PPP Loan Fraud: A Growing Crisis Exposes the Need for Stronger Oversight — Insights from Amicus International Consulting
Vancouver, Canada – The U.S. Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), launched in 2020 to save small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic, has become one of modern history's most fraud-plagued government initiatives.
Amicus International Consulting, the global leader in compliance consulting and financial crime prevention, has released a comprehensive analysis titled 'PPP Loan Fraud Grows More Complex,' examining how fraud infiltrated the program, the legal repercussions, and lessons for the future.
The Paycheck Protection Program: Promise and Pitfalls
The PPP was designed to provide forgivable loans to businesses struggling with pandemic-induced financial hardship.
However: Over $117 billion of the $780 billion in loans went to ineligible recipients.
of the in loans went to ineligible recipients. Oversight lapses and rapid deployment allowed widespread abuse.
Reliance on private lenders exacerbated vulnerabilities.
Key Insight:
Good intentions alone are not enough. Programs handling massive public funds must have rigorous, built-in fraud prevention systems.
Understanding the Scope of PPP Fraud
Rapid Deployment and Minimal Oversight:
To move quickly, the government outsourced loan processing to banks and fintech firms, leading to inconsistent vetting and compliance failures.
Decentralized Processing:
Each lender interpreted rules differently, creating cracks through which fraudulent applications slipped.
Key Statistics: Nearly 1 in 5 federal PPP loan fraud cases have ties to fintech platforms.
federal PPP loan fraud cases have ties to fintech platforms. Fraudulent schemes ranged from fake businesses to exaggerated employee counts.
High-Profile Case: Kabbage Under Scrutiny
Kabbage's Rise: Processed $7 billion in PPP loans in 2020.
in PPP loans in 2020. Relied heavily on algorithms with minimal human oversight.
Current Legal Challenges: Federal prosecutors in Massachusetts and Texas are investigating Kabbage's practices.
Investigations center on possible False Claims Act violations and anti-money laundering failures.
Unusual Transparency:
Ben Curtis of McDermott Will & Emery noted that public disclosure of this civil investigation is highly unusual, signalling the gravity of concerns.
American Express Connection:
American Express acquired Kabbage in 2020 but left its PPP portfolio behind in a separate holding entity, KServicing, further complicating liability issues.
Legal and Financial Repercussions for Kabbage and Others
Investigations into Violations: The DOJ Civil Division is coordinating inquiries across multiple states.
Lenders' failure to establish effective anti-money laundering (AML) controls is a central focus.
Litigation and Class Actions: K Servicing faces class action lawsuits for alleged failures in loan forgiveness processing.
Plaintiffs claim the company's practices delayed forgiveness, hurting legitimate small businesses.
Key Comment:
Jim Richards, a former senior financial risk officer, called Kabbage 'one of the most opportunistic profiteers' of the pandemic.
The Challenge of Loan Forgiveness
Forgiveness Bottlenecks:
While PPP loans were designed to be forgivable, many borrowers face obstacles navigating complicated processes.
Lowest Forgiveness Rates:
K Servicing has the lowest forgiveness rates among first-year PPP lenders, intensifying borrower frustration and litigation risks.
Broader Implications: Systemic Risks in Financial Aid Programs
Lessons Learned: Rushed deployment without adequate safeguards invites abuse.
Private sector intermediaries need strict compliance oversight.
Public funds must have stronger accountability mechanisms.
Future Recommendation:
Integrate fraud prevention at the design phase of any emergency relief program, with robust verification and post-funding audits.
Case Studies: PPP Fraud in Action
Case Study 1: The Celebrity Chef Scandal A celebrity chef secured millions in PPP loans despite having vast personal wealth.
Misused funds triggered federal fraud charges and a high-profile public scandal.
Case Study 2: The Fake Business Empire A fraudster created dozens of shell companies to siphon over $20 million in loans.
in loans. Used forged employee records and tax documents, resulting in a lengthy prison sentence.
Case Study 3: The Tech Startup Controversy A Silicon Valley startup exaggerated employee counts to secure $10 million in loans.
in loans. Funds were diverted to executive bonuses and luxury purchases.
Case Studies: Fugitives in PPP Loan Fraud
Case Study 1: The Disappearing Restaurateur Secured $5 million in PPP loans for struggling restaurants.
in PPP loans for struggling restaurants. Moved funds offshore and vanished before federal audits caught up.
Case Study 2: The Elusive Tech Mogul Obtained $10 million via fake employee records.
via fake employee records. Fled overseas, hiding in countries without U.S. extradition treaties.
