‘The Last of Us' Creator Neil Druckmann on Directing Pedro Pascal's Last Episode, That Pearl Jam Song and Catherine O'Hara's ‘Beautiful' Improvisation
SPOILER ALERT: This story discusses major plot developments from Season 2, Episode 6 of 'The Last of Us,' airing on HBO and streaming on Max (soon to be HBO Max again), as well as the video game 'The Last of Us Part II,' available on Playstation 4, Playstation 5 and PC.
'The Last of Us' co-creator and executive producer Neil Druckmann wasn't sure which episode of the show's second season that he wanted to direct. For Season 1, he helmed the action-packed Episode 2, which was written by co-creator Craig Mazin, so he at least knew that this time, it should be an episode he had a part in writing. That limited Druckmann either to the season finale or the penultimate episode, both of which he co-wrote with Mazin and Halley Gross, his co-writer on Naughty Dog's 2020 video game 'The Last of Us Part II.' Each episode had strong selling points. The finale is, well, the finale, while Episode 6 is a flashback that covers how Joel (Pedro Pascal) and Ellie (Bella Ramsey) became so estranged from each other between the events of Season 1 and Season 2.
More from Variety
'The Last of Us' Guest Star Joe Pantoliano on Filming That Heartbreaking Final Scene and Forgetting Pedro Pascal
Pedro Pascal Says 'F-- the People That Try to Make You Scared' When Asked About U.S. Political Chaos: 'Fight Back. Don't Let Them Win'
'Eddington' Review: Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal Square Off in Ari Aster's Brazenly Provocative Western Thriller, Set During the Pandemic the Film Says Made America Lose Its Mind
Ultimately, it was Pascal who kind of made the decision for Druckmann. Since Episode 6 constitutes his final full episode of the series, the actor requested that Druckmann direct it. 'It just made sense,' Druckmann says. 'I'm excited about doing an episode that had no action, which is almost the inverse of what I did last time. So I just felt like, this will be a good challenge.' More crucially for Druckmann, he realized that Episode 6 'is what the story is all about.'
Taking place on Ellie's birthday over successive years, the episode depicts how she and Joel, now fully a part of the tight-knit community of Jackson, Wyoming, have fallen into a new, uneasy rhythm as adoptive father and daughter. For her 15th birthday, Joel makes Ellie a cake and builds her a new guitar, only to have his plans turned upside down after Ellie deliberately burns her arm where she'd been bitten by an infected, so she could finally wear short sleeve shirts again. For her 16th birthday, Joel takes her to a long forgotten natural history museum that still has many of its exhibits more-or-less intact, including the space capsule from the Apollo 15 moon landing — almost exactly like the fan-favorite scene from the video game.
Things between them begin to sour, however, on Ellie's 17th birthday, when Joel walks in on her smoking weed while getting a tattoo from another girl, Kat (Noah Lamanna), over the burn scarring on her arm. Joel is furious.
'So all the teenage shit all at once,' he says. 'Drugs and tattoos and sex and experimenting — with girls?'
'It wasn't sex,' Ellie retorts, equally incensed. 'And it wasn't a fucking experiment.'
Joel is incredulous, which only fuels Ellie's anger further. She demands to move into the garage, and eventually he relents and tries to make amends.
Two years later, on her 19th birthday, Ellie tries to psych herself up to confront Joel about what really happened five years earlier at the end of Season 1, when Joel murdered almost all of the Fireflies in a Salt Lake City hospital to keep them from killing Ellie to find the cure for the cordyceps infection — and then lied to Ellie about all of it. Before Ellie can say anything, however, Joel arrives and takes Ellie on her first patrol, where they encounter Eugene (Joe Pantoliano), the weed-growing husband of Jackson's resident therapist, Gail (Catherine O'Hara). Eugene has been bitten by an infected, and the rules dictate that Joel must kill him on the spot, but Eugene pleads that he has enough time to make it back to town so he and Gail can say a proper goodbye to each other. Ellie forces Joel to agree to Eugene's request, and when she leaves to get their horses, he promises her that he won't kill Eugene before they get back.
Once again, Joel's lied. He knew there was little chance Eugene was going to make it back in time, so to protect Ellie, Gail, and the rest of Jackson, he leads Eugene to a beautiful lake and kills him.
When they bring Eugene's body back to Gail, Joel lies to her as well. 'He wished he could say goodbye to you in person,' he says. 'He wasn't scared — he was brave, and he ended it himself.'
