12 Women Share The Reality Of Marrying For Money
The thing is, in a society where women couldn't open bank accounts, buy homes, or build credit without a man's signature, in many ways, marriage was often the sole path to social and financial security. Even today, the gender pay gap persists, with women making on average just 84 cents to every dollar earned by men. And when women step away from the workforce to have children, they often return to lower salaries and limited opportunities — aka, the "motherhood penalty" — whereas when men become fathers, their wages increase, also the phenomenon known as the "fatherhood premium."
In a culture that still rewards men as the default breadwinners and punishes women economically for doing the same work (or even tells them outright they should just pursue a MRS degree instead), it's not surprising that some view marriage as a financial safeguard. Not necessarily because they want to (despite the tired and often overused "golddigger" stereotype), but sometimes because they feel they have to.
So, when someone on Reddit asked women who married "the rich one" for financial stability to share what life's been like now, it opened up a revealing and necessary conversation about the systemic pressures at play shaping women's choices. The answers highlight what happens when marriage becomes a form of economic survival — and, more often than not, just how often the tale unravels.
Here's what they shared:
"I'll speak for my mom. She thought she was marrying the rich one. My dad tried to talk her out of it. He even offered to pay her more than child support for her not to do it (not out of love...it's just who my dad is). That pissed her off and she married him anyway. I won't go into details about the stuff I went through, but he was not a safe person to be around. He was a big-time manipulator. He tied my mom up with 6 million dollars in debt. She had no idea until she wanted a divorce — that's when she found out he was putting his debt in her name for his failing businesses."
"She ended up having to file for bankruptcy to leave him, but the divorce took years. He would constantly hire new lawyers just to keep the process going. She almost didn't make it out in one piece mentally. It's been a long road for her. She hasn't made the best decisions in relationships (I had to cut her out of my life for a while because of it), but after some very extensive therapy, she's doing much better."—Ok_Ad_5658
"My first husband was very wealthy. When we were dating, that was fun, and he loved to spoil me and treat me to awesome things. After we were married, he became very controlling and definitely used his wealth and money to control and assert his dominance over me. I became very anxious and cried all the time, went on antidepressants, and went to therapy."
"I gave up my acting/directing career to be with an ex-partner, as I thought that I wouldn't succeed in my career, and I resigned myself to a life of normality. When I got dumped, the biggest thing that hurt was that I chose the safe path, and things still didn't work out. So the moral of the story is, don't give up your passions and career for a so-called 'normal life,' because when the worst happens, you're only left with yourself, and your previous skills and experience, and it can be hard to re-enter the workforce. I got lucky, and I'm much happier now pursuing the things I truly want."
"I was engaged to the 'rich one' and got away. It was NOT WORTH IT. The abuse — physical, sexual, emotional, mental, etc. It was extremely lonely...I always remember being sad on vacation. I'm on an expensive vacation in a beautiful resort, where normal people would be thrilled. But instead I was miserable and alone and honestly pissed that our usual routines were on hold and therefore I was expected to be in his presence all day."
"Do not do it. Life is too short for misery, and you deserve true love. Money is just money — it can come and go. Love and happiness are what life is about. People will say all day, 'Well, I don't pay any bills.' There isn't a bill in this world that costs more than my peace and happiness."—Born_Boysenberry4327
"A bit different. He became rich while we dated. We were both not working when we met. I was on leave from teaching after a death in my family. He had just moved to my city and was looking for work. He was a freelance graphic designer and landed a gig at a start-up company. This was around 2010, when mobile apps were just taking off, and things like Instagram were just coming out. Design after design, he won awards, and the company blew up because of him. Life was fun when there was money, parties, and award ceremonies. After a bit, drugs and drinking got in his way, he became more abusive, tried to kill me, and I left. He was fired and blacklisted."
"I am highly educated and have a successful career of my own, but he had built wealth that was far beyond anything I'd ever make. We married young, when he was setting up his company. I encouraged him, and we had a close partnership for many years. Eventually, he wanted more and more control and wanted me to be more of a trophy wife, less of a partner."
"My friend married a guy she did like...but she was also looking for someone wealthy (she is also highly educated with a good job that could earn well). Honestly? I'm not sure how much of it was love for her or how much of it was wanting a kid before she got too old. I think she didn't really know him...He ended up being very controlling. He wouldn't let her change anything about the house. She got pregnant and he was the least supportive partner you can imagine."
