logo
To Revanth Reddy's Rafale Question, BJP's "Miss World Photo Ops" Reply

To Revanth Reddy's Rafale Question, BJP's "Miss World Photo Ops" Reply

NDTV30-05-2025
New Delhi:
Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy has triggered a political back-and-forth after questioning Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the handling of the recent conflict with Pakistan. Mr Reddy's remarks, delivered at a public rally in Hyderabad on Thursday, have provoked a strong backlash from senior leaders of the BJP, who accused him of echoing anti-national narratives and undermining the morale of the armed forces.
Rafale, War, and the Modi Government
Speaking at a rally, Chief Minister Reddy raised questions about the recent escalation with Pakistan and the government's decision-making during the conflict.
"The soldiers of this (Secunderabad ) Cantonment participated in the war. The war planes being manufactured in Telangana upheld respect for our country. Rafale aircraft brought by Narendra Modi were shot down by Pakistan. There is no discussion on how many Rafales were shot down. Narendra Modi should answer how many Rafale aircraft were shot down by Pakistan during the recent war. You give us the account," he said.
The Indian Air Force has not officially confirmed any Rafale losses in combat.
He also criticised the Prime Minister for not convening an all-party meeting prior to ending hostilities with Pakistan, despite reportedly doing so before the engagement began.
"After four days of war, we do not know who threatened whom and who succumbed to whom. All of a sudden, US President Donald Trump came out and said he threatened India and stopped the war," the Chief Minister said.
Mr Reddy went further, suggesting that the Modi government had failed to capitalise on what he described as an opportunity to alter the map of South Asia. He accused PM Modi of failing to separate Balochistan from Pakistan and not taking control of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
"Indira Gandhi defeated China in 1967. She sent a message that anyone who messed with India would be taught a lesson," he added. He further referenced the 1971 war with Pakistan, during which Indira Gandhi oversaw the creation of Bangladesh.
BJP's Response: "Miss World Photo Ops"
The BJP responded to Mr Reddy's statements with counterattacks, accusing him and the Congress Party of undermining the armed forces.
In a post from the BJP Telangana unit's official handle, the party said, "Chief Minister Revanth Reddy didn't just echo Pakistan's narrative on Rafale and Operation Sindoor - he went a step further, calling it 'Mana Pakistan' (Our Pakistan). From questioning Surgical Strikes and Balakot to mocking our armed forces and opposing Agnipath - standing against is in Congress's DNA. Stick to Miss World photo ops, Revanth. National security isn't your ramp. When the nation wins, Congress sulks."
CM Revanth Reddy didn't just echo Pakistan's narrative on Rafale and #OperationSindoor — he went a step further, calling it 'Mana Pakistan" meaning "Our Pakistan".
From questioning Surgical Strikes and Balakot to mocking our armed forces and opposing Agnipath - standing against… pic.twitter.com/pWCl4AP4lV
— BJP Telangana (@BJP4Telangana) May 30, 2025
Union Minister and senior BJP leader G Kishan Reddy condemned the Telangana Chief Minister's remarks, accusing Congress of a history of disrespecting the military and national security efforts.
"From their leader Rahul Gandhi to their CM Revanth Reddy, Congress is demeaning our brave armed forces day in and day out. This is not the first time they have questioned the surgical strikes, not the first time they are speaking the enemy's language," he said.
Congress - From their leader Rahul Gandhi to their CM Revanth Reddy are demeaning our brave armed forces day in and day out.
Not the first time Congress and its leaders are resorting to cheap and dirty politics, not the first time they have questioned and doubted the surgical…
— G Kishan Reddy (@kishanreddybjp) May 29, 2025
BJP leader Bandi Sanjay Kumar attacked Congress for past failures and missed opportunities during its decades in power.
"Congress ruled India for decades after Indira Gandhi - from Rajiv Gandhi to PV Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh, with Sonia Gandhi running the show. Yet they did nothing to reclaim PoK or stop cross-border terrorism. Only speeches. Only blame games," he said.
"PM Modi didn't create the Pakistan or China problems. He inherited six decades of Congress failure. But he's the first to respond with strength and clarity," Mr Kumar added.
Congress' Jaihind Yatra isn't about the country -it's a PR stunt to rescue Rahul Gandhi's image after one electoral failure after another.
Congress ruled India for decades after Indira Gandhi ji-from Rajiv Gandhi ji to P.V. Narasimha Rao ji, Manmohan Singh ji,with Sonia Gandhi…
— Bandi Sanjay Kumar (@bandisanjay_bjp) May 29, 2025
He went on to criticise the Congress response to the 2008 Mumbai attacks, contrasting it with what he called the decisive nature of PM Modi's retaliatory strikes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Political Firestorm Erupts As Former Minister Challenges Pakistan Terror Link Claims
Political Firestorm Erupts As Former Minister Challenges Pakistan Terror Link Claims

Hans India

time10 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Political Firestorm Erupts As Former Minister Challenges Pakistan Terror Link Claims

