
Explained: Familiar problems linger, global uncertainties complicate picture
Helped by a late 7%-plus surge in the last quarter, India's real GDP in Financial Year 24-25 grew 6.5% on a year-on-year basis. Some tailwinds have continued on to this fiscal (FY26), with domestic economic activity exhibiting resilience in the wake of strong agri growth; some gains, albeit uneven, are seen in industrial activity; and there is continued buoyancy in the services sector.
The domestic headwinds are familiar: stubbornly indifferent private capex, weak urban consumption, patchy rural recovery, some indications of household balance sheet stress, and a negative credit impulse.
The uncertainty over tariffs imposed by the United States could weigh on global investment flows, but it also offers opportunities for India, from potential trade diversion to tapping into medium-term supply chain shifts. That said, higher tariffs and uncertainties could weigh on India's export performance as it negotiates multiple trade deals.
Continuing concerns
According to the World Bank, India's biggest supply side problem is capital expenditure, especially by the private sector — something that the BJP-led NDA government has tried hard to address over the last 11 years.
The government has more or less resolved the twin balance sheet problem by cleaning up the mess of corporate indebtedness and the bad loans on bank books.
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) introduced in 2017 unified the country's markets, while the insolvency code in 2016 offered banks a chance to resuscitate bankrupt companies.
In 2019, an unprecedented corporate tax cut was followed up with a major income tax relief in this Budget to boost consumption in the economy.
All along, the Centre has continued with the heavy lifting on capex, especially on infrastructure, in the hope that it will crowd in private investments. But to very little avail.
While companies' operating profits have surged since the corporate tax cut, capex has barely moved, with factories operating consistently at around 75% capacity over the last 11 years. Gross fixed capital formation, an investment metric, has remained at 25%, the same level as in 2014. There is now increasing concentration risk across sectors.
Companies are also scaling down their salary outlays, something that policy makers are concerned about. Analysts are flagging that growth in compensation, including hiring, has trailed the growth in profitability.
The industry states the problem as follows: consumption not growing fast enough to persuade companies to invest in new facilities or expand existing units.
Limits to intervention
The RBI has cut lending rates four times — totaling 100 basis points — since February this year. With Friday's 50 basis point cut and the change in stance to neutral from accommodative, the big question is whether the central bank thinks it has any headroom left for more rate cuts going forward.
The problem is that with the front-loading of this cut, and a possible monetary policy pause round the corner, the government too has all but expended the ammunition — having followed up its corporate tax cuts with income tax cuts earlier this year.
The view in the corridors of power in New Delhi is that there is little appetite for big reforms of any hue.
A relatively empty state election calendar in 2025 was seen as providing a window to push reforms. But with half the year gone, the appetite for initiating fresh reforms, or even restarting pending ones such as the Labour Codes, appears significantly diminished.
It is not that industry has stopped short of investing because of a paucity of funds; instead, it has done so more on account of a demand problem, and a degree of comfort in operating at a capacity utilisation of 75%. Dishing out manufacturing subsidies has its limitations, and that is now being debated internally.
From the perspective of the central bank, the last mile of disinflation that was turning out to be arduous is perhaps behind the country. Also, the rate cuts could hopefully reverse the slowing credit growth — both to households and the corporate sector.
Looking ahead
While India's long-term growth story is believed to be intact — with a 6.5% average growth rate projected over the next half-decade seen as helping the country retain the tag of the world's fastest-growing big economy — there are problems.
Countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea grew at well over 8% during their rapid growth phases on a sustained basis. Whether a 6%-plus growth would be enough for a country that needs to generate upwards of 8 million jobs every year until 2030 is a big question — as also whether this growth would be enough to bridge the growing wealth disparities and offer scope for generational mobility.
A well-intentioned internship scheme, despite its promise on paper, is struggling to take off. Jobs, consumption recovery, and private capex are festering problems.
The prognosis for 2025 is marred further by multiple external headwinds, including the uncertainties over protectionist regulations and curbs on immigration, two ongoing wars with no end in sight, and a weakening American economy that could compound the problems of a struggling Chinese economy.
If tensions with Pakistan were to be renewed, investments could be impacted. Defence spending could be forced up in the coming years.
The high-level deregulation commission in reducing compliance burden on businesses could be a net positive.
Also, the global uncertainty around trade presents an opportunity for India to lower its protectionist barriers, alongside a renewed opportunity to push much-needed investments in education and skilling.
Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka to seek increase in devolution funds under 16th Finance Commission
To recover losses from reduced devolution to Karnataka under the 15th Finance Commission, the Karnataka government has proposed to seek additional grants under the 16th Finance Commission during a meeting in Delhi on Friday. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who also holds the Finance portfolio, and his economic adviser and MLA Basavaraj Rayaraddi, and senior officials would participate in the meeting and hold discussions with Arvind Panagariya, chairman, 16th Finance Commission. The 16th Finance Commission has already held one round of talks with the Karnataka government. Decreased devolution Karnataka, which has been complaining about discrimination in the devolution of funds by the NDA government, is expected to demand the increase in the devolution from 3.64% to 5% in the 16th Finance Commission. The 15th Finance Commission, in its award period (2020-21 to 2025-26), had dragged Karnataka's share (horizontal devolution) down from 4.71% in the 14th FC to 3.64%. Owing to this, according to sources in the State Secretariat, the State is likely to lose ₹62,098 crore during the 15th Finance Commission period. Karnataka gets back only 0.29 paisa for one rupee it contributes to the Central pool of taxes, while Bihar gets back ₹7.06 and Uttar Pradesh gets back ₹2.73. This has been flagged by the government several times. Cess and surcharges Currently, the Centre does not share cess and surcharges collected from States. Karnataka has been requesting the Centre to bring cess and surcharges colleges from States under the divisible pool. The Centre has been collecting about ₹5 lakh crore annually in the form of taxes from the State, but receiving about ₹55,000 crore, including grants from the Centre. The Finance Commission's award period would commence from April 1, 2026.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gadkari seeks 5% GST on crude ethanol to push flex-fuel cars, warns against petrol parity
As the Centre and states gear up for a major overhaul of India's Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) framework, Union Road Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari has called for a reduction in the GST rate on crude ethanol—from the current 18 per cent to 5 per cent —in a bid to support the production and adoption of flex-fuel vehicles , according to a report by ToI. At present, ethanol that is used under the Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme attracts a concessional GST rate of 5 per cent . However, crude ethanol continues to be taxed at the higher rate of 18 per cent . A source told TNN that Gadkari has urged for parity between the two, cautioning that taxing crude ethanol at such a high rate could discourage people from opting for vehicles that run entirely on ethanol. "Why will people go for these vehicles if the price of crude ethanol is equal to or more than that of petrol?" the source quoted Gadkari as saying. Although over 400 fuel outlets in the country currently offer 100 per cent ethanol, consumer interest remains weak. Gadkari believes this trend can be reversed if a more favourable tax policy is introduced for crude ethanol. Gadkari's appeal comes as the Union government is in the process of re-evaluating the GST structure. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and a team of officials are reviewing various rationalisation proposals ahead of detailed consultations with states. The larger exercise aims to streamline the GST regime, enhance revenue efficiency, and address classification issues that have emerged since the tax was introduced in 2017. Earlier attempts to bring about change through two separate Groups of Ministers (GoMs) did not yield any actionable consensus. A third GoM is now studying the issue of cesses, particularly the compensation cess, which is set to lapse in March next year. India's GST structure currently features four primary tax slabs: 5 per cent , 12 per cent , 18 per cent , and 28 per cent . While the majority of items fall under the 5 per cent bracket, most of the revenue is generated from the 18 per cent slab. Industry bodies have long been pressing for a simplification of this framework, especially a merger of the 12 per cent and 18 per cent slabs into a single rate of 15–16 per cent . However, such a move may lead to revenue losses and face political opposition from states. Gadkari's proposal to lower GST on crude ethanol aligns with the country's wider energy and transport objectives, including reducing reliance on imported oil and encouraging the use of alternative fuels . It is still uncertain whether this suggestion will be included in the final set of GST reforms currently under consideration.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Reliance Industries trims 3.64% stake in Asian Paints, SBI MF buys for Rs 7,703 crore, Siddhant Commercials shareholding drops to 1.26%
Billionaire Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has divested a 3.64% stake in Asian Paints Ltd through a block deal valued at Rs 7,703.50 crore. The transaction, executed on Thursday via RIL's affiliate Siddhant Commercials Pvt Ltd, saw SBI Mutual Fund emerge as the buyer, significantly raising its holding in the company. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to data available with the National Stock Exchange (NSE), Siddhant Commercials sold 3.50 crore equity shares in Asian Paints at an average price of Rs 2,201 per share. This offloading reduced the RIL arm's stake in the company from 4.90% to 1.26%. SBI Mutual Fund's shareholding in Asian Paints rose sharply following the acquisition, moving from 1.51% to 5.15%. The fund house's large-scale purchase highlights its confidence in the long-term value of India's largest decorative paints manufacturer. Shares of Asian Paints reacted positively to the development, closing 0.73% higher at Rs 2,225 apiece on the NSE. The transaction comes amid broader moves by Reliance Industries to restructure and monetize select non-core investments, while institutional investors like SBI MF continue to consolidate positions in fundamentally strong businesses.