"I met my ex in college. He was in a field that offered high incomes right after graduation, so while we were not rich we were very comfortable. He became very controlling and mean, and watched every penny I spent, getting upset if I bought an extra non-perishable grocery item because it was on sale. Mind you, he did not do any shopping or cooking. I waited probably too long to divorce him because I was worried about the big drop in income and stability. But I finally did it, and while it was tough financially for a long time, I was fine and so much happier without him."
—YouMustDoEverything
"My friend married the 'rich one' because he is rich and she is living out the 'If you marry for money, you earn every penny' phrase. There is also not an insignificant age difference, the in-laws are assholes, the husband is a tightwad, and the family business is in a somewhat volatile industry dynamic. But he's rich, so she doesn't have to work outside the home, so she sort of got what she wanted?"
"This is not the same thing, but I didn't marry for love; I married my husband because we were good partners. He was financially stable enough that I could stay at home with our daughter, which I think we both wanted. I think we have a different kind of love for each other that has grown over time, but it's not a very romantic relationship, and I'm honestly happier than I was when I was deeply in love in the past."
"It's worked out well. I didn't pick him just because he's rich, but I've been with men similar in habit and compatibility to him who didn't have as much money. It's nice not to have to worry about whether we have enough money to pay the bills. And we can vacation where we want because we want to, and not pick places just because they are budget-friendly. The kids can participate in the activities they want and won't have to pick a lower-tier college in the interest of saving us money or reducing their own student loan burden. I do work because I want to, but I don't have to work jobs I hate or hours that suck because we have the household financial security to weather the storm of temporary unemployment."
And finally, "My husband isn't rich, but he makes good money, works really hard, is very responsible, and could afford to live on his own when we met. We got married for things other than money and love, but we do love each other. I was only 22 and I didn't go to college, so I wasn't financially stable in the same way. I worked and paid for everything I had and took care of my younger sister financially, but I lived with family and felt trapped. So it made sense getting married would help me, but the thing I wish I realized back then was not to become as financially dependent on him."
"We had a rough patch, and I realized I didn't have anything or anywhere to go if we got divorced. I recently returned to school to get out of dead-end jobs and have financial independence/security. Overall, I think people should check both boxes by picking someone you enjoy being around and actually like, as well as them being financially stable."—corkblob
Did you marry "the rich one" for financial stability? What was the reality, and what do you wish you'd known before saying "I do"? Share your story in the comments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Couple Calls Off Wedding After Groom's Father Invites 20 Families Without Consent
"I have never met any of these individuals and my fiancé has told me he doesn't know many of them either," the bride wrote on RedditNEED TO KNOW A couple canceled their wedding and decided to elope instead after the groom's father sent their save-the-dates out to strangers without their permission and withdrew wedding funding The bride and groom had "never met" any members of the "at least 15-20 families" invited without consent, and always envisioned a "small, intimate wedding" "We're both very excited to finally do it how we want without outside pressure from others," the bride wroteA couple called off their wedding after the groom's father sent their save-the-dates to many strangers without their permission. In a post on Reddit's "Wedding Drama" forum, the bride explained that she was "genuinely stumped" when her fiancé's father went behind her back and sent her wedding save-the-dates out to about 20 families, none of whom the couple have met. Because he refused to "fix the issue," the couple decided to cancel their entire wedding and elope instead. Originally, the bride and groom wanted a "smaller" wedding, and invited 70 "close friends and family." When the groom's father asked for a copy of their save-the-date, the couple obliged because they assumed "he was sending it to his mother as they keep in touch frequently." They never thought he would invite "at least 15-20 families each with spouses [and] kids." "I have never met any of these individuals and my fiancé has told me he doesn't know many of them either," the bride wrote. "It has been expressed to him that we did not approve this and he said that there's nothing we can do." The groom confronted his parents about the issue, and the conversation didn't go as hoped. "They're angry. As we thought they would be," the bride said. "They have said they see our POV but won't reach out to