PM Modi sounds BJP poll bugle in Bengal: Mamata govt enabling infiltration, hindering development
Addressing a massive BJP rally in Durgapur, where he launched several development projects worth over Rs 5,000 crore, the Prime Minister said: 'The TMC is actively helping infiltrators. I want to say this very clearly that those who are not the citizens of India and have entered illegally will be dealt with fairness in accordance with the Constitution.'
The Prime Minister's charge against the TMC government of aiding infiltration by providing fake identity cards comes amid reports of Bengali-speaking migrants being detained and deported to Bangladesh from some of the BJP-ruled states. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has been consistently and forcefully hitting out at the BJP and the Central government over the issue, and linking it to Bengali identity.
Emphasising the BJP's commitment to Bengali identity, Modi said, 'For the BJP, Bengali 'ashmita' (pride) is supreme. Wherever there is a BJP government, Bengalis are respected.'
Seeking to blunt the TMC's charge on harassment of Bengali-speaking migrants in BJP-ruled states, Modi said hsi government at the Centre had conferred classical language status to Bangla, which parties like the Congress, the Left, and the TMC 'ignored' despite being in power at the Centre.
He also began his half-an-hour-long speech by invoking Goddesses Kali and Durga. 'Jai Maa Kali… Jai Maa Durga,' he said amid chants of 'Modi, Modi'.
The Prime Minister also hit out at the Mamata Banerjee-led government over the issue of law and order and cases of crimes against women.
Referring to last year's rape and murder of a junior medical doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and the recent alleged rape of a student at a law college, Modi said: 'The injustice being done to the women of Bengal by this Maa-Mati-Manush government of Trinamool makes the heart heavy, and there is great anger (among people)… This land belongs to Dr Kadambini Ganguly, who was the first modern woman doctor. Today is her birthday. But women are not safe even in hospitals in West Bengal. You have seen how the Trinamool tried to hide the criminals after the atrocities on the woman doctor and blamed the victim instead. Before Bengal could overcome this pain, it saw another one. This time, in a college. The accused again had a TMC connection. Big Trinamool leaders and ministers were blaming the woman victim. There are many such examples. Bengal must be freed from this cruelty.'
The Prime Minister's sharp attack on the TMC government also extended to the economic and educational landscape of the state.
Alleging that Trinamool leaders collect 'Gunda Tax', he said that it was the primary reason why industrialists were shying away from investing in the state, forcing companies to leave and leaving the youth jobless.
'Trinamool's Gunda Tax is hindering investment in Bengal. The government here has allowed its leaders to openly commit corruption. That is why many companies have left West Bengal. The youth are leaving West Bengal. They have to go to other states even for small jobs. Durgapur, Asansol, Bardhaman were once the centres of industry, but now the industry is not growing; they are being closed down,' he said.
'The intelligent people of Bengal know that this era is the era of new technology. Bengal's enterprises also want new technology. Today's inauguration of projects (of the Centre) is part of the change…'
'What is happening in West Bengal is very worrying… Only the Trinamool government is an obstacle in the path of Bengal's development. The day the Trinamool government falls, Bengal will move at a new speed. Real change will only happen if the Trinamool government goes,' he said.
Referring to the recent communal violence in Murshidabad district, the PM said such violence and 'partisan policing' create an environment where 'no hope of justice' exists, making investment in the state impossible. 'Here, the state government cannot protect the lives of people and shops. That's why investors are worried,' he said.
Alleging 'systemic corruption' in the state, the Prime Minister said: 'Be it primary education or higher education, the situation is the same everywhere. Thousands of teachers have lost their jobs because of grassroots corruption. As a result, not only are jobless families facing problems, the present and the future of the students are uncertain too. The situation is such that the courts are saying that there is systemic corruption in the state. The Trinamool has put the present and future of Bengal in crisis.'
He also alleged that the TMC government was 'obstructing' Centrals funds for welfare schemes and tribals to come to the state, and said: 'Once the BJP comes, every person in West Bengal will get the benefits of all these schemes.'
Pitching the BJP as the alternative, the Prime Minister asked the people of West Bengal to give his party a chance, citing the party's success in other neighbouring states like Assam, Tripura, and Odisha.
'A developed Bengal is Modi's guarantee. Developed Bengal is BJP's resolve. We want to restore the lost glory of Durgapur. For this, new investment is needed. This requires new investment. We need education and technology for the youth. But it won't happen as long as the TMC government is here,' he said, adding
'Bangla bodol chaaye, unnoyan chaye' (Bengal wants change and development). –
'BJP is determined to bring West Bengal out of the crisis. Bengal needs a government that will guarantee peace and security. BJP is moving forward with this resolve. I see change, new enthusiasm among the people … Together we all have to bring change,' he said.
To supporters who held his portraits at the venue, Modi said, 'The soil of West Bengal is loving. I will accept these portraits from little children who have drawn pictures for me, and I will write a letter to them. I will request the SPG to take those pictures. You all have waited for a long time. It has rained quite a bit in between. You have endured that too.'
