Supreme Court orders probe into builder-bank nexus in Gurugram
'This verdict reignites our faith in the system,' said Ritu Bhariok, vice-president of the Federation of Apartment Owners Associations of Gurugram. 'Builders collected full payments and vanished, while banks and authorities looked the other way. The nexus has been an open secret. It's time this collusion is exposed, punished, and homebuyers get back their dignity.'
The ruling has renewed focus on multiple long-stalled housing projects in Gurugram.
Two such developments by Ramprastha Developers — Skyz and Rise in Gurugram — were promised for delivery in 2014. A decade later, Skyz has left 600 families stranded, and Rise another 300. Despite years of waiting, construction remains incomplete and legal battles continue at the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC).
Amit Jindal, a resident of Gurugram's Sector 48, said the problem runs deeper than just rogue builders. 'The State, the Town and Country Planning (TCP) department, and banks all facilitated this mess. How can a builder take the money, the buyer pay the money, and the product simply disappear? No politician has ever seriously raised this concern. It's systemic betrayal.'
Yashesh Yadav, president of the Dwarka Expressway Welfare Association, echoed the sentiment. 'This is not just a builder-buyer problem. It's a complete failure of governance. For 10 years, we've been running from one office to another. Now, finally, the Supreme Court has intervened. We hope it shakes the system.'
Buyers from Mahira Homes, an affordable housing project under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), called the betrayal even more painful. 'We've lost trust in PMAY. Licenses were cancelled after builders collected 100% payment. No one is helping us,' said Gaurav Gupta, a Mahira buyer.
Another affected project is OSB Expressway Towers, launched under PMAY in 2016 at Sector 109, Gurugram. Construction began in 2017, with possession promised by early 2022. After COVID-19, the builder slowed work, despite collecting 92% of payments. Buyers appealed to authorities, but progress was sluggish. In February 2023, the DTCP suspended the builder's license for six months. Yet again, the builder cited a lack of funds.
Col Naveen Hooda, a representative of the OSB Expressway Towers Buyers' Association, said more than 350 complaints are pending at HRERA, but no concrete action has followed. 'The RERA chairman himself said he couldn't force the builder to complete the project. Now, the builder wants to sell commercial space to raise funds, not to finish the homes. We've requested DTCP and HRERA to demand a strict resolution plan before granting any further permissions.'
As calls for criminal accountability grow louder, homebuyers say the crisis won't end without deep reform. 'We've waited long enough,' said Jindal. 'It's time the people who shattered our dreams are finally held accountable.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
8 minutes ago
- NDTV
After Top Court's Stray Dog Order For Delhi, Madras High Court's Big Hint
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday said it would consider directing the Tamil Nadu government to implement in the state the Supreme Court's order on managing street dogs in Delhi. A Bench was hearing and disposing of a batch of petitions relating to stray animals — one on stray cattle, another on street dogs in general, and a third on the menace of dogs inside a temple that had allegedly bitten devotees, causing injuries and raising fears of rabies. During the hearing, petitioners submitted alarming data, claiming that Tamil Nadu had already recorded 3.67 lakh dog bites and 20 deaths due to dog-bite-related rabies this year alone. The judges said they would issue combined formal orders after studying the Supreme Court's detailed guidelines. The possible directive has sparked mixed reactions. Animal welfare activists expressed concern over the state's lack of infrastructure, manpower, and veterinary expertise to handle such a large street dog population. "Dogs have equal rights to live in this world," one activist said, adding that a poorly implemented crackdown could leave thousands of dogs neglected or starving. They urged the court instead to ensure that the state rigorously enforces the Animal Birth Control (ABC) programme, which focuses on sterilisation and vaccination as humane solutions. On the other hand, many residents and civic activists welcomed the move, stressing that human life must come first. They argued that the rising number of fatal and non-fatal dog attacks called for immediate, decisive intervention. "Lives should not be lost to dog bites in this day and age," one petitioner said, pointing to the absence of coordinated rabies control measures in several districts. The court's reference to the Supreme Court's Delhi order suggests that Tamil Nadu could soon see new, court-mandated protocols for street dog management — potentially affecting everything from municipal responsibility and sterilisation drives to shelter management and public awareness campaigns. The Bench is expected to issue its final directions after reviewing the top court's ruling, setting the stage for a state-wide policy on balancing public safety and animal rights.
Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Summons to lawyers: SC reserves verdict
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its judgement in a suo motu case initiated by it to consider the issue of probe agencies summoning lawyers who provide legal advice to accused involved in criminal suo motu was initiated by the top court after it had issued summons to two senior lawyers for rendering legal advice to their clients. A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai reserved its verdict after briefly hearing arguments of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and other lawyers. "Lawyers need to be protected. Provisions are already there. But if they are party to the commission of crime, (they are not entitled to protection)," Mehta submitted. The bench said that it has already made it clear that no protection can be extended to such the last hearing, Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh had suggested that the guidelines issued by the ED to its officers should be adopted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and other investigating agencies as well. Singh had further suggested that for CBI and state police, there should be permission from the Superintendent of Police for issuance of summons to lawyers. He had further proposed that summons to a lawyer should be sent only after the concerned judicial magistrate clears the development took place during the resumed hearing of a suo motu case initiated by the SC on summons issued by ED to two senior advocates - Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal - in the course of ED's investigation into the grant of over 22.7 million Employee Stock Option Plans, valued at more than ₹250 crore, by Care Health Insurance to former Religare Enterprises chairperson Rashmi Saluja.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
The RTO crisis: Return-to-Office mandates spark mass exodus of working moms across America
The American workplace faces a growing crisis as return-to-office mandates challenge many employees, particularly working mothers. Increased childcare costs, lengthy commutes, and inflexible schedules are prompting them to reconsider their jobs. While companies emphasize in-person work to enhance collaboration, many workers seek flexible options. The tension between corporate policies and employee needs highlights the need for adaptable work arrangements that support different personal situations and more productive workforce.. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Challenges Faced by Working Mothers Economic Implications Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Corporate Response and Employee Sentiments FAQS: In recent months, a notable shift in workplace environment took place in the United States, particularly impacting working mothers. As companies execute stricter return-to-office (RTO) policies, many employees, especially those with caregiving duties, are facing new challenges that prompt them to reevaluate their employment corporations such as AT&T, JPMorgan Chase, Amazon and Ford have restarted full-time in-office work requirements, moving away from the flexible hybrid and remote models that became widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. These policies mainly aim to enhance better collaboration and rebuild company culture but have unintentionally led to higher turnover among employees who are not able to comply with these demands due to personal most of the working mothers, returning to the office poses significant logistical and financial issues. Childcare costs have risen sharply, with expenses increasing by 21% since 2019, making it unaffordable for numerous families. Additionally, the time spent commuting and the need to be physically present in the office conflict with caregiving duties, leading to difficult decisions about continuing employment.A report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) points out that rigid in-office mandates can be backfired, especially for employees with caregiving duties. The report suggests that flexible work arrangements can lead to enhanced employee retention and productivity, as they allow workers to balance their personal and professional lives more efficiently .The financial strain of returning to the office is not limited to childcare costs. Employees are also facing increased expenses related to travel, work attire, and food expenses. For example, federal employees, who had previously benefited from work savings due to remote options, are now experiencing a significant increase in yearly costs due to the return-to-office mandates In response to the increasing dissatisfaction, some companies are reconsidering their RTO policies. However, the shift towards a more rigid in-office persists in many organizations. Employees are expressing their concerns through various channels, including petitions and discussions on social media. The tension between corporate expectations and employee needs is becoming a centre point in discussions about the future of work culture.A1. A return-to-office mandate requires employees to work from the physical office instead of remotely. Many companies are enforcing these policies after widespread remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic.A2. A hybrid work model combines working both remotely and in the office. It offers flexibility to employees while maintaining some in-person collaboration.