Case Study 3: The Runaway Real Estate Developer Acquired $15 million through inflated payroll numbers.
through inflated payroll numbers. Liquidated assets and disappeared into South America under an assumed identity.
Conclusion: Urgent Need for Financial Oversight Reforms
The PPP program, while well-intentioned, highlights a critical truth: financial aid without proper controls invites exploitation.
High-profile frauds, ongoing investigations, and lawsuits show that future government programs must prioritize oversight, compliance, and transparency.
Key Takeaways for Future Programs: Centralized vetting and risk assessment must be mandatory.
Real-time fraud detection systems should be embedded.
AML and due diligence standards must be non-negotiable.
Why Work with Amicus International Consulting?
Amicus International Consulting specializes in: Compliance risk analysis.
Identity solutions for privacy protection.
Financial regulation advisory.
Crisis management for individuals and businesses.
Our Mission:
To protect clients from legal risks, financial fraud, and compliance failures in an increasingly complex global environment.
📞 Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned
Kim Yeong-hee works at a Homeplus Geumcheon branch. Late last week, MBK vowed to write off its entire stake in Home Plus to facilitate the company's corporate rehabilitation photo by Jeon Heoo-Kyun/EPA-EFE SEOUL, June 20 (UPI) -- Michael Byungju Kim, who worked at Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group, founded MBK Partners in 2005. Over the next two decades, he built it into one of Asia's leading private equity funds through aggressive mergers and acquisitions. It now manages up to $30 billion in assets. However, Chairman Kim and MBK face challenges, because of its major investments in Home Plus, South Korea's No. 2 discount chain, and Lotte Card, the country's fifth-largest card issuer. This prompts experts to question the business model of the buyout fund. Late last week, MBK vowed to write off its entire stake in Home Plus to facilitate the company's corporate rehabilitation process. The firm stated that "All $1.8 billion worth of common shares held by MBK in Home Plus will be canceled without compensation." This means that MBK is ready to walk away from the Home Plus investment empty-handed, although it poured billions of dollars to take over the supermarket chain. In 2015, MBK acquired Home Plus from Tesco in a $5.1 billion deal financed through a combination of equity and debt. But the rise of e-commerce and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic severely undermined its performance. Since 2021, Home Plus has reported losses for four consecutive years, and its debt-to-equity ratio surged to nearly 500% this year. It filed for corporate rehabilitation in March, and MBK eventually decided to relinquish all management rights and claims while receiving nothing in return. Yet, MBK is under pressure to do more, as the National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik noted during his visit to a Home Plus outlet in Seoul on Wednesday. He accused MBK of showing an irresponsible stance. "The livelihoods of some 100,000 people, who are directly and indirectly employed by Home Plus, are now at risk. The damage is already severe," Woo wrote on social media. "Even after initiating rehabilitation procedures, MBK failed to assume responsibility, instead shifting the burden to workers and merchants through delayed payments, asset sales, and store closures," he added. Woo hinted at potential legislative action, including a parliamentary hearing and new regulations targeting private equity funds. Lotte Card up for grabs There are other crucial tasks for MBK and its Chairman Kim, particularly regarding Lotte Card. In 2019, MBK partnered with Woori Bank to channel $1 billion for a 79.8% interest on Lotte Card. MBK holds 59.8% and Woori has the remaining 20%. MBK tried to sell its stake in Lotte Card in 2023, but failed. The fund strives to divest its stake once again by reportedly sending teaser letters to multiple potential bidders, including Hana Financial Group, last month. UBS is managing the sales, with preliminary bids expected to open as early as mid-July. It remains to be seen whether MBK will be able to dispose of Lotte Card this time. But the sale price is predicted to go down due to the recent setbacks of the company. Lotte Card's net profit for 2024 more than halved to $100 million compared to $269 million in 2023. During the first quarter of 2025, it netted $10 million in profit, down 42.4% from a year before. Two years ago, MBK reportedly hoped to secure at least $2.2 billion for its stake, but the price is feared to decrease substantially now, which may significantly reduce MBK's potential profit. "MBK's business model has been very successful over the past 20 years as shown by the fact that its founder Kim has become the wealthiest man in the country," Seoul-based consultancy Leaders Index CEO Park Ju-gun told UPI. "But, its business model is now being put to the test. The company would have to worry about its damaged reputation and growing political momentum for regulating private equity funds," he added. In the 2025 Forbes billionaire list, Kim was second to none among South Koreans with $9.5 billion in wealth, surpassing $8.2 billion of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong. Park expected that the country's unicameral parliament might introduce an act curbing highly leveraged buyouts and banning private equity funds from directly managing companies after acquisition. Seo Yong-gu, a professor of business administration at Sookmyung Women's University, echoed the concerns, although he opposed excessive regulations. "MBK has played a key role in developing Korea's capital market. But buyout funds have often been criticized for seeking short-term gains at the cost of long-term growth for a fast exit. We may need a reform," he said in a phone interview. "Highly leveraged acquisitions are also problematic. Still, I am against the idea of prohibiting private equity funds from managing their portfolio firms. It would fundamentally deny the very essence of the business," he said.
Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
How the Israel-Iran conflict could hit the economy
Presented by As the U.S. weighs intervention in Israel's conflict with Iran, Wall Street has been skittish, eyeing the potential fallout for oil prices and inflation. To get a better sense of what's driving the oil market and what economic risks might lie ahead, MM caught up with Rory Johnston, an oil market analyst at research service Commodity Context who's been following all of this closely. A takeaway from that conversation: The price jump has been notably large for a market that has become desensitized to political risks after safely weathering multiple shocks over the last few years, including Covid and the Russia-Ukraine war. Now, 'even a numb cynical oil market sees Israel bombing Tehran and says, 'OK, maybe worry a bit here,'' he said. Conflict with Iran is the 'No. 1 risk scenario that people talk about, and now we're living in it,' he added. A worst-case scenario would be if Tehran is driven to close off the Strait of Hormuz, a channel through which about a fifth of the world's oil passes. Experts including Johnston say it's unlikely Iran would do that unless pushed to the brink — such a move would run the risk of hurting its own economic lifeline, as well as antagonizing its neighbors in the region — but the shockwaves would be significant. For now, what struck your host is that this conflict is helping prop up prices at a time when they'd really started to drop, and that could help boost U.S. oil production, which had previously been forecast to contract in 2026. But the exact trajectory of all this is highly unclear. 'This is usually the lead-up to summer driving season, so gasoline prices were set to rise anyway,' POLITICO's resident oil market expert Ben Lefebvre told MM. 'Because of the current Middle East situation, they'll rise further than they might have when oil was still around $60 a barrel. But when compared to what U.S. drivers experienced even last year, it won't be too far off recent norms … if there is such a thing as 'recent norms.'' 'The interesting thing is whether this spurs U.S. oil companies to drill more,' he added. 'They might just see this as a temporary boost and not something they want to get too far ahead of.' Rewind to before the current Israel-Iran conflict escalated. OPEC, the cartel of major oil-exporting countries, had been holding back production but then ramped up output earlier this year. That move was taken, in part, to get ahead of the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which had raised fears that demand for oil would crater amid a global slowdown. That was leading to forecasts of oversupply later this year, Johnston said, reducing incentives for oil companies to produce. Now, Israel's attacks on Iran have likely led to fear-buying, as well as speculative trading, that has pushed up prices as much as 15 percent. Fighting so far has spared infrastructure that would significantly crimp the outflow of crude. 'While theoretically on its face, nothing that's happened so far has changed anything physical about supply and demand, part of the way … price formation has occurred is you have physical participants — a refinery, whatever — that's all of a sudden worried they're not going to be able to get cargos next month or the month after,' Johnston said. For prices to stay high or go higher, there likely would have to be some actual damage to key oil infrastructure, he said. But in the meantime, the scope for economic disruption is still significant. The largest price increases have been for diesel, a key input for shipping and therefore a potential risk to inflation in many sectors. 'It might not seem as harsh at the pump, but your shipping and your route delivery is going to feel the pinch of diesel far more,' Johnston said. More broadly, John Fagan, co-founder of Markets Policy Partners and the former markets head at the Treasury Department, said this oil price shock feeds the narrative that the U.S. is going to have slower growth and higher prices: stagflation. 'Demand is not collapsing, and oil prices are not unbelievably high, so you don't have that pop and drop kind of dynamic' when prices rise above where the market can support, he said. 'And if the dollar can't rally, that's supportive of [higher] oil prices.' HAPPY FRIDAY — Hope many of you got to have a restful day off yesterday. Send thoughts about the economic outlook to vguida@ and as always, send MM tips and pitches to Sam Sutton, who is back next week: ssutton@ Driving the day Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations at 12:30 p.m. Debt warnings fall on deaf ears — Republicans are largely ignoring a host of reports warning that their bill would worsen the nation's fiscal trajectory in a serious way, our Ben Guggenheim reports. The Congressional Budget Office estimates Tuesday led to an unusual finding. Usually tax cuts tend to cost less under so-called dynamic scores that include economic effects. Not so here: The $2.8 trillion figure released Tuesday outstripped the CBO's prior $2.4 trillion estimate that did not include economic analysis — mostly because the bill would increase interest rates. But the GOP is relying instead on estimates from the White House that Kyle Pomerleau of the American Enterprise Institute called 'outrageous' and 'way higher than everyone else's.' Your MM host chatted last week with Joe Lavorgna, who joined the Treasury Department this month as a counselor to Secretary Scott Bessent, and he had thoughts on CBO's projection that the economy would grow at an average rate of 1.8 percent over the next 10 years. 