A major political controversy has engulfed the national discourse following senior Congress figure P Chidambaram's public questioning of the government's assertions linking Pakistan to the devastating Pahalgam terror incident. The former Union Minister's comments have triggered fierce exchanges between ruling and opposition parties, with accusations of undermining national security flying from multiple quarters. The contentious remarks emerged during Chidambaram's interview with The Quint, where he challenged the evidence presented by authorities connecting the April 22 attack to Pakistani elements. The assault, which claimed 26 lives including numerous civilians in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam region, has become a focal point of political debate regarding India's counter-terrorism approach and intelligence capabilities. In his controversial statements, Chidambaram questioned whether investigators had successfully identified the perpetrators or established their origins, suggesting the possibility that the attackers could have been domestically radicalized individuals rather than foreign operatives. His remarks specifically challenged the automatic assumption of Pakistani involvement, citing what he described as insufficient evidence to support such conclusions. The veteran politician has since responded vigorously to what he characterizes as a coordinated misinformation campaign designed to distort his actual position. Writing on social media platform X, Chidambaram accused critics of deliberately manipulating his interview by selectively editing portions and removing crucial context that would clarify his intended meaning. Chidambaram's defense focused on the methodology used by his critics, describing them as employing deceptive tactics by suppressing the complete recorded interview while extracting isolated sentences and muting specific words to create misleading impressions. He characterized such behavior as representing the most harmful form of information manipulation in contemporary political discourse. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party launched an immediate and aggressive response to Chidambaram's statements, with senior leaders accusing the Congress party of providing unwarranted support to Pakistan's position while undermining India's national security interests. BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya questioned why Congress leaders consistently appeared to defend Pakistan following terrorist incidents, comparing their responses to those of legal advocates for Islamabad rather than responsible opposition politicians. The criticism intensified with BJP parliamentarian Nishikant Dubey adopting particularly harsh language, characterizing the Congress organization as fundamentally treasonous in its approach to national security matters. Dubey connected Chidambaram's remarks to broader allegations against Congress leadership, including claims about Rahul Gandhi's international engagements and corruption allegations, suggesting a pattern of anti-national behavior. Additional BJP voices joined the chorus of condemnation, with MP Deepak Prakash asserting that Congress leaders were aligning themselves with traitorous elements and predicting that Indian voters would never forgive such positions. The coordinated nature of the BJP response suggested a strategic decision to maximize political damage from Chidambaram's controversial statements. Congress leadership rallied behind their senior colleague, with multiple party representatives defending his right to question government evidence while redirecting criticism toward the ruling party's perceived failures in addressing terrorism effectively. MP Manickam Tagore characterized the BJP's response as a diversionary tactic designed to deflect attention from what he described as the Modi government's inadequate follow-through on Operation Sindoor. Senior Congress figure Pramod Tiwari amplified the party's counter-narrative by highlighting the extended timeframe since the attack without successful identification of the perpetrators. His emotional appeal referenced the families of victims while questioning the government's effectiveness in delivering justice and accountability for the tragic incident. Interestingly, the controversy also revealed divisions within opposition ranks, as Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi publicly disagreed with Chidambaram's position. Drawing on her experience and historical precedent, Chaturvedi argued that Pakistan's involvement in such attacks represented an established pattern spanning decades, pointing to The Resistance Front's initial claim of responsibility and Pakistan's advocacy for such groups in international forums. The political battle over Chidambaram's statements reflects deeper tensions regarding opposition responsibilities in matters of national security, the appropriate level of scrutiny for government claims, and the boundaries of legitimate political criticism during ongoing security investigations. The controversy has effectively overshadowed substantive discussions about the actual investigation's progress and the broader implications for India's counter-terrorism strategy. The timing of this political confrontation, occurring as Parliament prepared to discuss the Pahalgam attack and related security operations, has added another layer of complexity to an already charged political environment. The incident demonstrates how quickly national security matters can become partisan battlegrounds, potentially complicating efforts to achieve bipartisan cooperation on critical security challenges facing the nation.

Parliamentary Chaos Derails Critical Security Debate As Opposition Protests Force Triple Adjournment
Parliamentary Chaos Derails Critical Security Debate As Opposition Protests Force Triple Adjournment

Hans India

time10 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Parliamentary Chaos Derails Critical Security Debate As Opposition Protests Force Triple Adjournment

