logo
Test-Driving The 2025 Morgan Supersport

Test-Driving The 2025 Morgan Supersport

Forbes24-04-2025

The Morgan Supersport represents the brand's vision for the 21st century.
Morgan is known for its steadfast commitment to classic designs and traditional methods. In a world increasingly seeking out heritage designs and iconic shapes with everything from restomods to continuation series models, Morgan remains the only manufacturer dedicated to keeping its heritage present. The Morgan Supersport is the company's latest model, designed to sit at the top of the brand's line up.
Jonathan Wells, chief design officer at Morgan Motor Company said, 'The launch of the Morgan Supersport marks the culmination of five years of exploration, craftsmanship, and collaboration – our bold vision of 21st-century coachbuilding. It has been a passion project for our team, an opportunity to push boundaries and define what a flagship Morgan can be.'
Although the name Supersport has appeared throughout Morgan's history since 1927, typically seen as 'Super Sports', its moniker feels very deliberate. Since the Supersport sits in the upper echelon of sports cars and starts to border on the blurry line between sports cars and supercars, it feels like Supersport defines its own class.
From every angle the Supersport reveals stunning sweeping lines.
Based on its familiar classic design alone, you wouldn't expect the Supersport to boast so much power. With a curb weight of just 1,170kg (2579lbs), the 3.0-liter BMW in-line six is able to put down 335 bhp and 369 lb-ft of torque to achieve 60mph in just 3.9 seconds. If anything, Morgan's excelled itself and could pull back on the power so you get more opportunity to enjoy it within the speed limit.
There's two personalities looming beneath the surface. In its default driving mode, the Supersport is evocative of classic motoring, burbling along with not a care in the world. This is the best way to enjoy a gentle cruise to a car show or local cafe, it's the ideal Sunday morning vibe. But knock the gearstick to one side, click the S+ button and a completely different animal rears its head.
S+ unlocks the Supersport's supercar tendencies to give you any speed you like far quicker than it has any right to. Find a long enough stretch of road and you can feel the engine roar in your chest, it rises up through the cabin as your foot sinks towards the floor. Ask for a burst of power aggressively enough and the front end will even start to rear up.
The sweeping bodywork is unique in the modern automotive industry.
It's not just its straight line speed that's impressive though. Supersport is built on a new lightweight CXV aluminum chassis which feels impressively stiff. Into every corner it's resolutely planted to the road and the small steering wheel gives it a racing car feel. You'll find flappy paddles tucked behind the steering wheel but the gearbox handles itself so well that there's rarely an occasion to take over.
Glancing down the long bonnet and catching inquisitive glances from older generations makes you truly believe you're driving a classic car. There's few other cars that have such an impressive amount of bonnet real estate. While you can get lost thinking you're driving a classic, the strong brakes make you endlessly grateful of the modern engineering that's gone into this beauty. There's really nothing like it.
Eagle-eyed BMW fans will note the familiar looking gearstick.
The design largely stays true to classic Morgan interiors with a focus on including little more than the necessary functions. The modern Morgan includes some creature comforts though in the form of Bluetooth phone connectivity – which is seamless to link up – to play music and make hands free calls. There's also a wireless phone charger in front of the gearstick that doubles as a phone mount to use for navigation. In front of the driver, you get a small screen which displays a digital speedo, climate controls when you use the corresponding dial on the dash and media functions in response to the other dial.
Unlike other manufacturers that have taken the inclusion of technology too far, Morgan strikes the right balance with the Supersport. It still needs a physical key to turn the ignition on and a start/stop button brings the engine to life. And, there's no annoying bings or bongs from driver assistance systems, so you can focus on just enjoying the ride.
The trunk is perfectly blended into the rear panels.
The door cards are beautifully minimal with a leather handle and a sliding metal handle to release the door. The metal handle also doubles as the release for the side screens which pop out like an old school headrest with two metal posts. As standard, a side screen bag is included so you can pack them away in the trunk. Yes, trunk. This is the first Morgan in more than a decade to feature rear storage inside the car, a luggage rack had been the brand's go to solution until now.
These small additions combine to make a big difference to the overall liveability of the Supersport as an everyday car. While you'll want to garage it in wet and cold weather, it's more practical than ever to spend every day of the summer driving around in it. Every feature feels purposeful and well thought out.
As standard, it comes with a black mohair roof but can also be specified with a hard top or both.
Morgan builds cars to order with Supersport models priced from £85,000 ($113,000) as the base price before local taxes. Including the relevant taxes in the UK, this brings its entry-level price to £105,160 ($139,000). The nature of a Morgan is to be highly customizable and built to bespoke specifications, so you can really dial down into the details of the build to include everything you're looking for.
The example I tried was fitted with just over £20,000 ($26,500) worth of optional extras. Externally, this included a GT Silver special paint and 18-inch Superlite frozen grey wheels. Underneath, the Supersport was enhanced with the dynamic handling package, limited slip differential and an active sports exhaust which is worth every penny to get that gorgeous exhaust note.
Inside, it was adorned with a matte body color dash, connectivity pack, Sennheiser premium audio system and heated seats. Other additions included the cockpit wood finishes, leather seats and a specific stitching pattern. This level of customization means every Morgan Supersport that leaves the factory is unique.
Price as tested: £122,667 ($162,950)
Engine: BMW 3.0-liter TwinPower Turbo, inline six-cylinder
Power: 335 bhp
Torque: 369 lb-ft
0-62 mph: 3.9 secs
Top speed: 166 mph

