Caitlin Clark Could Help WNBA Generate Nearly $1 Billion in 2025
Caitlin Clark's impact on the WNBA is not just a storyline, it's an economic revolution. The Indiana Fever star guard is already redefining what's possible in women's sports, and according to financial projections, she could help the league generate nearly $1 billion in total economic activity in 2025.
This projection comes from Ryan Brewer, an associate professor of finance at Indiana University Columbus and a well-known expert in sports valuation.
Advertisement
After conducting an in-depth analysis of the WNBA's revenue streams including ticket sales, merchandise, television deals, and media exposure, Brewer concluded that Clark was responsible for an astonishing 26.5% of the league's entire economic activity during her rookie season in 2024.
And now, with a longer season and more national broadcasts on the calendar, that impact is expected to grow even further.
'If things just go as they were, and we have an expanded season of 22 home games with modest inflation, I'm looking at $875 million. And I could easily see that eclipsing a billion dollars on the economic impact of Caitlin Clark this year.'
That billion-dollar milestone, while staggering, doesn't seem far-fetched. Clark has already become a must-watch sensation, headlining 41 nationally televised games this season, more than any player or team in the WNBA.
Advertisement
Her jersey has been the league's top seller on Fanatics, ranking among the top 20 of all athletes across every sport. Attendance for Fever games has skyrocketed, routinely drawing larger home crowds than the NBA's Indiana Pacers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.
Even road games featuring Clark are breaking barriers. According to StubHub, the ten best-selling WNBA games of the season all include the Fever, with ticket prices surging as much as 140% when she's in town.
And during preseason, Clark's first exhibition against the Brazil national team drew 1.3 million viewers, an unheard-of number for a women's basketball game not even part of the regular season.
The Caitlin Clark Effect isn't just anecdotal; it's measurable. Retailers like Dick's Sporting Goods reported a 233% increase in WNBA merchandise sales year-over-year. Fanatics saw a more than 500% growth in WNBA gear sold in 2024 alone.
Advertisement
Even the league's media rights valuation is expected to skyrocket, with an 11-year deal projected to begin in 2026, an opportunity that's being bolstered significantly by Clark's popularity.
Yet despite all this economic value, Clark herself will earn just $78,000 in salary this season under the current WNBA collective bargaining agreement.
The overwhelming majority of her earnings, such as her reported $28 million Nike endorsement, come from off-court deals. That disparity is already fueling larger conversations about WNBA player compensation and revenue-sharing models.
In every way, Caitlin Clark is becoming the face of a league on the rise. Whether it's breaking records on the court or shattering financial ceilings off it, her influence could very well lead the WNBA into an era where billion-dollar seasons aren't a dream, they're the new standard.
Related: "Trash F***ing White Girl": Brittney Griner Allegedly Unleashes Racial Slur Toward Caitlin Clark After Fouling Out
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
40 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump wavers on workplace sweeps, revealing why they don't work
It should have occurred to President Donald Trump that his aggressive sweeps of places where large numbers of undocumented people work were going to be somewhat inconvenient for many employers. But no, that apparently didn't dawn on him until complaints started coming in from the industries most affected. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he wrote last week on his Truth Social platform.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
OpenAI and Microsoft Execs Reportedly Considering the ‘Nuclear Option'
OpenAI and Microsoft like to present themselves as the power couple of Silicon Valley, but behind closed doors, it's looking increasingly like a distraught and loveless marriage. The two companies, which are bound together by cash flows and an entwined product base, have been undergoing a turbulent negotiation surrounding OpenAI's desire for a shorter leash and the opportunity to turn itself into a for-profit company. Microsoft appears to be resistant to some of those goals. Now, a new report claims that the staff at OpenAI have prepped a 'nuclear option,' in case the negotiations do not go the way they want them to. The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI may run to the federal government and accuse Microsoft—its own sugar daddy—of anti-competitive practices. Were this to happen, OpenAI execs claim they would seek a federal regulatory review of the terms of the contract between them and Microsoft, with an eye towards identifying potential antitrust violations. For Microsoft, calling in the antitrust cops could be the most extreme form of betrayal that exists. It's been down that road, picked up the pieces, and become a very different company in the meantime. OpenAI might also launch a media campaign to air the duo's dirty laundry in public. The two companies have a quite unique relationship that could make such a conflict particularly disastrous. Microsoft doesn't own OpenAI outright, and the startup isn't technically beholden to the software giant. But Microsoft provides the cloud computing infrastructure necessary to fuel OpenAI's tools, and Microsoft earns a large percentage of OpenAI's profits until the startup repays Microsoft's initial investments. After the initial investment is paid, Microsoft will retain a large stake in the company and earn a certain percentage of OpenAI's profits until it hits a cap. But again, because it's not technically owned by Microsoft, OpenAI is still (technically) its own organization. OpenAI's effort to become a for-profit company is presumably pivotal to its long-term growth strategy—a strategy that could be strangled if Microsoft holds onto it too tightly. The Journal notes that much of the strife between the two companies seems to revolve around Microsoft's continued ownership over large parts of OpenAI's business: The companies continue to be at odds over how much of OpenAI Microsoft would own if it converts into a public-benefit corporation. Microsoft is currently asking for a larger stake in the new company than OpenAI is willing to give, people familiar with the matter said. OpenAI has to complete the conversion by the end of the year, or it risks losing $20 billion in funding. Were OpenAI to actually turn on Microsoft, the resultant corporate battle could be one for the ages—a truly ugly mud fight between two of the most influential companies in Silicon Valley. It's not clear whether we're at that stage yet, however. 'We have a long-term, productive partnership that has delivered amazing AI tools for everyone,' representatives for the two companies told the Wall Street Journal in a joint statement. 'Talks are ongoing, and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come.' Gizmodo reached out to OpenAI and Microsoft for more information.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Goldman Ditches Ban on SPACs as Blank-Check Firms Stage Comeback
By and Todd Gillespie Save Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is wading back into the market for SPACs three years after stricter regulatory scrutiny prompted a self-imposed ban on handling so-called blank-check companies. The investment bank is once again open to underwriting new deals for special-purpose acquisition companies, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The firm will evaluate potential deals on a case-by-case basis and may limit the sponsors it works with, one of the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private matters.
