logo
North Korea overtakes Iran as Russia's partner of choice

North Korea overtakes Iran as Russia's partner of choice

AllAfrica23-06-2025
North Korea is no longer just supplying Russia with manpower and missiles. It is embedding itself deep within Russia's war economy, sending thousands of workers to the heart of its drone industry and reshaping the balance of power in Eurasia.
This month, The War Zone (TWZ) reported that 25,000 North Korean workers are being sent to Russia's Alabuga Special Economic Zone in Tatarstan to assist with the manufacturing of Shahed drones, part of a deal reportedly brokered during Russian Security Council Secretary Sergey Shoigu's visit to Pyongyang.
Satellite imagery reveals new dormitory construction at the Alabuga site, indicating Russia's intention to increase drone production from 2,000 to 5,000 units per month.
Ukrainian intelligence chief Lieutenant General Kyrylo Budanov confirmed this development, citing the growing cooperation between Russia and North Korea and warning of the strategic implications for both Ukraine and South Korea. He added that some North Korean workers may be contracted into the Russian defense service.
The Alabuga plant, repeatedly targeted by Ukrainian strikes, remains a critical node in Russia's standoff strike capability, particularly amid high attrition from its war in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Russia is reportedly assisting North Korea in enhancing the accuracy of KN-23 missiles, long-range air-to-air munitions, and submarine-launched systems. The transfer of labor and technology underscores tightening bilateral military ties as both regimes confront isolation and intensifying global scrutiny.
Russia may be shifting its partnership of convenience from Iran to North Korea. As Iran falters under Israeli and US airstrikes and unfulfilled Russian arms deals, North Korea pulls ahead, embedding itself in Russia's war machine and Far Eastern strategy.
While Russia and Iran have a long history of distrust and conflict, their mutual disdain for the Western-dominated international order, autocratic governments and heavily sanctioned economies in the aftermath of the former's invasion of Ukraine has placed them in the same boat.
Iran has sought to make itself indispensable to Russia's war effort by supplying Shahed drones, tactical gear, and artillery in exchange for revenue and to avoid diplomatic isolation. It may have also sought Russian investment in the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).
Yet as Russia transitioned to a war economy and began producing Shahed drones locally, Iran's leverage may have declined, undercutting the latter's efforts to extract security guarantees or financial backing from the former.
Furthermore, while Iran has consistently requested advanced Russian equipment, such as Su-35 fighter jets, these deliveries have not yet materialized, as Russia may need those fighters more urgently in its conflict with Ukraine.
In October 2024, Israel destroyed Iran's prized S-300 surface-to-air missile (SAM) launchers, leaving the latter exposed to current air attacks. While Iran has downplayed the need to purchase the more advanced S-400 from Russia, citing the superior capabilities of its domestic systems, this could be a cover-up for Russia's refusal to provide such systems for the same reason it has withheld Su-35 fighters.
However, Israeli strikes on Iran present mixed implications for Russia. For one, while such strikes may have undermined Russia as a credible partner, strikes on Iranian oil and gas infrastructure may have eliminated Iran as a competitor to Russian energy exports.
Yet, these gains may be short-lived. Israel admits that its strikes are not sufficient to destroy Iran's nuclear program and that the goal is to pressure Iran back into negotiations.
Furthermore, it is unknown how Iran would respond in the aftermath. A nuclear-armed Iran may ultimately undermine Russia's influence. Russia may have less leverage over a nuclear-armed Iran, potentially triggering a Middle East nuclear arms race, with Saudi Arabia stressing that it will develop nuclear weapons if Iran gets the bomb.
Despite that possible long-term setback, Israeli strikes may distract the US from Ukraine, drawing attention and resources away from confronting Russia. It also allows Russia to point out US 'double standards,' with the US distancing itself from Israeli combat operations in Gaza while supporting Israeli strikes on Iran that have caused civilian casualties.
As Iran buckles under sustained Israeli and now US strikes, North Korea is stepping into the breach, presenting an entirely different set of nuances.
North Korea and Russia share deep ties dating back to the Korean War, and the former's nuclear arsenal arguably makes it a safer long-term investment for the latter. North Korea has deepened its role in Russia's war effort, providing matériel and manpower while reaping combat insights, hard currency, and access to advanced systems.
North Korea's interest in supporting Russia in Ukraine may be to reduce its overdependence on China, its main political and economic lifeline, to maintain strategic autonomy and regime survival.
These aims may clash with China's goal of maintaining stability in the Korean Peninsula. Arguably, North Korean missile tests pose a threat to China just as much as they are to Japan and South Korea, prompting China to threaten to scale down political and economic ties with North Korea.
To those ends, North Korea is actively developing nuclear delivery systems with possible Russian assistance, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) that could reach the US mainland and nuclear ballistic missile submarines (SSBN) that ensure a second-strike capability.
While a belligerent North Korea serves China and Russia's mutual interest of undermining the Western-dominated international order, it remains uncertain whether this wartime alignment will evolve into a lasting partnership once the guns fall silent in Ukraine.
Despite Russia being heavily sanctioned, it still seeks to resume trade with the US, raising doubts about the long-term growth of Russia-North Korea relations.
However, beyond the Russia-Ukraine War, Russia may use North Korea as leverage against China's growing presence, economic influence, and territorial ambitions in the Russian Far East, strengthening economic, political, and military ties to form a buffer state.
In turn, North Korea maintains its autonomy by balancing ties between Russia and China, with its nuclear arsenal providing a strategic backstop against regime change.
With Iran sidelined and China's shadow growing, North Korea is fast becoming Russia's most dangerous and dependable ally, fueling its war machine, fortifying its eastern flank, and tilting Eurasia's strategic balance in Russia's favor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?
Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?