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions onstage at tech conference
Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions onstage at tech conference

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions onstage at tech conference

Brett Adcock, co-founder and CEO of the humanoid robotics startup Figure AI, made a rare public appearance at the Bloomberg Tech conference on Thursday. Figure has recently been the subject of a couple news articles that questioned its progress with marquee customer BMW. Figure objected so strenuously to at least one of these reports that Adcock publicly threatened to sue the publication. When asked about the skepticism surrounding the BMW relationship and whether it is a pilot or has commercial value to the company, Adcock replied with an explanation of the technical benefit of having robots on a factory floor but didn't provide specifics about the contractual relationship with BMW. "We get a lot of value, and it's really important that we need to figure out how to run robots every day. We get to see how well they perform. We get to track all the metrics," he said. Two months ago, Figure also published a YouTube video showing a couple of its robots working in a BMW factory. Adcock did, however, say that Figure AI has signed a contract with a second, unnamed customer for initial deployment, a customer that Bloomberg has reported to be UPS. Figure AI has drawn attention for making claims that its AI-powered robots possess human-like fine motor skills and can manipulate objects with precision. Despite releasing numerous videos of its robots at work, the company hasn't done a live demonstration of the humanoids. The interviewer, Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow, pointed out that while two other robotics companies, Agility Robotics and Boston Dynamics, showcased their robots at the conference, Figure AI did not. 'It kind of goes back to our whole philosophy around we don't go to a lot of events," said Adcock. "I think it's a giant waste of time. To be frank, I have to bring a team here to bring robots here. They could be at the office,' he said, adding that the company is showcasing the robots in videos. Adcock confirmed that Figure AI is expecting to manufacture and deploy roughly 100,000 units within four years. The skepticism about Figure's commercial relationship comes amid the company's attempts to raise a $1.5 billion round at a $39.5 billion valuation, sources told Bloomberg, a fifteenfold increase from the $2.6 billion valuation it achieved in February 2024. TechCrunch reported in April that Figure AI has been issuing cease-and-desist letters to secondary market brokers, demanding they stop marketing its shares because they are not authorized to do so. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at

Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions on stage at tech conference
Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions on stage at tech conference

TechCrunch

time6 hours ago

  • TechCrunch

Figure AI CEO skips live demo, sidesteps BMW deal questions on stage at tech conference

