arrested a 58-year-old woman from Banbury on suspicion of assault and criminal damage. All four of those arrested have been released on conditional police bail pending further enquiries by investigating officers. Their bail dates are November 3 and 4. A spokesman from Thames Valley Police said: 'Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to call 101 quoting reference 43250421142.' Officers throughout Monday had urged residents to avoid the area knowing the road would be closed for some time. No charges have been made.