India to explore maximum use of water under now-suspended Indus Treaty
With the treaty now put in abeyance, the government is looking at ways to utilise the water of the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab.After Friday's high-level meeting, Jal Shakti Minister C R Paatil asserted that the government is working on a strategy to ensure that not a single drop of water flows into Pakistan.He said Prime Minister Narendra Modi has issued a slew of directives, and the meeting was held to follow up on them. Shah made several suggestions at the meeting for their effective implementation.advertisement"We will ensure that not a single drop of water flows into Pakistan from India," the Jal Shakti Minister had said after the meeting.Sources said the government is working on a long-term plan to ensure the effective implementation of its decisions.According to an official, the ministry has been asked to conduct a study to look at ways to utilise the water from the three western rivers.Experts have spoken about the lack of infrastructure that may limit India's capability of completely utilising the water it gets from the decision to suspend the treaty."The real issue is with the western rivers, where infrastructure limitations prevent us from immediately stopping water flows," Himanshu Thakkar of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP) said."We have several projects underway in the Chenab basin that will take five to seven years to complete. Until then, water will continue to flow to Pakistan by gravity. Once these are operational, India will have control mechanisms that currently do not exist," Thakkar had told PTI.Shripad Dharmadhikary, an environmental activist and the founder of Manthan Adhyayan Kendra, has also cautioned against assuming that India could rapidly divert water flows. "At present, we lack the major infrastructure needed to stop water from flowing into Pakistan," he said.advertisementIn response to India's decision on the water-sharing agreement, Pakistan's Senate, in a resolution, said the move amounted to "an act of war".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
CM Revanth Reddy urges Centre to supply Telanganas sanctioned urea allocation
Agency: PTI Last Updated: Hyderabad, Aug 19 (PTI) Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy on Tuesday urged the central government to supply urea to the farmers of the state in line with the sanctioned allocation. Revanth Reddy stated that Members of Parliament from Telangana have already raised the issue with Union Ministers, highlighting the problems arising from the inadequate supply of urea to the state despite the approved allocation, the Telangana CMO said in a post on 'X'. The Chief Minister pointed out that although 8.30 lakh metric tonnes of urea had been allocated to Telangana for the current Kharif season, only 5.32 lakh metric tonnes were supplied so far – a shortfall of nearly 3 lakh metric tonnes – causing significant hardship for farmers across the state, it said. He also referred to a representation submitted to the Union Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers J P Nadda by the state's MPs. The CM further said that he had personally taken up the matter with the Union Minister and that state Agriculture Minister Tummala Nageswar Rao had also written multiple times to the Centre regarding the issue. He alleged that the Centre was discriminating against Telangana by 'failing" to supply urea as per the state's actual needs. He also criticised the Centre for its continued 'negligence", saying despite repeated efforts by Telangana MPs – including raising the matter in Parliament and staging protests on behalf of farmers – the supply still does not match the approved quota. Reddy reiterated his demand for the immediate delivery of urea in line with the sanctioned allocation to protect the interests of Telangana's farmers. PTI VVK VVK ROH view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What Nehru told Parliament on Indus Waters Treaty: ‘Not at all satisfied but… cannot quarrel indefinitely'
BJP national president J P Nadda on Monday slammed former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru for signing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan, terming it 'one of Nehru's biggest blunders'. Nadda also said that Nehru signed the treaty – which was suspended by India in the wake of the recent Pahalgam terror attack – without keeping Parliament in the loop and that the discussion that happened later in the House lasted all of two hours. The IWT was signed between Nehru and then Pakistan President Ayub Khan on September 19, 1960, with the World Bank as a guarantor. The debate on the treaty took place in the Lok Sabha on November 30, 1960. He went on to cite passages critical of the treaty from the Parliament debate. The IWT, brokered by the World Bank, divides the waters of the Indus River system, allocating the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej) to India and the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab) to Pakistan. While India controls the eastern rivers, Pakistan gets access to the western rivers, though India can build run-of-the-river hydroelectric projects on the western rivers. Excerpts from the Lok Sabha debate, which lasted just over two hours: The discussion was opened by Akali Dal MP from Ferozepur Sardar Iqbal Singh, who said that Punjab's voice 'was not heard sufficiently despite it being most affected by the treaty'. 'We in Punjab fear that the farmers who depend on these waters may face insecurity. The Centre must ensure that Punjab's interests are fully safeguarded before expecting us to accept this arrangement,' he said. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then a Jana Sangh MP from Balrampur, also opposed the treaty, saying: 'We have bartered away our rights in the hope that Pakistan would treat us kindly. The government says the World Bank is a guarantor. But can the World Bank guarantee Pakistan's goodwill? This treaty may well become another chapter in the story of our unilateral concessions.' The IWT was not just about water, the future PM said, adding that Pakistan had never reciprocated India's gestures and wondered if the treaty would be any different. Praja Socialist Party (PSP) MP Asoka Mehta argued along the same lines, saying the IWT could not be 'separated from the broader political realities with Pakistan'. Cautioning the government against 'too much sentimentalism in these matters', Mehta added, 'The House must realise that the burden of expenditure is not light. It should not be ignored in enthusiasm… While we support peace with Pakistan, we must remain cautious that sentiment does not override national interest. The PM's optimism is welcome, but Parliament should note the heavy financial burden India has to shoulder.' Ganatantra Parishad MP Surendra Mahanty, urged the government not to be 'carried away by hopes of goodwill and judge agreements with Pakistan with caution'. However, Mahanty added: 'If this Treaty helps our farmers by removing uncertainty, I will not oppose it.' From the Congress's side, the IWT was defended by Nehru and then Irrigation Minister Hafiz Mohammad Ibrahim, apart from MPs A C Guha, B C Mathur and Kalika Singh. Saying that the IWT represents not only an engineering statement but a political settlement of sorts, which gives India a chance to turn a new page, Nehru said, 'I am not at all satisfied with this Treaty in the sense that I should have liked it to be different. But agreements are arrived at by mutual consent, not by one party imposing its will. We could have continued quarrelling indefinitely, but that would have been disastrous for both countries… It is better to have an agreed settlement on a vital matter like water rather than perpetual quarrels. We are not giving away our waters; we are using them in a planned way while ensuring peace and goodwill.' Terming the IWT as 'no small matter', Ibrahim said the treaty would ensure that India got complete control over the waters of the eastern rivers. 'It is not true that Pakistan is being given a gift. They will have to spend hundreds of crores to utilise what has been allocated… This treaty is a great engineering and administrative achievement. It ensures for us a dependable share of waters for generations to come. The World Bank's role as a guarantor strengthens confidence in the execution of works and removal of disputes,' he added. Guha hailed Nehru for his 'vision in ending a long-standing quarrel', and said the objections raised are 'mostly theoretical'. 'We must trust our engineers and planners who assure us that India's requirements are safeguarded,' he said. Mathur said that the treaty was 'not an act of charity', while Kalika Singh said the government had shown 'courage to finalise a matter which was hanging fire for 13 years'. He also urged those opposing the IWT to offer a 'practical alternative'. Swatantra Party's Brijraj Singh said the government should not brush aside the fears of farmers of Punjab and Rajasthan, who were uneasy over the IWT, as 'imaginary'. 'We are asked to believe that this treaty will ensure peace. But peace cannot be bought by surrender.' While acknowledging the merit in the argument that 'certainty was preferable to indefinite conflict (with Pakistan)', Independent MP Krishnaswami said that the cost of the arrangement was 'heavy '.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rupee surges to highest level in August; ends 40 paise higher at 86.95/$
The Indian Rupee rose to its highest level in August as the currency strengthened past the 86 mark on Tuesday on strong economic hopes, softening geopolitical tensions and a fall in crude oil prices. The domestic currency closed 40 paise or 0.45 per cent higher at 86.95 against the dollar on Tuesday, according to Bloomberg. During the day, it rose to the 86.92 level but pared some gains at the end. During the year so far, the currency has depreciated by 1.57 per cent. The gain in the currency was fuelled by the Centre's proposal to ease the complex GST system into two slabs of 5 per cent and 18 per cent, with a 40 per cent bracket reserved for sin goods. In his Independence Day speech, the prime minister had promised 'a double Diwali'. Rupee marked a strong positive move after S&P upgraded India's economic outlook following PM Modi's GST reduction announcement, Jateen Trivedi, VP Research Analyst - Commodity and Currency, LKP Securities, said. While US tariffs remain a concern, the S&P upgrade reflects confidence in India's economic development. Additionally, positive triggers emerged from India-Japan ties ahead of PM Modi's visit to Japan on August 29, further improving sentiment, he added. "With FIIs showing reduced selling pressure, the rupee is expected to trade in a range of 86.60-87.25." The unwinding of long dollar positions and support from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) prevented the currency from hitting a new record low after coming close two weeks ago. The Rupee today also shrugged off any major impact from the rising dollar, which climbed to 98.21 on Tuesday as Trump hosted talks on ending the war in Ukraine and traders cut bets on a September rate cut ahead of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's speech. The dollar index, a measure of the greenback against a basket of six major currencies, was up 0.15 per cent at 98.02. In commodities, crude oil prices were trading lower on optimism over trilateral talks with Russia. Brent crude price was down 0.92 per cent at 65.99 per barrel, while WTI crude prices were lower by 0.98 per cent at 62.8, as of 3:45 PM IST.
