logo
Resurgent inflation could unfold as world economy reels from Trump's trade policies

Resurgent inflation could unfold as world economy reels from Trump's trade policies

Irish Times29-06-2025
Resurgent US inflation could unfold as the world economy reels from Donald Trump's disruptive trade policies, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warned.
That bleak scenario was described by general manager Agustin Carstens, presenting an annual report that catalogued how existing global vulnerabilities have been further exposed by the American president's actions since taking office in January.
'We were meant to have a soft landing – everything was going according to plan,' the former Mexican central-bank chief told reporters. 'Then we had this very substantive period of volatility with the threat that tariffs would make more difficult convergence towards 2 per cent in some countries.'
The final report of Mr Carstens' term in office, published Sunday, details a backdrop of economic uncertainty at 'levels typically associated with crises,' driven by higher import levies imposed by the White House, albeit limited for now during a 90-day hiatus.
READ MORE
Growth prospects have diminished while risks have intensified with regard to the stability of consumer prices, public finances and the financial system, the BIS said.
Facing such challenges, the Basel officials counsel central banks to stay focused on core missions in order to preserve and foster trust, and to enhance the effectiveness of their actions.
Mr Carstens highlighted how the Federal Reserve may encounter an especially hard time in the current environment. Chair Jerome Powell is steadfastly resisting White House pressure to cut interest rates.
'In the US, you could face a very difficult scenario for the central bank, which is when you have higher inflationary pressures or deviating inflationary expectations and a slowdown in the economy,' he said. 'That is a circumstance that central banks usually find particularly difficult.'
In a speech to central bankers on Sunday, Mr Carstens highlighted how it's not just monetary officials who have a responsibility to foster credibility in economic management.
'Trust cannot stop at monetary policy and the door of the central bank,' he said. 'It must extend to every aspect of public policy. People must trust that policymakers and elected officials will act to advance legitimate objectives and will do so effectively.'
The BIS report frequently emphasized inflation risks, including how trade disruption could hit economies already squeezed by aging populations and labour shortages, and hurt the supply of goods.
Officials stressed that the increased sensitivity of consumers after the pandemic may combine with still-heightened expectations on living costs to feed renewed challenges on price stability.
Such analysis in light of recent spikes in crude oil that have since partially receded may give policymakers pause.
'It's a case of once bitten, twice shy,' said Hyun Song Shin, economic adviser at the BIS. 'It's very important to make sure that just a one-off price increase does not translate into a sustained inflation episode.'
Other dangers relate to unprecedented national debt accumulated in some countries. Among OECD members, interest payments as a percentage of gross domestic product reached 4 per cent last year and will keep rising, the report said.
'Risks to inflation and financial stability can more easily originate from or be propagated through stress in sovereign bond markets,' the BIS said. 'Growing concerns about fiscal sustainability could give rise to refinancing challenges and potentially dislodge inflation expectations.'
Meanwhile officials warned that the threat could emanate in the other direction too, with volatile or persistent price increases driving up government bond yields.
The way investors respond to global developments is another sensitivity. A separate chapter analysed how global financial markets have become more connected, transmitting conditions faster from one economy to another.
'Macro-financial vulnerabilities have the potential to amplify economic developments, including the anticipated slowdown triggered by the shift in trade policy and heightened uncertainty,' the report said.
The BIS laid out a list of policy prescriptions to promote growth and productivity, such as loosening labour markets, cutting bureaucracy, removing trade barriers and raising public investment, while also counselling fiscal repair.
On supervision, officials warned against any loosening of bank regulatory requirements, and called for close monitoring of non-bank financial institutions.
As for central banks, the BIS advised them to 'carefully balance' growth and inflation risks, especially given how an era when consumers took price shocks in their stride seems to have passed.
'That world has ended,' said Andrea Maechler, the BIS deputy general manager. 'Now there's a much bigger sensitivity whenever you see any price increase – the fear that it's not just a simple price increase, but that it affects the inflation dynamics.' – Bloomberg
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US government investment in Intel looks bad for Leixlip
US government investment in Intel looks bad for Leixlip