Ellie, seething, can't take it anymore. 'That's not what happened,' she announces, and tells the truth to a devastated Gail, who slaps Joel and begs him to leave.
Joel looks at Ellie, shocked by what she's done. She stares daggers at him: 'You swore.'
Nine months later, the show returns to Joel's porch on the night before he died, after Ellie kisses Dina (Isabela Merced) at Jackson's New Year's Eve party and, to Ellie's dismay, Joel defends them from the town's resident homophobe, as seen in the season premiere. In this episode, after Ellie arrives home from the party, the two finally have it out about what really happened at that hospital in Salt Lake City.
'I'm going to give you once last chance,' Ellie says. 'If you lie to me again, we're done.' Joel can barely speak at first, but he confesses his crimes.
'Making a cure would have killed you,' he says in tears.
'Then I was supposed to die!' Ellie says, crying too. 'That was my purpose! My life would have fucking mattered, but you took that from me!'
Joel, sobbing now, is resigned to the consequences of his choices, but he doesn't regret them. 'If somehow I had a second chance at that moment, I would do it all over again,' he says. 'Because I love you. In a way you can't understand.'
There's a long silence. 'I don't think I can forgive you for this,' Ellie says. 'But I would like to try.'
For anyone who has played 'The Last of Us Part II,' the timing of this breathtaking scene between Joel and Ellie is shocking, since it comes at the very end of the game, after far more has transpired for all of the characters. Druckmann explained to Variety why he, Mazin and Gross chose to move that scene so far up for the show. He also discussed what guided their thinking about the new scenes between Joel and Ellie on her birthdays, his emotional reaction to seeing locations from the game created in real life — and what happened when O'Hara disagreed with his direction for the scene in which Gail slaps Joel.
We wanted this episode for Ellie to find out definitively that Joel lied. In the game, we did in a very different way, where she traveled all the way back to the hospital and found documentation. It felt like we would be stretching the reality of the world and how dangerous it is on the show compared to the game. But also, looking at documents and exploring that space, I don't know if that makes as compelling of a drama for a TV show. The engine for the show is a little different than the engine for an interactive experience. So that ultimately led to the whole Eugene sequence.
Because we were spending more time in Jackson than we were in the game, we came up with way more ideas than what ended up in the show. But each one of those was vetted through this lens of the arc we wanted, where they start out in this much better place. They know there's a lie, but they're trying to move past it, and then this thing just weighs on them and their relationship. Each step you feel like it's pushing them apart. That was the most important thing that we needed out every sequence, to drill that home.
It started with conversation in the game, which was, Joel is oblivious, and mistakes Ellie's friendship with Jesse for something more. I believe that's something Halley wrote — it's so long ago now, I forget. We really wanted to keep that here, and then take it a step further. He finds out [Ellie is gay] in the game when she kisses Dina on the dance floor. Here, it felt like there's an opportunity to show more of Ellie's evolution of becoming a teenager in Jackson, and for that misunderstanding to create more of a rift between them. But also show evolution, forgiveness, movement — you could feel how much Joel is trying.
He gets things wrong. It's the first time he's [parenting] a teenager at this age, but he's trying to accommodate all the things that Ellie wants. She wants to move to the garage, and even though he doesn't want her to, he gives it to her. She gets this tattoo, and she does drugs, and it infuriates him. And then he's looking at her tattoo, and he says, This looks better than the one I've done on the guitar. He's trying. She wants to go on patrols, and eventually he yields on that. Almost everything she wants, he gives it to her, and it's never enough, because ultimately their friction is not about any one of those things.
Well, I'm not sure when it was written. You'd have to ask Eddie Vedder that. However, it did come out to the public in 2013, and it is anachronistic in that it should not exist in our timeline. Initially, when we were making this episode, there would have been a different song. As we were exploring it, just felt like we were prioritizing the wrong thing, this timeline of events and when things would be available. Clearly, we're not in the same timeline as our universe, so we have some leeway. And that song felt so important. Because it was in the game, because it has so much association, not only for fans, but even for myself, we changed course. The thing that we thought we cared about, we ultimately didn't care about, and the emotional truth of the song was more important than the timeline truth of the world that we live in.