India's legislative proceedings descended into complete disarray as persistent opposition protests successfully blocked the commencement of crucial national security discussions that were scheduled to address the Pahalgam terror incident and Operation Sindoor. The highly anticipated debate, originally planned to begin during Monday's Monsoon Session, faced insurmountable obstacles as demonstrating lawmakers created an atmosphere of sustained chaos within both parliamentary chambers. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla found himself compelled to suspend proceedings until 2 PM following relentless disruptions from opposition benches, marking the third consecutive adjournment within a single day. The unprecedented level of parliamentary paralysis effectively prevented any meaningful discourse on matters of critical national importance, despite prior agreements between ruling and opposition parties to conduct comprehensive discussions. The scheduled parliamentary agenda featured an impressive roster of prominent political figures prepared to contribute to the debate. Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, BJP leaders Bajyant Panda, Tejaswi Surya, Sanjay Jaiswal, and Anurag Thakur were among the notable speakers listed for the discussions. Regional party representatives including TDP members Lavu Srikrishna and Harish Balyogi, Samajwadi Party's Ramashankar Rajbhar and Chhotelal, AITC's Kalyan Banerjee and Sayoni Ghosh, and DMK's A. Raja and K. Kanimozhi were also positioned to participate in the proceedings. Congress party leadership had strategically arranged their speaking order with Gaurav Gogoi designated to initiate the opposition's perspective, followed by significant contributions from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deependra Hooda, Praneeti Shinde, Saptagiri Ulaka, and Bijendra Ola. The party had reserved a prominent slot for Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi to deliver his remarks during Tuesday's continuation of the debate. However, internal party dynamics within Congress revealed interesting tensions regarding the party's approach to Operation Sindoor. Veteran parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor made an unprecedented decision to decline participation in the debate despite direct requests from both the Leader of Opposition's office and the party's deputy leadership in the Lok Sabha. Sources within the Congress revealed that Tharoor's withdrawal stemmed from fundamental disagreements with the party's current critical assessment of the military operation. Tharoor's position represents a significant departure from his party's official stance, as he maintains his longstanding evaluation that Operation Sindoor constituted a successful military endeavor. According to party insiders, when informed that adherence to the party's more critical narrative would be necessary for his participation, Tharoor chose to abstain entirely rather than compromise his personal convictions regarding the operation's effectiveness. The foundation for these discussions was established on July 25 when opposition parties formally agreed to participate in extensive 16-hour debates across both parliamentary chambers. The discussions were designed to comprehensively examine the government's response to the April 22 Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the tragic loss of 26 civilian lives and raised serious questions about security preparedness and intelligence coordination. Opposition leadership, spearheaded by Rahul Gandhi and other prominent figures, has consistently challenged the government's handling of the crisis, pointing to apparent intelligence lapses and questioning India's international diplomatic positioning. Particular scrutiny has focused on claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding potential mediation between India and Pakistan, assertions that the Indian government has categorically denied. The parliamentary impasse reflects deeper political tensions surrounding national security discourse, with opposition parties seeking accountability for security failures while the ruling dispensation attempts to defend its counter-terrorism strategies and diplomatic approaches. The inability to commence these discussions despite prior agreements highlights the deteriorating state of parliamentary cooperation and the increasing polarization affecting even matters of national security. The disrupted proceedings underscore the challenges facing India's democratic institutions when partisan politics override substantive policy discussions on critical security matters. The repeated adjournments not only delay important national conversations but also demonstrate the extent to which political rivalries can paralyze constitutional processes designed to ensure governmental accountability and public discourse on vital issues affecting national interests.

NDA VP candidate meets PM
NDA VP candidate meets PM

United News of India

time10 minutes ago

  • United News of India

NDA VP candidate meets PM

New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) NDA Vice Presidential candidate C P Radhakrishnan met Prime Minister Narendra Modi here today. The Prime Minister tweeted that Mr Radhakrishnan's long years of public service and experience across domains would greatly enrich the nation. ''Met Thiru CP Radhakrishnan Ji. Conveyed my best wishes on his being the NDA's Vice Presidential nominee. His long years of public service and experience across domains will greatly enrich our nation. May he continue to serve the nation with the same dedication and resolve he has always demonstrated,'' the Prime Minister tweeted. UNI RB 1606 Tharoor hails Shubhanshu Shukla's ISS mission amid Opposition skipping special discussion 18 Aug 2025 | 2:56 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) With the Opposition abstaining from a special prliamentary discussion, senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor took the opportunity to express national pride over Commander Shubhanshu Shukla's recent mission to the International Space Station (ISS), calling it a landmark moment in India's space journey. see more.. AAP hits out at Delhi, Central govts for failing to ensure security to students 18 Aug 2025 | 2:50 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) today criticized the BJP-led central and local governments, accusing them of failing to ensure security in the national capital. see more.. Cash-for-jobs scam: SC grants bail to former Bengal Minister Partha Chatterjee, others 18 Aug 2025 | 2:49 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The Supreme Court today granted bail to former West Bengal Education Minister Partha Chatterjee, former Vice Chancellor Dr. Subires Bhattacharyya, and senior education official SP Sinha in the multi-crore cash-for-jobs (teacher recruitment) scam being investigated by the CBI. see more.. AIMPLB moves Supreme Court against 'Umeed Portal', seeks suspension pending Waqf Act challenge 18 Aug 2025 | 2:04 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has approached the Supreme Court seeking suspension of the Union government's recently launched 'Umeed Portal', arguing that it undermines ongoing challenges to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. see more..

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store