After tense talks in Beijing and a bruising trade blow from Washington, EU bureaucrats are heading into their August break weary and short of wins, as doubts deepen over the bloc's global leverage. Last week's summit in Beijing went off without too much drama, seen as an achievement in itself, given how fraught EU-China ties had become in the run-up to the long-awaited event. But on some of their longest-standing complaints, the Europeans found that Beijing would not budge and was keen to display the confidence and swagger that European officials say has been on show since it forced a climbdown on US tariffs three months ago, according to sources familiar with proceedings. Talks on Ukraine , however, were said to have been open, frank and more meaningful than previous summits, during which European Union officials felt their concerns were dismissed out of hand. Over more than three hours of talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the Europeans pushed him again to rein in his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, only for Xi to point to US President Donald Trump's failure to deliver on a pre-election pledge to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours as evidence of how little leverage anyone has over the conflict. A repeated motif of the Europeans' face-to-face engagement with Xi is the Chinese leader telling them that he has less leverage over Putin – whom he often describes as a 'good friend' – than they think. But whereas in previous years the EU complained that Xi had batted their assertions about China's support for Russia away, this time there was an in-depth debate.

21 die in strikes on Ukraine amid Aeroflot cyberattack
21 die in strikes on Ukraine amid Aeroflot cyberattack

RTHK

time6 hours ago

  • RTHK

21 die in strikes on Ukraine amid Aeroflot cyberattack

21 die in strikes on Ukraine amid Aeroflot cyberattack At least four people were killed and eight injured in attacks on Dnipro. Photo: Reuters Russian glide bombs and missiles struck a Ukrainian prison and a medical facility overnight, killing at least 21 people, officials said on Tuesday, as Russia kept up its bombardment of civilian areas despite US President Donald Trump's threat to soon punish Russia with sanctions and tariffs unless it stops. The airstrikes came after a cyberattack on Russian state-owned flagship carrier Aeroflot caused a mass outage to the company's computer systems on Monday, Russia's prosecutor's office said, forcing the airline to cancel more than 100 flights and delay others. Ukrainian hacker group Silent Crow and Belarusian hacker activist group the Belarus Cyber-Partisans, which opposes the rule of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, claimed responsibility for the cyberattack. In the Russian airstrikes, a prison in Ukraine's southeastern Zaporizhzhia region was hit, killing at least 17 inmates and wounding more than 80 others, officials said. In the Dnipro region, authorities reported at least four people were killed and eight injured. Trump said on Monday he is giving Russian President Vladimir Putin 10 to 12 days to stop the killing in Ukraine after three years of war, moving up a 50-day deadline he had given the Russian leader two weeks ago. The move meant Trump wants peace efforts to make progress by August 7-9. Trump has repeatedly rebuked Putin for talking about ending the war but continuing to bombard Ukrainian civilians. But the Kremlin hasn't changed its tactics. The Kremlin pushed back, however, with a top Putin lieutenant warning Trump against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia.' 'Russia isn't Israel or even Iran,' former president Dmitry Medvedev, who is deputy head of the country's Security Council, wrote on social platform X. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' The Ukrainian air force said Russia launched two Iskander-M ballistic missiles along with 37 Shahed-type strike drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight. They say 32 Shahed drones were intercepted or neutralized by Ukrainian air defenses. The Russian attack close to midnight on Monday hit the Bilenkivska Correctional Facility with four guided aerial bombs, according to the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine. At least 42 inmates were hospitalized with serious injuries, while another 40 people, including one staff member, sustained various injuries. The strike destroyed the prison's dining hall, damaged administrative and quarantine buildings, but the perimeter fence held and no escapes were reported, authorities said. In Dnipro, missiles hit the city of Kamianske, partially destroying a three-storey building and damaging nearby medical facilities including a maternity hospital and a city hospital ward. Two people were killed and five were wounded, including a mother-to-be who is now in a serious condition, according to regional head Serhii Lysak. (AP)

