logo
Largest Boost To Learning Support In A Generation

Largest Boost To Learning Support In A Generation

Scoop22-05-2025
Minister of Education
The Government is delivering the most significant investment in learning support in a generation to better support Kiwi kids to thrive at school, Education Minister Erica Stanford says.
Key investments include substantial annual increases to teacher aide hours, building up to over 2 million additional teacher aide hours per year, from 2028; Learning Support Co-ordinators for all schools with Year 1-8 students; expanding early intervention services from early learning through to end of year 1; and an historic overhaul of the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding model to ensure that demand for the service is met with guaranteed funding so all students with high and complex needs who are verified for ORS receive the support they need.
'Too many children wait too long to receive support, or miss out altogether, on the help they need to succeed. We are addressing this by investing in a smart, system-wide reform that significantly increases specialist and support staff resources in our schools.
'We're powering up support to the frontline and investing early to ensure our kids get the tailored help they need, and so that teachers have more time to teach the basics brilliantly,' Ms Stanford says.
Budget 2025 invests $2.5 billion over the forecast period in Vote Education with a focus on delivering a transformational boost to learning support funding.
'Backed by a social investment lens, this is a seismic l shift in how we support learning needs in New Zealand. We're deliberately prioritising early intervention, investing in what works and directly tackling long-standing inequities in the system.'
The learning support funding package includes:
· $266 million to extend the Early Intervention Service (EIS) from early childhood education through to the end of year 1 of primary school. This will fund more than 560 additional FTE for EIS teachers and specialists. We are investing in:
expanding the service through to the end of Year 1 to support the effective transition into school of around 4,000 children with additional needs.
reducing existing waitlists in early intervention so that more than 3,000 children that need the support receive it sooner.
o increasing the amount of specialist support provided to the more than 7,100 children who are currently enrolled in EIS.
o building up annually to an additional 900,000 teacher aide hours per year, from 2028, to support young learners in EIS.
· $122 million to meet increased demand for ORS (Ongoing Resourcing Scheme) for students with high and complex needs. This includes a structural change to the funding model so every child who is verified for ORS funding receives the support they need. This investment will also increase the number of specialists and teacher aide time to support the more than 1,700 additional learners forecast to access ORS over the next four years.
$192 million to ensure that over three years, all Year 1-8 schools and kura are funded for a Learning Support Coordinator to work with students, families and educators to identify and respond to learner needs. This investment will benefit 1250 schools and an additional 300,000 learners around New Zealand.
· $43 million for an extra 78.5 FTE speech language therapists, as well as additional psychologists and supporting teacher aide hours to help meet the growing demand of students with communication and behaviour needs. This will provide specialist supports to around 2500 students over the next four years.
· $3 million of investment in our teacher aides with targeted professional development for working with learners with social, emotional, wellbeing, behavioural, and neurodiverse needs.
· $4 million to employ 25 intern educational psychologists each year to enable a more sustainable pipeline of locally trained workforce.
· $90 million of capital for approximately 25 new learning support satellite classrooms to provide around 225 new student places across the Ministry of Education's specialist school network, as well as provide learning support property modifications so that schools are more accessible to learners with additional needs.
'Across all learning support services in Vote Education, we are building up to more than 2 million additional teacher aide hours into the system every year from 2028.
'The education sector has been calling for more support for a long time, and this Government is delivering results. This investment recognises and responds to the growing number of children with additional learning needs and the pressure it places on teachers,' Ms Stanford says.