No. When we were making the game, I knew that scene should exist. I didn't know where it goes. That was true for all the flashbacks. Even pretty late in production of the game, we were moving those flashbacks around. In talking about it with Craig, it's the first time I really thought about the time between seasons. So much of writing is set ups and payoffs, and we would have set certain things up that get paid off years later. That felt too long, especially because this season focuses so much on Ellie's journey and this emotional truth of what did she know? What didn't she know? To wait additional years until Season 3 will come out — or maybe even Season 4, it depends where all the events land and how many seasons we have — I was easily convinced by Craig that that would be too long.
It was a day's worth of conversation of us wrestling with it. The way I work is, when a suggestion like that is made, I say, 'Let's play it through.' I just assume that it's correct, and then we play it through and not only talk about this season, but talk about the future seasons, and then say, does it make sense? If the answer is yes, we go with it. If the answer is no, we either keep wrestling with it until we find another solution, or we just go back to how it was in the game.
[Long pause] That's right.
We knew we had this Eugene mystery, and we had so many iterations on it of just what that sequence should be about. There were versions that had all this action and fighting and shooting infected, and much smaller versions. It went from me to Hallie to Craig, from me to Hallie to Craig. It just didn't feel right for a long time, until we landed on him lying to her about killing Eugene. and then everything just fell into place, as far as, like, Oh, this is how she'll know. It felt like such a dramatic way for her to figure things out.
As far as shooting that scene, if no one knew the lie, what I like about that scene is he's being very considerate. Would you want to tell Gail that he wanted to see her, almost in this pitiful way, and I still had to put him down, because those are the rules, and that's the way to keep you safe? Sometimes you could buy the argument that the lie is better than the truth, right? But for Ellie, it wasn't, because of everything else that has come before, because she saw that he betrayed her trust. That meant more than just this moment, it meant that everything that Ellie was worried about, the survival guilt that she's felt all the way back to Season 1 of needing to justify Riley's death and Tessa's death and Henry and Sam and all these people who died along the way so that something good can come of it at the end. It's almost in that moment she realizes nothing good came out of it. That's not entirely true, but that's how she feels about it. So it was just important that all the actors knew the truth they're going into it, and for it to be genuinely shocking.
If I may, I just want to sing Catherine O'Hara's praises.
It was one of my favorite directing moments. In the scene, she slaps Joel, and then in his shame, he's supposed to take a few steps back. We were struggling with it. It just felt artificial. It felt rehearsed. Initially, there were no lines of dialogue for that little moment. I went to Catherine, and said, 'I think we need to do something else here. I don't know what. What if, like, his proximity to this body is somehow desecrating it now that you know the truth, and if you want, you could yell at him to get away?' And she's like, 'Oh, I'm not so sure. I like the beauty of there being no dialogue.' And I'm like, 'Please, just try it. If it doesn't work, we'll go back to the other version. But I always like experimenting, just shaking it up in some way.' So I asked her to yell to get away. I thought that would motivate Pedro [to step back]. Instead, she almost did the opposite. It was so beautiful. She goes inside [herself] and starts sobbing, and begs him to please get away in this very soft spoken voice. I'm like, Oh, my God, that's so much better than what I asked for. It's one of those beautiful moments of collaboration, where I asked for something, she internalized it, made it something else, and it's better because of it. That's the take you see in the episode.
We didn't. Pretty early on, we talked about the tragedy of that. We had a conversation about Episode 1 where, like, 'Should there be a picture of the two of them in their home?' 'No, just the shoes.' That's the only sense you see, his shoes next to her shoes. Sometimes those are my favorite moments in storytelling, those gaps where we trust you as a viewer to fill in that relationship. You can picture them smoking weed together and doing all this stuff, but we felt like for this story, we didn't need to show.
I haven't found the words to describe this feeling. It's so surreal. I can't even tell you why I get so emotional when I'm on these sets. The first time I walked on set, I was in Joel's house with Hallie, my co-writer on the game and was the other co-writer on the show on this episode as well. We're like, look at this dining room! This is where in the game, Maria talks to Ellie and Dina, and it looks exactly the same. Every set felt like that.