Trump's weaker export controls risk security to please China
Trump's weaker export controls risk security to please China

AllAfrica

time11 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Trump's weaker export controls risk security to please China

Recent US export control decisions imperil national security and threaten not only US artificial intelligence 'dominance' but potentially many other emerging technologies critical to military programs. While legal US exports of AI-related semiconductors were blocked, China got at least US$1 billion worth of Nvidia-made chips illegally, mostly in 'packages' of data-center-ready racks. The packages being sold in China are labeled as Supermicro, Dell and Asus. The chip packages, which include software, were sold at a 50% markup over US prices. Meanwhile, the Financial Times reports that the Trump administration has decided to lift 'aggressive' strategic export controls and has directed the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security to implement the new directive. Under the US export control system, commercial exports, also known as dual-use exports, are controlled by the Department of Commerce. However, the Commerce Department is supposed to coordinate with the Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security and US intelligence. By law, US export controls support national security, lim supply and US foreign policy. These are broad categories. The US is also supposed to coordinate its export controls multilaterally, but since the dissolution of COCOM in 1994 and the weak substitute Wassenaar arrangement, very often the US resorts to unilateral export controls. It is not clear what 'aggressive' strategic export controls are, nor is it clear how they impact the interagency deliberative process. One presumes that the Commerce Department's Bureau of Export Controls will try to come up with some sort of export licensing guidelines to cover the White House directive. Neither the Commerce Department nor the other involved agencies apparently played any role in the White House directive. Prior to the White House decision, Trump previously told Nvidia it could restart chip exports to China, an apparent quid pro quo in which China released rare earth exports to the United States. Twenty former US officials say allowing Nvidia to export chips to China was a strategic misstep. The latest White House move, lifting 'aggressive' strategic export controls, is designed to facilitate trade negotiations between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Looked at objectively, Chinese export restrictions trumped Trump (pun intended). Some expected that Trump would go to China in September when Russian President Vladimir Putin is also expected. However, it appears that the idea has been nixed, and Trump won't meet with Xi and Putin together and will go to China later in the Fall, probably after the APEC meeting in South Korea. News reports say that China and the US are working on an agenda and a date for a high-level meeting. The immediate impact of removing 'aggressive' export controls will be on AI-relevant technology. The Trump administration has released an AI Action Plan. The plan calls for removing 'red tape' that delays AI investments and initiatives, investing more in AI and boosting government investment, especially by the Defense Department. It also describes the US effort in AI as a 'race' like the 'space race' in the past and seeks 'American dominance' in AI. The latest decisions on export controls, and specifically on Nvidia, compromise the AI Action Plan. They are totally incompatible. The lifting of export controls on Nvidia, which is the premier component in AI data centers, and the subsequent order to lift 'aggressive' export controls, not only subverts the billions of investment already made in AI but also leaves uncertain what other critical US technologies will be sold off to China. There is little doubt China is aggressively pursuing AI and is investing billions in the effort. According to investment bank Morgan Stanley, China is a sleeping giant that is now awakened and seeking global AI dominance by 2030. It is important to note that US companies like Nvidia will now directly assist China by sharing know-how and technology. There are many sensitive emerging technologies that are quite important and in many cases sensitive to US national security. The chart below illustrates some of them: ​The immediate question is whether the latest policy guidance from the White House includes any or all of the emerging technologies? The above chart was published to highlight what the Trump administration originally wanted to curtail using export controls. It is normal whenever new US export controls or guidance is proposed for the Commerce Department to publish the policy for comment before it is approved. In the comment period, the public (most often industry) comments on the proposed rule. It is far from clear if the Commerce Department will publish guidance for the latest policy change, but it should do so. Moreover, it should explain the national security implications as it understands them. There is also the question of interagency coordination, a non-trivial part of the US export control process. Will the Defense Department and other agencies (especially the intelligence community) be consulted, or will the Commerce Department ignore the other agencies? Typically, the Defense Department concerns itself with the impact of approving export licenses that might undermine national security and the military mission. Beyond that, many of the emerging technologies are critical to US defense systems and represent areas where the Defense Department has invested billions of dollars. The latest decisions contradict the AI Action Plan and potentially compromise export control protection of critical emerging technologies. In turn, the decisions damage US national security as defined, in part, by the administration itself. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared on his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store