Sweety Kumari reports from West Bengal for The Indian Express. She is a journalist with over a decade of experience in the media industry. Covers Crime, Defence, Health , Politics etc and writes on trending topics.
With a keen eye for investigative and human-interest stories. She has honed her craft across diverse beats including aviation, health, incidents etc. Sweety delivers impactful journalism that informs and engages audiences.
Sweety Kumari is a graduate of Calcutta University with an Honors degree in Journalism from Jaipuria College and a PG in Mass Communication from Jadavpur University. Originally from Bihar, she is brought up in Kolkata and completed her education from Kendriya Vidyalaya SaltLake. Multilingual, Sweety is fluent in English, Hindi, Bengali, and Maithili. She started her career as an Entertainment and lifestyle journalist with a newsportal in Kolkata. She is working with The Indian Express for 8 years now. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC issues notice to Centre, states over President's reference on timelines for assent on Bills
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre and all states on the reference made to it by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143 of the Constitution, following its verdict that fixed timelines for the President and governors to act on Bills passed by state assemblies. Article 143 refers to the President's power to consult the top court. A Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha, and A S Chandurkar, which took up the matter, said it will fix timelines for the hearing next week. CJI Gavai said, 'Tentatively, we propose to start (the hearing) somewhere in mid-August.' The counsels appearing for Kerala and Tamil Nadu said they propose to question the maintainability of the reference. The CJI asked them to reserve their arguments for the hearing. In the reference made under Article 143(1) of the Constitution, President Murmu has posed 14 questions over the top court's April 8 verdict. The President sought to know whether the actions of governors and the President are justiciable (whether courts can look into it) and whether such timelines can be imposed on them in the absence of any such provision in the Constitution. The reference pointed out that 'there are conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court as to whether the assent of the President of India under Article 201 of the Constitution of India is justiciable or not'. Under Article 145 (3), when the President makes a reference for the court's opinion, it is placed before a five-judge bench. On April 8, the Supreme Court had set a timeline for governors to act on pending Bills, and for the first time, prescribed that the President should take a decision on the Bills, reserved for consideration by the Governor, within three months from the date on which such reference is received. Under Article 201 of the Constitution, no timeframe has been set for a President's decision. The Supreme Court had said that 'in case of any delay beyond this period, appropriate reasons would have to be recorded and conveyed' to the state concerned. The April 8 ruling by a two-judge bench, headed by Justice J B Pardiwala, set aside Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's decision to withhold assent to 10 Bills for consideration of the President in November 2023 after they had already been reconsidered by the Assembly, and said that the action was illegal and erroneous. In her reference to the apex court, President Murmu sought to know: 'Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the President under Article 201 of the Constitution of India justiciable? In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed timeline and the manner of exercise of powers by the President, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of discretion by the President under Article 201 of the Constitution of India?' Article 201 prescribes the powers of the President and the procedure to be followed while assenting to Bills or withholding assent therefrom, but 'does not stipulate any time frame or procedure to be followed by the President for the exercise of constitutional options.' President Murmu pointed out that Article 200 of the Constitution, which prescribes the powers of the Governor and the procedure to be followed while assenting to Bills, withholding assent to Bills and reserving a Bill for the consideration of the President, 'does not stipulate any time frame upon the Governor for the exercise of constitutional options'. 'Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor?' the President sought to know. Murmu asked whether 'in light of the constitutional scheme governing the powers of the President', she 'is required to seek advice of the Supreme Court by way of a reference under Article 143 of the Constitution of India and take the opinion of the Supreme Court when the Governor reserves a Bill for the President's assent or otherwise?' 'Are the decisions of the Governor and the President under Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution of India, respectively, justiciable at a stage anterior to the law coming into force? Is it permissible for the Courts to undertake judicial adjudication over the contents of a Bill, in any manner, before it becomes law?' The President also asked: 'Can the exercise of constitutional powers and the orders of/by the President/Governor be substituted in any manner under Article 142 of the Constitution of India?' Some of the other questions referred to the top court are: 'What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented to him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?; Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all the options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?' The reference pointed out that the Constitution enlists numerous instances where the assent of the President has to be obtained before a legislation can take effect in a state. It said that 'the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor and the President under Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution of India, respectively, are essentially governed by polycentric considerations, inter alia being federalism, uniformity of laws, integrity and security of the nation, doctrine of separation of powers'. The President said, 'States are frequently approaching the Supreme Court of India invoking Article 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies) of the Constitution of India (and not Article 131 which states that the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over legal issues between states or between states and the Union), raising issues which by their very nature are federal issues involving interpretation of, inter alia, the Constitution of India.' The reference also said that 'the contours and scope of provisions contained in Article 142 of the Constitution of India in context of issues which are occupied by either constitutional provisions or statutory provisions also needs an opinion of the Supreme Court of India.' Article 142 refers to the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court. The President also said that 'the concept of a deemed assent of the President and the Governor is alien to the constitutional scheme and fundamentally circumscribes the power of the President and the Governor'.
