No 'harsh action' against strays till SC order: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta
DELHI: Chief minister Rekha Gupta has reportedly directed all the departments concerned not to take any "harsh action" against stray dogs till the Supreme Court pronounces its final order on the contentious issue.
A three-judge SC bench on August 14 reserved its order on pleas against a two-judge bench's earlier directive to relocate Delhi-NCR strays to distant shelters.
At a recent meeting, CM directed all officials concerned not to take "any kind of harsh action that may hurt the sentiments of dog lovers or harm the dogs", Indian Express quoted a senior official as saying.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
|
Gold Rates Today in Delhi
|
Silver Rates Today in Delhi
"Until the Supreme Court delivers a final decision, the government will stay on 'watch and ward' mode,' the official told the daily, adding a massive campaign will be launched in Delhi soon for sterilising dogs on a daily basis.
The past week witnessed massive protests in many parts of India, particularly Delhi-NCR, and abroad against the SC's relocation order, with people -- from celebrities to politicians to NRIs -- advocating for a humane and scientific approach like sterilisation and immunisation over mass confinement of stray dogs.
By Satrajit Moitra
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A.P. exporters seek Centre's intervention as U.S. tariffs hit seafood industry hard
The Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI) has appealed to the Central government to extend urgent relief measures to protect the Indian seafood export industry, saying that it is reeling under the impact of newly imposed tariffs by the United States. A delegation led by Union Minister of State for Steel and Heavy Industries Bhupathiraju Srinivasa Varma, along with SEAI president Pawan Kumar and others, met Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in her Parliament office on Tuesday and submitted a memorandum. The delegation highlighted that with the recent 25% tariff imposed by the U.S.A., along with countervailing duty (CVD) and anti-dumping duties, Indian exporters are now burdened with nearly 35% in levies, drastically reducing the competitiveness. They said that exports to the U.S.A.—which account for nearly 25% of India's $8 billion seafood exports in 2023–24 fiscal year—are expected to decline sharply, severely impacting the livelihoods of 2.8 crore fishermen, aquaculture farmers, processing workers, packaging staff, and transporters who depend on the sector. To help overcome the crisis, the SEAI proposed a set of relief measures, including soft loans up to 30% of working capital at concessional interest rates (below 5%); extension of export credit facilities for 240 days for all seafood exporters; financial assistance at 8% of the FOB value for exports to the U.S.A.; additional support at 2% of the FOB value for exports to other countries; special financial packages for small and medium aqua farmers to prevent distress. 'If these measures are implemented, exporters will be able to sustain themselves in global markets and the industry, along with the 28 million people dependent on it, can be safeguarded,' said Mr. Pawan Kumar. Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman assured the delegation that the issues would be examined and appropriate measures would be considered. CEO Dr. Raghavan, National Committee member Irrinki Ganga Ram, Poojitha, and MPs Sana Satish Babu and Beeda Mastan Rao were also present.
The Wire
28 minutes ago
- The Wire
What is China's ‘Early Harvest' Proposal for Border Talks That Modi Govt Has Now Conceded?
This decision represents a fundamental departure from India's long-standing position that the border dispute must be resolved as a comprehensive package deal, as established in the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles. New Delhi: The Modi government's decision to agree to establish an expert group for exploring China's 'early harvest' proposal in the recent India-China Special Representatives talks represents a reversal of India's longstanding position that betrays decades of careful diplomacy and strategic thinking. This concession – to explore fast-tracking a settlement of the India-China boundary in the Sikkim region – comes at a time when China has been systematically using the border dispute as leverage while offering cosmetic solutions that primarily benefit Beijing's strategic objectives. What are the origins and evolution of China's 'Early Harvest' proposal? Even though the 'early harvest' in Sikkim idea had been broached by Beijing with Indian officials earlier, it first surfaced publicly in 2017 when Chinese Ambassador Luo Zhaohui cryptically mentioned it during a think tank event at New Delhi. This was a couple of months before the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Indian soldiers had crossed from Sikkim into Bhutan to stop the Chinese from constructing a road to the sensitive Jhampheri ridge. 'Early harvest' involves exclusively settling the boundary in Sikkim –a proposal which the then foreign minister Sushma Swaraj had described as the Chinese equivalent of saying a 'low-hanging fruit'. This would separate the Sikkim boundary from the three other sectors on the disputed Sino-India border: western, middle and eastern. Chinese military analyst senior colonel Zhao Xiaozhou later clarified in 2017 that the proposal essentially sought to replace the 1890 Great Britain-China convention with a new agreement signed directly between China and India. 