fix the issue. They refused to let us know who they invited and won't let us in the group message to make the situation right." When the groom began wedding planning, his parents "contributed to [the] catering." Although the bride and groom know that "it's customary" for parents to "get a say" in some wedding decisions when they are financially contributing to the celebration, they believe that the wedding invitation fiasco "has been a clear overstep." In retaliation to the bride and groom's wish for them to disinvite the group of strangers, the groom's mother and father "pulled half the funding they originally gave" them. "[They] basically told us unless we do it their way then they will not pay," the bride said. "We gave them the other half back as well. So they're fully re-funded." Because a compromise couldn't be reached, the couple felt as though they were left with no other choice than to cancel their wedding. "We have decided to cut our losses and cancel the original wedding we planned," the bride said. "Looking back we always wanted a small, intimate wedding. It has turned into a bigger event than we wanted. We looked at finances/contracts and found we would lose less in deposits to cancel than we thought. We canceled everything." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In "the next year," the pair will elope and host "a dinner party for close family and friends afterward." She added, "We're both very excited to finally do it how we want without outside pressure from others." "Now, it's time to tell FIL (father-in-law) and MIL (mother-in-law) that they get to tell those family members that the wedding is canceled. They're angry now, but I know them. I know they will feel horrible about this situation when everything calms down," she continued. The majority of Reddit users agreed with the bride's decision and viewpoint that a "boundary had been crossed. "It's your wedding, not his (groom's father)," the top comment reads in part. "Helping financially doesn't mean he gets a say about the guest list." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Says Mother-in-Law Is Moving Just 15 Minutes Away. Now She's Worried 'Our Lives Will Be Overrun'
She told her mother-in-law their city was too close, but now the woman is house-hunting nearby anywayNEED TO KNOW A woman says her mother-in-law is moving within 15 minutes of their home despite being told their city was too close The couple is expecting a baby and fears the mother-in-law will demand constant time and involvement The husband struggles to set boundaries with his mom, who becomes defensive and manipulative when challengedA woman seeks support from the Reddit community following a difficult update in her already complicated relationship with her overbearing mother-in-law. What was once a distant plan has suddenly become a pressing concern: her mother-in-law is officially moving to their state, and much sooner than expected. "You all told me and she said it would be 1-2 years out. And it's happening now," she writes in frustration. What was originally a plan for the mother-in-law to live 30 minutes away has now been reduced to 15 minutes — or less. She and her husband had made it clear that their own city was too close for comfort. "She specifically asked us if our city was too close. And we said yes, that's too close. And she did not like that answer." Despite being told no, the mother-in-law dismissed their concerns. 'Her response to this was 'we don't have to hang out,' ' the woman shares, highlighting the dismissive tone that's become all too familiar. The couple is expecting a baby girl in just a few months, and the mother-to-be is already setting expectations around her postpartum boundaries. 'I will not be spending postpartum and mat leave with his mother while he's working,' she states firmly. At a recent dinner, she tried explaining to her husband why the situation feels particularly invasive. 'His mom is used to spending all her time with him when they visit,' she explains, shedding light on the dynamic that's played out for years. Though he has told his mother not to base her move on their lives or schedules, it hasn't stopped her from doing exactly that. 'That went in one ear and out the other,' she writes. 'I can tell she wants to move to gain more control of his life and by proxy our life and our baby's.' Her fear is that their family life will be consumed by the mother-in-law's expectations and demands. 'She expects 24/7 time with him/us. He doesn't want that and neither do I.' There's also a deep frustration that the mother-in-law doesn't seem to acknowledge their autonomy. 'It's like she's never seen us as adults in our day to day lives,' the woman writes. Her husband is hesitant to confront his mother directly because the conversations always turn sour. 'Imagine a dramatic teenager throwing a temper tantrum,' she says. 'She gets defensive, masks her behavior as 'help' or 'concern,' gives him the silent treatment, then yells at him, and inevitably says I'm controlling him and calls me names behind my back.' The woman empathizes with her husband, who struggles with the emotional toll. Still, she's clear that avoiding the issue isn't an option. 