Caste Census: What it means, why it matters, and how it could be a political tinderbox?
Caste Census: Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs (CCPA), on 30 April approved the enumeration of castes in the upcoming Census — a surprising decision that the opposition has long been demanding amid the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) resistance. A pan-India census, due since 2021, was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Modi government's push for caste enumeration has already stirred the political pot in the country, with the Congress party and Rahul Gandhi claiming credit ahead of the Bihar Assembly election.
What is Caste census, why does it matter, and how would this open a Pandora's box in the country's political dynamics? LiveMint explains in the short primer:
The Census is a decennial population-based survey that was conducted 15 times until 2011. It was undertaken every 10 years beginning in 1872 under Viceroy Lord Mayo, and the first complete census was taken in 1872. Post-1949, the Census was conducted by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).
All the Censuses since 1951 were conducted under the 1948 Census of India Act, which predates the Constitution of India. The last census was held in 2011, whilst the next was to be held in 2021 before it was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic in India.
The next census is yet to have a confirmed date.
A Caste Census means collecting Caste-based data during the Census. The data provides details on the distribution of caste groups, their socio-economic conditions, educational status, and other related factors.
The idea behind the caste census is to include questions about caste during the ordinary census exercise.
Caste enumeration was a regular feature of census exercises during British rule from 1881 to 1931. However, with the first census of independent India in 1951, the government discontinued the practice.
After India got its freedom, the government classified citizens into four broad groups based on social and educational criteria: Scheduled Tribes (ST), Scheduled Castes (SC), Other Backwards Classes (OBC), and the General category.
But the data gathered during Censuses since 1951 in India included the numbers of individuals belonging to the SCs and STs, besides religious denominations like Hindus and Muslims.
Members of caste groups other than SCs and STs were not counted. By 1961, however, the Union government had allowed states to conduct their own surveys and compile state-specific lists of OBCs if they wished.
The last caste data available is from the 1931 Census, which was taken before independence. The 1941 Census, which was taken during World War II, also collected data on caste, but it was never released.
The Modi government's push for caste enumeration in the upcoming Census comes in the wake of the caste surveys conducted by at least three states—Bihar, Telangana, and Karnataka.
Bihar conducted the survey and published the data in 2023, when Nitish Kumar, the Chief Minister, was the head of the JDU-RJD-Congress government. Telangana and Karnataka are both Congress-ruling states.
The Congress government in Telangana released its Socio Economic, Educational, Employment, Political, and Caste survey report in February last year. On Wednesday, Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy reacted to the Central government's decision, saying that today, we have finally proven that what Telangana does today, India will follow tomorrow.
The Karnataka caste survey report, or the Socio-Economic and Education Survey, was commissioned during CM Siddaramaiah's first term in 2015. However, the report was submitted to him only on 29 February this year. It was finally tabled before the CM Siddaramaiah Cabinet on April 11.
For long, the BJP was seen as averse to thecaste census. In fact, many party leaders often targeted the Congress, accusing it of using caste to divide the society.
On 20 July 2021, Minister of State (Home Affairs), Nityanand Rai, told the Parliament that theModi governmenthas decided it's a matter of policy not to enumerate caste-wise population other than SCS and STs in the Census.
Union MinisterAshwini Vaishnaw, who announced the decision, called it the reversal of the Congress party's policy. He blamed the Congress party for never conducting a caste census since independence and all the years it was in power.
In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the consolidation of disadvantaged sections of society within the SCs, OBCs, and STs around the opposition's agenda impacted the BJP's numbers in many states and, in fact, denied it a simple majority, unlike in 2014 and 2019, according to analysts.
A senior BJP leader told news agencyPTIthat the party's lesson from the 2024 results was the need to make constant efforts to win over the deprived sections. These sections have been voting for the party in good numbers since Prime Minister Narendra Modi's advent on the national scene but are not its committed voters.
The government has yet to announce the next census, which was held in 2011. So, the timeline of the caste census and its political implications remains far from clear.
The announcement comes as the Opposition, with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi at the forefront, has adopted the caste census as a key election plank. It also comes six months ahead of the assembly election in Bihar, one of the key Hindi heartland states considered a cauldron of caste politics in India.
BJP's rivals, including the Congress, often turned to social justice politics, speaking about the empowerment of non-general castes, to counter its overarching plank of Hindutva. With the Modi government's decision on caste census, the BJP hopes to disarm them, at least for now.
In September 2010, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh-led Union Cabinet decided on a separate Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC).
The data from the SECC, which cost around ₹ 4,900 crore, was published by the Ministries of Rural Development and Urban Development in 2016, but the caste data were excluded.
The raw caste data was handed over to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, which formed an Expert Group under then-NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson Arvind Pangaria to classify and categorise it. The data has not been made public yet.
Political experts said that the announcement of caste enumeration during the upcoming census is more about 'rhetoric than substance.' The next steps, which include conducting the exercise, releasing the numbers, and how parties weaponise them to seek quotas and sub-quotas in jobs and education proportional to caste representation, might as well open a Pandora's box, they said.
'The Supreme Court has put a 50 per cent cap on reservations. The caste data, whenever it comes, would only have a meaning when it is used in fixing quotas in jobs, reservations etc. Will the parties challenge the 50 per cent quota. It is not going to be easy. It will open a Pandora's box,' political analyst Rasheed Kidwai told LiveMint.
The announcement of caste enumeration during the upcoming census is more about 'rhetoric than substance.'
First Published: 1 May 2025, 11:00 AM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Even in defeat, we don't abandon people: Gujarat BJP chief ahead of Assembly bypolls
With nearly over a week left for the upcoming Visavadar Assembly by-election, the Gujarat BJP unit has gone into action mode, treating the triangular political contest as a matter of prestige. In a campaign event held on Monday, Gujarat BJP President and Union Jal Shakti Minister, C.R. Paatil, addressed a gathering of party workers and local leaders at Bhesan in Junagadh district, declaring that the BJP "has never learned to lose, and even when defeated, it doesn't abandon its ground". Attacking both the Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Paatil warned voters not to fall for the "delusions and provocations" of parties that, according to him, "have no base in Gujarat" and lost deposits on 136 seats in the 2022 Assembly election. "Those who came from Delhi and claimed they would form the government had their deposits forfeited by Gujarat's voters," he said, pointing to the BJP's dominant win in 156 Assembly constituencies in 2022 state election. Reminding the people at the gathering that although Visavadar voters may have "experimented" in the 2022 Assembly election, this time there should be no mistakes, Paatil urged, noting that the Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel himself came to file nomination papers with BJP candidate Kirit Patel -- "a sign of the state leadership's commitment to Visavadar's progress". Kirit Patel, the BJP's candidate in the upcoming bypoll, also addressed the gathering, highlighting his long-standing connection with Visavadar, Bhesan and Junagadh. "I have worked in this region for 16 years, assisting with education, health and resolving civic issues. During crises like Covid-19, I stood by the people," he said. Patel also alleged a conspiracy by Opposition candidates "brought in from outside" and claimed they were spreading misinformation and misleading voters. "These are not development-focused people. They only incite and provoke," he said, contrasting it with what he described as the BJP's platform of "development and trust". A total of 16 candidates are contesting the Visavadar seat, 12 of whom, Patel claimed, have no real ties to the region. "Visavadar does not need outsiders," he emphasised. The rally was also attended by several top BJP leaders, including MPs, Ministers, and MLAs -- Raghavji Patel, Kunvarji Bavaliya, Mulubhai Bera, Mukesh Patel, Rajesh Chudasama, Jayesh Radadiya, and others. The upcoming by-elections for the Visavadar and Kadi Assembly constituencies in Gujarat, scheduled for June 19, have emerged as politically significant contests for all three major parties -- the BJP, Congress and the AAP. The Visavadar seat fell vacant after BJP MLA Harshad Ribadiya resigned and joined the Congress ahead of the 2022 Assembly elections, only to return to the BJP recently. Meanwhile, the Kadi Assembly seat became vacant following the resignation of Congress MLA Karshan Solanki, who also joined the BJP.
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Three-Month Ration Rice Distribution a Reality Under Modi Government: BJP District President RamAnjaneyulu
Gadwal: In a notable outreach effort, BJP District President T. RamAnjaneyulu visited Ration Shop No. 2603032 located on Rajaveedhi in Gadwal town on Sunday. The visit, organized under the leadership of BJP Town President Rajaka Jayashree, aimed to monitor the distribution of ration rice to the public. During the inspection, RamAnjaneyulu emphasized that ration rice distribution should be carried out without causing inconvenience to ration card holders. He instructed the ration dealers to ensure smooth and transparent delivery to all eligible beneficiaries. Speaking on the occasion, District President T. RamAnjaneyulu lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his consistent efforts toward the welfare of the poor. He stated that due to the farsightedness of the Modi government, especially during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the monsoon season, the central government has made it possible to distribute three months' worth of ration rice at once. This initiative, he noted, eliminates the need for people to make repeated visits for essential supplies. He urged all eligible beneficiaries to utilize the ration rice responsibly and make the most of the government's welfare scheme. The event was also attended by BJP District General Secretary Ravi Ekbote, State Council Member Bandala Venkata Ramulu, District Vice-President Rajaka Narasimha, District OBC Morcha President Deva Das, senior BJP leader Mohan Reddy, and others.
Scroll.in
23 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge
The Supreme Court's Justice Surya Kant has said that the collegium system of appointing judges, despite its imperfections, serves as a 'crucial institutional safeguard' and preserves the judiciary's autonomy, The Indian Express reported on Sunday. Kant, who is slated to become the next chief justice of India, said that the collegium system 'significantly limits interference by the Executive and Legislature, thereby preserving the Judiciary's autonomy and insulating judges from extraneous pressures that could otherwise compromise their impartiality,' the newspaper reported. Under the collegium system, the five most senior judges of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice, decide on the appointments and transfers of judges to the top court and the High Courts. Speaking at Seattle University in the United States on June 4, Kant acknowledged that the system has faced criticism, especially on the lack of publicly articulated criteria for selecting judges. However, he said that 'recent efforts by the Supreme Court signal a growing commitment to enhancing transparency and public confidence in it'. In 2022, the Supreme Court Collegium had published detailed documentation of its deliberations on selecting five judges. Since October 2017, the Collegium has also been publishing its resolution on the court's official website. Kant also said that the 'the judiciary's evolving relationship with its own independence, lies at the very heart of how India's vast, pluralistic democracy continues to function with remarkable cohesion'. He also said that some phases of institutional strain 'particularly during the Emergency' eventually 'gave way to renewed judicial consciousness'. In recent years, the Bharatiya Janata Party government at the Centre has been selectively appointing judges recommended for elevation to the bench by the Supreme Court collegium, which has allowed the Union government to exercise a veto over judicial appointments. The executive and the judiciary have been in a tug-of-war regarding appointments to higher judiciary in recent years. Former Law Minister Kiren Rijiju and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar have repeatedly criticised the collegium system of appointing judges, contending that it is opaque. In 2014, the BJP-led government had introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act with the objective of making appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts 'more broad-based, transparent, accountable and bringing objectivity in the system'. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act had proposed to make judicial appointments through a body consisting of the chief justice, two senior Supreme Court judges, the Union law minister and two other eminent persons nominated by the chief justice, the prime minister and the Leader of the Opposition. In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the Act, ruling that it was unconstitutional.