Brett Adcock, co-founder and CEO of the humanoid robotics startup Figure AI, made a rare public appearance at the Bloomberg Tech conference on Thursday. Figure has recently been the subject of a couple of news articles that questioned its progress with marquee customer BMW. Figure objected so strenuously to at least one of these reports that Adcock publicly threatened to sue the publication. When asked about the skepticism surrounding the BMW relationship and whether it is a pilot or has commercial value to the company, Adcock replied with an explanation of the technical benefit of having robots on a factory floor but didn't provide specifics about the contractual relationship with BMW. 'We get a lot of value, and it's really important that we need to figure out how to run robots every day. We get to see how well they perform. We get to track all the metrics,' he said. Two months ago, Figure also published a YouTube video showing a couple of its robots working in a BMW factory. Adcock did, however, say that Figure AI has signed a contract with a second, unnamed customer for initial deployment, a customer that Bloomberg has reported to be UPS. Figure AI has drawn attention for making claims that its AI-powered robots possess human-like fine motor skills and can manipulate objects with precision. Despite releasing numerous videos of its robots at work, the company hasn't done a live demonstration of the humanoids. The interviewer, Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow, pointed out that while two other robotics companies, Agility Robotics and Boston Dynamics, showcased their robots at the conference, Figure AI did not. 'It kind of goes back to our whole philosophy around we don't go to a lot of events,' said Adcock. 'I think it's a giant waste of time. To be frank, I have to bring a team here to bring robots here. They could be at the office,' he said, adding that the company is showcasing the robots in videos. Adcock confirmed that Figure AI is expecting to manufacture and deploy roughly 100,000 units within four years. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW The skepticism about Figure's commercial relationship comes amid the company's attempts to raise a $1.5 billion round at a $39.5 billion valuation, sources told Bloomberg, a fifteenfold increase from the $2.6 billion valuation it achieved in February 2024. TechCrunch reported in April that Figure AI has been issuing cease-and-desist letters to secondary market brokers, demanding they stop marketing its shares because they are not authorized to do so.

Why Do Most Drivers Turn Off Vehicle Safety Systems?
Why Do Most Drivers Turn Off Vehicle Safety Systems?

Forbes

time7 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why Do Most Drivers Turn Off Vehicle Safety Systems?

