James Carville Gives Fox News Viewers An Uncomfortable Reminder About Jeffrey Epstein
Fox News host Jesse Watters asked Carville if Democrats would consider Hunter Biden, son of former President Joe Biden, as a possible presidential candidate.
'You know, everybody in the world is talking about Epstein, and Fox is still talking about Biden's memory,' Carville said. 'That's so long ago I can't even remember it.'
'Well, do you want to talk about Epstein?' Watters asked.
'I don't mind talking about Epstein,' said Carville.
Carville's reminder comes as a new report found that Fox News has indeed shied away from Epstein coverage ― just as Trump has asked. The report by Media Matters for America finds that on Monday, for example, Fox News mentioned former President Barack Obama 117 times and Epstein just twice.
Carville and Watters resumed talking about the Bidens but returned to Epstein later in the segment.
'I wasn't even going to bring Epstein up,' Watters said. 'But because you did, do you, James Carville, a Clinton guy, think that the Democrats should be begging for the release of the Epstein files?'
Like Trump, former President Bill Clinton was also once close with Epstein, who was convicted of sex crimes in 2008. He was arrested again in 2019 and died in custody later that year, apparently of suicide, while awaiting trial on allegations of trafficking underage girls and other charges.
Carville said he didn't know what was in the files.
'I suspect that they'll come out. I don't know what they are, but the story is not going away,' he said. 'That's pretty clear. It's just not going anywhere.'
Trump has been facing new questions over his ties to Epstein after the Justice Department said it would not release any new material related to the case despite Trump's promises to do so.
When asked about the case, Trump has deflected and complained about Obama instead.
See the full segment below:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Buttigieg: Approach to transgender rights ‘starts with compassion'
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Democrats should approach transgender rights, including eligibility requirements for trans athletes, 'with compassion' during an interview aired early Monday with NPR's 'Morning Edition.' Buttigieg, who confirmed in May that he is weighing a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination after passing on a Senate run in Michigan, was asked about his messaging on transgender rights in response to remarks from former Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel that diminished trans identities. Emanuel, a Democrat and former Chicago mayor, has also said he is considering a 2028 presidential bid. 'Your approach starts with compassion — compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them,' Buttigieg, who ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic nomination, told host Steve Inskeep on Monday. 'And I think when you do that, that does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said. 'Meaning the parent who has complained about this has a case,' Inskeep interjected. 'Sure,' Buttigieg said. 'And that's why I think these decisions should be in the hands of sports leagues and school boards and not politicians. Least of all, politicians in Washington trying to use this as a political pawn.' Buttigieg's stance on transgender athletes echoes that of other potential Democratic candidates for the 2028 presidential election. In May, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said the party should be more open to hearing legitimate concerns about trans students participating in girls' and women's sports, similarly advocating for compassion and a hands-off approach from Washington. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), seen as a top contender for the 2028 nomination, said in March that he found transgender girls and women competing on female sports teams 'deeply unfair.' He later said he would be open to a conversation about limiting their participation in California if such a discussion were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.' Newsom applauded a pilot program announced last month by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports in the state, allowing more girls to qualify for California's track-and-field championship in events where a transgender student-athlete also qualified. The issue is likely to play out on the campaign trail. Roughly two-thirds of Americans said in a recent Gallup poll that they support policies preventing transgender people from participating on sports teams that match their gender identity. On Monday, Buttigieg said he disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to transgender athletes, which includes a sweeping executive order stating that the U.S. opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports' and more than two dozen federal investigations into states, universities, school districts and athletic associations that continue to allow trans women and girls to compete on teams that match their gender identity. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee updated its eligibility rules last week to exclude transgender female athletes, citing Trump's order. The NCAA barred trans women from competition in February, shortly after Trump issued the order on trans athletes. President Trump and administration officials have refused to use the word 'transgender' in orders and policies related to transgender Americans, routinely referring to trans women as 'biological males' and 'men.' An executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaims the federal government recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female. 'I think that chess is different from weightlifting, and weightlifting is different from volleyball, and, you know, middle school is different from the Olympics,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'So, that's exactly why I think that we shouldn't be grandstanding on this as politicians. We should be empowering communities and organizations and schools to make the right decisions.' Buttigieg, who is gay, has criticized other recent moves by the Trump administration that target transgender Americans, including a Department of Defense policy that took effect last month barring trans people from serving openly in the military. 'Deep down, I have to believe that most Americans get that whatever group happens to be disfavored at the moment, and it's always somebody, that the kinds of politicians — left, right or center — that get ahead by stepping on their faces, nothing good comes of that,' Buttigieg said at a VoteVets Action Fund town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May, responding to a question about Democratic messaging on transgender rights. In February, Iowa became the first state to remove anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class when it struck safeguards for transgender people from its civil rights code. 'There's a perception that Democrats became so focused on identity that we no longer had a message that could actually speak to people across the board, or that we were only for you if you fit into a certain identity bucket,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'And the tragedy of that is that I believe the right kind of Democratic vision is one that lifts everybody up — it pays specific attention to discrimination or mistreatment of people because they're Black or because they're women or LGBTQ or whatever reason that might be. But you don't have to be in this particular combination of categories to benefit from what we have to offer.'
Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Sherrod Brown met with Schumer in Ohio amid 2026 Senate push
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and former Sen. Sherrod Brown met in Ohio this weekend, as Brown weighs a possible comeback bid to flip a GOP Senate seat in the state, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Schumer has lobbied Brown for months to run. Fresh off a major recruiting victory in North Carolina, he wants to expand that luck to Ohio. Brown, 72, lost re-election last year, and is considering both a Senate and gubernatorial bid in Ohio, according to sources familiar with his thinking. The former three-term Democratic senator is likely his party's best chance at running a competitive 2026 campaign in the state. Former Vice President Kamala Harris lost Ohio last year by over 10 points. Brown lost by just under four points. The big picture: Schumer has limited pickup opportunities in the Senate next year. Hitting recruitment home runs could help him expand that map. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) on Monday announced he would run for Senate. Axios scooped last week that Cooper was planning to enter the race, which was a priority for Schumer and co. Democrats are also hopeful that Maine Gov. Janet Mills will decide to run for Senate next year, challenging Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine.) for the seat. Zoom in: While party insiders see Ohio as a stretch target for Democrats, Brown's entrance would instantly shift those dynamics. He'd face Republican Jon Husted, who was appointed to fill the vacant seat created when JD Vance resigned from the Senate to serve as vice president. Between the lines: Since leaving office, Brown has launched a pro-workers organization that promotes understanding the lives of American workers. And since his loss last year, Brown has made the case in public columns that the Democratic Party must reconnect with the working class. "It is an electoral and a moral imperative, and it will be my mission for the rest of my life," Brown wrote in a March column for The New Republic. "To win the White House and governing majorities again, Democrats must reckon with how far our party has strayed from our New Deal roots, in terms of both our philosophy toward the economy, and the makeup of our coalition," he added.
Miami Herald
8 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
‘Un-American' ICE raids on sacred spaces must end, says suit by religious groups
Eleven religious groups are suing the Department of Homeland Security in response to a Trump administration policy reversal ending a decades-long practice protecting houses of worship, schools and hospitals from immigration officials looking to enforce action. The lawsuit, filed July 28 by Democracy Forward and the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs on behalf of the religious groups — including American Baptist Churches USA, Quaker groups in San Francisco Friends Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends and five Evangelical Lutheran Churches across the country — asks the court to declare the policy reversal unconstitutional and end ICE raids in sacred spaces. '(The) rescission of longstanding protections for houses of worship and other sensitive religious locations is not just harmful and un-American; it violates federal law,' the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, states. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told McClatchy News in a July 28 email the administration views the policy reversal as a way to protect those spaces from 'criminals' living in the country illegally. 'DHS's directive gives our law enforcement the ability to do their jobs,' she said. The policy reversal was seen by some as controversial, and multiple faith groups — including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Association of Evangelicals — issued statements condemning the move, saying it stopped some congregants from attending religious services. And despite promises by the administration to remove the worst criminals, ICE deportation data from Jan. 1 to June 24 shows most people who were removed or detained didn't have a violent criminal record, CBS News reported. 'Raids in churches and sacred spaces violate decades of norms in both Democratic and Republican administrations, core constitutional protections, and basic human decency,' Skye Perryman, president & CEO of Democracy Forward, said in a July 28 email shared with McClatchy News. ICE raids bring fear, disruption to religious communities, suit says The new immigration policy has sown fear among religious communities, causing a drop in attendance as reports of people being detained on and near houses of worship continue, according to the complaint. In June, ICE agents brandished a rifle at a pastor while seizing a man outside of a church near Los Angeles, according to the complaint. 'Today was a very emotional day,' Downey Memorial Christian Church leaders said in a June 11 Facebook post after the incident. 'A couple of our pastors and other community members witnessed a man being detained and taken away by men that were masked and armed.' Church leaders were unsure at the time what law enforcement agency the men were from, and they wouldn't identify themselves, according to the post. Some congregations have pivoted to meet secretly, holding baptisms — occasions previously seen as something to celebrate in community — in private, according to the complaint. 'The open joy and spiritual restoration of communal worship has been replaced by isolation, concealment, and fear,' the complaint states. More lawsuits against immigration policy reversal The lawsuit is the latest in a slew of actions taken by some religious groups against the new immigration policy. In January, five Quaker groups filed a similar lawsuit against the DHS, citing the cancellation of some worship services due to fears instilled by the policy, McClatchy News reported. Shortly after, more than two dozen Christian and Jewish groups filed a lawsuit against the policy, saying it 'infringes on the groups' religious freedom,' the Associate Press reported. 'We cannot worship freely if some of us are living in fear,' the Most Rev. Sean Rowe, presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church, which joined the lawsuit, told the outlet. This new lawsuit states the policy reversal is a violation of the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 'The court should hold the new policy unlawful and order appropriate preliminary and permanent relief,' according to the complaint.