'Boundaries need to be set or our lives will be overrun.' In therapy, she was advised to ask her husband why setting boundaries with his mom is so difficult. When she did, his answer was sobering. 'He wishes things were different but ultimately knows they will never change with his mom.' To her, the behavior screams narcissism. 'Anything that we want that she doesn't somehow must be a her problem.' The mother-in-law doesn't seem to grasp the idea that they need space and privacy. 'You can't really tell someone that they are all encompassing/engulfing and take up 99.9% of your time when you're with them.' When she visits, the couple finds themselves sneaking away just to breathe. 'My husband and I 'escape' through naps, and walks around our neighborhood to get away.' Time alone becomes a rare luxury when the mother-in-law is around. 'To say we have more than 10 mins a day to ourselves when she visits is generous.' Even past efforts to create physical boundaries have failed. 'Some people are probably thinking ask her to stay in a hotel… oh we have and she still doesn't leave until 9pm, or she just doesn't go to the hotel.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The woman admits that their inability to enforce boundaries has made things worse. 'As you can tell we are pretty spineless.' Feeling overwhelmed and hopeless, she turns to the community. 'You warned us, and I'm feeling hopeless now.' Though she understands the need for boundaries, she admits to feeling unsure about how to enforce them. 'My therapist said my husband has to do it. I agree, but again idk how support him in doing that…' They're aligned in what boundaries they want — but the delivery is where things break down. 'It's the 'communicating' them. He doesn't feel like he can because she doesn't listen or she yells at him.' The mother-in-law is known for manipulating situations to get her way. 'She's also so manipulative in getting what she wants whether that's going around him and trying to triangulate us, or mask getting what she wants through gift giving.' A commenter offers advice, urging the husband to start therapy and prepare for backlash. 'He should also prepare himself to not take the bait when she inevitably overreacts or flips out… you both need to be prepared to enforce consequences.' The original poster is grateful but admits that the unpredictability is what makes it hard. 'She will cross a boundary out of nowhere. When she hasn't before.' Caught off guard, the couple often doesn't have time to talk through what happened. 'Then it's like well the moment passed and we didn't know this would be a problem.' While the couple knows boundaries are crucial, they're still figuring out how to hold the line. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Market Basket drama — Deli, devotion & doughnuts: Why we care so much
There's an old joke in politics that the most dangerous place on Earth is the space between an elected official and a microphone. If you live and work in the Greater Boston area, the second-most dangerous place just might be your local Market Basket on a Sunday morning in October when the Patriots are playing and the cider doughnuts are in the warmer. Throngs of customers, usually in team colors, barrel down the wide aisles, bobbing in and out of traffic with all the subtlety of drivers on the Southeast Expressway at rush hour. Their carts are filled with burgers, dogs, the key components for Italian subs from the deli aisle, buns and rolls, chips and drinks. Townie accents cut through the din. The regional chain is beloved for its low prices and wide selection. And while everyone has their favorite supermarket, the loyalty that Market Basket inspires is just next level. 'If you're not grocery shopping at Market Basket, you are getting ripped off,' one Reddit user asserted a few months back. The response they engendered was ... well ... passionate. The post garnered over 1,000 likes and 674 comments, prompting its author to marvel at the reaction. 'Wow, this really blew up!' they wrote. 'I have been to just one MB store and it's extremely well run, efficient, and while busy, everyone seems to act like rational humans.' And that loyalty can go back years — as evidenced by a review posted by one Yelp user. 'Over the years (I am now approaching 80), I have shopped at numerous supermarkets. I give the store high praise for its cleanliness, well-stocked shelves, and friendly, helpful staff,' they wrote. 'Prices are good when compared to other local food markets. When checking out, in almost all cases, there are people to bag the food. The prepared food section offers a wide selection of choices at great prices,' they continued. 'Need specialized meet cuts? Just ask. Hard to understand the criticism raised by others. The fresh orange is a plus.' What criticism? It's ... measured, at best, 'All staff are very helpful all the time,' another Yelp user wrote. 