Driver shutting off the Lane Keep Assist on a RAM 1500 There's a good chance that your late-model car, truck, or SUV has a handful of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). There's also a good chance that you are not using them, as numerous studies have revealed that most drivers find them distracting and annoying due to frequent alerts, perceived over-correction, or unexpected interventions. If you are like most drivers, you get frustrated and turn them off—negating the safety benefits. To dive deeper into why drivers are shutting off their vehicle's ADAS technology, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking (often marketed under slightly different names, depending on the automaker), I polled more than a half-dozen drivers to get some additional insight. My findings were consistent with the published studies. Drivers welcomed the ADAS technology (often paying to have their vehicle equipped with the features), optimistic that it would make driving less stressful and more relaxing. Instead, they frequently found the features intrusive, annoying, unreliable, and startling as they intervened unexpectedly and without warning. While some of the technology, such as Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB)—designed to intervene only in emergencies—could not be defeated, systems that could be turned off were often. 'I must turn off the system continuously,' says Sean Dugan about BMW's Lane Keeping Assistant. 'It's jarring and most of the time—more like all the time—unexpected.' And he notes that things are even worse after the sun goes down. 'At night, even when nobody is around, you make a lane change without using a blinker that the car starts fighting to stay in the lane.' Tesla owner Patrick O'Connor finds Lane Assist, part of the company's Autopilot system, frustrating. 'It is over-aggressive, and it doesn't seem to adjust well to naturally curvy roads. I have to turn my lane assist off because it keeps jerking me almost out of my lane—it thought I was swerving on the freeway, although I was following the road within the lane properly.' His wife, Ashley, drives a Kia and uses the vehicle's Smart Cruise Control regularly. 'As a mom of two children under five, I found it helpful in most insists when I drive the kids around. However, I do note that it needs more fine-tuning—it abruptly swerves and does not seem to have as much distance awareness as the system in my husband's Tesla.' 'We have a Cadillac Escalade, and I like the Adaptive Cruise Control because I can set it for 75 (even when freeway traffic is at 35), and it will stay with the flow of traffic automatically speeding up and slowing down. It's kind of nice,' explains Chad Armstrong. 'With that being said, the Reverse Automatic Braking tends to overreact sometimes by slamming violently on the brakes when there's nothing there. For some reason, and I know this sounds weird, it seems to be triggered by shadows.' But not everyone is unsatisfied. Esther O'Connor, who drives a Subaru, appreciates the ADAS features. 'I love them. As you get older, I think they are great because they are very good at alerting you if you get momentarily distracted,' she said, referring to Subaru Lane Keep Assist, part of the company's standard EyeSight driver-assist system. 'Everyone occasionally gets distracted, whether while taking in road signs or watching for other traffic. The automatic system is good because it moves the steering wheel when you leave the lane, and it beeps.' But she's not smitten with all the systems. Esther has a steep driveway that continuously triggers Subaru's Reverse Automatic Braking (RAB) system when backing out of her driveway. When her Outback crosses over the gutter on the street, it automatically comes to a jarring stop. Frustrated, she's developed a work-a-round. She puts the transmission in neutral (thus defeating the ADAS) and rolls into the street without stopping. Meighan Offield drives a Volvo equipped with the company's Pilot Assist & Adaptative Cruise Control System. 'I don't like using adaptive cruise control because I get disengaged from actually driving—same with the lane-centering self-steering. I need to keep my hands on the steering wheel for it to work anyhow, so I'd rather just steer and stay engaged,' she explains. 'Additionally, the adaptive cruise control brakes and accelerates too hard when cars change in and out of lanes in front of me. I prefer to be in control.' Offield also notes other frustrations with ADAS, including one with Volvo's Rear Auto Brake (RAB) that mirrors Esther O'Connor's frustration. 'My driveway is sloped, so when I'm backing out of my driveway, the car senses the unlevel pavers and auto brakes. The system brakes really hard, and it's very startling—you think you have hit something. Fortunately, the button to disable it pops up on the screen when the rearview camera turns on, so I often disable it.' Volvos are fitted with forward collision warning systems, which is part of the company's City Safety or Active Driver Assist features. 'When I'm driving on a curved road with parked cars along the sides, the forward collision prevention system kicks in and starts braking my car aggressively when it shouldn't,' Offield observes. 'It seems to read the parked cars on the side of the road, and because of the angle, it thinks I'm going to have a head-on collision. This is very frustrating, but unlike the back-up system, the forward collision system is not as easy to turn off without navigating to it in the infotainment system, so I leave it on.' Charlie Schiavone drives a RAM 2500 pickup with Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC). 'I religiously use adaptive cruise control in every car I drive, including rentals when they have it. It takes away all the fatigue when driving, especially in traffic,' he explains. 'However, the sudden and harsh braking you get when a car gets in front of you is annoying. More times than not, there is enough space in front of you that simple coasting will suffice.' Schiavone also notes that the system doesn't drive naturally—like a human. 'When cars are moving out from in front of you, the adaptive cruise control accelerates way too quickly to close the gap, and if there is slowed or stopped traffic ahead, you need to intervene, or the system will do some harsh braking. It always feels like it engages too late—it feels like you're going to hit the car in front of you, and you may!' Jeep owner Shannon McGee finds that ADAS offers some benefits but also has more than a few frustrations. Her vehicle is fitted with the company's Active Driving Assist (or Active Lane Management). 'Thankfully, my lane-keeping assist isn't as aggressive as other vehicles, and it just slowly corrects my wheel. However, my Jeep has a Forward Collision Warning with Active Braking, and the sensor isn't the greatest. My car will automatically brake if it senses another vehicle too close, and most of the time, there is no reason to brake—it brakes hard and beeps, too. It usually scares me more than helps me.' Like many motorists, McGee finds the system 'crying wolf' so often that it can't be trusted. 'I can see its benefits if I need it to prevent an accident, but it seems to activate when it's not needed, and it makes things more dangerous.' Automakers have spent billions of dollars engineering, developing, validating, and testing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). However, studies and interviews indicate that most consumers still find them infuriating—to the point where they are ignored or defeated. The reality is that drivers prefer to maintain complete control of their vehicles rather than trust current ADAS technology. Drivers I interviewed want ADAS technology to drive naturally and predictably, mimicking the way they drive—staying smoothly within the lane on the road, anticipating the flow of highway traffic, gently applying the accelerator and brake, and memorizing familiar challenges such as backing out of a driveway at home. They want ADAS to drive more like a human. Despite widespread consumer frustration with current ADAS technology, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is mandating that all new vehicles have emergency braking systems as standard equipment by September 2029. But unless automakers make drastic improvements to the technology, it appears that most drivers will simply shut it off.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store