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Bad news for Shehbaz Sharif as Pakistan nears bankruptcy, will soon face Rs 650000000000 'bomb' due to....
Rs 7500 crore drones, intelligence and Jihad: Pakistan and this Muslim country planning big conspiracy against India, trying to… New Delhi: Bankrupt Pakistan is likely to witness more financial crunch in the current financial year. According to the reports, if Pakistan fails to repay a debt of Rs 6.50 lakh crore (approximately USD 23 billion) during this period, a default is likely. Citing Pakistan's Economic Survey 2024–25, The News reported that the government is required to repay USD 23 billion in debt during 2025–26. Failure to do so could push the country to the brink of default. The country's total public debt stood at Rs 76.01 trillion by the end of March 2025. This includes Rs 51.52 trillion in domestic borrowing (approximately USD 180 billion) and Rs 24.49 trillion (around USD 87.4 billion) in external loans. The external debt is divided into two parts: funds borrowed directly by the government and loans received from the IMF. This debt has accumulated over years due to economic mismanagement, temporary funding solutions, and repeated bailouts. However, the repayment demands for this year have exposed how little room the government has left to maneuver. USD 12 Billion in Temporary Deposits The bankrupt Pakistan is required to repay USD 23 billion this year. To meet this obligation, USD 12 billion will be received as temporary deposit amounts from four of its friendly countries. These include USD 5 billion from Saudi Arabia, USD 4 billion from China, USD 2 billion from the United Arab Emirates, and USD 1 billion from Qatar. Here are some of the key details: Pakistan is required to repay USD 23 billion this year. USD 12 billion will be received as temporary deposit amounts from China, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. USD 5 billion from Saudi Arabia, USD 4 billion from China, USD 2 billion from the United Arab Emirates, and USD 1 billion from Qatar. If any of these countries decide to withdraw their support, Pakistan will have to repay the entire amount within this year. The News has warned that if these friendly nations refuse to extend the rollover of their deposits, the situation could deteriorate further. This would make repayment unavoidable for the government, pushing it to rely more on diplomatic goodwill than on financial strength. And there are signs that even that goodwill is weakening. USD 11 Billion in Payments Still Pending The Shehbaz Sharif government still has to pay around USD 11 billion to external creditors this year even if all its temporary deposits are rolled over. This includes USD 1.7 billion in international bonds, USD 2.3 billion in commercial loans, USD 2.8 billion to institutions like the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Islamic Development Bank, and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and $1.8 billion in bilateral loans. This financial burden comes at a time when Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves are already under pressure. The country has limited sources of new income and is still awaiting a new extended programme from the IMF.
Scroll.in
17 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Mehbooba Mufti urges Rahul Gandhi to raise concerns about ‘victimisation of Muslims' in Parliament
Peoples Democratic Party chief Mehbooba Mufti on Monday urged Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to raise concerns about the 'victimisation, dispossession and disempowerment' of Muslims during the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. Mufti said that Muslims in India had chosen to remain in the country after Partition because of their faith in the Congress leadership. 'Today, as the bearer of that legacy, the responsibility falls on your shoulders to uphold and defend the secular and democratic values enshrined in our Constitution,' she added. The Peoples Democratic Party leader said that the ongoing special intensive revision of voter rolls in Bihar appears to be another 'systemic effort to dispossess, disempower and ultimately disenfranchise Muslims, effectively erasing their presence'. As part of the revision of electoral rolls, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. Opposition leaders have alleged that the exercise risks disenfranchising a large number of voters as they may not be able to submit the necessary documents. Mufti also referred to reports of India having deported refugees by 'pushing' them into Bangladeshi waters, saying: 'Under the pretext of targeting 'Bangladeshis' and 'Rohingyas', Muslims are being pushed into increasingly desperate situations. Disturbing media reports have even suggested that some were forced into the sea in attempts to expel them from India.' The large scale demolition of thousands of Muslim homes in Assam is deeply troubling, Mufti added. Between 2016 and August 2024, more than 10,620 families – the majority of them Muslim – have been evicted from government land in Assam, according to data provided by the state revenue and disaster management department. Deeply disturbed by the ongoing victimization, dispossession and disempowerment of Muslims on a daily basis - I have written to Rahul Gandhi ji urging him to raise this critical issue in the upcoming Parliament session. — Mehbooba Mufti (@MehboobaMufti) July 21, 2025 Mufti said that while India rightly condemns the treatment of Hindu minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh, there is 'complete silence' when Muslims are targeted in India. 'As a politician from one of the only Muslim-majority regions that chose to join the Indian Union largely due to the vision and secular character of your great-grandfather, I feel extremely helpless at times,' she said. 'Placing great hope in your leadership, I urge you to continue speaking up for a minority that is being steadily marginalised and pushed to the fringes of Indian society.'
