Mechanism needed to determine sighah fatwa– Constitutional expert
The fatwa gazetting procedure must be clearly outlined and take into account the views of legal advisors.
International Islamic University Malaysia law lecturer Professor Datuk Dr Shamrahayu Ab Aziz
SHAH ALAM – Authorities responsible for issuing fatwas must establish specific methods or mechanisms to determine the wording (sighah) or phrasing of fatwas, following the Federal Court's decision on Thursday allowing Sisters In Islam (SIS) Forum's bid to nullify the enforcement of a fatwa against the organisation.
International Islamic University Malaysia law lecturer Professor Datuk Dr Shamrahayu Ab Aziz said the fatwa gazetting procedure must be clearly outlined and should take into account the views of legal advisors.
"Some states already have and practise such procedures, but there are also states that still lack a clear process regarding this matter.
"The National Council for Islamic Religious Affairs must take a firm stand by instructing all state fatwas to be reviewed in order to minimise the risk of being sued or brought to court," she said in a Facebook post on Thursday.
Earlier, the Federal Court allowed the SIS Forum's appeal in a dispute involving a fatwa issued by the Selangor Islamic religious authority, which had declared the organisation as deviant and astray from Islamic teachings, as gazetted in 2014.
The decision was delivered by a five-member panel of judges led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who, through a majority judgment, allowed the final appeal by SIS Forum and two other parties to challenge the validity of the fatwa.
Shamrahayu explained that although the court did not annul the fatwa entirely, its impact remained significant.
"We must be cautious when drafting the sighah of a fatwa, especially when it is intended to become law. As a form of legislation, a fatwa is subject to interpretation.
"This isn't the first time such an institution has 'lost' in court over issues relating to the sighah of a fatwa. There was a similar case previously involving Kassim Ahmad in Kuala Lumpur," she added.
Shamrahayu said although questions remained as to why a fatwa may not be enforceable against an 'artificial person', the public would have to wait for the Federal Court's full written grounds of the majority judgement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
3 hours ago
- Barnama
Sultan Of Selangor Disappointed, Sad With Federal Court's SIS Fatwa Ruling
SHAH ALAM, June 19 (Bernama) -- The Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, has expressed disappointment and sadness with regard to the Federal Court's decision. The court ruled that a 2014 fatwa issued by the Selangor Fatwa Committee does not apply to the Sisters in Islam (SIS) Forum Malaysia as an organisation or institution, but only to individuals. In a post on the Selangor Royal Office Facebook page, the ruler expressed his agreement with the statement issued by the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) regarding the court decision. Following this, the Sultan of Selangor, as the Head of Islam in the state, urged the SIS Forum Malaysia to cease using the term Sisters in Islam in any publication or platform associated with the organisation. This request was made to prevent the indiscriminate use of the term Islam for the benefit and interest of the organisation. "His Majesty emphasised that the misuse of the term Islam in the name and publications of SIS Forum Malaysia can cause confusion among the Muslim community," the post said. Earlier today, the Federal Court granted an appeal by SIS Forum Malaysia and its co-founder, Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar, challenging the 2014 fatwa issued by the Selangor Fatwa Committee. The fatwa had labelled the organisation as deviating from Islamic teachings. A four-judge panel led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, in a 3-1 majority decision, set aside the fatwa regarding its applicability to companies and institutions. MAIS Chairman Datuk Salehuddin Saidin earlier said that the council disagrees with part of the Federal Court's ruling, particularly the decision that the fatwa dated July 31, 2014, applies only to individuals and not to SIS Forum Malaysia as an organisation or institution. He added that MAIS had expressed sadness that the decision indirectly interferes with the process of issuing and applying fatwas related to Islamic law.
Malaysiakini
5 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Selangor sultan urges SIS to drop 'Sisters in Islam' from publications
The Selangor Sultan has expressed disappointment and regret over part of the Federal Court's ruling in favour of rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS), urging the NGO to stop using 'Sisters in Islam' in its publications. In a statement posted on his official Facebook page, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah said that the 'misuse' of the word 'Islam' in the name and publications of SIS Forum (Malaysia) could cause confusion among the Muslim community.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Selangor sultan urges SIS to cease using ‘Islam' in its name
Selangor Sultan, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, expressed disappointment with the Federal Court's decision earlier this morning. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, the head of Islam in the state, is urging women's rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS) to cease arbitrarily using the word 'Islam' in its name or in any of the company's publications, after the Federal Court quashed a religious edict issued by the state's authorities earlier today. SIS is a company limited by guarantee established under the Companies Act 1965. 'The word 'Islam' should not be arbitrarily used to benefit the company or for its interest,' Sultan Sharafuddin said. The statement was published on the Selangor Royal Office's Facebook page. The sultan also said the 'misuse' of the word 'Islam' in SIS's name and publications could cause confusion among the Muslim community. He also expressed agreement with the Selangor Islamic religious council's (Mais) statement responding to the apex court's decision. Mais had pointed out that the Federal Court also declared as unconstitutional the state provision which allowed it to ban and confiscate material related to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. The council said it respected but disagreed with the court's decision, claiming it was akin to interfering in the formulation and implementation of fatwas based on Islamic law. It also expressed concern that the decision would lead to 'irresponsible' groups using 'Islam' in the names of their organisations or entities while practising and spreading deviant Islamic teachings. Mais said it would continue to work with the state's religious authorities to monitor and take action on anyone spreading deviant teachings. In a majority decision earlier today, the Federal Court ruled that a fatwa could not be imposed on an organisation like SIS which could not 'profess' a religion. Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the phrase 'persons professing the religion of Islam' in the Federal Constitution refers exclusively to natural persons, not entities such as companies or organisations. Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Justice Nallini Pathmanathan formed the majority in the ruling while Justice Abu Bakar Jais dissented. SIS had sought to quash a 2014 fatwa by Mais that the NGO had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. The group contended that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be imposed on a corporate entity governed by civil law. It failed in its previous challenge of the fatwa in the lower courts between 2019 and 2023.