Budget 2025 also includes substantive key investments in the Government's priority areas:
$298 million into strengthening Curriculum and Assessment supports, including $132.2 million for accelerated learning in literacy and maths.
$572 million of capital funding invested into school property.
$100 million of operating funding, to maintain and upgrade classrooms.
$150 million to build the education workforce of the future through leadership development pathways, teacher supply initiatives, and funded registration and certification.
$104 million to support Māori learner success, including $50 million of capital funding for new classrooms in Māori Medium and Kaupapa Māori schools.
$140 million for a new attendance service and to support and strengthen frontline attendance services
'To deliver this investment, we have assessed underspends and reprioritised initiatives that are underperforming or lack clear evidence that they're delivering intended outcomes. Around $614 million within the vote has been identified for reinvestment into frontline, priority education initiatives.
'Budget 2025 builds on the strong foundations we've already laid through teaching the basics brilliantly. We will continue to invest to raise achievement and close the equity gap in schools across the country, so all Kiwi kids have the knowledge, skills and competencies they need to reach their full potential,' Ms Stanford says.
Notes:
Learning support funding – detailed breakdown
$192 million of operating funding so all Year 1-8 schools and kura have access to a learning support coordinator (around 650 additional Full-Time Teacher Equivalents - FTTEs), enabling improved identification of and response to learner needs. This builds a nationally consistent model for in-school Learning Support services and reducing substantive inequities in access to support for children with additional learning needs
$266 million to extend the Early Intervention Service (EIS) from early childhood education through to the end of year 1 of primary school. This will fund more than 560 additional FTE for EIS teachers and specialists. We are investing in:
expanding the service through to the end of Year 1 to support the effective transition into school of almost 4,000 children with additional needs
reducing existing waitlists in early intervention so that more than 3,000 children that need the support receive it sooner
increasing the amount of specialist support provided to the more than 7,100 children who are currently enrolled in EIS
building up annually to an additional 900,000 teacher aide hours per year, from 2028, to support young learners in EIS
$122 million of operating funding to meet forecast demand for the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS). ORS provides specialist support for students with the highest levels of ongoing need, and the new funding will mean all learners who meet the criteria will receive the specialist support they need. This investment will also increase the number of specialists and teacher aide time to support the more than 1,700 additional learners forecast to access ORS over the next four years. This includes a structural change to the funding model away from a constrained annual Budget bid approach to a forecast driven model that automatically updates the funding each year, to reflect demand so every child who is verified for ORS funding receives the support they need.
ORS provides a package of support for students who have the highest level of ongoing need, including access to specialists (such as therapists, psychologists), additional teacher time in school staffing entitlements, contribution to teacher aide hours, and consumables grants for small items to support students' needs. Students get a unique mix of resources, to reflect their individual needs. ORS follows the student and they continue to receive support for the whole of their schooling. ORS is provided on top of the per student funding paid to each school for every student.
$41.5 million of operating funding and $1.4 million of capital funding for an additional 78.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) speech language therapists, 6.2 FTE psychologists and teacher aide time for behaviour and communication services. This will also help the service meet the forecast demand increase of 2,479 learners who'll need this support over the next four years.
$4 million of operating funding for 25 intern educational psychologists each year to boost the locally trained workforce and address shortages.