'For China, early harvest means, we want to have a new agreement with India, because the 1890 convention was signed between Great Britain and China,' he explained, adding that China wanted to 'start from the easiest, that is what we call early harvest' in the Sikkim sector. China formally submitted these proposals to external affairs minister S. Jaishankar during his meeting with Wang Yi in Beijing in August 2019. After the 22nd dialogue of the Special Representatives on the boundary issue between Ajit Doval and Wang Yi in New Delhi in December 2019, the Chinese statement on the talks said the two sides should 'promote early harvest consultations'. There was no mention of such proposals in the statement from the Indian side. New Delhi instead linked the proposal to the simultaneous demarcation of the middle sector in Uttarakhand, in line with the 2005 agreement. What has been India's historical resistance to the proposal? What are its strategic concerns? For years, India consistently rejected China's 'early harvest' approach, recognizing it as a strategic trap. In 2019, former foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal articulated the core problem: 'China's early harvest proposal violates the 2005 agreement on the guidelines and parameters for resolving the boundary issue as it clearly says that it has to be a package deal. This is the usual Chinese way of walking out of agreements. This early harvest proposal relates to the Sikkim border which is the only one which is settled. So where is the early harvest for India in this? On the contrary, China will seek to settle the tri-junction in its favour through this proposal which is unacceptable. Is China ready to accept tri-junction as per the Indian position?' Indian officials recognised that the Sikkim proposal was 'not so simple, as any Indian agreement on demarcation will be used by Beijing to settle the boundary with Bhutan with an eye towards the Doklam plateau'. A former Indian Army chief warned that "if India settles Sikkim, where it dominates both Chumbi Valley and Finger Area up in the north, then China will expand its Chumbi Valley area and increase pressure on the Siliguri corridor in West Bengal". The strategic concern was that settling the Sikkim border would directly impact the India-China-Bhutan trijunction at Batang La, potentially allowing China to extend its reach to the Jhampheri ridge, from where "the entire Siliguri corridor becomes extremely vulnerable to the PLA. The lights of Gangtok are visible from Jhampheri ridge," as one China expert noted. Why has the Modi government conceded now? Despite years of principled resistance, the August 19, 2025 MEA statement reveals a dramatic policy reversal. The Modi government has now agreed to 'Setting up an Expert Group, under the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC), to explore Early Harvest in boundary delimitation in the India-China border areas'. In the statement issued after Wang Yi's meeting with Modi, the Chinese side said that 'on the boundary issue, new consensus was reached on… initiating boundary demarcation negotiations in areas where conditions are met'. This U-turn by the Modi government appears driven by multiple pressure points. Trump's tariff war against India, imposing 50% tariffs on Indian goods and threatening further penalties over Russian oil purchases, has made India more vulnerable to China. The Modi government appears keen to seek friendly ties with China, at Beijing's own terms, despite the obvious strategic risks. Indian officials claim that China has reportedly promised to address India's concerns regarding rare earths, fertilisers and tunnel boring machines. None of these have figured in any of the official statements but these economic carrots, essentially reversing the coercive actions taken by Beijing, have led to a major strategic concession by the Modi government. What are the strategic risks of this concession? This decision represents a fundamental departure from India's long-standing position that the border dispute must be resolved as a comprehensive package deal, as established in the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles. By agreeing to explore 'early harvest' options, the Modi government has legitimised China's piecemeal approach that violates this foundational principle. The move is particularly dangerous given China's expanding claims against Bhutan, including new territorial demands in the eastern part of the Himalayan kingdom that emerged around 2020. Any resolution of the Sikkim sector boundary without addressing these broader strategic concerns will only embolden China's aggressive posture toward India's Himalayan neighbours, security experts feel. Moreover, the agreement comes at a time when China has been systematically strengthening its border infrastructure and military capabilities. The PLA has established itself firmly in the Doklam plateau and explored alternative routes to reach the Jhampheri ridge. The PLA's enhanced capabilities, and increasing superiority over India, make any territorial concessions even more strategically problematic. To conclude, the Modi government's decision to explore China's 'early harvest' proposal represents a dangerous precedent that abandons decades of careful strategic thinking for short-term economic and political relief. By legitimising China's divide-and-conquer approach to the border dispute, the Modi government has weakened India's negotiating position and potentially compromised the strategic interests. There is no 'early harvest' for India in this arrangement, only a reversal of its longstanding policy disguised as diplomatic progress. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal
Delhi government on Tuesday announced the launch of the "Delhi Mitra" app, enabling people across the city to register their grievances with various departments and agencies. The decision was made in a cabinet meeting chaired by Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. After the meeting, Gupta posted on X that for a more effective redressal of public grievances, a single-window system will now be implemented, bringing the Delhi government, Delhi Police, DDA, MCD, NDMC, and Delhi Cantt on a single platform. "Delhi Mitra is not only a platform for complaints but also a digital bridge of trust between the public and the government," the chief minister stated. The app will enable the residents of the national capital to register their complaints with the government through mobile phones and WhatsApp as well. "They will receive updates on every stage of their complaint via messages. Moreover, it will also be possible to file complaints through WhatsApp," Gupta noted. Nodal officers will be appointed in every department to speed up the process and make it more accountable. Additionally, public grievance redressal officers from various departments will hold public hearings every Wednesday from 10 am to 12 pm, she said in the post. The chief minister emphasised that the initiative is not just a technological innovation but a commitment to ushering in a new era of public hearing culture, so that the voice of citizens are heard and solutions to their problems are guaranteed.