'Once the One Big Beautiful Bill passes, it's going to lock in the gains that we saw in the first Trump administration, when we were growing at nearly 3 percent,' he told your MM host. 'Then, you could make a case because of AI,' productivity growth will be much higher. 'The trailing 10-year growth rate of GDP is 2.5 percent. Why aren't we using that? .. 1.8 is unbelievably pathetically slow.' On the pods: Hear from CBO Director Phillip Swagel himself on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast. Sober news on entitlements — The longterm financial health of Social Security and Medicare worsened last year, our Michael Stratford reports. 'Annual reports released by the Treasury Department on Monday show that Social Security's reserve funds, if combined, would run out of money to fully pay beneficiaries in 2034 — a year sooner than projected last year,' Stratford writes. 'And the trust fund that pays Medicare's hospital bills would be depleted in 2033 — three years earlier than expected.' Trump calls for 'clean' Senate crypto bill to pass — Late Wednesday, Trump called on House Republicans to move 'LIGHTNING FAST' to send Senate-passed stablecoin legislation to his desk, dialing up pressure on GOP lawmakers in the lower chamber to adopt the measure without any changes, our Jasper Goodman reports. The Economy ICYMI: Fed holds rates steady — Federal Reserve officials announced Wednesday that they will hold interest rates steady, ignoring repeated calls from President Donald Trump to dramatically lower borrowing costs. In fact, projections from the central bank's policymakers suggest they're less confident they will be able to significantly decrease rates than they were in March. Vibe check: Here was Trump's response on Truth Social Thursday morning: ''Too Late' Jerome Powell is costing our Country Hundreds of Billions of Dollars. He is truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government, and the Fed Board is complicit. Europe has had 10 cuts, we have had none. We should be 2.5 Points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt. We have LOW inflation! TOO LATE's an American Disgrace!' Jobs report Carolyn Davis is now director of comms at Better Markets. She previously was director of external comms at Leadership for Educational Equity. Mike Spratt has joined the ICI as an associate general counsel. He previously was assistant director in the Division of Investment Management Disclosure Review office at the SEC. He also served as counsel to former SEC Commissioners Kara Stein and Elisse Walter.
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
As Los Angeles faces budget crisis, legal payouts skyrocket
The amount of money that the city of Los Angeles pays annually for police misconduct, trip and falls, and other lawsuits has ballooned, rising from $64 million a decade ago to $254 million last year and $289 million this fiscal year. The reasons are complicated, ranging from aging sidewalks to juries' tendency to award larger judgments to possible shifts in legal strategy at the city attorney's office to an increase in the sheer number of lawsuits against the city. The biggest chunk of payouts over the past five years were for 'dangerous conditions' — lawsuits singling out faulty city infrastructure, such as broken elevators — at 32%, followed by civil rights violations and unlawful uses of force at 18%, and traffic collisions involving city vehicles also at 18%. City officials have cited the legal payouts as a significant factor in a nearly $1-billion budget shortfall for fiscal year 2025-26 that was closed with layoffs and other spending cuts. City Atty. Hydee Feldstein Soto, who took office in December 2022, heads the office that defends the city against lawsuits. In an interview with The Times and public appearances throughout the city, Feldstein Soto cited a backlog of cases from the COVID-19 pandemic, when courts were barely moving, that were settled or went to trial in recent years. 'Structured settlements' negotiated by her predecessor, Mike Feuer, which are paid out annually rather than in one lump sum, have also contributed to the tab, she said. Feldstein Soto also said she believes juries are increasingly antagonistic to city governments, resulting in larger verdicts. Feuer said in an interview that the city was entering into structured settlements before he took office, and he does not believe he increased their use. To explain the rise in legal liability payouts during his tenure — from about $40 million in 2013 to about $91 million in 2022 — Feuer cited a lack of investment in city infrastructure like streets and sidewalks during the 2008 financial crisis. In public appearances, Feldstein Soto has sometimes blamed plaintiffs for trying to get financial compensation for what she characterized as risky behavior or interpersonal disputes. Speaking to the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association earlier this year, she said that two types of lawsuits — 'dangerous conditions' lawsuits and those brought by city employees over working conditions — are ripe for abuse. Some employees who sue the city simply don't like their bosses, Feldstein Soto said, citing a lawsuit by an LAPD captain, Stacey Vince, who alleged that higher-ups retaliated against her after she complained about her boss. Vince was awarded $10.1 million by a jury, and the city subsequently settled the case for just under $6 million. Feldstein Soto also described one man who sued the city as an 'idiot.' The man was riding his electric scooter without a helmet, Feldstein Soto said, when he crashed on an uneven sidewalk and into a nearby tree, suffering a traumatic brain injury. According to Feldstein Soto, taxpayers ultimately pay the price for these lawsuits. 'Please understand that every dollar you award is your money,' she said. The number of lawsuits filed against the city has risen each year since the pandemic, from 1,131 in 2021 to 1,560 in 2024. At the same time, the average amount the city pays per case has increased dramatically, from under $50,000 in 2022 to $132,180 in 2024. A contributing factor is the increase in payouts of least $1 million, with 17 such cases in 2022 and 39 in 2024. (The city counts settlements or jury verdicts in the fiscal year they are paid out, not when the dollar amount is decided.) From July 2024 to March 2025, the city paid $1 million or more in 51 lawsuits. Feldstein Soto said these 'nuclear verdicts' cut deep into the city budget and could raise payouts for similar cases in the future. Total annual payouts in police misconduct cases jumped from $15 million in 2020 to $50 million in 2024. Dangerous conditions cases rose from around $41 million in 2020 to about $84 million in 2024. Earlier this year, the city paid $21 million to plaintiffs in a series of lawsuits related to a botched LAPD bomb squad fireworks detonation that injured more than 20 people and displaced many residents. Also this year, the city paid out a $17.7-million verdict to the family of a man with mental health issues killed by an off-duty LAPD officer. This coming fiscal year, the city increased its allocation for liability payouts from about $87 million to $187 million — far less than what it has been paying in recent years — out of a $14-billion budget. City Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, who chairs the council's public works committee, said the rising payouts stem in part from the city's long-term lack of investment in infrastructure. The city spent about 10% of its overall budget on streets and other public works last year — substantially less than it spent on police, said Hernandez, who favors a smaller LAPD. 'As a city, we don't invest in the maintenance of our city,' she said. 'I have felt like I've been screaming into the void about some of these things.' In one lawsuit paid out this year, the city agreed to give $3 million to a man who tripped over a slightly uneven sidewalk and suffered a traumatic brain injury. Last April, the city reached a $21-million settlement with a man whose skull was broken by a street lamp part that fell on him. The city had gone to trial, with a jury awarding the man $22 million, but the parties eventually settled for the slightly lower amount. 'I believe the driving force is the delays and lack of maintenance of the city that has caused an increase in such incidents,' said Arash Zabetian, a lawyer for the man hit by the streetlight. Some plaintiffs' attorneys say that Feldstein Soto's legal strategies are contributing to the rising liability costs. They assert that she is taking more cases to trial, resulting in larger verdicts than if she had settled. Matthew McNicholas, an attorney who often sues the city on behalf of police officers, said he recently went to trial in five cases and won all of them, for a total payout of more than $40 million. He would have been happy to settle all five cases for a total of less than $10 million, he said. One of the lawsuits, which ended with a $13-million verdict, was filed by two male officers accused of drawing a penis on a suspect's abdomen. The officers alleged that higher-ups did not cast the same suspicion on their female colleagues. In another of the lawsuits, a whistleblower alleged that he was punished for highlighting problems in the LAPD Bomb Detection K-9 Section. A jury also awarded him $13 million. 'It's not a tactic to say we're going to play hardball. It's just stupid,' McNicholas said. 'I am frustrated because she goes and blames my clients and runaway juries for her problems.' Greg Smith, another plaintiffs' attorney, said he has also noticed a tendency at Feldstein Soto's office to push cases to trial. 'Everything is a fight,' Smith said. 'I have been suing the city for 30 years, and this has been the worst administration with respect to trying to settle cases.' Feldstein Soto said her office settles 'every case we can.' 'It's in nobody's interest to go to trial. It's a waste of resources,' she said. 'But we will not settle cases where we don't think we're liable or where the demand is unreasonable.' To stem the flood of large payouts, Feldstein Soto is looking to Sacramento for help, proposing a bill that would cap lawsuits against California cities at $1 million or three times the economic losses caused by an incident, whichever is greater. Caps on damages exist already in 38 states, according to Feldstein Soto's office. She has yet to find a state legislator to sponsor the bill.