$7 million of operating funding for 45 additional places (a 7.5 per cent increase) for Te Kahu Tōī Intensive Wraparound Service, so more learners with the most complex social, emotional and behavioural needs can get tailored supports.
$3 million of operating funding for targeted professional learning and development for teacher aides, to help them support learners with social, emotional, wellbeing and behavioural needs associated with disability and neurodiversity.
$90 million of capital funding and $18 million of operating funding for up to approximately 25 new learning support classrooms to provide 225 new student places across the Ministry's specialist school network, and up to 350 learning support property modifications so that schools are more accessible to learners with additional needs.
Knowledge-rich curriculum: $ 287 million in operating funding and $11 million in capital funding to support the ongoing delivery of a knowledge-rich curriculum and structured teaching approaches in schools and kura. This includes:
Early maths and pāngarau checks for learners at Year 2.
143 FTTE specialist accelerated learning teachers across Years 0–6 to raise achievement in mathematics and pāngarau.
Maths/ pāngarau tutoring for up to 34,000 Year 7-8 students per year.
Increasing ongoing structured literacy staffing across Years 0-6 by 78 FTTE to 349 FTTE. This maintains the 2025 one-year expansion of 46 additional FTTE, and adds a further 32 FTTE
Hands-on science and pūtaiao kits for all Year 0-8 learners to lift science engagement and achievement.
Homework and tutoring services for Year 9-10 learners in schools with 50 per cent or more Pacific learners. This supports meeting the literacy and numeracy co-requisites and achievement across NCEA.
Support oral language development in early childhood education. This includes the ENRICH (Enhancing Rich Interactions) programme for up to 525 early childhood education services.
A new assessment tool for Years 3 to 10 in reading, writing, maths, pānui, tuhituhi and pāngarau to support quality, consistent assessment and reporting for approximately 540,000 students.
Māori Education
$54 million in operating funding and $50 million in capital funding to support Māori learner success through investment in curriculum supports and professional learning and development for teachers. Key investments include:
Training and support for up to 51,000 teachers in Years 0-13 schools to learn te reo Māori and tikanga.
A Virtual Learning Network that will deliver online STEM education to more than 5,500 Year 9-13 students in Kura Kaupapa and Māori Medium education.
Seven new curriculum advisors to support teachers in understanding and using the redesigned Te Marautanga o Aotearoa and its key resources.
New curriculum resources in te reo matatini and STEM to support around 5,000 senior secondary students.
Developing a new Māori Studies subject area for The New Zealand Curriculum, for Year 11-13 English medium schools.
Supporting our Workforce: 150 million of operating funding in workforce so that we can bring more teachers and leaders into the classrooms and support our current workforce. This includes:
Covering the costs of domestic teacher fees and levies for around 115,000 school and early childhood teachers over the next three years.
530 additional places in the School Onsite Training Programme over four years and cost adjustments for 1,331 places committed to through Budget 2024.
Professional learning developments in literacy and te reo matatini, maths and pāngarau, and assessment and aromatawai, for 1,800 to 2,000 teachers working across Years 0-10 over the next four years.
An aspiring principals programme for up to 200 principals each year from 2026 to help build their leadership skills and confidence.
17 more leadership advisors to provide one-on-one support to around 2,500 principals who can access the service, with specialist advisors available for rural, area, Māori, and Pacific principals.
Domestic and overseas marketing campaigns to attract more teachers and raise the profile of the profession.
Schools' operational grants
$121.7 million of operating funding to increase school operational grants by 1.5 per cent to address cost pressures. This includes increased base funding for Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu, Secondary-Tertiary Programmes and Service Academies.
Attendance
Around $123 million for the delivery of a new attendance service and almost $17 million to support and strengthen frontline attendance services.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters: Despite Donald Trump's tariffs, we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine
Letters: Despite Donald Trump's tariffs, we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine

NZ Herald

time2 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Letters: Despite Donald Trump's tariffs, we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine

So, in summary and even factoring in US state sales taxes, in totality, New Zealand is only marginally disadvantaged. Further mitigating factors both in favour of the American consumer and the New Zealand exporter is the ongoing strength of the US dollar and Donald Trump's recent big, beautiful tax bill, which will pass significant tax relief and buying power into the hands of millions of American consumers. Also front of mind should be that other countries and direct New Zealand competitors are facing similar, if not greater, tariff increases than New Zealand. Given we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine products, it's unlikely, after a period of adjustment, that price increases at the retail level will have any meaningful impact on American consumers. Bruce Eliott, St Heliers. Voting changes People are criticising the Government for closing voting enrolments two weeks before the election. If you don't want to vote, that is fine. However, if you do, but can't be bothered to put in a small amount of effort to enrol over two weeks before an election, the problem isn't the system, it's you. If you want to vote, make an effort. Mark Young, Ōrewa. Electoral requirements If it is a legal requirement to be enrolled on the electoral roll, as stated by the Government on national television Q&A programme yesterday, why are all those on a benefit or Superannuation or in public services jobs not being checked by either employers or Winz? Who is responsible for checking that all New Zealanders are enrolled and are therefore not in breach of the law? Or does this Government not care about the 'dropkicks' or those who have been removed from the Māori roll? What happens to those who turn 18 on or near polling day? If the enrolment time is shortened, how will NZ Post guarantee that all New Zealanders are enrolled in time, and also the many thousands of Kiwi who have moved to Australia this past year who are still New Zealand citizens? Where is the democratic right for all New Zealanders? It behoves every Kiwi eligible to vote and all parliamentary parties to check the electoral roll in 2026 to make a concerted effort to gather those who are in breach of the law. Marie Kaire, Whangārei. Credit card fees So, the Government is banning credit card fees, whoop de do. Not all retailers charged extra anyway and the ones that did will recover them in some other covert way instead. A waste of Government time and energy all round. A.J. Petersen, Kawerau. Lions v Australia In a dead rubber, Australia won one test against the British and Irish Lions which, in spite of rugby's prevailing conflicting laws, held a passing interest. The game again was an eight-man-a-side wrestling contest with hardly any flowing seven-man backline plays. The tries scored were due only to individual opportunism, rather than teamwork. Once again, rugby was ... the loser. Larry Mitchell, Rothesay Bay. Jami-Lee Ross' political return Former National MP Jami-Lee Ross has said he is aiming for a political comeback, and will run for a seat on the Howick local board in the Flat Bush subdivision. No doubt he has weighed up the pros and cons of this move, but given the way the final chapters of his previous time in politics played out in the media, I'd suggest it would probably be best to give it a miss. He would open himself up for scrutiny, old controversies will be brought up, and his new venture, running an escort agency, will no doubt be 'grist for the mill' for his opponents. The message in Kenny Rogers' song The Gambler says it best: 'You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away and know when to run...' Lorraine Kidd, Warkworth.

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?
Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

NZ Herald

timea day ago

  • NZ Herald

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited? Good business sense using consumer psychology. Photo / Getty Images Every city has its signatures. In Ho Chi Minh City it was someone pointing at my sneakers and offering to clean them. In Da Nang it was, 'Taxi, sir?' and in Hội An it's been, 'Want a boat ride?' We have resolutely fought off all efforts to part us from our money. Well, most efforts. It was our first afternoon in Hội An, a historical port city in central Vietnam, home to a Unesco world-heritage ancient town. We'd gone in search of a particular tailor, recommended to us by our hotel and breathless English tourists on TikTok. At the first street corner, I got out my phone to check directions, and 15 minutes later we were at a completely different tailor, having been expertly waylaid by one of their 'scouts', who'd seen us and asked if she could offer directions … The next day we did a lantern-making class at our hotel, led by the ever-patient tutor, Moon. Moon asked us what we had planned and made a few recommendations, including one for dinner at the Citadel restaurant at which a friend of hers worked. That evening, we followed her advice and had a frankly delightful evening marked by fantastic food, an absolutely lovely waitress, Anna, and regular check-ins from Gray, the manager (who also happens to be a Kiwi). As with every restaurant we visited, we had to force ourselves to sit back and enjoy the experience; at no point did we ever feel like we had to rush to finish, pay, and give up our table to the next customer. Not like, ahem, at home in Wellington. What do these latter examples have in common? Bloody good business sense based on friendliness and strategic use of consumer psychology. Having recently hosted friends visiting Wellington from overseas, my heart was warmed by hearing them say how friendly New Zealanders are, but it's a step change to Vietnamese hospitality. For example, first and last impressions count or, in technical terms, primacy and recency. We make impressions incredibly quickly and largely unconsciously, and research shows that, while we care deeply about how good the chef is, we have to be drawn in first to find out. That can hang entirely on the rapport we sense from our first encounter. When we left the restaurant, Anna farewelled us by our names (which she remembered several days later when we happened to pass by). That's a personal touch that leaves a positive impression. Ever started to feel tense because wait staff check in on you a little too frequently? Or neglected because they don't check in at all? That's another tricky balance, and one that requires a bit of intuition about the best time to stop by. Another thing Citadel did well, but almost every other restaurant we ate at didn't, was a sensibly curated set of options. Ever eaten at the American restaurant chain The Cheesecake Factory? The menu runs to more than 200 items and around 20 pages. It is frankly exhausting. You get to a point where you no longer care what you order, you just want to make it stop. Psychology researchers Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper are probably best associated with the notion of this 'paradox of choice'. In a particularly well-known experiment they showed that people may be more likely to head over to a counter offering 24 types of jam than a counter with only six, but people were 10 times more likely to buy jam when the number of types available was reduced from 24 to six. Why? Because what if you make the wrong choice? The more choices, the harder the decision, and the greater the likelihood of buyer's remorse. So in keeping with this research, we broke our holiday rule and went back to the Citadel and its more limited number of choices a second time.

Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is the Govt so desperate they announce any half-baked idea?
Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is the Govt so desperate they announce any half-baked idea?

NZ Herald

timea day ago

  • NZ Herald

Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is the Govt so desperate they announce any half-baked idea?

Of all of the above, it's the ban that's going to give them ongoing headaches. On the face of it, it's great retail politics. Everyone hates being stung 2% for using the credit card at the sushi shop. But there will be consequences. The surcharge is there because it costs to use your credit card. Someone has to pay for it. Either you or the retailer. Currently, it's you in the form of the surcharge. After the ban, it'll be the retailer. And we're talking a lot of money. Interchange fees alone – the fees Visa and Mastercard charge – suck nearly $1 billion out of NZ businesses a year. Add what retail banks charge on top of that and we're talking several billion apparently. One retailer reckons they were paying $2500 a month just in merchant fees. That's $30,000 a year. They realised they were basically subsidising everyone's credit card loyalty schemes. So, they introduced the surcharge. No savvy small or medium-sized retailer will suck up a cost like that. If they can't get that back through a surcharge, they'll get it back by upping the price on products. So, while the Government can sell the story that they're saving consumers money through the ban, they're not. Pity the poor travel agents especially. Let's say they book flights to London for a family of four at the cost of $15,000. If the family put it on the credit card, which most of us would do, there is a $225 merchant fee. Once the ban kicks in, the travel agent will essentially be helping the family pay for their holiday. So, you can see why retailers are up in arms. They're so angry they've managed to mobilise the country's chambers of commerce into banding together in a statement criticising the ban. Their point is a fair one: the Government should really be dealing with the source of the problem, which is banks and credit card companies charging too much for a basic service. Ministers choosing to beat up on Kiwi retailers instead of sorting out big foreign bankers is bizarre. Even more so because SME owners are traditionally National Party and right-leaning voters. The Government is burning its own support base here. Which brings us to the weirdness of this. It should have been entirely predictable that this would blow back badly. So, why did they do it? Are they so desperate to get good coverage that they take any half-baked idea pitched at them by a minister at the weekend to announce the following Monday? Did they run out of time to interrogate the idea before announcing it? Or did they anticipate all the problems but ignore them in their desperation to get a cost-of-living announcement out? It also begs the question, why are they so panicked? The answer is probably that it's not just the Government's vibe that has shifted. It's the country's vibe too. It's the middle of this Government's term and the middle of winter and the tail end of a very long and hard recession. The goodwill towards the coalition Government is suddenly depleting. It's possibly recoverable. Summer and an economic recovery should improve things again. But even when we're warm and flush, it won't stop the Government stuffing things up itself if it keeps making weird announcements like this. Watch now for how they get out of this. And they'll have to. They can't be doing this to their own voter base just months out from next year's election.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store