This [museum] set in particular, the day we're shooting this, I had two visitors from Naughty Dog, Arne Meyer, who is our heads of communication, and Alison Mori, who is my partner in running the studio. They got to see a part that we end up cutting from the episode, more in the dinosaur museum. I'm like, come with me, and we walk through this dark hallway with stars, and we got to the space capsule, and I'm like, 'Look at this.' I'm emotional, but I've been seeing it as it's been built. I look at them, and they both have tears in their eyes. This thing that we worked so hard to perfect in digital forms with pixels on a flat screen, now you could stand in it, you could go into it, you could touch it. All the buttons are working. The seats are real. They creak when you sit in them. It felt like we went into the game. It's this really wonderful feeling to know that this incredible crew that I worked with treated the source material with such reverence. It literally moved us to tears.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Emmy Predictions: Talk/Scripted Variety Series - The Variety Categories Are Still a Mess; Netflix, Dropout, and 'Hot Ones' Stir Up Buzz
Oscars Predictions 2026: 'Sinners' Becomes Early Contender Ahead of Cannes Film Festival

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
32 minutes ago
- The Verge
Posted Jun 10, 2025 at 8:43 PM EDT 0 Comments
Tesla asks its remaining fans to make 90 second ads. You might recognize this TeslaVision campaign seeking fan-submitted ads as a callback to the Project Loveday contest from 2017 (that was the year the Model 3 started shipping, but the new Roadster and Semi did not). Beyond the request for free advertising labor amid an ongoing brand crisis and political quagmire, Tesla's 2025 request is also designed to try to flood social media, requiring posts on YouTube, X, and Instagram by July 17th to maybe win a Model Y and a trip to Gigafactory Texas.


Fox News
39 minutes ago
- Fox News
Dakota Johnson has one, non-negotiable dating deal-breaker
Dakota Johnson is sharing her dating deal-breaker. On Monday, the 35-year-old actress appeared on "Today" with Chris Evans to promote their upcoming movie, "Materialists," in which Johnson plays a professional matchmaker and the Marvel star portrays her ex-boyfriend. During the episode, host Craig Melvin asked the duo, "If either of you were to engage with a real-life matchmaker, what would be one non-negotiable for you?" While Evans, 43, shared that any potential interest "must love dogs," his co-star had a more blunt reply. "Like, not an a------," Johnson said to laughter from Evans, Melvin and the audience. "That's concise," Evans quipped with a smile. "There it is. Nail on the head." Johnson might be back in the dating pool after she reportedly split from Chris Martin after eight years together. During an interview June 4 with the Los Angeles Times, Johnson sparked speculation that she and Martin had called it quits as she shared her view on relationships. "For a long time we've all been so quick to judge relationships or how they should happen, how they should exist in the world. When people should get married. Divorce is bad. All these things that actually, if you think about it, why is divorce bad?" " the "Fifty Shades of Grey" star said. "Why do people have to get married or at a certain age or only once? Why? It doesn't matter," Johnson added. Later that day, People magazine reported that Johnson and Martin had ended their on-and-off again relationship and the split appeared to be permanent. "It feels final this time," a source told the outlet. Johnson and the Coldplay frontman have been dating since 2017. Martin was previously married to Gwyneth Paltrow for 10 years. The former couple, who share children Apple, 21, and Moses, 19, announced their separation as a "conscious uncoupling" in 2014. Their divorce was finalized in 2016 but the two have remained on good terms. In December 2020, Johnson and Martin sparked engagement rumors when the "Madame Web" actress stepped out sporting a large emerald ring on her left ring finger. A source told People magazine in March 2024 Johnson and Martin "got engaged years ago but were in no rush to get married." In August 2024, a representative for Johnson denied rumors the pair had decided to part ways. "The reports are not true," Johnson's spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "They are happily together." At the time, a source told People magazine Johnson and Martin's relationship was "going strong." "They've had ups and downs, but now they're definitely back on," the insider shared. The actress previously spoke with Elle U.K. and shed some light on her low-profile relationship with the "Fix You" singer. "We've been together for quite a while, and we go out sometimes, but we both work so much that it's nice to be at home and be cozy and private," Johnson said in 2021. When asked how she and Martin manage to maintain a private relationship, Johnson added, "Most of the partying takes place inside my house."