'Hard to get down the aisle sometimes with the [stockers]. [It] helps keep everything in [stock] during the day, though.' Given all that, it's not surprising to find out (or maybe it is) that ongoing drama surrounding the company's leadership has provoked equally passionate debate. The question is: Why? And we'll get to that in a minute. But first, a quick primer, in case you're not up to speed. In late May, the Tewksbury-based company's executive committee put its CEO, Arthur T. Demoulas, popularly known as 'Artie T,' on paid leave. That's to differentiate him from his cousin, Arthur S. Demoulas, or 'Artie S,' who successfully pushed Arthur T. Demoulas out as CEO in June 2014. That led to a summer of discontent, punctuated by worker protests and shopper boycotts that saw 'Artie T.' restored to his perch atop the company in August of that same year. Officials justified the latest move by saying they were investigating whether Arthur T. Demoulas was considering leading a work stoppage that could potentially disrupt the business, The Boston Globe reported. In a statement to the Globe, a spokesperson for Demoulas said he'd been ousted by his three sisters, all of whom are shareholders in the chain and three appointed board members. Demoulas's daughter, Madeleine, and his son, Telemachus, also were placed on leave, along with several others, the spokesperson told The Globe. And then ... Earlier this month, two long-serving executives, operations manager Joe Schmidt and grocery supervisor Tom Gordon, were sacked. Like Demoulas, they'd earlier been put on paid leave amid concerns that they were trying to organize a work stoppage in the hopes of protecting their boss from losing his position, MassLive previously reported. Gordon and Schmidt, meanwhile, charged that they were given the hook as part of an effort to silence employees who oppose changes that the board and some company shareholders want to make to the company. If all this sounds too 'Succession' for words, that's because it is. And just like the popular HBO show, Market Basket's very passionate customers are also tied up in the corporate drama. Again, back to Reddit. 'I don't understand what's happening with Market Basket, and I'm almost too afraid to ask,' one user asked not too long ago. Their fellow Redditors, however, were more than happy to fill in the blanks, responding in a thread that stretched to 132 comments. But again: Why? Why the loyalty? These marketing and public relations experts know exactly why. 'It's going the path less traveled. It's the everyman of supermarket brands,' Bobbie Carlton, the founder of Lexington-based Carlton PR & Marketing, said. 'When you think that, for years, they didn't have a website. You think about the [in-house music] playlist, which has become TikTok famous. 'Market Basket is a stand-in for you, the average person,' she continued. 'What do we all want? We all want to be liked. We all want people to think well of us.' Marlo Fogelman, the founder and CEO of Marlo Marketing which has offices in Boston and New York, offered a similar sentiment. 'The same principles of hospitality that apply to any consumer-facing business [apply] to the grocery business. People think of 'hospitality' as mostly aligned with businesses like restaurants, hotels, etc.," she said. 'But any consumer-facing brand has the opportunity to be a hospitality-forward brand, and ultimately, hospitality drives loyalty.' Bottom line, that's a 'feeling of being welcome, of having a consistent high-quality experience, great vibe, great service, value for what you're getting, feeling like you belong there,' she continued. 'Especially in the grocery store space, I believe that the personal touches that Market Basket offers as compared to other stores – such as the fact that none of the stores have self-checkout lanes and instead choose to keep their stores fully staffed with human cashiers and baggers, along with everything else they're known for — fosters that loyalty," Fogelman said. Carlton, meanwhile, is something of a confessed Market Basket fan, as well. Her home base in Lexington is midway between the chain's stores in Waltham and Burlington. Her two grown sons love the 'Mystery Shelf' of day-old baked goods. Friday nights are set aside for Market Basket-brand frozen pizza. Don't get her going on the cider doughnuts. And then there's the bucket. A 5-gallon Market Basket brand bucket that she uses to brine her Thanksgiving turkeys. It's embossed with 'Demoulas' on the side of it. 'I think all New Englanders hope that internal fighting stops and that things return to normal, she said. 'And status quo is normal. We don't like change here in New England. That's a part of it. And when you have a good thing, why would you want it to change? And after all that, there might be some light at the end of the tunnel. In a statement released Tuesday, Demoulas said through a spokesperson that he and the company are set to air their differences before a mediator on Sept. 3. The goal? 'Avoiding litigation and reaching a quicker and amicable resolution that is in the best interest of Market Basket's associates, customers and the communities it serves.' And it might even be wrapped up before the cider doughnuts hit. Read more analysis from John L. Micek Mass. student turns terrifying choking incident into legislative action | Bay State Briefing A nicotine-free Mass.? These lawmakers say 'yes' | Bay State Briefing She got out. Then she gave back: How a Boston woman went from incarceration to inspiration Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword