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US government investment in Intel looks bad for Leixlip

Intel is getting the Donald Trump treatment. Two weeks ago, the president of the United States called for the resignation of Lip-Bu Tan , the recently appointed chief executive of America's flagship microchip maker. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,' he blasted on his Truth Social account. The reason being the connections of Tan – a US citizen born in Malaysia – to China, including the sale of chip design products to a Chinese military university by one of his businesses, Cadence. The writing was on the wall for Tan, but four days later he was invited to the White House. All talk of his resignation evaporated and was replaced by the suggestion that the US government would take a direct stake in Intel as it tries to reinvent itself, having missed out on the boom in chips to power artificial intelligence. Depending on where you stand on Trump, the proposal is either further evidence of his business acumen and deal-making skills or more proof of his erratic temperament and general unsuitability for office. READ MORE Few details have emerged of the proposed investment, but Intel shares – which have lost half their value over the past couple of years – are up strongly on the news. It's hard to gauge what the consequences of the investment would be for Intel's Irish operation in Leixlip, which seems to have escaped the worst of the cost-cutting measures introduced by Tan when he took over in March (although it was reported in July that almost 200 mandatory redundancies would be implemented this year at the Leixlip plant). [ Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel Opens in new window ] The best guide is the deal that Trump made to allow Japan's Nippon Steel take over US Steel, the iconic American steelmaker. Trump insisted on the federal government getting a so-called golden share, which gives it the right to appoint an independent director and also a veto over some investment decisions. These include the transfer of production and jobs outside of the US as well as 'certain decisions on closure or idling of US Steel's existing US manufacturing facilities, trade, labour and sourcing outside of the United States'. There are cosmetic measures such as keeping the name US Steel, but the import of the agreement is clear. It is to safeguard US jobs and maintain domestic capacity in a strategic industry in the interest of national security. It is hard to see how a significant investment in Intel – which is also being promoted on national security grounds – could come without similar strings attached, which in turn would have to militate against significant new investment in Leixlip. If the rationale for the US government taking a significant stake in Intel is to ensure that the country boosts domestic chip-making capacity, why put money into Ireland? The ability of Intel to resist Trump's overture – even if it wanted to – is limited. The company is haemorrhaging cash and before Tan's appointment was contemplating splitting off its chip-making arm to focus on chip design. This is the model adopted by more successful rivals who have wiped it eye on AI chips. Tan seems committed to staying in the chip-making business although he has made this contingent on finding customers for its two latest chip-manufacturing processes known as 18A and 14A. Both processes are based in domestic plants in Oregon and Arizona, which received billions of dollars' worth of investment under the Chips Act brought in by the Biden administration. The Act aimed to bolster domestic chip manufacturing. Leixlip has been touted as a possible site for 18A manufacturing but there does not seem to be any progress in that regard. To date, Intel has failed to find enough third-party customers for its new manufacturing processes and remains its own biggest customer. Unless it can find more customers, its business model is simply not viable, hence the weakness of its share price over the past two years. The presumption is that once the US government is on board as a shareholder – a 10 per cent stake worth about €10 billion has been touted – Trump will pressurise other US companies such as Apple and Qualcomm to become customers of Intel. They currently source chips from manufacturers in Japan and Taiwan. The jump in Intel's share price and the decision by Softbank to take a 2 per cent stake in the business on Monday reflects the obvious short-term benefits of the Trump administration bullying other US firms to become its customers. More red-blooded capitalists have warned that the US will fall into the nationalisation trap whereby a government decision to prop up an uncompetitive national champion weakens the economy long term. But if things continue to unfold in this way, it looks likely that Intel's Leixlip plant will, at best, be left to wither on the vine as future investment is focused on boosting manufacturing capacity in the US. Alternatively, Trump could change his mind in the morning.

Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year
Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year

Pay for S&P 500 chief executives rose by 7.7 per cent last year as packages at the US's biggest companies keep increasing. Median total pay for S&P bosses rose to $19 million (€16.3 million) last year. The jump in median chief executive pay was higher than a 7.2 per cent rise in 2023, according to Farient Advisors, a pay consultancy, and marked the quickest pace of growth since an 11.5 per cent gain in 2021. Total pay for the broader American workforce increased 3.6 per cent in the 12 months that ended December 2024, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'We're still seeing executive pay increases above the inflationary rate as well as above typical rank-and-file employees,' said Eric Hoffmann, chief data officer at Farient Advisors. READ MORE The highest paid S&P 500 CEO last year was Rick Smith of Taser maker Axon Enterprise, who raked in $164.5 million mostly from stock awards after meeting targets over several years, according to data provided by MyLogIQ. Brian Niccol, chief executive of Starbucks, was second with $95.8 million in total last year, mostly from stock awards. His pay package included a $5 million sign-on bonus and two one-off stock awards that ranged from $75 million to $80 million to cover forfeited cash and unvested equity he accrued while running Chipotle. Axon did not respond to a request for comment and Starbucks declined to comment. In the UK, median pay for chief executives of the 100 most valuable London-listed companies rose 6.8 per cent to £4.58 million in 2024-25 year on year, according to the High Pay Centre's annual survey released on Sunday. This is the highest level on record, and the fourth successive year that bosses' pay has increased. The level of pay for S&P 500 executives has drawn scrutiny from groups that question whether it is exacerbating inequality. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, a national trade union, flagged Niccol's pay package as an example of the widest pay gap between the top executive and median employee of one of the biggest US companies. Niccol's annual pay was more than 6,666 times greater than the total pay for the median employee, a part-time barista, who earns about $15,000 a year, according to company filings. 'We just see ever-growing income inequality in this country, and it's becoming harder and harder for workers to make ends meet,' said Carin Zelenko, director of capital strategies at AFL-CIO. Sarah Anderson, global economy project director for the non-profit research group Institute for Policy Studies, said the widening gap between chief executive and worker pay was bad for democracy. 'This gap between CEO and worker pay is a key driver of rising inequality and concentration of wealth at the top. We're seeing more and more signs of how ultra-wealthy people have too much influence over our political system,' she said. Still, the larger pay ratio between an employee and a chief executive may also reflect a company's business model. A retail boss is likely to have a wider pay ratio than a technology chief executive who usually hires engineers who are full-time workers. Nvidia, the most valuable US company, reported a chief executive to median employee pay ratio of 166 to 1, with its median employee earning $301,233 compared with CEO Jensen Huang's total pay of $49.9 million in 2024. Meanwhile, shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained strong. ISS-Corporate found that the median shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained between 92.4 per cent and 92.6 per cent for the past five years. Jun Frank, head of compensation and governance services at ISS-Corporate, said US economic uncertainty may affect executive pay trends in the future. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

S&P affirms US 'AA+' credit rating, cites tariff revenue
S&P affirms US 'AA+' credit rating, cites tariff revenue

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

S&P affirms US 'AA+' credit rating, cites tariff revenue

S&P Global has affirmed its 'AA+' credit rating on the US, saying the revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs will offset the fiscal hit from his recent tax-cut and spending bill. Donald Trump signed the massive package of tax-cut and spending bill, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', into law in July. The bill, which delivered new tax breaks, also made Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. "Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending," S&P said in a statement. "At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation." The US reported a $21 billion jump in customs duty collections from Trump's tariffs in July but the government budget deficit still grew nearly 20% in the same month to $291 billion. Since returning to power in January this year, Trump has launched a global trade war with a range of tariffs that have targeted individual products and countries. The president has set a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports to the US, as well as additional duties on certain products or countries. S&P said the outlook on the US rating remains stable. The ratings agency expected the Federal Reserve, which Trump has often criticised for not cutting rates fast, "to navigate the challenges of lowering domestic inflation and addressing financial market vulnerabilities." It projected the country's general government deficit to average 6% of GDP during the 2025-2028 period, down from the 7.5% in 2024, and from an average 9.8% of GDP in 2020-2023. Peer Moody's downgraded the US sovereign debt rating in May citing rising debt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store