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun
The latest entry in a genre one wishes weren't so burgeoning is HBO's Surviving Ohio State, following in the sadly necessary footsteps of documentaries about sexual abuse in the athletic departments at Michigan State (Athlete A and At the Heart of Gold) and Penn State (Happy Valley). When Surviving Ohio State was announced, anticipation hinged on the participation of producer George Clooney and the possibility that exploring the abuses of Dr. Richard Strauss and alleged negligence by authority figures at Ohio State might topple Jim Jordan, Ohio Congressman and Trump lapdog. More from The Hollywood Reporter Broadway Box Office: 'Good Night, and Good Luck' and 'Othello' End Runs on New Highs 'A Tree Fell in the Woods' Review: Josh Gad and Alexandra Daddario in an Uneven, Occasionally Insightful Relationship Dramedy Jim Sheridan's 'Re-creation' Puts One of Ireland's Most Troubling Murder Cases Back on Trial If your interest in Surviving Ohio State revolves entirely around Jim Jordan-related schadenfreude, you can probably skip it. Jordan, who refused to participate in the documentary for self-evident reasons, comes across as heartless and negligent, but the doc lacks any sort of smoking gun likely to dissuade his dedicated constituents, who have known about all of these allegations for each of the last three times they've voted for him. Jordan, unfortunately, also proves to be a distraction to the filmmakers, especially in the documentary's second half. Caught up in the they-said/he-said-in-previous-statements disagreements, director Eva Orner largely fails to explore the institutional side of the scandal. I shouldn't come away from a documentary like this fixated on the name of a single assistant wrestling coach (one who was not and has not been accused of anything criminal) and completely unable to name the Ohio State president, athletic director and key administrators under whose watch these abuses occurred. For the first half of its 108-minute running time, Surviving Ohio State is, as its title suggests, a compelling examination of the survivors of abuse and the mechanisms through which large-scale abuse can occur at a major university. Per a 2019 independent investigation, from 1978 to 1998 Dr. Richard Strauss abused at least 177 male students at Ohio State. Strauss had particularly close ties to a number of Buckeyes sports programs, including fencing, hockey and the wrestling team, coached by Russ Hellickson, with two-time NCAA champ Jordan as his primary assistant. The accusations from athletes involved Strauss' inappropriate examinations, his tendency to take regular, extended showers in several athletic locker rooms, and grooming behavior escalating ultimately into rape. For some of that time, Strauss worked at the Student Health Center and thus had access to the entire student body, and although he was relieved of certain of those duties after complaints, he retired from Ohio State entirely on his own terms. A group of wrestlers from the mid-90s are Orner's primary points of entry, and this group of survivors proves crucial to both the strongest aspects of the documentary and the distraction that leaves it less effective than it could be. At least a half dozen of those wrestlers tell their stories to the camera, accompanied by filler re-enactments — a shower head spurting water, the hallway leading to a medical examination room — that add very little. The stories themselves are candid and graphic, the haunted men today contrasted with vintage footage of wrestling matches and the various athletes in their high-achieving youth. Well aware of skepticism from online trolls who have wondered how veterans of a combat sport could allow this sort of 'victimization,' the men talk about the surprise and shame that led them not to respond in the moment and to remain silent about the incidents for decades. It's the film's way of setting up the psychology of male survivors and, perhaps more than that, of explaining why the OSU scandal hasn't received the instant attention and sympathy that greeted revelations from generations of female gymnasts about Michigan State and United States national team doctor Larry Nassar. The truth is that Jordan's involvement has contributed to what visibility the Ohio State situation has had. All of the wrestlers present in this documentary have made it clear that Strauss' behavior wasn't a secret, and that the coaches all knew about the inappropriate showers and concerns about the examinations, taking little action in Hellickson's case and no action in Jordan's case. Jordan has belligerently and vehemently denied that he knew anything at all, which makes him at best an oblivious caretaker of young men. The wrestlers, plus at least one referee with a story of his own, are completely persuasive, and Orner is able to give a sense of pervasive rumors about Strauss' creepiness. But that's been the story since these allegations against Strauss came out back in 2018 — and other than one small, thoroughly speculative detail about Jordan's actions well after the scandal broke, no new information is provided and no dots connected regarding Jordan or Hellickson or anything else. The frustration of Surviving Ohio State is how fixated it becomes on Hellickson and Jordan and unnamed figures at the university — Hellickson and the board of trustees, like Jordan, declined to provide any response — without that smoking gun or that key piece of dot-connecting. Given how potent the survivor interviews are and how negligible the details are on the systemic failures, Surviving Ohio State would have been better with more focus on the former and less unsubstantiated insinuation — however persuasive — about the latter. The documentary is extremely effective at giving voice to those survivors and providing context and understanding for their silence — and that's extremely important, especially alongside those documentaries about what happened at Penn State and Michigan State. It may not be as sensational and buzzy as bringing down a major university or a sitting congressman, but since Surviving Ohio State won't do either thing, it's worth praising the potency of what it does well. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT 'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now